1. The
English only appear radical to themselves; when confronted by the more genuine radicalism
of an Irishman, an Arab, an Indian, or what have you, they quickly return to
their true colours, which are invariably conservative.
2. The Englishman is not even a bureaucratic conservative
fundamentally, or perhaps I should say nonconformistically, so to speak, but
the worst possible sort of conservative: an autocrat.
3. Even
in left-wing parliamentary democracy, the neo-autocratic beast has raised its
ugly head before the extreme left-wing social democracy can get a look in;
though when it does, as on extra-parliamentary terms, such a beast is more
inclined to 'give and/or take head', in homosexual fellatio, than to 'give
and/or take arse' in homosexual sodomy.
4. Of
course, the 'arse' cannot be ruled out.
But it is just that neo-autocratic tendencies display a marked
predilection towards, if not preference for, homosexual fellatio over
homosexual sodomy, so that one might speak rather colloquially of a neo-'pus'
correction of, and even alternative to, outright homosexual 'shit'.
5. Of
course, homosexual fellatio is what could, in ideological terms, be called
rather more secondary 'church' than primary state in respect of Social
Democracy, and thus less characteristic of a social democratic bent per se than
would be masturbation involving homosexual pornography, both of which need to
be distinguished from the parliamentary parallels of heterosexual fellatio as
secondary to heterosexual pornography.
6. For
liberal, or parliamentary, democracy remains broadly heterosexual, if within a
markedly male-oriented context, and therefore such pornography or oral sex as
might be said to parallel it will likewise be broadly heterosexual, even if
containing a homosexual element on the parliamentary Left, which veers towards,
though remains apart from, the social democratic radical Left of an outright
homosexual orientation in both pornography and fellatio, not to mention sodomy
in general.
7. One
fancies that female-oriented heterosexual cunnilingus would be autocratically secondary
to female masturbation in an outright autocratic context, where the State would
necessarily take precedence over the Church, and 'frigging' tendencies
accordingly pull rank on 'snogging' ones within a context typified, in
metachemically sensual vein, by the 'jerk', who will be 'frigging' first and
foremost and only 'snogging' on a rather subordinate basis, analogous to
religious fundamentalism.
8. In
liberal democratic societies, by contrast, it is the 'sodding' tendencies which
pull rank on 'fucking' ones, given that one is dealing with a context typified,
in physically sensible vein, by the 'prick', who will be 'sodding' first and
foremost and only 'fucking' on a subordinate basis, analogous to religious
humanism.
9. Terrestrial
television would stand to cinema pretty much as neo-autocratic to autocratic,
or neo-'frigging' to 'frigging', and thus pretty much within a left-wing
parliamentary to social-democratic extreme-left
context, where, one fancies, it also enters the realm of cable TV.
10. The
democratic extreme Left are paradoxically the distorted mirror image of the
autocratic extreme Right, for they are of the resurrection of autocratic
tendencies within a broadly social-democratic context, which fights shy of
parliamentary de-centralizing in favour of a centralized state totalitarianism.
11. In Britain, mention of the word 'left' automatically confers
a democratic connotation which is so much taken for granted that no other
concept of the Left is ever mooted.
12. But, of course, the Left in Britain, particularly in
England, are merely democratic Left.
They are not theocratic Left, and the concept of such a Left would be
completely alien to the British, and likely to be dismissed as aberrant and subversive
of genuine left-wing values.
13. Which
is a sad testimony of the extent to which
14. Strange
irony that the extreme Left of a social democratic persuasion assume a
neo-autocratic character in the context of state totalitarianism, with its
centralizing tendencies guaranteed to resurrect, within male-oriented terms, all that most typified autocratic authoritarianism.
15. The
left-wing Englishman can be so democratic that even bureaucratic and theocratic
affiliations seem autocratic to him, and something to dismiss as right wing and
reactionary.
16. Little
does he realize the extent to which affiliation with an autocratic-democratic
axis, falling from the one to the other, as from Hell in the sky to hell on
earth, has blinded him to the reality of the bureaucratic-theocratic axis
typifying countries like Eire, in which there is a rise from heaven in the
water, so to speak, to Heaven in the sky, and where a clean break with
bureaucratic conservatism would be no-less radically left-wing, in its own
context, than a clean break with autocratic conservatism in respect of social
democracy.
17. Such
a clean break with bureaucratic conservatism I call Social Theocracy, and it
stands to Social Democracy, the extra-parliamentary mode of democracy, as the
Second Coming to the Antichrist, or Heaven in the sky to hell on earth, or the
saving of souls to the savouring of 'arseholes', or, in simple elemental terms,
air to earth, and, in colloquial parlance, 'gas' to 'shit'.
18. How
the two peoples diverge! The English down to the lowest depths of earthly equalitarianism,
the Irish up towards the highest heights of heavenly elitism, as between
salvation and damnation, heaven and hell.
19. Celts,
more generally, will have to know where they are at and take a stand on it, not
sit on the 'British' fence between English Protestant and Irish Catholic
extremes as though it didn't matter.
For, in truth, nothing matters more!
20. On the basis one would argue that there can't be any
practice, or praxis, without theory, it could be maintained that there can't be
any gnosis without knowledge.
21. Which
in metaphysical terms would be equivalent to saying that there can't be any
theosophy without theology, any 'love' of God without 'knowledge' of God, as to
what constitutes God.
22. Likewise,
in physical terms, such a contention would be equivalent to saying that there
can't be any philosophy without philology, any 'love' of knowledge without
'knowledge' of language, as to what constitutes logic.
23. Thus I argue for a parallel between theology and theosophy on the
one hand, that of metaphysics, and for a like-parallel between philology and
philosophy on the other hand, that of physics.
24. In
both cases, theology and philology are the theory that leads to or makes
possible a theosophical or philosophical praxis, depending whether one is
metaphysical or physical, heavenly or earthy, upper-class male or lower-class
male, highlander or lowlander, which is to say, divine or masculine, godly or
manly.
25. Love
of, or concern with, God must rank higher than love of, or concern with, human
knowledge, and therefore one can safely maintain that the theosophist, or
theosopher, is as superior, in male terms, to the philosopher as the theologian
to the philologist, or philologian, since he represents the higher discipline,
which has intimate associations with metaphysics rather than mere physics.
