29
If all atoms are not equal but divisible (over
and above those which are equal
or equivalent, like metaphysical atoms with one another) between antithetical
kinds of noumenal and phenomenal atoms, as well as
between antithetical kinds of pseudo-noumenal and
pseudo-phenomenal pseudo-atoms, then it is difficult to see how all men could
possibly be equal, or even be 'born equal', when they derive from atomic and
pseudo-atomic preconditions whose various molecular permutations make for
differences in both gender and class, not to mention ethnicity and occupation.
In Great Britain, men are certainly not 'born
equal', but are divisible between nobles and plebeians, the upper classes and
the lower classes in both alpha and omega, pseudo-omega and pseudo-alpha
antitheses, even if it is possible for some to go 'up' and others 'down' in
society, while the great majority remain the same for better (noble) or worse
(plebeian).
In the United States of America, by contrast,
which was forged in revolutionary struggle against Britain and, hence, the
British Empire, they uphold the notion that all men are born equal in a
republican endeavour to exclude, as far as possible, the noble classes, so
that, though Americans would probably be the last to admit it, American society
is largely comprised of plebs, or persons with no royal or aristocratic
connections whatsoever, but whose social values are effectively lower class,
that is, deriving to a large extent from bourgeois and/or proletarian
antecedents, with little or nothing of anything else, peasants and artisans
notwithstanding.
In truth, men are not born equal, but, quite
apart from gender and physical and even racial differences compounded by
ethnicity, are born into different classes, more so in some countries, like
Great Britain, Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, etc., than in others, like
those professing some republican creed. And so a kind of noble/plebeian, upper-class/lower-class
distinction, on both genuine and 'pseudo' terms, continues to exist, as with
the aforementioned distinction between atoms and pseudo-atoms on both noumenal/pseudo-noumenal and phenomenal/pseudo-phenomenal
planes.
Societies, like nations, are at a low ebb when they strive to reduce everything to the
lowest-common-social-denominator of lower-class life. As a revolt against undue
exploitation or neglect, or what is perceived as such, from metachemical/pseudo-metaphysical,
or autocratic/pseudo-theocratic kinds of upper-class life, this is perhaps
understandable, if not exactly laudable. For until such societies endorse a
contrasting shift towards the rule and/or leadership (for the two are often
intertwined) of metaphysical/pseudo-metachemical, or
theocratic/pseudo-autocratic kinds of upper-class life, they will continue to
wallow in their own slough of plebeian despond, without any prospect, even with
some degree of residual allegiance to traditional theocratic/pseudo-autocratic
powers, of deliverance from their lowly conditions to a better world 'On High',
a world or, rather, an otherworldly/pseudo-netherworldly
pairing characterized by the freedom of metaphysics to dominate pseudo-metachemistry independently of any metachemical/pseudo-metaphysical
obstacles to that ultimate freedom such that would always leave metaphysics
short of its full capacity and unable, in consequence, to properly dominate
pseudo-metachemistry, to its own detriment,
including, in repudiation of its entitlement to be identified with 'Sacred
Lungs', any 'Sacred Heart'-like subsuming into pseudo-metachemistry
that leads to a deference, in triangular vein, to the anterior rule of metachemistry over pseudo-metaphysics and thus ensures the
ongoing enslavement of 'the world', in both its chemical/pseudo-physical and
physical/pseudo-chemical manifestations, the one indirectly and the other
directly, to the born enemy of godliness/pseudo-devilishness, the Saint and
(neutralized) She-Dragon, which is really devilishness/pseudo-godliness, the
Whore (to use equivalent minoritarian terminology)
and (neutralized) He-Dragon.