Of Cans and Bottles in relation to Binding and Freedom. One of the most obvious parallels, on both phenomenal and noumenal planes, to our hood/brolly distinction between binding and freedom, clenched-fist and open-hand saluting, must be that between cans and bottles, provided we make a distinction between tall or large cans and squat or small cans on the one hand, and small or squat bottles and large or tall bottles on the other hand, as with the aforementioned distinction between low and high types of freedom and binding (see previous essay).  Therefore paralleling the collapsible brolly as an exemplification of low, or somatic, freedom at the northwest point of the intercardinal axial compass will come squat or small bottles, while parallel to the collapsible hood as an exemplification of low, or somatic, binding at the southeast point of the said compass will come squat or small cans - both of which could be regarded as signifying an adherence to state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axial criteria.  Similarly, paralleling the non-collapsible hood as an exemplification of high, or psychic, binding at the southwest point of the intercardinal axial compass will come tall or large cans, while parallel to the non-collapsible brolly as an exemplification of high, or psychic, freedom at the northeast point of the said compass will come tall or large bottles - both of which could be regarded as signifying an adherence to church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axial criteria.  In either case, the cans and bottles can be used for alcoholic or non-alcoholic drinks.