RETURNING TO SELF
1. Clearly before any progress beyond liberal
rationalism can be made, one has to be capable of respecting the male reality
of psyche over soma, of a cultural precedence over philistinism, as grace over
sin, and thus of understanding that feelings which lead to the aggrandizement
of will are strictly undesirable from a higher, or post-liberal,
standpoint. One needs to be capable of
respecting one's self, the self that is a combination, for males, of brain stem
and spinal cord, the former the effective seat of the ego, the latter the seat
of the soul, and thus have come to an accommodation with either humanism
primarily in relation to physical ego or with transcendentalism primarily in
relation to metaphysical soul, notwithstanding the lesser soulful and
egocentric counterparts to each which, though deriving from the same sources,
stand in a subordinate relationship to the prevailing attribute of the self, be
it egocentric or emotional.
2. In fact, such a prevalence is so determined
by the nature of one's class as a male, whether manly or godly, that one cannot
simply imagine a man, say, opting to become a god or vice versa, since those
who are predominantly self-oriented in relation to the brain stem, and hence
ego, are ever distinct from those whose psychic orientation is closer to the
spinal cord, and hence the soul. One is
either masculine or divine, as a rule, not both at once or by turns, although
alternations between sensual and sensible masculinity and/or divinity are not
uncommon, as witness those Catholic males who subscribe, prayerfully, to
physical sensibility one moment and, audibly or musically, to metaphysical
sensuality the next.
3. Readers familiar with my texts will know
enough, by now, about my projected theories concerning the structural pluralism
of the triadic Beyond and its tier subsections to realize how the divine is to
be distinguished from the masculine, or the soulful from the intellectual, even
within any given tier, quite apart from the position of feminine females in
each of the tiers, with due distinctions between persons of Nonconformist,
Anglican, and Catholic denominational background, presuming, with 'Judgement',
upon a majority mandate for religious sovereignty and their deliverance, in
consequence, from the schismatic dialectics of inverted and/or perpendicular triangularity to the Social Transcendentalist synthesis of
the triadic Beyond.
4. Certainly the patterns for salvation and
damnation that I have outlined in previous texts need no apologetics or further
mention here, so I shall content myself with reminding the reader that the
development of Truth in 'Kingdom Come' is not anti-rationalistic but an
enhancement of rationalism beyond the liberal or equivocal traditions,
especially those of the Catholic Continent, to the level of an unequivocal
endorsement of the possibility, for those who are 'up to it' and have been
earmarked for such a destiny, of unitive knowledge of
God and, more especially, experience of Heaven through transcendental
meditation, which of course presupposes the acceptance of a psychic
predominance in the region of most wavicles/least
particles, and therefore of a pretty absolutist commitment to transcendentalism
and the right of transcendental psyche to utilize somatic idealism for purposes
of its graceful enhancement from metaphysical ego to soul, as from the
metaphysical consciousness of God-the-Wise-Father to the metaphysical subconsciousness of Heaven-the-Holy-Soul via the
metaphysically mindful 'naturalness', or consciously-tempered unnaturalness,
viz. bound will, of God-the-Wise-Son and the metaphysically emotionalized 'subnaturalness', or subconsciously-tempered supernaturalness, viz. bound spirit, of Heaven-the-Holy-Spirit,
the latter two of which orders of not-self, appertaining in metaphysical
sensibility to the lungs and the breath, stand in a secondary relationship to
the prevailing primacy of the metaphysical self, which is alone free.
5. For one cannot, as a self-respecting male,
tolerate or condone a situation in which the Son takes precedence over the
Father, in somatic subversion of the male reality of psyche over soma, whether
in the absolutist context of idealism, as witness the drift of German
Romanticism towards Hitlerian Fascism (Hitler a kind,
I have to say, of Second Coming who stands closer to the Son than to the
Father, to the negative profanity of metaphysical soma in falsity and woe,
tempered, and further corrupted, as it indubitably was, by, first,
fundamentalism and, then, materialism), or in the relativistic context of
liberal rationalism wherein humanism loses ground to naturalism as the
generality of masculine Christians, or Christian males, increasingly find
themselves identifying with soma at the expense of psyche, not only in
consequence of the fatality of Christianity to emphasize the Son at the expense
of the Father, nor even solely in relation to wives and family, and thus to
somatic precedence of psyche by females, but also in response to the growth of
Protestant criteria and influence throughout society, and Europe in particular,
with its more openly somatic hegemonies, as evidenced by the subordination of nonconformism to realism and, ultimately, of fundamentalism
to materialism in the 'march of history' towards ever more secular freedoms,
for which read: somatic predominance.
6. Whatever the reasons, the failure of
Christianity to sufficiently uphold the male reality of psyche over soma, of
the precedence of soma by psyche, or to prevail against Nature and the brute
sexual realities of life, has led to the somatic freedoms, with all due
attendant barbarities and crimes, of the contemporary world, and it is from the
pit of that crime-ruled barbarous world that we must now climb, Protestant and
Catholic alike, back to sanity and thus the sensible lead of culture, with an
emphasis upon grace and sin, not, as before, upon sin at the expense of grace,
in all too paradoxically Christian and lower-class fashion, but upon grace at
the expense of sin, upon culture utilizing philistinism for its own enhancement
of sanctity.
7. I have outlined the ways and methods by means
of which this may be achieved, and therefore it requires the authorization, at
some future date, of a paradoxical kind of election in which the electorates of
the relevant countries, particularly Ireland (North and South) and
Scotland, are granted the opportunity to
elect for religious sovereignty and thus for deliverance from the 'sins and/or
crimes' of the somatic World in which, through political sovereignty of one
liberal persuasion or another, they still remain bogged down at the time of
writing.
8. So much does the criminal reality of soma
over psyche, of free soma conditioning bound psyche, currently prevail, that
even males have been, for the most part, twisted against their gender and
gender interests and brought to a sinful and even quasi-criminal low which,
unlike in the past, cannot even depend upon the tenuous consolations of
Catholic grace or, for that matter, of Protestant punishment, in primary or
secondary psyche. For the churches, both
truthfully free and fictitiously bound, have been further compromised or
undermined by the reluctantly subordinate illusory bindings and frantically
galloping factual freedoms of state soma, and cannot even pretend to offer
mankind a way out of the dilemma in which the greater proportion of it now
languishes, irrespective of denomination.
9. The only way out, as I have taught, can come
via 'Kingdom Come', and therefore through the rejection of political
sovereignty, and its scientific and even economic corollaries, in favour of the
religious sovereignty, the enhanced commitment to self, which Social
Transcendentalism has to offer the World, and not really through the Second
Coming of Christ, through another Son, but in relation to an understanding of
the primacy of the Father over the Son, of psyche over soma, of culture over
philistinism, taken to an unprecedentedly sensible
level of metaphysical development. Call
me Anti-Son, or Anti-Christ, if you like, but I am one who offers a truthful
alternative to the Lies of both the New Testament personal Son and the Old
Testament cosmic Father, the so-called First Mover (Jehovah) as God.
10. I offer you the prospect, through salvation,
of the universal Father, whether in relation to God (for Catholic males) or in
relation to Man (for Protestant males), and I tell you that as the Germanic
equivalent of the Second Coming acted
physically, as a sort of Son, upon what was considered irrelevant to and even
dangerously subversive of any prospects for the growth and development of
Western civilization from a somatic standpoint, so will the Gaelic equivalent
of the Second Coming, a higher order of Messianic deliverer commensurate with
the Father, be obliged to act metaphysically upon the psychic manifestations,
so to speak, of that same irrelevance and subversive threat - namely, the
Bible, and have it removed from the sphere of our daily life.
11. For until we - and by 'we' I mean Gaels in
particular - are free of that cultural irrelevance, we shall not be able to
grow into our full stature as free beings for whom the culture of Social
Transcendentalism is the Final Solution to all subversive underminings
of Truth.
12. Verily a higher phase, characterized by the
enhancement of Gaelic religiosity, of the European evolutionary struggle is
about to begin, and out of it will emerge a new human being, a godly being who
leads, and elevates, the generality of men and women to pastures new and even,
ultimately, to the overcoming of mankind in the Cyborg,
the meaning and justification of the heavenly Beyond.