SOME
OPENING
SALVOS
One
evening
I decided I had had enough of being
a TV-sucking sonofabitch, and that was that.
Or was it? I had a second thought
and figured that one was more of a sonofabitch with radio and something
akin to
a quasi-bitch with television - which is worse!
One
thing
I am not and never shall be is a
God-fearing sonofabitch!
I
could
never accept a female boss – it would
make me a sonofabitch. That is the
problem with sexual or gender equalitarianism, quite apart from the
fact that
if you give a woman an inch she is almost bound, sooner or later, to
take the
proverbial mile – one way or another.
All
these
God-mongering sons-of-bitches make me
sick. They just don’t realize how
religiously fake they are!
Jews
are
traditionally amongst the most
culpable of God-mongers – virtual inventors of Devil the Mother hyped
as God
the Father, that is, as the Creator, Jehovah, call it by what name you
like.
How
can
a close-lipped smile, motivated by joy,
be identified with doing or saying anything?
Much less singing anything!
Young
people
are like roses, old people like
tulips.
The
internet
is chock-full of piffling little
money-grubbing sites. Truly awful! A page of … what? Nothing! Only sordid
money-grubbers.
I’ve
never
known a computer that hasn’t held me
back and more or less screwed me around, including the one I’m
currently using
(a Compaq).
AN
ALTERNATIVE
TAKE ON LIFE AND DEATH
Although
the
concepts of ‘life’ and ‘death’ are
commonly understood in relation to living and dying, the actual alpha
and omega
of life are ‘birth’ and ‘death’, the former of which precedes life as
commonly
understood in relation to conscious duration, and the latter of which
succeeds
it.
There
is,
however, another way of looking at
life and death, and that is to equate them with free and bound, or
positive and
negative, or bright and dark, or, indeed, virtue and vice, so that they
constitute two sides of the same elemental or even pseudo-elemental
coin, be it
metachemical/pseudo-metaphysical at the northwest point of the
intercardinal
axial compass, chemical/pseudo-physical at the southwest,
physical/pseudo-chemical at the southeast, or
metaphysical/pseudo-metachemical
at the northeast, the point polar to what exists at the southwest and
antithetical to the northwest.
Consequently,
I
also like to think of life and
death in this dichotomous sense as the free and bound sides of the same
elemental/pseudo-elemental coin, whether that coin happens to be
absolute or
relative, noumenal or phenomenal, ethereal or corporeal.
There
is
an infinite life and death in
metachemistry and a pseudo-eternal pseudo-life and pseudo-death in
pseudo-metaphysics at the northwest point of the intercardinal axial
compass,
the former representative of a 3:1 ratio (absolute) of free soma
(beauty and
love) to bound psyche (ugliness and hate); the latter significant of a
1:3
ratio (absolute) of free soma or, rather, pseudo-free soma (pseudo-joy
and
pseudo-truth) to pseudo-bound psyche (pseudo-woe and pseudo-illusion).
Conversely,
there
is an eternal life and death
in metaphysics and a pseudo-infinite pseudo-life and pseudo-death in
pseudo-metachemistry at the northeast point of the intercardinal axial
compass,
the former significant of a 3:1 ratio (absolute) of free psyche (joy
and truth)
to bound soma (woe and illusion); the latter representative of a 1:3
ratio
(absolute) of pseudo-free psyche (pseudo-beauty and pseudo-love) to
pseudo-bound soma (pseudo-ugliness and pseudo-hate).
Likewise,
there
is a finite life and death in
chemistry and a pseudo-temporal pseudo-life and pseudo-death in
pseudo-physics
at the southwest point of the intercardinal axial compass, the former
representative of a 2½:1½ ratio (relative) of free soma (pride and
strength) to
bound psyche (humility and weakness); the latter significant of a 1½:2½
ratio
(relative) of pseudo-free soma (pseudo-knowledge and pseudo-pleasure)
to
pseudo-bound psyche (pseudo-ignorance and pseudo-pain).
Finally,
if
conversely, there is a temporal
life and death in physics and a pseudo-finite pseudo-life and
pseudo-death in
pseudo-chemistry at the southeast point of the intercardinal axial
compass, the
former significant of a 2½:1½ ratio (relative) of free psyche
(knowledge and
pleasure) to bound soma (ignorance and pain); the latter representative
of a
1½:2½ ratio (relative) of pseudo-free psyche (pseudo-pride and
pseudo-strength)
to pseudo-bound soma (pseudo-humility and pseudo-weakness).
The
metaphysical/pseudo-metachemical
point of
the intercardinal axial compass that I favour is therefore
constitutive, in
general terms, of a contrast between the Eternal Life in relation to
the preponderating aspect of the element of metaphysics
(psyche) and, a plane down, the pseudo-Infinite pseudo-death of the predominating aspect of the pseudo-element of
pseudo-metachemistry (soma) – call this a contrast between Heaven and
pseudo-Hell or, better, the pseudo-Devil, since whereas the fulcrum of
metaphysics is Soul (and hence Heaven), the fulcrum of
pseudo-metachemistry, by
contrast, is pseudo-bound Will (and hence the pseudo-Devil), given the
gender
differentials which, here as elsewhere, preclude a straightforward –
and
oversimplified – parallelism of terminological usage.
THE
LOGICAL
VIEW OF SAINTS
Despite
what
I may have written in that
revised/reformatted weblog ‘Saints of the British Isles’ (see The
Centre
of
Truth), I don’t actually accept the
fourfold placement of a saint at each hegemonic point of the
intercardinal
axial compass since, quite apart from logical objections, common sense
alone
should suggest that there are only two hegemonic points at which saints
can
reasonably exist – namely the southeast and the northeast in relation
to
physics and metaphysics, with the former pseudo-righteous (and hence
pseudo-saintly) but the latter alone genuinely righteous (and hence
genuinely
saintly), bearing in mind the phenomenal/noumenal, corporeal/ethereal
distinction between these two male elements on what are, in practical
terms,
two opposing axes, with contrasting emphases between state and church
and,
indeed, soma and psyche.
So,
of
course, saints, whether pseudo
(physical) or genuine (metaphysical) can only exist at the southeast
and
northeast hegemonic points of our intercardinal axial compass, and not
right
across the axial board, so to speak, in any of the hegemonic elements. Two of them, viz. metachemistry and
chemistry, are characterized by whores (genuine and pseudo
respectively), and
whores exist in conjunction, hegemonically, with demons (whether pseudo
in
pseudo-metaphysics or genuine in pseudo-physics), who are axially polar
to the
saints, both types of which exist in hegemonic conjunction with angels
(whether
pseudo in pseudo-metachemistry or genuine in pseudo-chemistry), so
that, in
general terms, saints and angels are no-less correlative than whores
and
demons, the only difference being that saints are genuine in
metaphysics and
angels in pseudo-chemistry, whereas whores are genuine in metachemistry
and
demons in pseudo-physics, as noted above.
As
to
the distinction between St George and St
Patrick, the former would seem to be metaphysical and the latter merely
physical, since the one has his foot, metaphorically speaking, on a
neutralized
dragon (a pseudo-metachemical pseudo-dragon) and the other on a
neutralized
snake (a pseudo-chemical pseudo-snake), as though to keep them down or
in their
inferior place – assuming snakes were not altogether banished (from
Ireland) in
a general cull.
Whatever
the
case, snakes, lacking wings, don’t
fly, whereas dragons do (or were alleged to), given their reliance on
wings. Therefore since dragons are a
higher (flying) species of life than snakes, it seems only logical to
regard St
George as a higher (or genuine) species of saint than St Patrick, whose
association with snakes is, to say the least, less exalted.
But
if
St George, being metaphysical, is the
genuine saint, and St Patrick, his physical counterpart, the
pseudo-saint, then
it should be possible to logically infer that the neutralized dragon
(pseudo-dragon) corresponds to the pseudo-angel and the neutralized
snake
(pseudo-snake) to the genuine angel – much as one may naturally balk at
such a
correlation in view of their apparent incompatibility.
But
that
is merely a consequence of a
conventionally-conditioned false concept of angels which, like the
false concept
of saints, has traditionally characterized Western and, indeed, much
Eastern
thinking and religion, to the detriment of logic. Such
falsehood
was rooted in mystical fancy
often deriving from myth and tended to either overlook or confound
gender – something
I would regard as the equivalent of a cardinal sin.
Saints,
in
short, are righteously hegemonic
males, angels their justly subordinate pseudo-female counterparts.
By
contrast,
whores are vainly hegemonic
females, demons their meekly subordinate pseudo-male counterparts.
All
this
derives from logic, not mysticism.
THE
AUTOCRACY
OF WAR VIS-À-VIS THE THEOCRACY OF
PEACE
With
alpha-stemming
life, war is the rule and
peace the exception – the exception of an escape, through some degree
of
theocracy, from gender friction in monastery-like vein.
Men
and
women are permanently at war because
they are opposites, and nothing men do to reject or hide this fact from
themselves through so-called folk wisdom and other subterfuges playing
up to
the delusion of male supremacy will make any difference.
The
only
way to peace – to Paradise Regained,
as it were, with ‘Kingdom Come’ – is for males to transcend gender
friction
through hegemonic dominance over females and, hence, their absolute
subjection
through neutralization, as in the paradigm of St George and the
(neutralized)
dragon – what, in the past (and above), I have called a pseudo-dragon,
equivalent to the ‘lion’ that has been obliged to ‘lie down’ with the
‘lamb’ in
the other well-known Biblical metaphor.
Only that can guarantee males a return to ‘Edenic’ self-respect
in
relation to psychic peace through being at one with their true, or
deeper, self
– the Soul.
SINGING
VIS-À-VIS
HUMMING
The
metaphysical
approach to vocals is, of
course, humming, at least at the human level of mankind, whereas
synthesized
humming, whereby the voice is ‘put through’ a synthesizer, would surely
equate
with a cyborgistic equivalence, bearing in mind the significance of
synthesizers to global universality and, hence, to cyborgkind.
Singing,
on
the other hand, stems from female
dominance, whether in terms of metachemistry over pseudo-metaphysics
(noumenal)
or chemistry over pseudo-physics (phenomenal), and inevitably suggests
a kind
of objective and/or pseudo-subjective outpouring of the voice in overly
expressive or pseudo-impressive terms.
Unlike
hummers,
singers open their mouths in
what appears to be an extrovert, though in the male or, rather,
pseudo-male
case may actually be pseudo-introvert, outpouring of melodic ideas
tempered by
emotion.
Since
singing
is a kind of water-dominated
vocal activity (as described in earlier texts) especially germane to
the
chemical/pseudo-physical southwest point of the intercardinal axial
compass, it
is not – and cannot be – metaphysical (like humming, or interiorized
non-verbal
vocalizing), but these days in particular is much more a pop/rock
phenomenon
which also has the commercial benefit of providing a narrative tag with
which
to ‘bait’ potential or actual customers, as in the purchase of CDs.
Singing
can,
however, approximate to a
progressive rock status as and when the verbal vocals are synthesized,
or put
through a synthetic device for purposes of enhanced artificiality and a
comparatively more progressive production.
Such synthesized vocals will still fall short, however, of what
I have
elsewhere (see earlier texts) termed regressive electronica which,
ironically,
would be less likely to utilize a synthesizer in this regard, if only
because
it represents a descent from a synthetic purism while remaining rooted,
for all
that, in synthesized percussion and/or bass rhythms.
But
electronica-proper
will, in utilizing the
maximum of synthesizers, favour a metaphysical approach to vocals, and
such an
approach should, in godly vein, imply synthesized humming – the humming
not of
mankind but, in post-worldly and even universal terms, of cyborgkind,
man’s
evolutionary successor.
A
COMMON
MYTH
They
say
your eyes get better with age, but the
not infrequent dispensing with glasses in my case has more to do with
disillusionment with spectacles than with any perceptive improvement in
vision.
They
say
your eyes get better as you grow
older, but in my experience they get so bad that you can no longer bear
wearing
spectacles (contacts were never an option), neither psychologically nor
physiologically.
I
escaped
the optical straitjacket of
spectacles and, boy, did I fee liberated!
These days I could never go back to wearing glasses all day and,
no
matter how bad my eyesight, to looking through the wrong end of a
telescope via
lenses that not only distort one features but look like the proverbial
beer
glass. Fuck that!
Wearing
spectacles
to see things more clearly
or sharply is just another form of keeping up appearances – one of the
worst,
most psychologically damaging forms.
You’re
straining
your eyes watching hours of
television, staring fixedly at the screen, when on come the optical
entrepreneurs to cash in on your predicament and put pressure on the
viewer to
come in for an eye test and to buy another pair of spectacles, perhaps
– irony
of ironies – getting an additional pair free! What a perfect medium
television
is for such advertisers! They have you
over the back of the proverbial barrel.
But I have the solution to all that – not so much muting the
volume or
switching channels as … watching TV without spectacles, so that I am
relatively
indifferent to what I see, in any case.
As
for
High Definition and all the rest of it –
who needs to see blood and gore and violence and greed more clearly and
sharply! That is only further playing
into the Devil’s hands and partaking of a superbitch-ridden alpha that
is as
far removed from anything metaphysical and heavenly as you could
possibly be …
short of being burnt alive.
A
LOGICAL
SEQUENCE
From
the
most devolution in cosmic
metachemistry and the most counter-evolution in cosmic
pseudo-metaphysics to
the most evolution in cyborg metaphysics and the most
counter-devolution in
cyborg pseudo-metachemistry via more, less, and least degrees (stages)
of
devolution and counter-evolution on the one hand, and least, less, and
more
degrees (stages) of evolution and counter-devolution on the other hand,
the
intermediate stages approximating to nature and mankind.
FOUR
BASIC
SOCIAL DIVISIONS
Gender,
racial,
class, and occupational
implications are facts of life that cannot be wished away, even if they
can be
regarded as not existing by woolly-minded, self-deceiving people. Equality in these matters would not even be
beneficial or desirable, since any attempt to deny or underestimate any
of them
only exposes the hollowness and implausibility of claims to the
contrary.
LIKE
LIVING
IN HELL
I
don’t
know if there is anything lower than
the Bangladeshi family I am now living with, but I have never
encountered anything.
These
people
reach or, rather, plumb levels of
obscenity in their attitudes and behaviour that beggar belief. At times they seem scarcely human but
decidedly subhumanist (a common Eastern reality) if not subhuman.
My
Bangladeshi
neighbours never chastise their
kid but, rather, allow and even encourage him to make as much noise,
both
verbally and physically, as he likes. He
uses their bed as a trampoline all day and never stops chortling and
giggling
while he is bouncing, noisily, up and down, with their door almost
permanently
ajar! They act as though we, the other neighbours, didn’t exist,
largely, I
suspect, because of their close relationship to the landlord, who is
obviously
free to do as he pleases. Impossible to
have cordial relations with such people.
As
an
Irishman brought to England as a young
boy, I bitterly resent having to live with these scrapings of the
British
Empire. It seems to me like I am the
victim of an ongoing crime … It is now 10.52 pm and the bed-bouncing
antics
show no sign of abating.
My
neighbours
at Hermiston Avenue – all
detestable idiots! The Bangladeshis especially, who are forever up and
down the
wooden – yes uncarpeted – stairs leading from the first floor (where my
and two
other tenants’ rooms are) to their attic renovation and extension
upstairs.
That
Bangladeshi
kid is a monster – bouncing up
and down on his bed hours on end and hollowing all the while. You’d never suppose they’d already put a
full-size trampoline in the back garden!
Which, of course uses up most of the space, including the little
left,
when you can find room on the clothesline or, rather, tripod, for the
washing.
That
detestable
little sonofabitch is never
still or quiet, I repeat never still or quiet.
He is a constant nuisance and I have the distinct feeling of
being
tyrannized over by a kid!
The
detestable
tyranny of kids and …
women! And I am not in the least
responsible for that creature … his father, who is probably back in
Bangladesh,
was responsible for bringing that monster into the world and … I and
the other
non-Bangladeshi neighbours have had to put up with the consequences!
When
I
say life makes me sick, I am not
exaggerating.
And
they
say these creatures were made by
God!!? Even if that were true, which I
don’t for one moment believe, it would make conventional religion all
the more
detestable and, frankly, contemptible … that a god was responsible for
such a
monster.
My
life
under the Bangladeshi regime at
Hermiston Avenue, Hornsey, is absolute hell, not least when the
big-handed
ex-wife of the landlord exits the building regularly slamming the front
door
like it was meant to be slammed.
Complaints, of course, are of no avail – never were and never
could be
with such people, who behave as they do simply because that is the way
they
are, with little if any sensibility.
Having
a
Bangladeshi landlord is bad enough,
what with the sort of ‘exotic’ neighbours he has tended, over the
years, to
inflict upon one, not to mention his gross incompetence in most things,
but
when he eventually moves his extended family in and more or less takes
over the
place, then you know what it means to be marginalized, not least in the
cooking-ridden kitchen! Is this a case
of ‘devil take the hindmost’? If so,
then I don’t see the justice in it.
Aren’t I one of the greatest philosophers and writers (not to
mention
artists, musicians, composers, transcribers) who ever lived? But, of course, I’m an Irishman in England.
The
stink
of their food coming upstairs from
the communal kitchen is positively overwhelming in its nauseating
richness and
snot-like acridity – enough, at times, to make one vomit.
And to think that I have to share that
fly-ridden kitchen with them every day! Difficult enough to actually
find any
room in the fridge or on the cooker what with their food and pots and
pans
everywhere. This really is
disgusting! But when their kid invades
it, as he often does, trailing a long scarf and babbling inanely in
between hysterical
outbursts … one feels like a complete idiot for actually being there
and having
to endure it all.
It
would
be difficult to imagine a less
romantic place than Crouch End/Hornsey, where I’ve lived, unhappily,
for some
thirty-six years without so much as a one-night stand or a single kiss. I was never intended for such a place. But even Crouch End/Hornsey pales into
insignificance when compared with the Bangladeshis….Impossible to lead
a
dignified existence in close proximity to such people.
I fear for the future of Britain with people
like this able to breed and continue in their anarchic and
fundamentally
barbarous lifestyles, I really do, and I am not in the least British
but
unable, all the same, to escape the consequences of living in
twenty-first
century Britain.
These
are
a people accustomed to arranged
marriages. There is no ‘opt-out clause’;
the breeding is taken for granted. And
look at their numbers! Such people
deserve nothing less than our pitiless disdain for acting the way they
do.
AN
INTERESTING
GENDER QUESTION
Do
women
have egos, much less souls? It seems
doubtful, since it appears that
their natural, which is to say hegemonic, condition is the bound psyche
(to the
free soma) of negative ego and soul, the former chemically weak and the
latter
metachemically hateful.
A
PET
HATE
Every
time
I hear the word ‘God’ I
metaphorically reach for the proverbial revolver (a Millerism), as
though to
plug one of those self-deceiving sons-of-bitches.
NATURE
OF
THE WORLD
The
world
is at bottom largely if not
completely irrational. Christ’s injunction
to ‘become as little children’ is one of the stupidest, most irrational
things
he ever said, or is alleged to have said, and deserves to be
contemptuously
dismissed. Those bundles of frigging
energy throwing their sonofabitch weight around all day …?
Reason
is
achieved not because of the world,
but in spite of it – by turning one’s back on it and being true to
oneself as a
subjective (male) creature capable of inner peace through self-harmony,
which
is to say, of psychic togetherness, something that can only be achieved
independently of women and … kids. As
Christ himself said: you’ve got to leave them (females) behind, though
as I
could add: provided you’re able to.
TWO
KINDS
OF TRANSCENDENTALISM
I
used
to think that there was only one kind of
transcendentalism – namely, the metaphysical kind.
But that is really a progressive, or
evolutionary, transcendentalism, as applying to the metaphysical
salvation of
males.
There
is
also what could be called a
regressive, or devolutionary, kind of transcendentalism, as applying to
females
who achieve the overcoming of their hellish netherworldly vacuity
through the
attainment of a surrogate plenum in the guise of motherhood – a
purgatorially
worldly resolution which, by its very existence, tends to the
diminution if not
eradication of progressive transcendentalism in males.
Only
messianic
intervention, it seems, could
comprehensively deliver such pseudo-masculine males from their
pseudo-earthly
kind of worldliness to an otherworldly heaven.
But the inevitable concomitant of that, i.e. salvation, is the
counter-damnation of chemical females, or females who have achieved a
regressive transcendentalism, to the
pseudo-fundamentalism/pseudo-materialism
of pseudo-metachemistry, the subordinate corollary of metaphysics. Only thus can paradise be regained … for
males.
For
females,
on the other hand, there is only
the predominating neutralization of pseudo-infinite life and
pseudo-infinite
death (see ‘An Alternative Take on Life and Death’ above) – akin to the
age-old
metaphor of the neutralized dragon (pseudo-dragon) under the saintly
heel, or
the ‘lion’ (pseudo-lion or, better, lioness) that is perforce obliged
to ‘lie
down’ with the ‘lamb’ (of heavenly godliness) as the
pseudo-metachemical
partner of otherworldly triumph.
LOATHE
TO
QUALIFY
‘Jesu,
joy
of man’s desiring’ – a line from a
Bach hymn, if I’m not mistaken. But
Christians are loathe to qualify anything, least of all with respect to
gender. It is certainly not woman who,
other than in mundane terms, would be germane to the ‘man’s desiring’,
or even
man per se, the humanistic physical
egocentric creature across the axial divide from anything
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate; rather it would be the
aforementioned
pseudo-physical pseudo-man, the mass catholic pseudo-male who, if saved
from
his lowly upended predicament under woman (chemical females) at the
southwest
point of the intercardinal axial compass, would be eligible for the
‘joy’ of
‘man’s desiring’; though less in
relation to Christ, the so-called ‘Son of God’ who barely transcends
bound
metaphysical soma (the crucifixional paradigm) than in regard to free
metaphysical psyche which, in relation to joy, is less of godliness, or
godfatherliness, than of Heaven … the Holy Soul, the actual fulcrum of
metaphysics
which is the precondition of any godly confirmation and effulgent
consequence –
mere proof of the underlying joy.
THE
ADAMIC
PARABLE
We
are
told, from the Bible, about the ‘curse
of Adam’ (not just the so-called adam’s apple), but the male who,
post-puberty
and in youthful idealism, has been brought low and cast out of the
garden of
his Y-chromosomal self-esteem for having succumbed to female temptation
is less
cursed than unblessed … with salvation from pseudo-physics to
metaphysics, and
thus the prospect of gender-sync blessedness in free psyche and bound
soma to
an absolute (3:1) degree, as befitting the context of noumenal
subjectivity
(metaphysics).
The
‘meek’,
contrary to Christ, are not
‘blessed’; they are, as pseudo-physical pseudo-males, simply unblessed
(with
salvational deliverance). And they
exist, as pseudo-masculine males, under those who, as chemical females,
or
feminine females per se, are simply
counter-uncursed (with somatic freedom and psychic binding to a
relative, i.e.
2½:1½, degree). But as the chemical
‘first’ they will end-up counter-cursed with pseudo-metachemical free
psyche
and bound soma to an absolute (1:3) degree in the event of the
salvation of
their pseudo-physical counterparts, the proverbial ‘last’, to
metaphysics,
wherein the ‘first/last’ standing is reversed.
Paradise
regained
at the expense of …
woman. That is the simple truth.
FALSE
RELIGIONS
The
want
of qualification of terms and contexts
in Christianity by Christians, or those who consider themselves such,
is proof
of the absence of gender resolve on the part of males to properly
differentiate
between the genders. Just think of how
difficult it must be for a Catholic priest to tell a mixed
congregation, i.e.
the Christian norm, that to become like or follow Christ the males must
abandon
females (wives, daughters, sisters, mothers, lovers, etc.) to take up
the Cross
… and multiply that by a factor of two or more when it is a female who,
in a
Protestant church, is in the pulpit. One
might suppose that such advice would not be to the forefront of her
mind but,
rather, a sense of the (worldly) desirability of familial ties and
fidelity. Bah! The
want
of a Christian resolve even among
so-called Christians, who regularly attend church, is sickening. Christianity, particularly in its Protestant
manifestations, is just another false religion.
NO
HELP
WITHOUT HINDRANCE
There
are
some who say the world helps those
who help themselves and others, by contrast, who argue that it only
helps those
who help others. Both attitudes are
right and simultaneously wrong, since there is more, axially
considered, than
one type of world, and even they are divisible into a
chemical/pseudo-physical
mass Catholic and a physical/pseudo-chemical mass Protestant dichotomy
between
what could be described as those who, objectively, help others and
those who,
pseudo-subjectively, pseudo-hinder themselves on the one hand, and
those who,
by contrast, help themselves and those who, pseudo-objectively,
pseudo-hinder
others.
The
former
pairing, being mass Catholic at the
southwest point of the intercardinal axial compass, and therefore
gender
divisible in predominating and preponderating ratio terms between
pseudo-evil
chemical free soma and sinful pseudo-physical bound psyche, I would
define in
relation to mothers helping kids and fathers pseudo-hindering
themselves
through non-protective (traditionally) coitus attendant upon a sinful
(bound
psyche) acquiescence in folly (free soma), whereas the latter pairing,
indubitably mass Protestant (Puritan) at the southeast point of the
said axial
compass, and therefore gender divisible in preponderating and
predominating
ratio terms between pseudo-graceful physical free psyche and good
pseudo-chemical bound soma, I would incline to define in terms of
fathers
helping themselves through knowledge-based protective coitus and
mothers
pseudo-hindering others, i.e. children, through either a want of kids
or within
a small family unit (one or two kids) attendant upon a good (bound
somatic) pseudo-chemical
acquiescence in punishment (free psyche) that would contrast with the
traditionally larger families conceived by, in the main, Irish
Catholics within
a British Isles-type axial dichotomy.
So
much,
then, for a lopsided perspective on
who or what the world (which I am not in favour of) helps!
A
TAUTOLOGY
The
notion
of straight-line divergence would be
tautological. Anything that explodes in
straight lines can only be divergent – and female, whether absolutely
(metachemical) or relatively (chemical), that is, in terms of squares
or
rectangles. It is the product of a
vacuum, and contrasts with what is centred in a plenum, like the slap
with the
punch.
NO
BIBLE
STOOGE
Although
I
occasionally use the Adamic paradigm
as describing the ‘Fall of Man’ from noumenal heavenliness/godliness to
worldly
(pseudo-earthly) phenomenality adjacent to that order of worldliness
(purgatorial) germane to Woman as the Eve-like creature who can only
achieve
the regressive transcendence of a surrogate plenum (child) via the
exploitation
(seduction) of the male, I have never been of the Biblical opinion that
Adam
precedes Eve … as the male the female or, in generic terms, man
preceding
woman, since it appears incontrovertible to me that woman is the
anterior sex
from whom man emerged and because of which the struggle towards a
heavenly/godly solution in metaphysics is always an uphill one, given
the
traditional – one might say, fundamental – female dominance of things
in back
of anything male. I am confident that
John Cowper Powys, for one, would have no difficulty with this argument.
The
‘Fall
of Man’ (when male) into familial
servitude due to female pressures is the only ‘fall’ one can reasonably
postulate. And that is in relation to
males who actually become to a degree metaphysical, not to those –
probably the
great majority – who are seduced by the ‘forbidden tree of knowledge’
into
physics and are thus axially polar to the metachemical female who
should – in
Anglican monarchic fashion – find it easier to dominate such males from
an
axially hegemonic standpoint, not from, as with metaphysical males, a
contrary
axial standpoint which, by religious definition, will necessitate
greater
effort on the female’s part.
I
believe
the principal indicator of a male who
becomes more metaphysical than physical is a love for rock, and
associated
types of contemporary music, and a tendency to reject formal education,
not
least in relation to so-called further education, so that he is
somewhat of a
hippy or freak type as opposed to a regular college-educated (physical)
male,
who may well be into sports, to boot.
As
regards
the starting point for males as well
as females, it is neither metaphysical (and/or physical) nor
metachemical, but
more chemical/pseudo-physical (according to gender), and therefore it
could be
said that, contrary to being made in the ‘image of God’ (a misnomer)
man,
speaking generically, is the product of woman, not least the chemical
free soma
(as opposed to bound psyche) of pride and strength, Purgatory the Clear
Spirit
(spirit per se) and Woman the Mother, so that far from resembling a
psyche
preceding and preponderating over soma (metaphysical and/or physical)
situation
initially, he is closer, whether boy or girl, to the somatic precedence
and
predominance over psyche of his mother, and is accordingly more
congenial,
because relative, to her than would otherwise be the case, i.e., when
the male
child attains to puberty and either gravitates towards physics (2½:1½
free
psyche to bound soma) or towards metaphysics (3:1 free psyche to bound
soma) in
which positions he will be at variance, whether axially or in terms of
polarity, with the somatic predominance of, in particular, females who
have
gravitated, following childhood, to metachemistry and accordingly
exemplify a
free somatic/bound psychic disposition (3:1) that is fated, in the
interests of
acquiring a surrogate plenum through maternity, to war on the male,
whether
metaphysical or physical (depending on his ethnicity and/or
physiological type)
preparatory to – at least in the metaphysical case – bringing him low
(a
‘fall’), as and when he succumbs to her beauty (coupled to love) and
ends up
fathering children … to the detriment of his gender attainment, with
puberty,
to free psyche and bound soma, or that which puts him at variance, if
not
loggerheads, with the adult female.
In
Britain,
the tendency of male maturity is to
gravitate towards physics rather than metaphysics, given its Protestant
opposition, traditionally, to Catholicism, and therefore to partake of
the
‘forbidden tree of knowledge’ (in physics) at the expense of
metaphysical
transcendentalism/idealism and the possibility, assuming one does not
succumb
to female seductions, of developing into a ‘philosopher king’ and even,
in
exceptional instances, someone credibly messianic, the logical outcome
of such
a ‘king’. For only the latter individual
would have the know-how and, eventually, means to deliver the
pseudo-physical
(through salvation) to metaphysics and have the chemical delivered
(through
counter-damnation) to pseudo-metachemistry, a position requiring the
cooperation, as it were, of a pseudo-female pseudo-Devil whose duty it
was to
take care of the chemical (females) while their pseudo-physical
(pseudo-male)
counterparts on the church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis were being
saved
(as from female dominion in chemistry over pseudo-physics at the
southwest
point of the intercardinal axial compass).
There
is
a lot wrong with the Edenic myth, as
with Genesis and the Old Testament generally, and it behoves us to
extricate
ourselves from this account of Creation and to adopt a more realistic
and even
scientifically factual account of how humanity or mankind or Man came
to pass
and, not least, who precedes whom in terms of gender, particularly as
the term
God is a misnomer used in relation to Devil the Mother, i.e. the
metachemical
‘first mover’, and not to anything or, rather, anyone metaphysical,
wherein
Heaven precedes godliness, as Soul the ‘bovaryized’ ego (compared to
physical
ego) that can be termed super-ego, and that stands as a truthful
testament to
the prior existence of Joy, like a light (halo/smile) around the flame
of the
soul’s inner burning, or being.
Thus
there
is no God ‘in the Beginning’ and Man
was not created in God’s image (as noted above), since the precedence
of soma
by psyche (or body by mind) only becomes perceptible in the male with
or
following puberty and is not characteristic of the feminine-like child
who is,
of course, closer to his mother in physiological/psychological make up,
irrespective of gender, and therefore an energetic creature
(animal-like) who
exemplifies more soma than psyche, more body than mind, and can only
continue
to do so until the dawn of puberty and a gradual break with the mother
and all
things feminine, whether in terms of superfeminine metachemistry for
girls or
of masculine physics and/or supermasculine metaphysics for boys, the
latter of
whom would more approximate a ‘godly image’ to the extent that they
come to
reflect the precedence of soma by psyche to an absolute degree, i.e.
3:1;
though it should not be forgotten that in metaphysics, the religious
element par
excellence, soul takes precedence over
‘bovaryized’ ego (super-ego) as Heaven over God or, rather, godliness,
and Joy
over Truth, so that we still have to distinguish his coming of
metaphysical
age, so to speak, from an ‘image-of-God’ conception that, frankly,
grants too
much credit to God (at the expense of Heaven) and then, where the
increase-and-multiply ethos of the Bible is concerned, in relation to
Devil the
Mother hyped as God the Father, so that the term ‘God’ becomes
untenable from a
properly metaphysical standpoint and has to be held at arm’s length, so
to
speak, by recourse to such (down-played) terms as ‘godliness’ or
‘godfatherliness’
or, as above, godly. There is no
God-thingfulness in metaphysics, only a state of mind (super-ego) that,
in
truth, reflects the joyful essence of the metaphysical soul, which is
soul per
se, and the be-all-and-end-all of metaphysics, as of true religion, the
heavenly ground of supreme being (joy).
CLASSICAL
MUSIC
Classical
music
is definitely music for
stay-at-homes like me. There is
something intensely subjective about bowing.
MALE
ABSTRACTIONS
If
pornography
is wrong, then so, too, are
take-away meals wrapped in cellophane or whatever from supermarkets. So, too, would be abstract art.
Male
hegemonic
realities lead to a
proliferation of abstractions, and that, vis-à-vis the female-dominated
tradition, is a good (beneficial/desirable) thing or, rather, rejection
of
concrete thingfulness in favour of abstract thinglessness, in keeping
with the
psychic preponderance (over soma) of what is properly – and freely -
male.
IMAGE
OF
WOMAN
Humans
are
not made in the psyche-over-soma
image of God, as the Bible claims, but in the soma-over-psyche image of
Woman
(the Mother), from whom they gravitate, following puberty, to either
metachemistry (females) or metaphysics and/or physics (males), the
latter of
whom are then more usually picked off by the XX-chromosomal cosh … of
females,
to assume a pseudo-metaphysical deference to metachemistry prior to a
pseudo-physical ‘fall’ in conjunction with the attainment of a
surrogate plenum
(in chemistry) by the female, who is then primarily Purgatory the Clear
Spirit
(pride) and secondarily Woman the Mother (strength) of chemical free
soma, the
beneficiary, either way, of a regressive transcendence.
And, as noted, this is so of the physical no
less than the metaphysical, since, despite pretensions to the contrary,
they,
too, are ‘picked off’ by females and end-up living in familial
circumstances
effectively, if not officially or consciously, dominated by females,
despite
their equivocal hegemony over pseudo-chemistry and the resulting
tendency
towards small families. But to suppose
that the Protestant (puritan) female had no beauty (and love) to begin
with …
but was merely pseudo-proud and pseudo-strong in free psyche and
pseudo-humble
and pseudo-weak in bound soma … would not leave much room for seduction
or
romance.
NO
DIVINE
ORIGIN
The
world
depends for its existence upon
evil/crime; without these metachemical factors, epitomized by the
noumenal
female, it would be unable to exist.
Therefore the world shows itself to be unworthy of divine
sanction, and
should accordingly be ‘overcome’ in the interests of the salvation of
the
sinful/foolish pseudo-physical ‘meek’ to metaphysics and the
correlative
counter-damnation of the pseudo-criminal/pseudo-evil chemical
‘pseudo-vain’ to
pseudo-metachemistry, the neutralized dragon (pseudo-dragon) under the
saintly
heel, so to speak, as of the so-called ‘lion’ that is perforce obliged
to ‘lie
down’, in pseudo-metachemistry under metaphysics, with the ‘lamb’ of
saintly
righteousness.
For
only
such a deliverance of those at the
southwest point of the intercardinal axial compass to its northeast
point on
the (stepped-up) church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis will bring
down the
metachemical ‘vain’ and their pseudo-male dupes, the
pseudo-metaphysical
‘pseudo-meek’, obliging them to rub shoulders in damnation with the
pseudo-chemical ‘just’ and in counter-salvation with the physical
‘pseudo-righteous’, prior to the total eclipse of
state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axial criteria, as and when the
remnants
thereof are transferred to middle and bottom tier positions (on the
triadic
Beyond of the resurrected church-hegemonic axis) under the
metaphysical/pseudo-metachemical top tier in what, in overall terms,
would be
the initial inescapable pluralism of a process destined to culminate,
following
long-term centro-complexification, in totalitarian absolutism, a
totalitarianism in which only metaphysics and pseudo-metachemistry
would be
effectively germane, not least in respect of a kind of space-centre
‘Celestial
City’ with a subsumed ‘pseudo-Vanity Fair’.
A
GENDER
PARADOX
The
advantage
of being a ‘nobody’ is that one
is more likely to be a ‘someone’, whereas a so-called ‘somebody’ is
almost
invariably a ‘no-one’ when it comes to having a mind and being able to
systematically develop and/or fearlessly express it.
EQUALITARIANISM
Equalitarianism
always
leads to one thing – a
loss of values, whether in respect of class, gender, race, or
profession.
Socialism
opposes
values because it reduces –
or strives to reduce – everything to a valueless equalitarianism. Ultimately, life becomes meaningless under an
equalitarian system.
Equalitarianism
is
a worldly levelling that
fights shy of diabolic and divine inequalities as it struggles to
maintain the
equalitarian reductionism of life, through democracy, towards the
lowest-common-denominator of worldly secularism.
DEMOCRACY
Britain
is
not – and never has been (bar the
brief Cromwellian interlude) – a democracy in the accepted republican
sense,
but a plutocratic pseudo-democracy of bourgeois parliamentary origin
which
primarily contrives to serve the economic interests of the plutocratic
oligarchy.
As
for
democracy-proper – it tends towards the
pseudo-economics of socialism and is therefore not a male but a female
(political) dominated society which the Irish Republic once identified
with,
though more in consequence of a rejection of British imperial
interference than
as an end-in-itself.
To
some
extent, the Church continued to pose as
that in the Republic, i.e. the true end of society; though these days
it has
been sidelined by a quasi-plutocratic sell-out which is the victim, in
no small
measure, of Anglo-American, not to mention European, pressures on the
Irish
economy.
As
for
me, I repudiate everything that is not
Social Theocratic and therefore profoundly religious, except, of
course, the
subordinate corollary of a pseudo-scientific ‘pseudo-dragon’ fated or
destined
to pseudo-metachemically remain under the saintly heel (of metaphysics)
up at
the northeast point of the intercardinal axial compass on what,
following a
majority mandate for religious sovereignty, would be the resurrected
(post-Catholic) church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis.
SOVEREIGN
PEOPLE
The
People
would not hail the Social Theocratic
leader for the simple reason that they would still, as now, be
sovereign –
sovereign, that is, in religious rather than political terms, with a
corresponding order of rights both strictly theocratic (metaphysical)
and
pseudo-autocratic (pseudo-metachemical), this latter of course the
subordinate
position in regard to females, whose pseudo-metachemical existence
under the
hegemonic control of metaphysics would be akin to pseudo-space (spaced)
under
time (repetitive), the time, needless to say, of Eternity within the
framework
of ‘Kingdom Come’.
NATURE
OF
THE MIDDLE CLASSES
The
middle
classes are not interested in truth,
as I understand it (metaphysically), but only in defending the status
quo
which, in their case, equates with the safeguarding of plutocratic
humanism.
REVOLUTIONARY
RESPONSIBILITIES
A
thoroughgoing
revolution that is minded of
the desirability of advancing religious sovereignty and removing
obstacles,
both political and religious, not to mention economic and scientific,
to its advancement
in the People can only be led by an extraordinary individual – one so
extraordinary as to be virtually dictatorial in his messianic
‘omniscience’.
But
such
power as devolves upon him from the
People, having elected through him for religious sovereignty, can only
be used
in the interests of the religiously sovereign, not for any other,
unrelated
purpose.
HITLER
Hitler
was
a warmonger. He violated the Munich
Agreement by invading,
annexing and exploiting the rest of Czechoslovakia in the interests of
the
Greater German Reich. After that, the
British and French could no longer be expected to negotiate with him,
and
therefore when he cynically invaded Poland, ostensibly over Danzig and
the Corridor,
without having declared war on her, accompanied, be it not forgotten,
by the
Soviet Union, his then-ally, Britain and France were left with no
alternative
but to declare their countries to be at war with Nazi Germany, though
not, as
it happened, the Soviet Union. Which of
course led to the so-called Phoney War, insofar as neither Britain nor
France
were prepared to assist Poland at the risk of antagonizing Hitler’s
ally, and
Poland very quickly succumbed in consequence.
Thus
began
the Second World War, and Hitler,
despite initial successes, eventually got what he deserved – total and
utter
defeat, even if at the price for Britain and France of cooperation with
the
Soviet Union, that former co-invader of Poland, and, of course, an
immense
input, utterly crucial to the outcome, from the USA.
CHURCHILL
Churchill
may
or may not, as an Anglican, have
been a Jew-ridden autocrat, but whatever he was he morally responded to
a
situation that was imposed upon him by Hitler’s criminality and the
manifest
unsuitability of his government predecessor (Chamberlain) in dealing
with
Hitler as he deserved – ruthlessly and without equivocation.
FREEDOM
There
is
no great merit in freedom; it is the
natural state-of-affairs. But once you
have found your freedom you must remain bound to it, else the opposite
of
freedom and binding, which is anarchy, will ensue.
RELIGION
AND
SCIENCE
The
less
religion the more science, the less
rebirths the more births, and the
world, taken at face value, becomes increasingly overcrowded or
overpopulated,
and the accomplice, in consequence, of mass movements and ideologies. A world without hope of divine redemption
(overcoming) through religion, which is – or should be – about
deliverance from
the mass and therefore a whittling down of numbers through communal
centro-complexification.
FOREIGNERS
Sympathy
for
the Devil now takes the form of
sympathy for foreigners – mostly third world – trying to bring down
Western
civilization, which, in a global age, is understandable if not exactly
laudable.
SOLITARY
HOUSEHOLDER
The
solitary
householder, in some suburban or
rural setting, is always prey to the fear of burglary and/or mugging. There is a price to be paid for living in
isolation from the urban generality in their terraced or semi-terraced
housing,
both financially and psychologically.
‘FLY
SWAT’
It
is
easier, in Nietzschean parlance, to be a
‘fly swat’ than not to be a ‘fly swat’ when one lives in close
proximity to the
generality of people. But it only plays
into their hands and ultimately is not worth the trouble.
GENDER
FIDELITY
She
sat
by her man through thick and thin like
a beast of prey, waiting for an opportunity to pounce on any weakness
that
promised to play into her predatory hands.
CONVENIENT
FICTION
Do
we
really live in 2010 A.D., or is that just
a convenient fiction over the plethora of heathenistic facts that
characterize,
in female-oriented vein, our secular time?
BOOKS
People
into
rock music often buy books when,
really, they should be buying e-books.
FEMALE
FREEDOM
I’ve
always
viewed female freedom, which is
bodily, as a threat to male freedom, which, by contrast, is mental,
that is,
psychic, or of the mind.
CONCRETION
VIS-À-VIS
ABSTRACTION
Concretion
wars,
in gender terms, upon
abstraction, the body on the mind, and strives, with all its will, to
bend the
abstract to its concrete cause, namely the propagation, through sex, of
offspring. It is perfectly possible to
believe in a body-mind symbiosis in connection with female
triumphalism, which
seeks to dominate and subjugate males.
A
mind-body
symbiosis, on the other hand, is
only intelligible in relation to male hegemonic criteria, which, even
if it
doesn’t exactly establish a genuine mind-body symbiosis in the female,
at least
neutralizes and subjugates the body-mind symbiosis, making it less
likely to
openly prevail.
WRITING
Sometimes
the
writing capacity ‘dries up’; at
other times it ‘flows in torrents’, like a fast-moving stream.
Writing
is
far less troublesome than computing
– you just get on with it.
APHORISTIC
The
philosopher
who doesn’t become increasingly
aphoristic (and metaphysical) is either standing still or going
backwards.
(Assuming he isn’t a Lockean clod into essays because, racially or
ethnically,
he has no alternative but to be corporeal).
WHO
I
AM
I
am
not only the Sartre or Nietzsche of my
generation; I am the best self-taught philosopher who ever lived, as my
centretruths website would attest.
PROTESTANTS
Much
as
I despise Catholics, I have nothing but
contempt for the philosophy of Protestants; it not only doesn’t add up,
it
can’t add up, because too autocratically or ‘democratically’
(plutocratically)
narrow.
THE
ENGLISH
The
English,
being overwhelmingly Protestant,
will be the last people to accord recognition to my philosophy, which
is too
profoundly religious, i.e. metaphysical, for their empirical
capacities,
grounded in scientific experiment, to accommodate.
They are a people for whom the subjective is
taboo. So, in other respects, are the
British generally.
NEW
WAY
OF WRITING
I’ve
discovered
a new way of writing: when my
internet-ridden computer lets me down (as it frequently does) I
scribble into a
notebook.
Alternatively,
it
helps to have two computers
‘on the go’ at any given time, so that you can switch between them when
the
‘going gets tough’ (or ceases altogether) with either of them.
MASS
MUSIC
The
one
constant feature about mass or popular
music is that it is detestable at any level.
MUSIC
KEYBOARD
The
black-on-white
keys of a music keyboard,
even with samples, no longer appeal to me.
I would be a hypocrite to play such an instrument while
publishing my
literature on the internet in white-on-black.
A white-on-black music keyboard, on the other hand, would be
fine for
someone who believes in a non-book-like approach to text, an approach
that
appears or, rather, seems to favour free psyche over bound soma.
SARTRE
Was
it
Sartre who said that other people are
hell? How right he was!
But I should like to add computers to the
observation, preferably when connected to the internet.
SECULAR
AGE
Only
in
an age as secular as this would it be
possible for so-called human beings to spend so much time in front of
machines
– far more time than monkeys would be prepared to spend, if we recall
D.H.
Lawrence’s gripe!
WAX
EARPLUGS
It
would
be no exaggeration to say that my
chief mainstay, that which has made it possible for me to continue in a
culturally intellectual lifestyle since moving from Surrey to London
(1974) has
been wax earplugs, to which I have taken regular recourse both during
the day and
at night to protect me from the noise of neighbours, few if any of whom
have
been consistently quiet.
THE
PEOPLE
The
People
– a bitch-dominated bugbear that
fights shy of religious truth and, hence, true philosophy which, unlike
the
false, or scientific, variety, is anything but empirical.
KOESTLER
Koestler
–
fundamentally a cosmic materialist
with an empirical axe to grind at the expense, needless to say, of
progressive
transcendentalism.
I
hardly
think Sartre was a worse, i.e. lower, type
of philosopher than Koestler, that Ena Sharples-admiring jumped-up
political
émigré hack.
NO
HOPE
FOR MANKIND
There
is
no hope for mankind, least of all when
humanistically left to its own democratic devices.
Hope is a question for radical theocrats and
their ability to overcome mankind in the name of cyborgkind.
The
cyborgistic
overcoming of mankind through
democracy towards a radical, or social theocratic, end – isn’t that at
the core
of my philosophy?
TIME
WASTED
Time
wasted
staring at the computer screen when
– as is all too often the case - it jams up or ceases to function
properly – so
much time and sight wasted on mechanical rubbish!
No
wonder
our age is so sad! We are all too
often the victims of crappy machines/technologies which poison the soul
and
blight the mind, as well as inducing eyestrain.
CLOSE
TO
NATURE
Those
who
wish to get close to Nature forget or
conveniently overlook the fact that it is a bitch pregnant with
predatory zeal
that desires, from a male perspective, only the contempt fitting to an
object
of unchristian aggression and mercenary unquiet.
BOURGEOIS
DECADENCE
The
decadence
of bourgeois civilization, i.e.
women priests, is one thing; proletarian barbarism and philistinism
quite
another, even if the two realities co-exist in this (transitional) day
and age
on a classical music/rock-like basis.
DIABOLICAL
EQUATION
‘Energy
=
MC²’ – a diabolical equation rooted
in cosmic materialism.
IRISH
‘INDEPENDENT’
Buy
the
‘Irish Independent’ and read the ‘Daily
Telegraph’ and the ‘Times’, those two worthy right-wing British
newspapers.
On
second
thoughts, one can at least console
oneself that the general standard of typography with articles from
those titles
will be higher.
ACTING
UP
Acting
up
for other people – I gave that up
years ago. No wonder I don’t have a
woman – I couldn’t act up for her.
All
acting
up is rooted in vanity.
The
actor
is, by definition, of female
persuasion.
NONSENSICAL
NOTION
Male
ego
was behind the nonsensical notion (in Genesis)
that man preceded woman and was, in some degree, responsible for her
creation. What a joke!
As
everyone
should know, the more complex
arises out of the simpler, like man out of woman. Eggs
and
chickens.
SHAW
Shaw
was
not even a poetic sonofabitch. As a
playwright he was a ‘quasi-bitch’. The
worst type of literary animal – virtually
criminal
WOMEN
AND
KIDS
Oh
to
be free of the tyranny of women and kids!
Wouldn’t that be closer to Paradise?
LIFE
Some
say
life is too long, others – and usually
the majority – that it is too short. For
my part, I say it depends on one’s circumstances, and I, for one, the
solitary
victim of decades of exile from nation and class, would categorically
find it
far too long.
BLACK
Black
=
heathenistic bitch-loving fool (at
least in a majority of cases), though with the compensatory honesty to
call a
spade a spade and a bitch a … bitch!
MY
COMPUTERS
My
computers
are so bad (slow, inept, noisy,
etc.) that it makes more sense to scribble in my notebook than to waste
time
(and health) staring interminably at a non-functioning screen.
Could
anything
be worse than Vista? What one has
to endure every day is a patent
crime!
Always
being
held up by computers – the most
frustrating of experiences! How I detest
these f***ing useless machines! And
despise myself for being so soulless that I can put up with them!
Sometimes
I
feel like giving-up computing and
going back to writing again, so frustrating and humiliating is the
computer
experience….Not that I ever entirely stopped writing, but it did get
rather
scaled down due to other – and usually worse - commitments.
WHORES
The
problem
of whores and an overcrowded
world. Nothing to do with godliness,
much less Heaven.
DISTINCT
DIFFERENCE
There’s
a
distinct difference between being a
master of one’s life and a victim of machines.
RELIGIOUS
FAKES
All
those
religious fakes keep speaking of God
as though that were the crux of religion.
And, of course, God made man, etc., etc.
The hell she did!
U2
How
I
detest that U2 song ‘Beautiful Day’. So
modern, so heathenistic, so … shallow and
complacently acquiescent in the natural status quo!
But this is not an age in which Truth, in the
religious or metaphysical sense, would be encouraged, let alone
understood.
FEMALE
VALUES
With
women’s
liberation, or feminism, one can
only expect society, well accustomed to female dominion, to accord
value to
beauty and, well, strength or, rather, pride, since that, too, is
female in
character.
Truth
is
a pariah in contemporary
female-dominated society, with its Beauty-oriented materialism and
pride-oriented naturalism.
Even
knowledge-proper,
which appertains to ego,
gets a raw deal these days, since it would seem to be associated, all
too
often, with bourgeois tradition and an opposition, by implication, to
carnal
knowledge, which defers, after all, to the hegemony of female values,
particularly pride and strength, and has more of a black racial
overtone that
complicates and, as with all such matters, further exacerbates the
majority
Western position to a point where it cannot be evaluated except in
relation to
the impact, for better or worse, of coloured elements within the slowly
unfolding global context.
RELIGIOUS
TRADITIONS
Judaism
extolled
Will, Catholicism Spirit,
Protestantism or, rather, Puritanism the Ego, and … but no, it is
difficult if
not impossible to think of a traditional religion which extolled Soul,
at least
to any appreciable extent. That would
seem to be for the future, when Eternity comes to pass and machines no
longer
dominate but serve, as though in the background to a more important
eventuality.
JEWS
AND
MOSLEMS
Jews
and
Moslems are even worse than Christians
in relation to the God-thing, or deity thingfulness, since they relate,
in
all-too-Middle-Eastern netherworldly vein, to the so-called Almighty,
the
‘All-Powerful’ Creator, whereas Christians, being more worldly (in
historical
and environmental terms) usually make do with the extrapolative
personifications like Mary and Christ which, to my mind, is the
prerogative of
half-wits rather than nitwits, or those for whom Beauty takes
precedence not
only over Truth (joy) but over Strength (pride) and Knowledge
(pleasure) as
well. Ugh! How I detest the Netherworldly
and their pseudo-Otherworldly dupes.
DISHONESTY
AND
MORAL COWARDICE
Of
all
the forms of dishonesty, there is
nothing worse than religious dishonesty and the moral cowardice it
breeds.
HIGHER
ART
Higher
art,
by which is meant original creative
art, is always effectively anti-People, that is, beyond the limitations
of the
masses and therefore something that proceeds independently of them on
an
intensely individual basis.
FICTION
AND
FEMINISM
Fiction
–
a pseudo-bitch (pseudo-chemical)
and/or pseudo-superbitch (pseudo-metachemical) art-form is incompatible
with
feminism, the female (pseudo-female) novelist and/or short-story writer
is
gender subordinate to a male hegemony in either physics (essayistic
philosophy,
or pseudo-philosophy) or metaphysics (aphoristic philosophy, or
philosophy-proper), as in pseudo-chemistry under physics at the
southeast point
of the intercardinal axial compass and pseudo-metachemistry under
metaphysics
at the northeast point of said compass.
Therefore a ‘female’ who writes fiction (as opposed to plays)
isn’t in
the remotest degree feminist.
As
for
those amoral
quasi-pseudo-bitches/superbitches who write novels and/or short stories
rather
than stick to philosophy of one sort or another … I have nothing but
contempt.
They ought to be made to wear tapering skirts and/or dresses, depending
on
their literary bent.
THE
LIBERATED
FEMALE
The
liberated
female, or female-proper, is by
definition hegemonic over males (pseudo-males) in metachemistry and/or
chemistry, with the latter very much pseudo-metaphysical under
metachemistry
and pseudo-physical under chemistry.
SEXUAL
EQUALITY
Equality
between
the sexes is a delusional
concept. Treating them as equals in
certain respects, i.e. salary, job entitlement, justice, etc., is of
course
another matter. Which, of course, also
applies to race.
WOMEN
PRIESTS
Much
as
I abhor the Christian (bourgeois)
decadence of so-called ‘women priests’, I nonetheless concede that
pseudo-devils will be required, as pseudo-females, to oversee the
pseudo-metachemically
counter-Damned no less than godly male individuals to oversee the
well-being of
the metaphysically Saved in the future global or universal setting
that, with
the democratic acceptance of religious sovereignty, I identify with
‘Kingdom Come’. There will be strict
gender segregation
between the saintly metaphysical and the pseudo-angelic
pseudo-metachemical, as
between religion and pseudo-science, righteousness and pseudo-justice,
time and
pseudo-space, eternity and pseudo-infinity, noumenal subjectivity and
noumenal
pseudo-objectivity, extreme right-wing and extreme pseudo-left-wing
criteria,
as germane to the supercross and the pseudo-superstar of a St George
and the
(neutralized) dragon-like scenario that would be equivalent to choppers
and
jump jets (pseudo-jets) or, in the latter instance, the ‘lion’ that is
perforce
obliged to pseudo-justly ‘lie down’ with the ‘lamb’ … of saintly
righteousness.
THE
CONTEMPORARY
WORLD
The
contemporary
world is dominated by devils,
or liberated females who ‘strut their stuff’ the better to captivate
and
dominate males, who are then reduced to pseudo-male sons-of-bitches. The only way to defeat this is to so save the
pseudo-physical ‘meek’ to metaphysics and so counter-damn the chemical
‘pseudo-vain’ to pseudo-metachemistry that there will no longer be an
audience,
a gullible public, a lapsed catholic generality, etc., for the devils
(and
pseudo-metaphysical pseudo-gods) to exploit, and no way that they and
their
human-all-too-human physical/pseudo-chemical financial backers on the
state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis (northwest to southeast on the
intercardinal axial compass) could continue to profit from the
exemplifications
of somatic licence which characterize their purely evil concept of
freedom – one
necessarily female in character in its illustration of a beautiful free
will.
INDIGENOUS
IRISH
SPORTS
Indigenous
Irish
sports – Gaelic football,
Hurling, and Camogie – have the advantage over their British-derived
imperial
counterparts - rugby, football, and cricket – of being
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate, and therefore germane to a people
for whom
the southwest and northeast points of the intercardinal axial compass
are
integral to their sense of axial polarity as exemplified through
cultural ethnicity.
DOGGEREL
Ali
Dali
from Mali goes to Bali.
MALE
ENSLAVEMENT
TO FEMALES
Do
females
enslave males? Yes, they most
certainly do, whether to an
absolute degree (in metachemistry over pseudo-metaphysics) or to a
relative
degree (in chemistry over pseudo-physics), that is, whether in the
ethereal
terms of a 1:3 ratio of free soma to bound psyche (contrasting with the
female
3:1 ratio) or in the corporeal terms of a 1½:2½ ratio of free soma to
bound
psyche (contrasting with the female 2½:1½ ratio). Either
way
the male, as pseudo-male
sonofabitch, is preponderantly enslaved by the free female and
accordingly
obliged to live more on the ‘dark side’ (bound psyche) than in ‘the
light’ (of
free soma) – in complete contrast to the free female.
WAR
AND
PEACE
War
and
peace – the alpha and omega of life,
autocracy and theocracy, metachemistry and metaphysics, Devil and God
or, more
accurately, Heaven, will and soul, whether in cosmic, natural, human,
or (to
anticipate the future) cyborg terms or, indeed, right across the board,
as it
were, from the utmost alpha in metachemical cosmos (stellar-like) to
the utmost
(coming) metaphysical omega (subjectively cyborgistic).
‘KINGDOM
COME’
In
‘Kingdom
Come’, which I equate with a Social
Theocratic society centred (at least for the metaphysical) in religious
sovereignty, the males will be metaphysically free (in psyche) and the
females
pseudo-metachemically bound (in soma) – the reverse, in other words, of
what
exists in the netherworldly/pseudo-otherworldly context of contemporary
metachemistry over pseudo-metaphysics.
MARRIAGE
Anyone,
that
is, any male, who wants to get
married must be fuck*** mad – certainly off his head, having ‘lost it’
to a
woman. Then he officially becomes a
ring-toting sonofabitch, whether in his ear or, in the ‘fallen’ state
commensurate with marriage, on his finger.
AUTHORS
An
author
should be authoritative, but
evidently not authoritarian. Where is
the logic in that?
DERIVATION
OF
SIR
Most
people
probably don’t realize that ‘sir’
derives from ‘sire’, its medieval counterpart.
YES
Despite
their
instrumental brilliance I really
don’t like the rock band Yes, largely because of their sun-oriented
lyrics
which strike me as crassly heathen. Also
Anderson’s high-pitched thin voice, almost female, leaves me cold. Hippy-dippy.
It
would
be no exaggeration to say that there
is an obsession with the Sun with Yes or Anderson’s lyrics – an
obsession
bordering, ironically, on lunacy.
Sunday
is
the ‘ideal’ day, it seems to me, on
which to play Yes, not least the ‘Live at Montreux 2003’ DVD.
Lyrically
Yes
are terrible – their songs make
me cringe.
In
some
respects (though not the obvious ones)
Yes would be more suited to the Proms than to a jazz festival like
Montreux. They aren’t exactly classical,
no, but then again they aren’t jazz either.
No doubt, the Montreux Festival profits from selling out to Rock.
SUNDAY
Fancy
calling
the traditional Christian day of
rest Sunday! What could be further from
the spirit of Christ? Is a country with
a day called Sunday, i.e. day of the Sun, really Christian? I doubt it.
In fact, I completely deny it.
Actually
the
Sun is Satanic, that is, what
corresponds to the pseudo-Father and pseudo-Son (3:1) rolled into one
and
dominated, stellar-wise, by the metachemical Mother and Daughter (3:1),
the
free soma and bound psyche that rules the pseudo-metaphysical ‘fall
guy’, or
solar sonofabitch.
MY
LIFE’S
WORK
All
my
life’s work – the literature (especially
philosophy), art, photography, videos, literary transcripts, music,
website
building, etc. – has been a compensation for the emptiness and
loneliness of
exile from my native land (Ireland). I
have attempted to fill the void with cultural activities.
But the void, of course, persists … and will
doubtless continue to do so … as long as I remain in English exile.
MIXED
CONGREGATIONS
The
disgusting
spectacle of mixed congregations
in churches – what can they know of godliness (in relation, more
importantly, to
Heaven, as of ‘bovaryized’ ego [super-ego] in relation to Soul) who
make a show
of worshipping God, whether in the ‘Person’ of the so-called Father or
in His
Son?
CREATIVE
CONTRADICTION
Man
might,
as superman, be ‘made in the image
of God’ or, rather, Heaven/godliness to the extent that his psyche
(mind)
precedes and preponderates over his soma (body) to a 3:1 degree,
commensurate
with noumenal absolutism in metaphysics (subjective), but that would
not apply
to the 2½:1½ ratio of psyche to soma characterizing man per
se as a physical entity paradoxically subject to subversion to
somatic emphasis in secondary state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axial
vein
vis-à-vis the primary state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axial status
of
pseudo-chemical pseudo-females in gender polarity with their
metachemical
female counterparts who, of course, hegemonically ‘call the shots’ in
relation
to a 3:1 free somatic/bound psychic disposition.
Nor
would
it explain how, having at the
superhuman level been made in godly image, ‘man’ allowed this same
‘God’ to
fashion ‘woman’ from his ribs as a creature not only at gender
loggerheads with
anything godly (and metaphysical) but,
in her free soma and bound psyche, at variance with him to the extent
that,
succumbing to carnal temptation, he is no longer able to remain true to
his
self (soul) but is perforce obliged to ‘walk the world’ as a familial
exile
from Paradise.
A
god
who makes something or, rather, somebody
in the opposite image to himself is a contradiction in terms, like the
Genesis
account of ‘the Garden’ and, indeed, of all Creation.
The
sooner
this Biblical nonsense is officially
consigned to the ‘rubbish heap of history’ the better; for the Bible is
a
tissue of lies and contradictions that, notwithstanding the innumerable
anachronisms characterizing its ancient Middle Eastern origins,
actually
favours Devil the Mother hyped as God the Father and Her entitlement,
under a
beautiful free will, to ‘increase and multiply’.
Of
course,
there are also people who prefer
Christ, the so-called ‘Son of God’, hyped as God and even some, mostly
female,
who regard the so-called ‘Mother of God’ in such an idolatrous light. All deluded and partial, in consequence, to
‘bovaryized’ religion, i.e. to the conventional religious traditions of
Western
and even Eastern civilization.
RELIGION
AND
THE PEOPLE
The
People,
meaning principally the broad
uncivilized (barbarous/philistine) masses, are never too partial to
genuine
religion (about which, in any case, they can have only the foggiest
idea), in
which abstract values preponderate, by dint of their propensity towards
concrete values owing not a little to the sexual and familial
domination of
females which, with them, is virtually inevitable and regarded, in a
manner of
speaking, as de rigueur.
GREATER
PEACE
To
establish
a greater peace, a more genuine
peace (inner), in which the male is elevated (through salvation) from a
pseudo-male pseudo-physical status under chemical females, as
pseudo-mass under
volume, to a properly male metaphysical standing over
pseudo-metachemical
pseudo-females or, rather, pseudo-superfemales, as time over
pseudo-space, the
‘first’, in respect of the chemical, becoming pseudo-metachemically
‘last’ and
the ‘last’, in respect of the pseudo-physical, becoming metaphysically
‘first’
in an unequivocal hegemony at the northeast point of the intercardinal
axial
compass on what would be a stepped up (resurrected)
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis stretching from southwest to
northeast
points of the said compass … to establish such a greater peace, I say,
one
would have to war on ‘the People’ as chemical/pseudo-physical elements
in order
to overcome their familial, worldly and effectively female-dominated
status,
with intent, in effect, to overcoming ‘the world’ as it exists at the
southwest
point of the aforementioned compass and therefore in axial contrast to
the
physical/pseudo-chemical manifestation of it at the southeast, which,
due to
its economic hegemony in physics, is financially ‘hand in glove’ with
the
somatic licence of the female-dominated
metachemical/pseudo-metaphysical
northwest point of the intercardinal axial compass on what, by
contrast, is the
state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis and secular fruit, in this day
and age,
of schismatic heresy. One might even say
that the relationship of the physical/pseudo-chemical to the
metachemical/pseudo-metaphysical resembles a Faustian pact, in which
the
knowledge-compromised soul is sold to the beautiful free will that
rules a
diabolic or devilish roost.
THE
ENEMY
Am
I
an enemy of ‘the People’? No.
Actually, I’m the enemy of the metachemical/pseudo-metaphysical
elements
at the northwest point of the intercardinal axial compass who prey upon
the
chemical/pseudo-physical elements from the netherworldly standpoint of
female-dominated somatic licence and thereby preclude their deliverance
(to
metaphysics/pseudo-metachemistry) and effective ‘end of the world’, as
that
much-preyed upon gender dichotomous entity that is only an
end-in-itself as far
as the regressive transcendence of females is concerned.
To
me,
the chemical/pseudo-physical elements
are pawns in my game of putting the metachemical/pseudo-metaphysical
‘out of
business’ for want of prey down at the southwest point of the said
compass and
therefore damned (metachemistry to pseudo-chemistry) and counter-saved
(pseudo-metaphysics to physics), and, as pawns, they cannot be enemies
but,
rather, means to a specific end – the progressive transcendence of
pseudo-physics in metaphysics on the male side coupled to the
regressive
counter-fundamentalism (counter-materialism) of chemistry to
pseudo-metachemistry on the female side.
ACTORS
AND
FILMS
In
the
following I attempt to draw up a list
not only of my favourite films on DVD but of my favourite all-time film
roles
by a given actor or pair of actors.
Hence:-
Tom
Cruise
and Tom Wilkinson in ‘Valkyrie’;
Sean
Connery
and Christian Slater in ‘The Name
of the Rose’;
Johnny
Depp
and Lena Olin in ‘The Ninth Gate’;
Richard
Burton
and Leo McKern in ‘Massacre in
Rome’;
Anthony
Hopkins
in ‘The Bunker’;
James
Coburn
and James Mason in ‘Cross of
Iron’;
Kenneth
Branagh
and Stanley Tucci in
‘Conspiracy’;
Michael
Caine
in ‘The Eagle Has Landed’;
Liam
Neeson
and Alan Rickman in ‘Michael
Collins’;
Burt
Lancaster
in ‘The Train’;
Robert
Shaw
in ‘Battle of the Bulge’;
Stephen
Fry
in ‘Oscar Wilde’;
Orson
Welles
in ‘Is Paris Burning?’;
Peter
O’Toole
and Donald Pleasance in ‘The
Night of the Generals’;
Robert
Mitchum
and Peter Falk in ‘Anzio’;
Gabriel
Byrne
and Mira Sorvino in ‘Attack on
Leningrad’;
Jude
Law
and Ed Harris in ‘Enemy at the Gates’.
Thomas
Kretchmann
in ‘Stalingrad’;
Jürgen
Prochnow
in ‘Das Boot’;
Bruno
Ganz
in ‘Downfall’.
SUPERIMPOSITION
That
superimposition
of feminist secularism
upon decadent bourgeois civilization ensures that the latter is often
conditioned by the former to an extent whereby it comes to mirror the
barbarous/philistine criteria largely applying to the proletariat, not
least in
respect of the Protestant-oriented phenomenon of so-called women
priests. Bah! What a shambles!
PSEUDO-RIGHT-WING
SONS-OF-BITCHES
All
those
left-wing or, more correctly
vis-à-vis their extrinsically left-wing female counterparts,
pseudo-right-wing
sons-of-bitches with their philistine acquiescence in feminist
barbarity and
all that is most democratically and socialistically superficial in
contemporary
(global) society – how they revolt me!
PRO-EXTREME
RIGHT-WING
No-one
could
be more pro-extreme right-wing
than me, the apostle of the Supercross and its moral entitlement to
keep what I
have elsewhere called the pseudo-Superstar in its gender subordinate
place, as
in pseudo-metachemistry under metaphysics (pseudo-space under time) at
the
northeast point of the intercardinal axial compass – a neutralized
dragon (pseudo-dragon)
under saintly heels, pretty much like the proverbial ‘lion’ that is
perforce
obliged to ‘lie down’ with the ‘lamb’ (of godliness in relation to
Heaven)
because it has been neutralized and has no other choice.
Jump jet (pseudo-jet) under chopper on an
aircraft carrier would be an equivalent metaphor. But
haven’t
I said all this a thousand times
before?
PSYCHIC
FREEDOM
Free
speech
or, rather, writing comes with me,
not with the proletarian mob of bitch-slavering half-wits whose lips
are sealed
in all but profane contexts.
SHADOW
To
come
out of the shadow of autocracy hyped as
theocracy – what a liberation for mankind that will be!
The genuine theocracy of Social Theocracy
and/or Transcendentalism – a male preserve, so really not something
that would
appeal to women or females generally, given their fundamentally
autocratic
dispositions, and doubtfully congenial to decadent bourgeois vested
interests,
who prefer the proletariat, the urban-cum-global generality, under
their
autocracy-deferring heels.
ANTI-PORN
Anti-porn
people
are detestably stupid and …
concrete, or human-all-too-f***ing-human.
CRT
It
is
to be hoped that with the passing of
CRT-type televisions and computers the age of the ‘hollow men’ has also
passed. For the ‘hollow men’ are those
who are most dominated by and akin to free females, who are never so
televisually free than when ‘strutting their stuff’ via the cathode ray
tube.
FAVOURITE
FEMALE
SINGER
I
think
my favourite female singer is Liana
Foly, and I’ve only got one of her albums, viz. Reve Orange, which
doesn’t
exactly complement my favourite (German) group – Tangerine Dream.
TOP
TEN
FEMALE SINGERS
Probable
order
of my all-time top ten female
singers:-
1. Liana Foly;
2. Chrissie Hynde;
3.
Joni Mitchell;
4. Sinead O’Connor;
5.
Maire Brennan;
6. Mary Coughlan;
7.
Enya;
8.
Andrea Corr;
9.
Angela Gossow;
10.
Cher.
TOP
TEN
MALE
SINGERS
Probable
order
of my all-time top ten male
singers:-
1. Mick Jagger;
2. Ian Gillan;
3. Glenn Hughes;
4. Chris Logan;
5. Chris Farlowe;
6. Robert Plant;
7. Ozzy Osbourne;
8. Alice Cooper;
9. Ronnie James Dio;
10. Bruce Dickenson;
TOP
TEN
SINGER/SONGWRITERS
Probable
order
of my all-time top ten
singer/songwriters:-
1. Bob Dylan;
2. Neil Young;
3. Joni Mitchell;
4. Gerry Rafferty;
5. David Crosby;
6. Chris de Burgh;
7. Paul Brady;
8. Lou Reed;
9. Roy Harper;
10. Freddie White.
TOP
TEN
ELECTRIC
GUITARISTS
Probable
order
of my all-time top ten electric
guitarists:-
1. Michael Schenker;
2. Jeff Beck;
3. Gary Moore;
4. Rory Gallagher;
5. Jimi Hendrix;
6. Eric Clapton;
7. Frank Zappa;
8. Carlos Santana;
9. Snowy White;
10. Phil Donnelly.
TOP
TEN
ELECTRIC
KEYBOARDISTS
Probable
order
of my all-time top ten electric
keyboardists:-
1. Keith Emerson;
2. Chick Corea;
3. Rick Wakeman;
4. Dave Greenslade;
5. Jon Lord;
6. Jan Hammer;
7. Herbie Hancock;
8. Mike Ratledge;
9. Barry Miles;
10. Don Airy.
TOP
TEN
ELECTRIC
GUITARISTS/KEYBOARDISTS
Probable
order
of my all-time top ten electric
guitarists/keyboardists:-
1. Steve Winwood;
2. David Sancious;
3. Edgar Froese;
4. John Mayall;
5. Joni Mitchell;
6. Wayne Findlay;
7. Chris de Burgh;
8. Pete Townshend;
9. Neil Young;
10. Jerome Froese.
TOP
TEN
ELECTRIC
BASSISTS
Probable
order
of my all-time top ten electric
bassists:-
1. Stanley Clarke;
2. Dave LaRue;
3. Jaco Pastorius;
4. Jack Bruce;
5. Phil Lynott;
6. Roger Glover;
7. Mark Clarke;
8. Chris Squire;
9. Alphonso Johnson;
10. Roger Waters.
TOP
TEN
DRUMMERS
Probable
order
of my all-time top ten
drummers/percussionists:-
1. Jon Hiseman;
2. Pierre Moerlen;
3. Billy Cobham;
4. Ian Paice;
5. Carl Palmer;
6. Alan White;
7. Mitch Mitchell;
8. Colin Allen;
9. Keith Moon;
10. Richard Bailey.
TOP
TEN
GROUPS
Probable
order
of my all-time top ten groups:-
1. Tangerine Dream;
2. Deep Purple;
3. The Rolling Stones;
4. Thin Lizzy;
5. King Crimson;
6. Colosseum;
7. ELP (Emerson Lake & Palmer);
8. MSG (Michael Schenker Group);
9. Return to Forever;
10. Weather Report.
TOP
TEN
ROCK
GROUPS
Probable
order
of my all-time top ten rock
groups:-
1.
Deep
Purple;
2.
The
Rolling
Stones;
3.
Thin
Lizzy;
4.
Michael
Schenker
Group;
5.
The
Doors;
6.
The
Grateful
Dead;
7.
The
Allman
Brothers Band;
8.
Black
Sabbath;
9.
Spiritual
Beggars;
10.
Jethro
Tull.
TOP
TEN
WIND
PLAYERS
Probable
order
of my all-time top ten wind/horn
players:-
1. Wayne Shorter;
2. Miles Davis;
3. Wallace Roney;
4. Dick Heckstall-Smith;
5. Ian Anderson;
6. Michael Brecker;
7. Randy Brecker;
8. Thijs Van Leer;
9. Barbara Thompson;
10.
Elton Dean.
SPECTACLES
(Revisited)
Increasingly
I
like to take a break from the
optical straitjacket of spectacles and become optically liberated into
an
impressionistic world where ugliness (and beauty) is much less
discernible. What an all-round relief!
EVERYTHING
I
DO
Everything
I
do I do for the sake of an
intellectually cultural/pseudo-civilized Few, not for the impulsively
pseudo-barbarous/philistine Many, with their hideous sports and uncouth
tempers.
The
only
thing that would preclude me from
wiping out an entire city (assuming, for the sake of argument, that I
had the
power) would be the harm that would befall the intellectually
cultural/pseudo-civilized
Few, as interpreted by me in relation to freak and/or hippy-like
artistic
radicals of a metaphysical and/or pseudo-metachemical disposition
(depending on
gender).
As
for
the barbarous/pseudo-philistine Few and
the pseudo-cultural/civilized Many – right now the state-hegemonic
don’t mean
that much to me and I am not interested in their immediate welfare.
HMV
Oxford
Street
HMV (His Master’s Voice in, I
believe, two if not three locations) may be the biggest and
best-stocked of
such shops in the British Isles, but that only means that it has more
godless
junk than anywhere else, including the smaller provincial stores.
These
days,
HMV is a multimedia high-street
monopoly with little or no competition from rival digital-media
outlets, most
of which have since folded or retrenched, including Virgin Music and
Tower
Records.
HMV
sounds
like a disease, though much of its
stock is less about nourishing the Soul than appealing to people
seemingly
without one – those who have wilfully turned their back on the Soul
under
female pressures, allowing what remains of it to be bent and twisted
out of all
recognition.
SOUL-DENYING
PROTESTANTISM
Protestants
would
traditionally have been even
less likely than Catholics to acknowledge, much less cultivate, the
Soul. Their secular descendants prefer
simply to
deny it from the standpoint of materialism, which includes mechanics
and
contemporary technologies.
IRISH
POLITICS
If
there
is anything worse than the centre left
in Irish politics, i.e. Fianna Fáil, it can only be the radical
republicanism
of the extreme left, meaning, in Irish political terms, Sinn Fein. No self-respecting right-wing person, least
of all when extreme right (noumenal), would want to have much or,
indeed,
anything to do with the likes of Sinn Fein, and the sooner this party
are
consigned to the rubbish bin of history the better.
Just
as
the Greens, a right wing (conservative
or, rather, conservationist) party, co-exist in government at the time
of
writing (2010) with the centre-left Fianna Fáil, and have their
temptations, if
not inclinations, to get around or over Fianna Fáil through some kind
of
association with the extreme left, if only to put the centre left under
pressure, so in the future I foresee the Labour Party as a political
assist to
any pro-extreme right-wing party/movement which, like Social Theocracy,
would
take the country towards ‘Kingdom Come’, if only to put pressure on the
centre
right Fine Gael party from a left-wing standpoint that may well prove
advantageous to the pro-extreme right, since paradoxes of that order
are the
stuff of contemporary Irish politics.
And if they do, well, rest assured that Social Theocracy must
take full
advantage of anything and everything that encourages such a shift in
political
thinking. For only then will it be
possible to get rid of the scourge – and shame – of the radical
republicanism
of the extreme left, bearing in mind Social Theocracy’s commitment to
the
Centre and hence to noumenal centrism, the means whereby extreme right
and
extreme pseudo-left elements can be reconciled in metaphysical and
pseudo-metachemical fashion, the proverbial ‘lion’ of the latter ‘lying
down’
with the ‘lamb’ of the former in what, with religious sovereignty,
would be the
Centre-proper.
LAMENT
Unfortunately,
as
long as we continue to be at
the mercy of machine-making (computers not least) epsilon semi-morons,
we shall
always be held back and have our lives turned on their head, so to
speak.
SCANDAL
Life
is
a scandal that few if any of us have
the guts to cry out and revolt against, with intent to turning it
around.
SOME
AXIALLY-MOTIVATED
RACIAL GENERALIZATIONS
Red
=
barbarism/pseudo-philistinism, i.e.
metachemistry and pseudo-metaphysics at the northwest point of the
intercardinal axial compass;
White
=
pseudo-culture/civility, i.e. physics
and pseudo-chemistry at the southeast point of the said axial compass;
Therefore
Red
is polar to White on the
state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis (as Class to Occupation).
Black
=
pseudo-barbarism/philistinism, i.e.
chemistry and pseudo-physics at the southwest point of the
intercardinal axial
compass;
Yellow
=
culture/pseudo-civility, i.e.
metaphysics and pseudo-metachemistry at the northeast point of the said
axial
compass;
Therefore
Black
is polar to Yellow on the
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis (as Sex to Race).
Catholic
Irish
tend to be divisible between
Black and Yellow (as opposed to Red and White), as between Gaelic
football and
hurling on the church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis stretching from
the
southwest to the northeast points of the intercardinal axial compass.
Protestant
Irish,
like their British
counterparts, tend to be divisible between Red and White (as opposed to
Black
and Yellow), as between rugby and soccer on the
state-hegemonic/church-subordinate
axis stretching from the northwest to the southeast points of the
intercardinal
axial compass.
NIETZSCHE
Wasn’t
it
Nietzsche who said women are base but
men evil? I disagree. I think the
reverse is more true – that men are generally base but women
fundamentally
evil, i.e. somatically beautiful and sensuously loving, just the
attributes to
seduce and bring men low with – as, I’m sure, Schopenhauer would
entirely
agree.
Such
beauty
and love exists in free soma, not
bound psyche, and it exists, like ugliness and hate, metachemically,
i.e. in
the fundamental female element on a materialist basis.
TRUTH
Truth,
in
the widest possible and therefore
non-theological sense, does not come to those who neither have the
balls nor
the brains for it. If you have just the
balls or the brains it tends to pass you by.
‘PR***S’
AND
‘PSEUDO-C***S’
Those
‘pr***s’
and ‘pseudo-c***s’ who went on
to ‘further education’ and partook more greedily of the ‘forbidden tree
of
knowledge’ are always beneath me – lacking in metaphysical and/or
pseudo-metachemical attributes from a standpoint centred in
physics/pseudo-chemistry.
POE,
DE
SADE AND OTHERS
Poe
and
de Sade – brothers in literary
crime. Two of a kind, bar the Sadian
sexual deviance and cruelty.
Jim
Morrison
had something of the Poe in him,
being a great poet. Indubitably one of
the American classics, despite his all-too brief career.
Morrison
lived
up to the mythic aura of Keats
and Shelley – by dying early (27).
From
Henry
James to Henry Miller – a tale not
so much of two cities (Boston and New York) as of two Henrys.
The
Italianate
delicacy of Ezra Pound, that
exquisite lyricist and fascist collaborator.
I
wrote
all the above notes in between watching
CSIs – including CSI NY’s Death House, a brilliant episode (10 from
Series 6)
which was strongly reminiscent of Poe.
As
a
youth I revelled in Ginsberg’s poetry,
despite the manifest obscenities and profanities liberally scattered
throughout
the texts. His is a poetry not only
distinct from Pound, but beyond Rexroth in its mesmeric turgidities and
torturous syntax, not to mention the boldness of its ambiguities.
IRA
No
matter
how detestable the IRA may be, it was
a product of British intransigence and a consequence, in large part, of
British
imperialism, which both defines and limits the IRA and its political
wing, Sinn
Fein.
Hence
no
British imperialism in Ireland, no
IRA/Sinn Fein.
But
Ulster
Loyalists are a consequence of
British imperialism, not something independent of it that just happens
to be pro-British.
They manifest the British will in Ireland, the protestant-derived
secular
capitalism that has a parliamentary sanction, pseudo-politics in the
service of
economics. Thus they are inevitably at
axial loggerheads with the Catholic majority on the island of Ireland,
despite
the latter’s apparent dotted-line sell-out to capitalism under WASPish
pressures both internally and externally.
Such
a
sell-out has come to grief and the
restoration of trust in politics demands not the continuance of
pseudo-politics
in the economic service at the southeast point of the intercardinal
axial
compass, nor the restoration of politics and pseudo-economics proper to
the
catholic majority at the southwest point of the said compass, wherein
socialist
republicanism comes back on to the agenda, but, rather, the utilization
of the
democratic process to a religiously sovereign end, such that may allow
the
existing republic to be transcended in the name of the Social
Theocratic Centre
and hence the concomitant salvation and counter-damnation of the lapsed
catholic generality to a context equivalent to ‘Kingdom Come’. For only in such an
otherworldly/pseudo-netherworldly context could the tendency of
selling-out to
capitalism be avoided, not merely averted.
TRUE
TO
SELF
The
worst
they can do to you is to stop you
from being true to yourself, your soul.
Being ‘true’ to somebody else is also counter-productive, since
it
necessarily precludes one, as a male, from being true to oneself.
Hence
to
betray oneself, or one’s self (the
soul), all one has to do is to be ‘true’ to another, like some woman
whose
beauty has seduced one and whose self is, in any case, not to be found
in
psyche but in soma, not in soul but in will and, lower down (in the
phenomenal
realm of the corporeal), not in ego but in spirit.
Few
men
wish or, indeed, are able to be true to
themselves in a world dominated by women.
The majority take it for granted that they will meet somebody,
fall in
love, get married, and raise a family.
With them, there is no prospect of Truth, which is to remain
true to
oneself or, more accurately, one’s self (the soul) and reflect and/or
confirm
its contentment in terms of a godly halo (smile).
THE
MASSES
You
cannot
ameliorate the lot of the masses in
terms of bodily overcoming through soul except that they are overcome
by a
messianic capability and transmuted, according to gender, in either
metaphysical (male) or antimetachemical-cum-pseudometachemical
(anti-female-cum-pseudo-female) terms, terms that necessitate their
transfiguration
from human (chemical/pseudo-physical) to supra-human (as described
above), as
and when a substance-motivated communal cyborgization becomes possible
under
the right kind of regime - one necessarily geared, through Social
Theocracy
(transcendentalism) to the development of ‘Kingdom Come’ at the expense
of ‘the
world’.
As
human
beings they cannot be delivered from
‘the world’, since the masses will always be characterized by female
dominion,
and it is precisely the domination of females that keeps the majority
of males
in a subordinate position, as mere breadwinners for the matriarchal
family.
But
if
you can overcome human life, then you
can overcome woman and establish a society whose supra-human elements,
whether
metaphysical (male) or pseudo-metachemical (pseudo-female) will allow
males to
be true to themselves, their souls, without fear of female intervention
and
seduction in the interests, ultimately, of offspring.
Only thus can ‘the world’ be overcome and Paradise
be established, one might evens say regained, if one wishes to
reference the
Biblical account of Adam before ‘the Fall’, bearing in mind what I have
already
critically said about it.
CREATION
Perhaps
the
Genesis account of Creation,
whereby ‘God’ made Adam before ‘He’ fashioned Eve from one of Adam’s
ribs, is
in some degree responsible for the reluctance of many if not most
people to
regard women as the primary sex and men as secondary, since such a
manifestly
objective account of the genders will appear to contradict the Bible
and, hence,
the so-called ‘word of God’. But of
course males wouldn’t succumb to females so easily and even readily if
the
latter were not, in most cases, more physically refined and
attractive-looking,
even beautiful, and able, in consequence, to get the better of them,
subordinating them, in due course, to a means whereby their need (more
than
desire) for a surrogate plenum in the form of offspring can be
gratified and,
ultimately, realized, thereby perpetuating ‘the world’ in its arguably
mainstream manifestation, which I have tended to identify with the
southwest
point of the intercardinal axial compass.
But
the
secondary sex before the primary
one? Give me a break!
Men emerge, as male babies, from women, as of
course do female babies, and that is not only how it is now but how it
has
always been. Only a fool or a biblical
lackey or simpleton would contend otherwise.
Of
course,
long before anyone even thought of
the Genesis account of Creation, never mind what subsequently turned
into the
Old Testament and, together with the New Testament, the so-called Holy
Bible,
there were cavemen who couldn’t write or read simply because such
things hadn’t
been invented then, and before them, well, dinosaurs and other
prehistoric
creatures who populated an even more dangerous – and barbarous – world
than the
one in which we are accustomed to living.
Nature is not, nor ever was, a picnic.
The predation of stronger animals upon weaker ones, of the
bigger upon
the smaller and the quicker upon the slower, is an age-old reality that
goes
way back beyond or, rather, before (anterior to) the caveman and his
illiterate
babble. We do not need some later scribe
or intellectual – primitive by contemporary standards – telling us
about the
creation of Adam as though no caveman, never mind prehistoric reptile,
had ever
existed. We do not need to listen to –
and in some cases worship – this poppycock.
What we do need is a regime
that will take it upon itself to rid the world of this idiocy once and
for all,
so that we never again have to put up with it.
Then the possibility of true religion, which has nothing to do
with free
will (beauty) and everything to do with free soul (joy), will arise,
and such
religion, appertaining to a religiously sovereign proletariat, will
know
nothing of priests or prayer-books or hymnals or churches or bibles or
confessionals or masses or sermons or anything else that stems from the
Genesis
account of Creation and flies in the face of both reason and
common sense. We need to be liberated from
all such pre-global
(Eastern and Western) anachronisms, before things will get any better,
as and
when the People are ripe for ‘Kingdom Come’.
To
be
perfectly honest, I think the author of
Genesis, if there was one (and not several), was an idiot.
To
tell
the truth about God … as Devil the
Mother hyped as God the Father …would probably constitute blasphemy in
some
people’s minds – minds unaccustomed to thought and to the exercise of
reason. In short, simple minds.
As
for
the truth about the so-called Son of God
… or, for that matter, the so-called Mother of God in relation to what
is
supposed, in any case, to be the ‘Son of God’, one would be accused by
the
simple-minded of being even more guilty of blasphemy.
But the sad truth about Western religion,
i.e. Christianity, is that it has nothing to do with godliness as the
mere
concomitant of Heaven, of a ‘bovaryized’ ego (super-ego) bearing
witness to the
Soul, because rooted in the Judaic Creator (Jehovah) and therefore
stemming
from Devil the Mother hyped as God … with all the attendant
extrapolative
‘thingful’ deities that bear witness not so much to religion as to the
mass
reality of female dominion, with the sanctity of free soma in
metachemical free
will behind the ‘increase and multiply’ ethos of the Old Testament.
That
is
why we want ‘Kingdom Come’ – not to
establish another false religion, but to do away with falsity in order
that the
Truth may prevail and true religion in consequence, something
inconceivable
outside and anterior to such a heavenly ‘Kingdom’, which must
necessarily be
both superhuman (administrative aside) and supra-human (the
Centre-proper).
IDIOT
The
girl
in the house next door, a teenager,
never or hardly ever walks; she always runs up and down the stairs,
around her
room, etc., and, rushing in or our, invariably slams the front door. A total idiot? What
was
it Baudelaire said about the modern
girl?
GOOD
QUESTION
For
anyone
to prefer the authors of the Bible
to the likes of Baudelaire or Nietzsche or Schopenhauer or Sartre …
well, what kind
of a person is that?
CIRCUMSTANCES
Circumstances
make
one unpleasant, mostly
circumstances beyond one’s control, like defective computers or unruly
neighbours or confined spaces or overcrowded environments or … bad
health.
People
being
made mentally and physically sick
by computers.
BITCH
Power
is
a bitch, and glory also. Or, more
correctly, a superbitch and a bitch
respectively.
THE
POPE
Whatever
the
Pope and other such high-ranking
ecclesiastics may have to say about moral relativism and so on … is a
Western
(Christian) anachronism in a global age, and it behoves us to do our
(Social
Theocratic) duty in the future and sweep them onto the rubbish heap of
history,
so that we can get rid of moral relativism from a standpoint beyond
both
Western anachronisms (bourgeois and Catholic) and contemporary global
barbarities alike. That is the only way
it can be done, not be attempting to reverse time (to Christian
criteria) or
pretending that televisions and cameras don’t exist or effectively
regarding
people who smelt metal as devils in hell … when one uses or has need of
the
products that emerge from their smelting.
BIBLES
If,
in
the event of a majority mandate for
religious sovereignty, bibles are going to be incinerated – and thus
effectively returned to their Maker (as John Cowper Powys might say) –
there
had better be stringent penalties put in place for anyone caught
continuing to
print them afterwards. It would have to
be made a crime against the religiously sovereign, that is, the
saved/counter-damned proletariat, for anyone to perpetuate biblical
anachronisms in the context of ‘Kingdom Come’.
And that goes for all such anachronisms – Eastern as well as
Western.
THE
TYRANNY
OF THE COMMON MAN
The
common
man, especially when British and
habituated, in consequence, to female dominion on state-hegemonic axial
terms,
is a tyrant of suspicion and incredulity with regard to anyone who has
the
capacity to lead an independent, cultural, creative lifestyle. He tends, when possible, to ‘nose in’ on
whatever you are doing, assuming you’re unfortunate enough to live in
close
proximity to such a person in, say, a bedsit or small flat in rented
accommodation, and, with nothing particular to do himself, he makes it
his
business not only to keep an eye on what you’re doing, but to make
efforts, for
the most part low-key, to dissuade you from doing it and even to
suggest –
though he knows nothing of what you really do and, even if he did,
would be a
poor judge in any case – that it is rubbish or that you are wasting
your time
to be doing it in the first place, etc., etc.
In
short,
the tyranny of the common man is a
refusal to accept creative or intellectual independence and, for want
of
anything better to do, to discourage one from being different. For if there is one thing that, besides sex,
is virtually sacrosanct to the common man, it is conformity with
society in
general and a refusal, in consequence, to live apart from the common
run.
And
yet,
all this is a product of misfortune
and social conditioning, not of wisdom or even common sense. The common man ends up taking his
socialization for granted. He wants to
be like everybody else. Thus he is the
antithesis of the philosophical artist or artist philosopher, who
regards the
standards of the Many as a threat to his cultural independence and
ability to
uphold Truth in a world ruled by Beauty and, to a lesser extent,
Strength.
The
common
man does nothing independently
because he is afraid of the consequences and/or humiliation at not
being able
to make it all ‘work out’. Thus he
adheres to the herd, the flock, the crowd, the audience, the
congregation, the
family, the firm, etc., and only finds his justification or meaning
within
society, especially when it is constituted, as in Britain, on a
state-hegemonic
axial basis, and therefore under the sovereign rule of female values
and the
piling up of somatic units, a rule that conduces not only to an
empirical
disposition but, more vulgarly, to an entrenched nosiness that would
not have
been out of place in the policing of empire.
GENUINE
MUSIC
Music,
if
true to itself and therefore
genuinely metaphysical, can only be expressive of itself or, more
correctly,
the focus of an impression that is less self-expressive than
self-impressive,
impressing one with its adherence to and reflection of soul (joy), so
that it
becomes a godly vehicle for the reflection of Heaven, impressing one
with its
truth. All else – music employing titles
ostensibly expressing some theme or subject extraneous to itself – is
false,
as, to a greater extent, are songs, which subordinate music to a verbal
narrative, pretty much the way religion, through alternative false
gods, is
subordinated, in the interests of men or women or devils (superwomen),
to
economics or politics or science, as the ethnic case may be.
Music
that
is not true to itself as an
impression of the Soul is … false, and therefore germane to cultural
falsity –
a populist norm that manifests in economic/pseudo-political
(men/pseudo-women),
political/pseudo-economic (women/pseudo-men), or
scientific/pseudo-religious
(superwomen/pseudo-supermen, or devils/pseudo-gods) cultural
‘bovaryizations’
of music, as in much classical, pop, and jazz.
In
traditional
serious Western music,
Romanticism signified an expressive departure from – and rejection of –
the
classical norms of musical form (true to self) and was avowedly a
degeneration
from the canons of classical propriety symptomatic of
aristocratic-cum-bourgeois decadence.
Of
all
artists, the musician is the one who can
– if he so desires – most approximate to a heavenly (metaphysical)
paradigm
through the manipulation, to a soulful effect, of notes.
By contrast, the painter is a virtual
empiricist, the sculptor a sensualist, and the writer an intellectual. Neither vision, touch, nor thought can convey
feelings to anything like the same extent as the application of varied
pressures to a musical instrument.
THE
LIMITATIONS
OF TRANSCENDENTAL MEDITATION
The
trouble
with transcendental meditation as a
penultimate form of metaphysics (as consistently argued by me in the
past) is
that, centred on man, it still uses ego or the nearest
(‘once-bovaryized’)
equivalent to it (super-ego) as its effective starting-point for any
soulful
self-realization that can only transpire – and then only intermittently
and
temporarily – on the recoil from the out-breath as a mode of
self-preservation
vis-à-vis the utilization of the relevant not-self, viz. lungs and
breath, both
of which have less to do with Heaven the Holy Soul and God the Father
(to speak
formerly and in keeping with my habitual way of explaining this) than
with the
Son of God and the Holy Spirit of Heaven.
Therefore
transcendental
meditation starts with
the ‘once-bovaryized’ ego of the nearest human equivalent of superman
(not the
comic book character) and ends, only too temporarily, with the soul
spinal cord
deep … before one is obliged to return to the starting point and plunge
anew
(the expression is not meant to paraphrase John Cowper Powys) into the
lungs
and breath in the interests of a degree of self-transcendence achieved,
not in
relation to the aforementioned not-self, but on the rebound from it,
like a
ball that is attached to a rubber band and recoils from wherever it is
launched
with a momentum that takes it back past its starting point.
Transcendental
meditation
is somewhat similar,
and therefore no more, as noted above, than a radical mankind approach
(compared with Catholic prayer) to metaphysics that could never be more
than
penultimate in relation not only to what precedes it in nature (sex)
but to
what will hopefully one day succeed it in cyborgkind (as antithesis to
anything
cosmic) when once global civilization, which is proletarian, comes of
sensible
age and opts to democratically abandon its current film-oriented stage
for the
benefits of ‘Kingdom Come’ and the equivalent, in consequence, of a
Christian
rebirth from outer to inner, sensuality to sensibility, female
hegemonic to
male hegemonic, secular to religious, through the use of – and with
democratically-mandated religious sovereignty – entitlement to
mind-enhancing
drugs that, by and by, will conduce towards the development of
cyborgization in
relation to the person, and thus to ‘man’s overcoming’ (to use a
Nietzschean
expression) in metaphysical divinity, an eventuality that while germane
to the
male sex would not be relevant to females, whose fate would, as
described
elsewhere, be less metaphysical than pseudo-metachemical, and thereby
subject
to a different order of substance entitlement (soma contracting as
opposed to
psyche expanding) and correlative approach (pseudo-objective rather
than
subjective) to communal cyborgization, the means whereby both male and
pseudo-female supra-human entities alike may be more efficaciously and
efficiently served from the administrative aside by a superhuman,
individually
cyborged ideological elite.
METAPHYSICAL
STAGES
Cosmos
=
the metaphysics of smoking, as of
other-contemplation;
Nature
=
the metaphysics of coitus, as of
other-realization;
Mankind
=
the metaphysics of meditation, as of
self-contemplation;
Cyborgkind
=
the metaphysics of chemical
enhancement, as of self-realization.
All
the
above contexts only have reference, of
course, to the metaphysical manifestations of the Cosmos, Nature,
Mankind, or
Cyborgkind, not, with the exception of Cyborgkind (which has yet to
come into
its metaphysical own), to their more prevalent manifestations, whether
metachemical (cosmos), chemical (nature), or physical (mankind).
CLASS,
OCCUPATION,
SEX AND RACE
Class
is
supersensuously rooted in
metachemistry as a noumenal expression of Will;
Occupation
is
sensibly centred in physics as a
phenomenal impression of Ego;
Sex
is
sensuously rooted in chemistry as a
phenomenal expression of Spirit;
Race
is
supersensibly centred in metaphysics as
a noumenal impression of Soul.
Upper-classfulness
=
inter-racial;
Middle-classfulness
=
occupation;
Lower-classfulness
=
sex;
Classlessness
=
race.
To
distinguish
the autocratic roots of Class at
the metachemical northwest point of the intercardinal axial compass and
the
pseudo-theocratic roots of pseudo-Race in relation to
pseudo-metaphysics from
the plutocratic roots of Occupation at the physical southeast point of
the said
compass and the pseudo-democratic roots of pseudo-Sex in relation to
pseudo-chemistry
upon what is the state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis.
Contrariwise,
to
distinguish the democratic
roots of Sex at the southwest point of the intercardinal axial compass
and the
pseudo-plutocratic roots of pseudo-Occupation in relation to
pseudo-physics
from the theocratic roots of Race at the northeast point of the said
compass
and the pseudo-autocratic roots of pseudo-Class in relation to
pseudo-metachemistry upon what is the
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis.
A
society
ruled by the upper class will
encourage sexual inter-breeding between the races in the interests of
occupation (capitalism) and the avoidance, so far as possible, of race
(religion), as in Britain.
Britain
and
America – secular democracies dead set
against religion from a racial premise, the only premise that really
determines
how religion will pan out.
Britain
is
traditionally a nation axially
divisible between Class and Occupation;
Ireland,
by
contrast, is traditionally a nation
axially divisible between Sex and Race.
The
British
are quick to ‘pounce on others’
from class-dominated superficiality. The
wilful shallow-pate is the first to take umbrage, especially when
female.
The
Irish,
on the other hand, are slow to ‘take
umbrage’ from race-dominated profundity.
The soulful ‘deep thinker’ is the last to take umbrage,
especially when
male.
THE
NATURE
OF DIVERGENCE
Straight
line
emanation, or divergence, from an
absolute rectilinear entity like a ringful (vacuous) square or absolute
star
will always be symptomatic of superfeminine domination in metachemical
objectivity, having more to do with Beauty and Love than with Ugliness
and
Hatred but still significant, in free soma and bound psyche (3:1) of
both.
A
society
dominated by females will be illustrative
of rectilinear divergence, and hence heathenistic or, in contemporary
parlance,
secular values. For the opposite of
anything Christian, which is male-orientated (in sensibility) can only
be that
which is female-dominated (in sensuality).
Hence
the
unchristian nature of female priests
– a degeneration of Christian criteria germane to the
medieval/bourgeois, but
particularly protestant bourgeois, overlap with the secular feminism of
proletarian barbarity and, hence, of the juxtaposition of decadent
Western with
unregenerate barbarous/philistine global civilization, as, in a limited
environmental sense, of suburban with urban.
HORNSEY
A
thoroughly
poisonous, mean-mouthed
environment that is absolutely soulless.
Torture!
My
exile
(successively from Galway, Hampshire,
and Surrey) in north London! Never a
sense of companionship with what they call ‘kindred spirits’. Always a feeling of isolation in a philistine
if not barbarous milieu where one remains distanced from if not at
loggerheads
with one’s neighbours. Injustice. And yet … anger and a desire for
vengeance. A passionate determination
not to spend the rest of one’s life in such a soulless place.
FROM
WILL
TO SOUL VIA EGO AND SPIRIT
The
Doing
of metachemical Will, which is
noumenally objective;
The
Taking
of physical Ego, which is
phenomenally subjective;
The
Giving
of chemical Spirit, which is
phenomenally objective;
The
Being
of metaphysical Soul, which is
noumenally subjective.
From
the
Doing of metachemical Will to the
Being of metaphysical Soul via the Taking of physical Ego and the
Giving of
chemical Spirit – the absolute Alpha and the absolute Omega via the
relative
omega and alpha.
Hence,
in
another sense, from Hell to Heaven
via the Earth and Purgatory or, alternatively, from the Devil to God
via Man
and Woman – though this is only an approximation, given the use
(over-simplistic) of parallel terms.
Certainly
the
fulcrum of metachemistry is Will
and therefore Doing, the Doing, one might say, of Devil the Mother
(beauty);
The
fulcrum
of physics is Ego and therefore
Taking, the Taking of Man the Father (knowledge);
The
fulcrum
of chemistry is Spirit and
therefore Giving, the Giving of Purgatory the Clear Spirit (pride);
The
fulcrum
of metaphysics is Soul and
therefore Being, the Being of Heaven the Holy Soul (joy).
Doing
and
Taking are the hegemonic factors,
corresponding to metachemistry (over pseudo-metaphysics) and physics
(over
pseudo-chemistry) on the state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis
stretching
from the northwest to the southeast points of the intercardinal axial
compass.
Giving
and
Being are the hegemonic factors,
corresponding to chemistry (over pseudo-physics) and metaphysics (over
pseudo-metachemistry) on the church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis
stretching
from southwest to northeast points of the intercardinal axial compass.
‘Christ
walking
on the water’ with an airy
backdrop is symbolically or metaphorically illustrative of
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate hegemonic factors, in that to get to
metaphysics over pseudo-metachemistry you have to be rooted in
chemistry over
pseudo-physics, with the chemical ‘first’ destined, in the event of
counter-damnation, to become pseudo-metachemical ‘last’ and the
pseudo-physical
‘last’, in the event of salvation, destined to become metaphysical
‘first’.
The
‘Christ
walking on the water’ metaphor
would have been lost on Protestants, whose religious apostasy put them
at axial
loggerheads with church-hegemonic/state-subordinate criteria and thus
not only
the possibility of understanding such a metaphor but of sensibly or
imaginatively relating to it.
Heresy
is
heresy is heresy is heresy, whose
spin-off, if not exactly decadent end-product, is the female-dominated
secular
society that characterizes contemporary (global) civilization.
The
Doing
of Class as opposed to the Being of
Race;
The
Taking
of Occupation as opposed to the
Giving of Sex.
From
the
state-hegemonic Doing of Class to the
church-hegemonic Being of Race via the state-hegemonic Taking of
Occupation and
the church-hegemonic Giving of Sex.
Class
and
Occupation are no less axially state
hegemonic than Sex and Race are church hegemonic – with Will and Ego at
axial
loggerheads with Spirit and Soul.
In
fact,
to recapitulate one of my principal
axial findings, Will and Ego alike correspond to what could, in this
instance,
be called the alpha preceding factor (as fulcrum) of metachemistry and
physics
– Beauty preceding Love in
metachemical free soma and Knowledge preceding
Pleasure in physical free psyche, whereas Spirit and Soul, by
contrast, correspond to what, in this instance, I shall call the omega
preceding factor (as fulcrum) of chemistry and metaphysics – Pride preceding Strength in chemical free soma and Joy preceding Truth in metaphysical free psyche.
Hence
the
axial compatibility of Will and Ego,
Beauty and Knowledge, on the one hand, that of state-hegemonic Doing
and
Taking. And hence the axial
compatibility of Spirit and Soul, Pride and Joy, on the other hand,
that of
church-hegemonic Giving and Being.
Taking
has
a tendency to suck-up to Doing in a
kind of Faustian pact, whereby the somatic licence of the latter is
financed by
the psychic freedom of the former.
Giving
can
only be overcome by Being, as and
when the pseudo-taking pseudo-physical ‘last’ (under-plane subordinate
in
pseudo-mass under volume at the southwest point of the intercardinal
axial
compass) are saved to metaphysics and the giving chemical ‘first’
(over-plane
hegemonic in volume over pseudo-mass at the southwest point of the said
compass) are counter-damned to pseudo-metachemistry, wherein the gender
positions are reversed as the ‘last’ become ‘first’ (over-plane
hegemonic in
time over pseudo-space at the northeast point of the intercardinal
axial
compass) and the ‘first’ become ‘last’ (under-plane subordinate in
pseudo-space
under time at the northeast point of the said compass), thereby
allowing Joy
and Truth to metaphysically flourish as never before.
MOTHER
AND
FATHER
Whenever
my
mother discussed my father, whom I
never knew, it was always to put him down and/or slag him off. I never once heard a good thing said about
him. But that only made me more
determined not to make his mistake and get married.
If,
at
the end of my life, I am still celibate
and single, I would like to think that not having married and had a
family was
my greatest achievement, greater, by far, than all of my literary,
musical, and
other cultural and/or internet-related accomplishments put together.
In
this
world, it is easier for a man to marry
and have a family than to remain single and celibate.
That is why most men get married.
Not
having
had the benefit of a father around
when I was a young boy only conduced towards my development of a
jaundiced view
of women, with regard to my mother and chair-ridden grandmother, from
which I
have never recovered. Even now I shiver
when I recollect how useless they were in acknowledging, much less
satisfying,
my various wants – physical as well as mental.
I was not only seriously malnourished and in generally poor
health by
the time my mother was free to dispatch me, at the age of ten, to a
Children’s
Home in Carshalton Beeches, Surrey, but frustrated and disgusted by
their – and
my mother’s in particular – inability to play with me or show me how
things
worked or encourage me to do or make certain things that, apparently,
only a
father would have been able to do, like playing ball with one in a park
or
something. I am only too aware of what a
misfortune and social disadvantage it is not having the benefit of a
father’s
presence so that, with only a mother, one develops a lopsided
perspective on
life and family relationships – a psychology which predisposes one to
see and
understand too much of he female side of life and little if any of its
male
side. The fact that I was an only child
(my parents separated too soon to have another), with neither brothers
nor
sisters, only compounded this predicament by making me more reliant on
my own
resources and unable or unwilling to interact with others – there
being, in any
case, no-one else, apart from my arthritic grandmother and hard-pressed
mother,
to interact with.
Fundamentally,
I
blame my grandmother for that
predicament. For it was she who returned
to Ireland with her daughter (my mother-to-be) and then failed to make
it
stick. Even with the break-up of my
parents’ relationship following my father’s discovery, I dare say, that
my
mother (his wife) was more of a Brit than he had suspected or even
initially
realized (despite having been born in Aldershot she contrived to fake
an Irish
accent), it would have been less bad for me to have grown up in Galway
than way
back in Aldershot, where my grandmother and mother-to-be had been
living,
compliments of a British Army connection involving my maternal
grandfather
(whom I never knew), who left his native Donegal to join the British
Army in
Scotland many years before and was subsequently posted elsewhere,
including the
army HQ in Hampshire.
But
in
Aldershot and, subsequently, Carshalton
Beeches I was even more alienated and solitary than I might otherwise
have
been, had I been able to grow up in Ireland, and accordingly more
disposed to
withdrawing into myself and turning my back, as far as possible, on the
world
and its various social demands. In
Aldershot, as remarked above, I also saw too much of the female side of
things,
and I did not always like what I saw. I
had no reason, in later life, to be enamoured of women, and although a
certain
anti-British element always entered into my attitude to women in
Britain, I
soon realized that I was in rebellion against my mother and everything,
including the British Army, she stood for, and that I had to some
extent been
ethnically or racially inoculated against the possibility of following
my
father’s tragic example and marrying outside the fold.
I guess I am like an extension of my father
in England, and therefore one who keeps to himself and holds the
British at
arm’s length, as they say. Not that that
makes me any more enamoured of immigrants from the British Empire and
other
far-away places – far from it! I recoil
from the Bangladeshis, for example, with whom I am obliged, in my
poverty, to
share a kitchen and bathroom as from a social or ethnic bugbear, and
have only
contempt for what I described as the scrapings of the British Empire. It’s as if they were worse than the British
themselves … But I digress.
If
I
have no regrets for never having married,
it is because I saw no prospect of marriage for someone like myself in
a
country which is not my own (I am of course an Irish citizen) and from
whose money-grubbing
values I generally recoil in horror. It
is not simply that I would not associate with, much less marry, a Brit. Rather is it that any arrangement which was
likely to lead to propagation would be unacceptable to me so long as I
was
still living in England and living, moreover, as an Irish-born outsider. Not only does the prospect of a family have
no appeal to me in relation to the overcrowded urban environments of
north
London, including Finsbury Park, to which I was obliged to move (though
not for
the first time) from Surrey back in 1974, when I stayed for a short
time at the
flat my mother and then stepfather were living in prior to moving to
Crouch End
and then Hornsey, but it doesn’t appeal to me as an Irishman in exile …
to be
responsible for forcing a British upbringing and (state-hegemonic
female-dominated) lifestyle upon any child, or prospective child, of
mine. I couldn’t do it, and therefore in
this and
certain other regards I am profoundly responsible, even though, to the
superficial eye, it may not look that way.
Frankly,
I
have developed a thick skin over the
years and don’t much care what others (and not just Brits) think. I feel obligated, in short, to live alone and
to invest in a damage-limitation-exercise that focuses the hurt and
suffering
back upon myself, even at a personal cost.
And if, as my mother would often have me believe, my father was
a bad
man, was ‘no good’, someone (an Irishman) she would never have married
had her
mother not obliged her to accompany her back to Ireland, then I shall
at least
have the satisfaction of knowing – quite apart from my feelings about her – that I have not passed on his genes to
anyone else and that the buck, as they say, stops here, with me. My ‘children’ are, and have long been, my
books and other cultural products, and if there is any special merit in
that in
a country which gives no particular encouragement to serious cultural
endeavour
and independence of mind, then I would be the first to acknowledge it,
not
forgetting what I said earlier about my celibacy and status as a
bachelor
which, in a society only too disposed to piling up somatic units in
increasing
numbers, is no mean feat!
OMNIPOTENCE
AND
OMNISCIENCE
Even
now
there are idiots who identify
omnipotence with God, or godliness (as I prefer to say), as though
something
all-powerful had anything to do with religion-proper (metaphysics) and,
hence,
Heaven (as the joyful condition of metaphysical soul).
Bad enough that they should equate
omniscience with God, as though something all-knowing had anything to
do with
religion. Are not omnipotence and
omniscience commensurate with metachemistry and physics respectively,
that is,
with science and economics, or Devil (the Mother) and Man (the Father),
as of
Power and Form, Will and Ego, Beauty and Knowledge.
In other words, the hegemonic elements of the
state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis that stretches from northwest
to
southeast points of the intercardinal axial compass.
I would have a moral (and axial) problem with
both….
SOME
PARTING
SHOTS
Society
is
divisible between those who follow
their own leads and those that copy others.
I
do
not follow; I lead.
Opposition
to
Class comes primarily from
Occupation; opposition to Sex primarily from Race.
I
have
always believed that not Class but Sex
(gender) is the underlining dynamic or dialectic of the historical
process. Therefore I have thought
church-hegemonically rather than state-hegemonically, as someone of
Roman
Catholic West of Ireland Gaelic descent who fights shy of the
Anglo-dominated
state-hegemonic axis … as he fights shy of Power and Form from a
standpoint
centred in Content(ment) and opposing Glory (with its chemical pride
and
strength).
The
danger
with taking the ‘bovaryized’ ego
(super-ego) too seriously in metaphysics is that it can become detached
from
the Soul to a degree whereby it ceases to serve or reflect Truth and
becomes
merely knowledgeable, sinking to the level of physics and the
‘forbidden tree
of knowledge’, were a ‘once-bovaryized’ soul (pleasure) is subordinated
to the
Ego, which is less philosophical than philological, and therefore more
disposed
to the pleasures of theology than to the joys of theosophy, the joys
that come
from being at one with the Soul.
The
philosopher
of Truth will not be ‘king’ for
long if he abandons metaphysics for physics and, effectively changing
axis,
descends into the mundane realm of mere knowledge, where not God, much
less
Heaven, but Man is if not exactly ‘king’ then avowedly governor,
disposed to
hyping knowledge as Truth and thus himself as God.
If
the
‘Philosopher King’ is to remain godly,
it will be because he defers to the primacy of the Soul, and thus of
Heaven, in
the construction – always loosely formal – of his philosophy, that
truthful
mirror, so to speak, of the Soul’s inner Being (joy), which is the
kernel of a
messianic credibility.
Let
my
epitaph be: he remained true to himself
(his self) and fathered no offspring but his cultural creations. He was the creator, above all, of a new
approach to thinking which stemmed, as far as possible, from the Soul,
and was
accordingly truly divine, that is to say, the ‘Word of God’, in its
metaphysical core. He ‘took note’ of
what his soul revealed to him of its essence, and he calls these notes
true …
to his self.
LONDON
2010 (Revised 2012)
Preview
BOLD AND ECLECTIC eBook
