Conceived by John O’Loughlin on a purely aphoristic basis, No Man-Oeuvre, with its pun on ‘manouevre’ (English spelling) and suggestion that there is more than man at work in the composition of what follows, lays down the case for godly rights in relation to the development of globalization to its universal summation, and contends, with the aid of comprehensive logical structures which stretch through the Elements (in general terms) from cosmic and natural to human and supra-human (divine), that since godliness has still not attained to its per se manifestation, there is no reason to regard such godliness as has and does obtain - quite apart from what Mr O’Loughlin would call ‘bovaryizations’ of God - as the end of the religious road but, rather, to understand how religion still has to develop beyond its traditional structures if God is to supersede and, in a sense, supplant man as the logical outcome of historical development and, indeed, of evolution generally. To that end, it has been part of the duty of No Man-Oeuvre to de-bunk conventional religion, both Western and especially Eastern, in order to demonstrate that all established religions leave something to be desired from the standpoint of true universality in relation to the final development of religion, of soulful totalitarianism, in genuinely global terms. – A Centretruths editorial.
Copyright © 2024 Philosophy eBooks from Centretruths Digital Media
