CYCLE THREE

1. To contrast the false metachemistry of idealist supernature with the genuine metachemistry of transcendentalist supernature, as one would contrast light with air, or illusion with truth.

2. To contrast the false chemistry of naturalist supernature with the genuine chemistry of fundamentalist supernature, as one would contrast fire with blood, or weakness with strength.

3. To contrast the false metaphysics of materialist nature with the genuine metaphysics of nonconformist nature, as one would contrast water with thought, or ignorance with knowledge.

4. To contrast the false physics of realist nature with the genuine physics of humanist nature, as one would contrast earth with offspring, or ugliness with beauty.

5. Just as I have distinguished between the physical and the metaphysical with regard to nature, so we may distinguish between the phenomenal and, for want of a better term, the metaphenomenal on a like basis, conceiving of the phenomenal as equivalent to the physical and of the metaphenomenal as equivalent to the metaphysical.

6. Similarly, just as I have distinguished between the chemical and the metachemical with regard to supernature, so we may distinguish between the noumenal and, for want of a better term, the metanoumenal on a like basis, conceiving of the noumenal as equivalent to the chemical and of the metanoumenal as equivalent to the metachemical.