CYCLE FIFTEEN
1. One can do negatively or positively,
competitively or co-operatively, and those who do negatively do such on
the basis of materialism in metachemical primacy, whereas
those who do positively do such on the basis of fundamentalism in metachemical supremacy.
2. One can give
negatively or positively, competitively or co-operatively, and those who give
negatively do such on the basis of realism in chemical primacy, whereas
those who give positively do such on the basis of nonconformism
in chemical supremacy.
3. One can take
negatively or positively, competitively or co-operatively, and those who take
negatively do such on the basis of naturalism in physical primacy, whereas
those who take positively do such on the basis of humanism in physical
supremacy.
4. One can be
negatively or positively, competitively or co-operatively, and those who tend
to be negatively are such on the basis of idealism in metaphysical primacy,
whereas those who tend to be positively are such on the basis of
transcendentalism in metaphysical supremacy.
5. An age or society in which primacy has
eclipsed supremacy as the prevailing mean will be one in which competition, founded
upon negative values, takes precedence over co-operation, and success is judged
on the basis of competitive ascendancy, especially in relation to materialism
and realism.
6. Even before the slide from sensual supremacy
to sensual primacy, and the corresponding hegemony of materialism over idealism
and of realism over naturalism, societies in which sensible primacy had become
the mean would have demonstrated, in contrary terms, a competitive bias,
whether with regard to idealism over materialism or, down below in the
phenomenal realm, to naturalism over realism.
7. It is not inconceivable, but indeed all too
plausible, that the degeneration of sensibly-biased societies from supremacy to
primacy played a part in the Protestant Reformation and consequent entrenchment
of sensual supremacy.
8. Be that as it may, the contemporary emphasis,
in the Anglo-American West, on sensual primacy is
indicative of a society in which competition will be rather more objective than
subjective, with corresponding materialist and realist hegemonies.
9. Competitiveness thrives on negative values
like hatred, humility, pain, and woe, and these are precisely the most
characteristic values of societies in which primacy has eclipsed supremacy in
consequence of the ongoing entrenchment of inorganic factors at the organic's expense.
10. Hence competition is something to regret from
an organic and therefore supreme standpoint which, due to its positive nature,
will prefer co-operation. No supreme
taking, much less supreme being, can be cultivated in societies which are in
the grip of primacy, whether in sensibility or, worse again from a male
point-of-view, in sensuality.
11. Even primal being, that characteristic of
inorganic godliness, will be subject to a subordinate position to primal doing
in sensual contexts, while primal taking will likewise be subordinate to primal
giving in those societies which are characterized by a sensual bias overall.
12. Hence the rule of metachemical
primacy over metaphysical primacy in the noumenal
case of sensual competitiveness, and the rule, or rather governance, of
chemical primacy over physical primacy in the phenomenal case of sensual
competitiveness.
13. Which is equivalent
to the rule of ugliness and hatred over falsity and woe in the one case, and of
weakness and humility over ignorance and pain in the other case.
14. Societies in which sensible primacy had
eclipsed sensible supremacy would more signify the lead of ugliness and hatred
by falsity and woe in the noumenal case, and the lead
or, rather, representation of weakness and humility by ignorance and pain in
the phenomenal case.
15. Either way, we would not be able to speak of
the hegemony of positive values, neither objectively in sensuality, where
beauty and love would rule over truth and joy and, down below, strength and
pride have the upper hand over knowledge and pleasure, nor subjectively in
sensibility, where truth and joy would have the upper hand over beauty and
love, and knowledge and pleasure likewise have the upper hand over strength and
pride.
16. Societies which have 'gone to the dogs' of
primacy are ill-equipped to foster positive values, whether in relation to
doing, giving, taking, or to being. Only negative values thrive in them,
whether in relation to materialism, realism, naturalism, or to idealism. Everything fundamentalist, nonconformist,
humanist, and transcendentalist will be subject to ridicule from the standpoint
of a competitive edge.