NEW
BEGINNINGS/OLD ENDINGS
It was shortly after the
Second World War that late-stage petty-bourgeois civilization began to get
properly under way and a world arose which signified a break with the past, a
new beginning, an aspiration, one might say, towards absolute proletarian
criteria. For centuries men had lived
with paintings, novels, symphonies, wind-up watches, spectacles, carriages,
ships, universities, houses, books, acoustic guitars, and numerous other things
which it seems fair to associate with a period of history stretching from
late-stage grand-bourgeois to early-stage petty-bourgeois times, from
approximately the mid-seventeenth to the mid-twentieth centuries, though some
of those things of course date from even earlier times.
But then, with the acquirement of new technologies and a desire
to revolutionize life in some degree, all that changed, and post-war man,
particularly in his late-stage petty-bourgeois manifestation, began to turn
against the past and acclimatize himself to the ever-changing present. Of course, the old things - wind-up watches,
universities, novels, etc. - continued to exist, both in their historical and
more contemporary manifestations. But a
growing number of people were preferring the new and thus living within a more
civilized context, if by 'civilized' we mean artificial and transcendental.
To be sure, there was still a large number of people going to
universities, those traditional institutions of higher education, but there was
also a large number, probably more petty-bourgeois/proletarian in character,
who went to technical colleges, those late-stage petty-bourgeois successors to
universities. Admittedly, there were
still a considerable number of people who preferred wind-up watches to digital
ones. But, even so, the number of
digital wearers seemed to be on the increase.
If many people still read novels, there was also a more contemporary
body of people who preferred their fiction in a magazine or comic book, and who
went to the cinema as often as possible or, alternatively, sat at home and
watched a film on television.
The old and the new often overlapped, but there could be no
doubt that the new was gaining in importance and influence as time wore
on. Even people with old-world habits
and allegiances occasionally indulged in some form of contemporary activity or
identification, if on a comparatively low-key basis. A detailed investigation of people's
lifestyles would probably indicate that most of them were far from consistent
in terms of contemporary allegiance and behaviour, largely, one suspects,
through ignorance as to the class-status of any given pursuit or
identification, and possible ambivalence as to their own class-status in a
continuously changing world.
Hence the paradoxical and often amusing chimeras of, say,
university students in jeans - those late-stage petty-bourgeois successors to
trousers - or, conversely, of technical-college students in trousers - those
more traditional kinds of legwear. No-one is ultra-consistent, and I myself
occasionally wear cords and a button-up shirt instead of a tee-shirt. Nevertheless a methodology of homogeneous
living is possible and could be systematically pursued by anyone intelligent
enough to work out both his own class-status and the class-status of the things
or habits available to him in the contemporary world, should he decide to
harmonize the two in the interests of ideological perfection.
Here, for example, is a list of some old and new things which
might be of interest to anyone aspiring towards a more homogeneous lifestyle:-
universities technical colleges
condoms the pill
ships hovercraft
natural
sex pornography
novels short stories
plays/theatre films/cinema
books magazines/tapes
paintings posters
cameos photos
spectacles contact lenses
trousers jeans
(denims/cords)
shirts tee-shirts
wind-up
watches digital watches
houses flats
operas vocal rock
symphonies instrumental rock
concertos modern jazz
ballroom
dancing disco dancing
stained
glass light art
drawing holography
sculpture kinetics
skirts/dresses slacks/boiler-suits
prayer transcendental
meditation
beer/cider cola/soda
writing typing
manual
washing-up washing-up
machine
hand
washing machine
washing
outdoor
drying spin/heat
drying
open
fire electric
fire
gas
cooker electric
cooker
drying
hair manually hairdryer
feather
bed water bed
hand
shaving electric/battery
shaving
manual
toothbrush electric
toothbrush
woollen
blanket electric
blanket
liberal
democracy social
democracy
Protestantism Marxism
capitalism socialism
dildos vibrators
prostitutes masseuses
girlfriends inflatables
bombs missiles
truncheons plastic bullets
handkerchiefs paper tissues
candles torches
matches lighters
men's
bicycles motorbikes
women's
bicycles scooters
houses flats
natural
conversation telephone
conversation
manual
games autonomous
games
potatoes chips
fish fishcakes/fingers
Catholicism Fascism
monarchs military dictators
This isn't by any means
an exhaustive list, but it should indicate the nature of the distinction that
exists between traditional bourgeois civilization and contemporary
petty-bourgeois/proletarian civilization, the former preceding the Second World
War and the latter succeeding it, the two generally overlapping in such open
societies as prevail in the West at present, particularly in the more
traditional societies of countries like Britain and France, which have a longer
history than the more contemporary nations like Germany and the United States,
not to mention Italy and Japan.
Indeed, it is in these more contemporary nations that
late-stage petty-bourgeois/proletarian civilization is more consistently upheld
and most clearly manifest, such aspects of it as apply to the older Western
countries often deriving from them. No
sooner does one think of America, for instance, than a veritable host of
contemporary things and practices leap to mind, including jeans, tee-shirts,
cola, cartoons, comic books, films, jazz, and basketball. If
Of course, this civilization is not the ultimate one, and I
personally have no doubt that another and better one will shortly emerge in
which specifically proletarian criteria will prevail, replacing most of the
contemporary things and attitudes which people in the West nowadays take for
granted. But, even so, the break with
tradition that followed World War II created the basis for any subsequent evolutionary
progress, and such progress as has still to be made will derive, in large part,
from what currently exists, whether in science or art, religion or politics,
society or sex.
Certainly it is difficult to see how the pill, contact lenses,
digital watches, hovercraft, and other such contemporary things could be
bettered, though profound changes will doubtless occur and, indeed, already are
occurring, as in the development of a new kind of pill, more long-term than the
old, and the burgeoning plethora of plastic digital watches in succession,
seemingly, to the older (and possibly more petty-bourgeois) metallic ones. Probably either a late phase of
petty-bourgeois civilization or an early phase of proletarian civilization is
already manifest in many of these changes, which herald an age of absolute
criteria. Assuming they haven't been
entirely eclipsed by computers, magazines may continue to be published in a
proletarian civilization, but it is unlikely that they will be crammed full of
adverts, as in capitalist societies.
Other aspects of contemporary civilization, like photography
and film, jazz and rock, motorbikes and bicycles, kinetics and light
sculptures, short stories and posters, will undoubtedly die-out in the course
of time, evolutionary progress having rendered them obsolescent, knowledge
having placed them within a certain time-span relative to a given class-status
and/or kind of civilization, and history having sealed their fate in the
process of its inexorable unfolding. Not
everything contemporary is necessarily the blueprint for a higher
development. Nevertheless a significant
proportion of it is, and in some cases that development has already been
realized.