VII

 

Brainwashing

 

In the two preceding chapters I have described the techniques of what may be called wholesale mind-manipulation, as practised by the greatest demagogue and the most successful salesmen in recorded history.  But no human problem can be solved by wholesale methods alone.  The shotgun has its place, but so has the hypodermic syringe.  In the chapters that follow I shall describe some of the more effective techniques for manipulating not crowds, not entire publics, but isolated individuals.

      In the course of his epoch-making experiments on the conditioned reflex, Ivan Pavlov observed that, when subjected to prolonged physical or psychic stress, laboratory animals exhibit all the symptoms of a nervous breakdown.  Refusing to cope any longer with the intolerable situation, their brains go on strike, so to speak, and either stop working altogether (the dog loses consciousness), or else resort to showdowns and sabotage (the dog behaves unrealistically, or develops the kind of physical symptoms which, in a human being, we would call hysterical).  Some animals are more resistant to stress than others.  Dogs possessing what Pavlov called a 'strong excitatory' constitution break down much more quickly than dogs of a merely 'lively' (as opposed to a choleric or agitated) temperament.  Similarly, 'weak inhibitory' dogs reach the end of their tether much sooner than do 'calm imperturbable' dogs.  But even the most stoical dog is unable to resist indefinitely.  If the stress to which he is subjected is sufficiently intense or sufficiently prolonged, he will end by breaking down as abjectly and as completely as the weakest of his kind.

      Pavlov's findings were confirmed in the most distressing manner, and on a very large scale, during the two World Wars.  As the result of a single catastrophic experience, or of a succession of terrors less appalling but frequently repeated, soldiers develop a number of disabling psycho-physical symptoms.  Temporary unconsciousness, extreme agitation, lethargy, functional blindness or paralysis, completely unrealistic responses to the challenge of events, strange reversals of life-long patterns of behaviour - all the symptoms, which Pavlov observed in his dogs, re-appeared among the victims of what in the First World War was called 'shell shock', in the Second 'battle fatigue'.   Every man, like every dog, has his own individual limit of endurance.  Most men reach their limits after about thirty days of more or less continuous stress under the conditions of modern combat.  The more than averagely susceptible succumb in only fifteen days.  The more than averagely tough can resist for forty-five or even fifty days.  Strong or weak, in the long run all of them break down.  All, that is to say, of those who are initially sane.  For, ironically enough, the only people who can hold up indefinitely under the stress of modern war are psychotics.  Individual insanity is immune to the consequences of collective insanity.

      The fact that every individual has his breaking point has been known and, in a crude unscientific way, exploited from time immemorial.  In some cases man's dreadful inhumanity to man has been inspired by the love of cruelty for its own horrible and fascinating sake.  More often, however, pure sadism was tempered by utilitarianism, theology or reasons of state.  Physical torture and other forms of stress were inflicted by lawyers in order to loosen the tongues of reluctant witnesses; by clergymen in order to punish the unorthodox and induce them to change their opinions; by secret police to extract confessions from persons suspected of being hostile to the government.  Under Hitler, torture, followed by mass extermination, was used on those biological heretics, the Jews.  For a young Nazi, a tour of duty in the Extermination Camps was (in Himmler's words) 'the best indoctrination on inferior beings and the subhuman races'.  Given the obsessional quality of the Anti-Semitism which Hitler picked up as a young man in the slums of Vienna, this revival of the methods employed by the Holy Office against heretics and witches was inevitable.  But in the light of the findings of Pavlov and of the knowledge gained by psychiatrists in the treatment of war neuroses, it seems a hideous and grotesque anachronism.  Stresses amply sufficient to cause a complete cerebral breakdown can be induced by methods which, though hatefully inhuman, fall short of physical torture.

      Whatever may have happened in earlier years, it seems fairly certain that torture is not extensively used by the Communist police today.  They draw their inspiration, not from the Inquisitor or the SS man, but from the physiologist and his methodically conditioned laboratory animals.  For the dictator and his policemen, Pavlov's findings have important practical implications.  If the central nervous system of dogs can be broken down, so can the central nervous system of political prisoners.  It is simply a matter of applying the right amount of stress for the right length of time.  At the end of the treatment, the prisoner will be in a state of neurosis or hysteria, and will be ready to confess whatever his captors want him to confess.

      But confession is not enough.  A hopeless neurotic is no use to anyone.  What the intelligent and practical dictator needs is not a patient to be institutionalized, or a victim to be shot, but a convert who will work for the Cause.  Turning once again to Pavlov, he learns that, on their way to the point of final breakdown, dogs become more than normally suggestible.  New behaviour patterns can easily be installed while the dog is at or near the limit of its cerebral endurance, and these new behaviour patterns seem to be ineradicable.  The animal in which they have been implanted cannot be de-conditioned; that which it has learned under stress will remain an integral part of its make-up.

      Psychological stresses can be produced in many ways.  Dogs become disturbed when stimuli are unusually strong; when the interval between a stimulus and the customary response is unduly prolonged and the animal is left in a state of suspense; when the brain is confused by stimuli that run counter to what the dog has learned to expect; when stimuli make no sense within the victim's established frame of reference.  Furthermore, it has been found that the deliberate induction of fear, rage or anxiety markedly heightens the dog's suggestibility.  If these emotions are kept at a high pitch of intensity for a long enough time, the brain goes 'on strike'.  When this happens, new behaviour patterns may be installed with the greatest of ease.

      Among the physical stresses that increase a dog's suggestibility are fatigue, wounds and every form of sickness.

      For the would-be dictator these findings possess important practical implications.  They prove, for example, that Hitler was quite right in maintaining that mass meetings at night were more effective than mass meetings in the day time.  'During the day', he wrote, 'man's will power revolts with highest energy against any attempt at being forced under another's will and another's opinion.  In the evening, however, they succumb more easily to the dominating force of a stronger will.'

      Pavlov would have agreed with him; fatigue increases suggestibility.  (That is why, among other reasons, the commercial sponsors of television programmes prefer the evening hours and are ready to back their preferences with hard cash.)

      Illness is even more effective than fatigue as an intensifier of suggestibility.  In the past, sickrooms were the scene of countless religious conversions.  The scientifically trained dictator of the future will have all the hospitals in his dominions wired for sound and equipped with pillow speakers.  Canned persuasion will be on the air twenty-four hours a day, and the more important patients will be visited by political soul-savers and mind-changers just as, in the past, their ancestors were visited by priests, nuns and pious laymen.

      The fact that strong negative emotions tend to heighten suggestibility and so facilitate a change of heart had been observed and exploited long before the days of Pavlov.  As Dr William Sargant has pointed out in his enlightening book, Battle for the Mind, John Wesley's enormous success as a preacher was based upon an intuitive understanding of the central nervous system.  He would open his sermon with a long and detailed description of the torments to which, unless they underwent conversion, his hearers would undoubtedly be condemned for all eternity.  Then, when terror and an agonizing sense of guilt had brought his audience to the verge, or in some cases over the verge, of a complete cerebral breakdown, he would change his tone and promise salvation to those who believed and repented.  By this kind of preaching, Wesley converted thousands of men, women and children.  Intense, prolonged fear broke them down and produced a state of greatly intensified suggestibility.  In this state they were able to accept the preacher's theological pronouncements without question.  After which they were reintegrated by words of comfort, and emerged from their ordeal with new and generally better behaviour patterns ineradicably implanted in their minds and nervous systems.

      The effectiveness of political and religious propaganda depends upon the methods employed, not upon the doctrines taught.  These doctrines may be true or false, wholesome or pernicious - it makes little or no difference.  If the indoctrination is given in the right way at the proper stage of nervous exhaustion, it will work.  Under favourable conditions, practically everybody can be converted to practically anything.

      We possess detailed descriptions of the methods used by the Communist police for dealing with political prisoners.  From the moment he is taken into custody, the victim is subjected systematically to many kinds of physical and psychological stress.  He is badly fed, he is made extremely uncomfortable, he is not allowed to sleep for more than a few hours each night.  And all the time he is kept in a state of suspension, uncertainty and acute apprehension.  Day after day - or rather night after night, for these Pavlovian policemen understand the value of fatigue as an intensifier of suggestibility - he is questioned, often for many hours at a stretch, by interrogators who do their best to frighten, confuse and bewilder him.  After a few weeks or months of such treatment, his brain goes on strike and he confesses whatever it is that his captors want him to confess.  Then, if he is to be converted rather than shot, he is offered the comfort of hope.  If he will but accept the true faith, he can yet be saved - not, of course, in the next life (for, officially, there is no next life), but in this.

      Similar but rather less drastic methods were used during the Korean War on military prisoners.  In their Chinese camps the young Western captives were systematically subjected to stress.  Thus, for the most trivial breaches of the rules, offenders would be summoned to the commandant's office, there to be questioned, browbeaten and publicly humiliated.  And the process would be repeated, again and again, at any hour of the day or night.  This continuous harassment produced in its victims a sense of bewilderment and chronic anxiety.  To intensify their sense of guilt, prisoners were made to write and rewrite, in ever more intimate detail, long autobiographical accounts of their shortcomings.  And after having confessed their own sins, they were required to confess the sins of their companions.  The aim was to create within the camp a nightmarish society, in which everybody was spying on, and informing against, everyone else.  To these mental stresses were added the physical stresses of malnutrition, discomfort and illness.  The increased suggestibility thus induced was skilfully exploited by the Chinese, who poured into these abnormally receptive minds large doses of pro-Communist and anti-capitalist literature.  These Pavlovian techniques were remarkably successful.  One out of every seven American prisoners was guilty, we are officially told, of grave collaboration with the Chinese authorities, one out of three of technical collaboration.

      It must not be supposed that this kind of treatment is reserved by the Communists exclusively for their enemies.  The young field workers, whose business it was, during the first years of the new regime, to act as Communist missionaries and organizers in China's innumerable towns and villages, were made to take a course of indoctrination far more intense than that to which any prisoner of war was ever subjected.  In his China under Communism R.L. Walker describes the methods by which the party leaders are able to fabricate out of ordinary men and women the thousands of selfless fanatics required for spreading the Communist gospel and for enforcing Communist policies.  Under this system of training, the human raw material is shipped to special camps, where the trainees are completely isolated from their friends, families and the outside world in general.  In these camps they are made to perform exhausting physical and mental work; they are never alone, always in groups; they are encouraged to spy on one another; they are required to write self-accusatory autobiographies; they live in chronic fear of the dreadful fate that may befall them on account of what has been said about them by informers or of what they themselves have confessed.  In this state of heightened suggestibility they are given an intensive course in theoretical and applied Marxism - a course in which failure to pass examinations may mean anything from ignominious expulsion to a term in a forced labour camp or even liquidation.  After about six months of this kind of thing, prolonged mental and physical stress produces the results which Pavlov's findings would lead one to expect.  One after another, or in whole groups, the trainees break down.  Neurotic and hysterical symptoms make their appearance.  Some of the victims commit suicide, others (as many, we are told, as twenty per cent of the total) develop a severe mental illness.  Those who survive the rigours of the conversion process emerge with new and ineradicable behaviour patterns.  All their ties with the past - friends, family, traditional decencies and pieties - have been severed.  They are new men, recreated in the image of their new god and totally dedicated to his service. [In the new People's Communes of China the educational methods hitherto reserved for missionaries are now being applied, it would seem, to everybody.  A twelve-hour working day ensures a state of permanent exhaustion; spying, delation and ubiquitous policemen foster a chronic anxiety; and the forced repression of sexual impulses and the common affections tends to create a sense of profound and hopeless frustration.  On men, women and children softened up by these tested Pavlovian methods there is poured a never-ceasing stream of command and dogmatic assertion, of red-hot jingoism and hymns of hate, of threats of dire punishment mitigated by millennial promises of glorious things to come.  How many millions will break down under this educational ordeal, remains to be seen.]

      Throughout the Communist world tens of thousands of these disciplined and devoted young men are being turned out every year from hundreds of conditioning centres.  What the Jesuits did for the Roman Church of the Counter-Reformation, these products of a more scientific and even harsher training are now doing, and will doubtless continue to do, for the Communist Parties of Europe, Asia and Africa.

      In politics Pavlov seems to have been an old-fashioned liberal.  But, by a strange irony of fate, his researches and the theories he based upon them have called into existence a great army of fanatics dedicated heart and soul, reflex and nervous system, to the destruction of old-fashioned liberalism, wherever it can be found.

      Brainwashing, as it is now practised, is a hybrid technique, depending for its effectiveness partly on the systematic use of violence, partly on skilful psychological manipulation.  It represents the tradition of 1984 on its way to becoming the tradition of Brave New World.  Under a long-established and well-regulated dictatorship our current methods of semi-violent manipulation will seem, no doubt, absurdly crude.  Conditioned from earliest infancy (and perhaps also biologically predestined) the average middle- or lower-caste individual will never require conversion or even a refresher course in the true faith.  The members of the highest caste will have to be able to think new thoughts in response to new situations: consequently their training will be much less rigid than the training imposed upon those whose business is not to reason why, but merely to do and die with the minimum of fuss.  These upper-caste individuals will be members, still, of a wild species - the trainers and guardians, themselves only slightly conditioned, of a vast herd of completely domesticated animals.  Their wildness will make it possible for them to become heretical and rebellious.  When this happens they will have to be either liquidated, or brainwashed back into orthodoxy, or (as in Brave New World) exiled to some island, where they can give no further trouble, except of course to one another.  But universal infant conditioning and the other techniques of manipulation and control are still a few generations away in the future.  On the road to the Brave New World our rulers will have to rely on the transitional and provisional techniques of brainwashing.