THE
FEW AND THE MANY
1. Truth is not for all, but only for some -
namely the metaphysical, who stand to the physical (to name but one alternative
category of persons) as the subjective Few to the subjective Many, the cultural
individuals to the natural (philistine) collectivity. Such people are genuinely (in
transcendentalism) religious, and they stand at a noumenal
(time/space) remove from the physical in what amounts to an upper-class mode of
subjectivity.
2. Knowledge is not for all, but only for some -
namely the physical, who stand to the metaphysical as the subjective Many to
the subjective Few, the natural collectivity to the
cultural individuals. Such people are
genuinely (in capitalism) economic, and they stand at a phenomenal
(mass/volume) remove from the metaphysical in what amounts to a lower-class
mode of subjectivity.
3. Strength is not for all, but only for some -
namely the chemical, who stand to the metachemical
(to name but one alternative category of persons) as the objective Many to the
objective Few, the civilized collectivity to the
barbarous individuals. Such people are
genuinely (in parliamentarianism) political, and they stand at a phenomenal
(volume/mass) remove from the metachemical in what
amounts to a lower-class mode of objectivity.
4. Beauty is not for all, but only for some -
namely the metachemical, who stand to the chemical as
the objective Few to the objective Many, the barbarous individuals to the
civilized collectivity. Such people are genuinely (in cosmology)
scientific, and they stand at a noumenal (space/time)
remove from the chemical in what amounts to an upper-class mode of objectivity.
5. Truth and beauty are for the Few, but for
opposite kinds of noumenal persons - namely the
metaphysical and the metachemical, the cultural and
the barbarous, the subjective and the objective, the philosophical and the
poetical, the soulful and the wilful.
6. Knowledge and strength are for the Many, but
for opposite kinds of phenomenal persons - namely the physical and the
chemical, the natural and the civilized, the subjective and the objective, the
fictional and the theatrical, the intellectual and the spiritual.
7. One can no more
expect all noumenal people to live by truth than to
live by beauty, or vice versa.
8. One can no more
expect all phenomenal people to live by knowledge than to live by strength, or
vice versa.
9. So long as there are distinctions between the
Few and the Many (as there will be in any viable and, in the broadest sense,
civilized society), there will be distinctions between beauty and strength on
the one hand, that of female objectivity, and between knowledge and truth on
the other hand, that of male subjectivity.
10. And, invariably,
there will be like-distinctions between science, politics, economics, and
religion, as between fire, water, vegetation, and air.
11. The metaphysical Few
understand the truth and live to transcend it in joy, which is heavenly.
12. The physical Many do not and (frankly) cannot
understand the truth (of genuine religion), and therefore religion for them has
to be conceived in terms of knowledge and, through that, the attainment of
pleasure, which is earthly.
13. The chemical Many do not and (frankly) cannot
understand the truth, and therefore religion for them has to be conceived in
terms of strength and, through that, the attainment of pride, which is
purgatorial.
14. The metachemical Few
do not and (frankly) cannot understand the truth, and therefore religion for
them has to be conceived in terms of beauty and, through that, the attainment
of love, which is hellish.
15. The metachemical Few
are thrice removed from the possibility of truth. The chemical Many are twice removed from the
possibility of truth. The physical Many
are once removed from the possibility of truth.
16. Only the metaphysical
Few can live in truth, for they are as gods compared to or contrasted with
everyone else.