76. Therefore it behoves the pseudo-antiphenomenally sensual male
lapsed Catholic masses of a quasi-pseudo-meekness under the anti-noumenally
sensible reign of pseudo-meekness to opt, democratically and peaceably, for the
righteousness of noumenal sensibility, and for their female counterparts of a
quasi-vain disposition under the noumenally sensual reign of vanity to opt,
democratically and antimartially, for the pseudo-justice of anti-noumenal
sensuality, in order that everything appertaining to the Devil and Antigod may
be rejected and all that is now of pseudo-woman and pseudo-antiman be
transvaluated and turned around in such fashion that what is of pseudo-antiman
leads to God and what is of pseudo-woman to the Antidevil, whose bound
spiritual and free soulful corollaries will be holy in their blessedness and
unclear in their pseudo-cursedness, whether in relation to church-hegemonic or
state-subordinate criteria.
77. Thus the onus will be on the People of our South West axial
compass-point to choose, with Judgement, as to whether they wish to remain
bogged down in alpha-worldly and anti-omegaworldly submission, duly modified by
contemporary criteria, to the predatory impositions of the netherworldly and
anti-otherworldly powers-that-do and powers-that-anti-be, or whether, with due
democratic resolve to better their lot, they opt for ‘Kingdom Come’ and an end
to the well-nigh tyrannical rule over their lives of the Vain and pseudo-Meek,
whose metachemical clearness and antimetaphysical unholiness are the natural
enemies of all that is metaphysically holy and antimetachemically unclear,
graceful/wise and pseudo-punishing/pseudo-good in noumenal sensibility and
anti-noumenal sensuality respectively.
78. Only the People can elect, with Judgement, for religious
sovereignty and an end, in consequence, to the (political) world of
alpha-worldly and anti-omegaworldly corruption such that is the product, in no
uncertain terms, of netherworldly and anti-otherworldly influence and
exploitation. Only the quasi-pseudo-meek and quasi-vain electorates of
traditionally catholic (meek and pseudo-vain) but contemporaneously
universalized and Americanized - one might even say Hollywoodized -
countries like Eire and France can democratically opt, should they agree to
utilize the electoral process in such a theocratically paradoxical manner, for
deliverance from their worldly plights to the otherworldly and
anti-netherworldly pastures of the coming ‘Kingdom’, and thus set the ball
rolling, as it were, for other countries of a like disposition to follow suit
and ‘up the pressure’ on all that is of noumenal sensuality and anti-noumenal
sensibility, until, eventually, with fewer and fewer numbers of the
pseudo-phenomenally sensual and pseudo-antiphenomenally sensible to prey upon
in terms of their somatic licence, they find themselves isolated and
effectively redundant, no longer able to do their uncursed undamdest or to
anti-be their pseudo-unblessed counter-unsavedest, so to speak, but obliged, by
want of financial viability, to collapse down the
state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis into the ranks of the
pseudo-antiphenomenally sensual and pseudo-phenomenally sensible, where not
vanity and pseudo-meekness but justice and pseudo-righteousness hold sway, and will
have to judge the ‘fallen’ in relation to their own criteria of damnation and
counter-salvation, cursedness and pseudo-blessedness, pseudo-antifemininity and
pseudo-masculinity, before there could be any prospect of they themselves being
swivelled across, as it were, to the foot of the other axis, the
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis, and ‘made over’ in the
pseudo-antimasculine and pseudo-feminine images of those who had already
vacated it for the divine and antidiabolic pastures ‘On High’ in noumenal
sensibility and anti-noumenal sensuality.
79. Thus, by degrees, will even persons of Protestant descent be
brought to Salvation and counter-Damnation on the
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis, as, one suspects, would persons of
Judaic descent, whose own want of options in respect of Salvation and
counter-Damnation is due, in no small part, to their noumenally sensual and
anti-noumenally sensible traditions in respect of metachemistry and
antimetaphysics, Jehovah and Satan in relation to the Cosmos and/or Saul and
David in relation to nature, and the impossibility of escape from
antimetaphysics to metaphysics by dint of the extent to which metachemistry
holds sway over the context in general and precludes what I used to call
counter-Cupidian escape for the ‘fall guy’ position, be it of the stellar/solar
Cosmos or of blossom/fruit nature in pre-mankind Old Testament-like vein.
Such Judaists tend more genuinely to line-up behind the Anglican generality of
those who head, from a traditionally pseudo-noumenally sensual and
pseudo-antinoumenally sensible standpoint, the
state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis, and therefore they can only suffer the
same fate as their Anglican counterparts in the event of Catholics or persons
of Catholic descent, including Eastern Orthodox, being saved and counter-damned
more efficaciously from their pseudo-antiphenomenally sensible and
pseudo-phenomenally sensual positions at the base of the
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis to which, with due contemporary
modifications, they appertain in unblessedly unsaved and pseudo-uncursedly
counter-undamned terms.
80. Even persons of Hindu descent line up, if rather more
polytheistically, behind Anglicans and Judaists in relation to cosmic-oriented
state-hegemonic/church-subordinate criteria and will have to undergo
pseudo-antiphenomenally sensual and pseudo-phenomenally sensible transmutation
before they can expect to follow Judaists and Anglicans across to the foot of
the church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis and be saved and counter-damned up
in due course, joining not only persons of Catholic descent who were already up
there but also the generality of those of Moslem and Buddhist descent who
already appertained, in various degrees, to noumenal sensibility and/or
anti-noumenal sensuality, if within traditional and therefore ‘pseudo’
manifestations by dint of their mankind (Buddhist) or natural and/or cosmic
(Islamic) shortfalls from global universality such that only the cyborgization
of life in ‘Kingdom Come’ can bring properly to pass.
81. I have written before about the want of genuine metaphysics in
noumenal sensibility making for a situation in which such metaphysics as does
exist is dovetailed into a context more typified by antimetachemistry, and that
the unfortunate consequence of this is that the context in general finds itself
roped-in to perpendicular triangularity in respect of the dominance of
noumenally sensual and anti-noumenally sensible elements, corresponding, in cosmic
fundamentalism, to Jehovah and Satan, or something, with due respect to Hindus,
to that stellar/solar effect. Thus all modes of pseudo-noumenal
sensibility and pseudo-antinoumenal sensuality are fated, it seems to me, to be
subverted and limited by the persistence of more genuine manifestations of
noumenal sensuality and anti-noumenal sensibility, and this explains why they
rarely if ever break free of cosmic subversions of the concept of universality
but continue to defer, even if from a contrary noumenal standpoint, to what I
have defined as Devil the Mother (hyped as God) and the Antison of Antigod
(denigrated as the Devil), the latter of whom will be more distasteful to them
the more antimetachemical factors, as with Islam and even Catholicism, predominate
over metaphysical ones, and a female-to-female conspiracy of antimetachemistry
with metachemistry keeps the denigratory pressure on the ‘fall guy’ segment of
perpendicular triangularity which we have identified with antimetaphysics.
82. Only Buddhism shows, in certain Far Eastern hands, any
independence of this paradoxical predicament, and it is for this reason that it
is the closest of all religions to the existence of God the Father as
metaphysical free psyche and therefore of a capacity for transcendental
meditation quite alien to the spirit of Catholicism and even Islam, both of
which display quite markedly antimetachemical shortfalls, hedged around by
prayer, from a metaphysical hegemony and are more vulnerable to noumenally
sensual and anti-noumenally sensible subversion and domination in
consequence.
83. Yet even the Buddhist approach to God the Father, and hence to
godliness, is at a mankind-like disadvantage to godliness per se
and is therefore yet another, if higher, manifestation of pseudo-godliness
coupled, with females, to pseudo-antidevilishness. There has not been a
genuine manifestation of God the Father to-date, neither in mankind nor, not
altogether surprisingly, in the older contexts of nature and the Cosmos, for
the simple reason that God is not definitive and of an effectively per se
order of metaphysics until metaphysics is in its most evolved
psychic mode, which is precisely the mode we have identified with the
cyborgization of life in relation to global universality and not to the more
(compared to most) evolved metaphysics in relation to mankind, i.e. Buddhist
transcendental meditation and to a lesser extent, with verbal absolution for
penitential contrition, Roman Catholicism; the less (compared to least) evolved
metaphysics in relation to nature, i.e. winged seed-pods on trees; or the least
evolved metaphysics in relation to the Cosmos, i.e. planets like Saturn which
are predominantly gaseous and of a haloed disposition that lends them a degree
of sensibility as far as the main body of the planet is concerned, all of which
less than per se modes of psychic evolution are ‘pseudo’ manifestations
of godliness vis-à-vis the definitive mode to come, with the development of
cyborgization (though not for its own sake) in ‘Kingdom Come’.
84. Thus God the Father is only definitive with what might be
called his fourth manifestation, the manifestation beyond anything cosmic,
natural or human which we have described as cyborgistic, and therefore His
Word, duly computerized and interneted, so to speak, is oriented to global
universality and is quite independent of either Western or Eastern traditions,
neither of which amount to a truly viable blueprint for what is to come and,
indeed, for what already exists in terms of the antihumanist stage of global
civilization, since they betray the limitations inherent in an imperfect, or
‘pseudo’, kind of noumenal sensibility and anti-noumenal sensuality,
limitations which either put the metaphorical cart before the horse, as in the
case of Catholicism (with its bound-somatic emphasis on ‘the Son’, the
‘Crucified’, to the detriment of free psyche), or exclude the horse altogether,
as in the case of those more markedly antimetachemical religions which, like
Islam, are more inveterately locked-in to perpendicular triangularity under the
dominance of an older and even per se, because cosmic, mode of
noumenal sensuality, call it Jehovah or ‘the Creator’ or ‘the Almighty’
or what have you, that precludes them from turning their back on it and
embracing metaphysics in anti-noumenally sensual and, more importantly,
noumenally sensible independence of anything alpha-oriented in the
aforementioned way, an independence which requires that clean break with, and
therefore rejection of, cosmic first movers before anything genuinely
metaphysical in Buddhist and more than Buddhist fashion can be entertained and
effectively deferred to, deferred to as Antidevil the Antimother to the Son of
God and, more significantly, as the Antidaughter of the Antidevil to God the
Father, the freely psychic manifestation of metaphysics that would require a
secondary church-hegemonic complement from antimetachemistry in the form of the
aforesaid Antidaughter of the Antidevil’s beautiful approach to Truth and the
Unclear Soul of Antihell’s loving approach to Joy, neither of which would be
commensurate with Truth and Joy as such, but simply the female complement to a
male hegemony in metaphysics, or time over antispace, Eternity over
Anti-Infinity.
85. To some extent one finds this hegemony enshrined in Islam,
where males and females have different statuses and therefore different
positions or places within the Mosque, and I can only admire and respect this
traditional religion’s resolve to differentiate between the genders in such fashion
that, with the burka, or head-covering veil-like attire worn by Moslem females,
one cannot but detect a parallel with the noumenally sensible/antinoumenally
sensual distinction between the Celestial City and anti-Vanity Fair that is of
the essence of the North East point of our axial compass. And yet, for
all its commendable attitude to gender differentiation and segregation within
religion, Islam remains less than fully or properly metaphysical and is
subject, in consequence I dare say of environmental pressures germane to the
Middle East in particular (though to the Moslem diaspora to lesser extents), to
the aforementioned subsuming within a perpendicular triangle characterized, in
noumenally sensual and anti-noumenally sensible vein, by the dominance of the
concept of a cosmic First Mover stretching all the way back to some
stellar-like body equivalent, in Judaism, to Jehovah, the alleged creator of
the world and, indeed, of the cosmos in general!
86. Allah is patently not Jehovah, but a useful generalization for
such pseudo-noumenal sensibility and pseudo-antinoumenal sensuality as exists
for Islam within a context largely characterized, via environmental
conditioning, by a cosmic bias and by adherence to cosmic roots. But,
like Jehovah, this sensible position in perpendicular triangularity, completing
a kind of Cupidian axis, is ranged against its Satanic position corresponding,
as I have argued, to the only real male component of the three and thus to the
one that is fated, in triangular convention, to play ‘fall guy’ for denigration
as devil, even though, as I believe I have shown, such a position, albeit
sensual, is less devilish than antigodly, less of Devil the Mother or, for that
matter, Antidevil the Antimother … than of the Antison of Antigod, and
therefore an effectively anti-Christic type postulate that is obliged to play
freely-somatic ‘second fiddle’ to Devil the Mother (hyped as God) while a more
bound soma, affiliated to antimetachemistry, ‘looks on’ with some degree of
sensible disdain for the sensual.
87. In truth, that triangular set-up is not an enviable cultural
situation; for it enslaves all who relate to it to cosmic criteria and
therefore reinforces the notion of a cosmic First Mover at the expense of
anything re-born even to a Catholic or Buddhist extent which, in the former
case at least, is more germane to the New Testament than to the Old.
Neither, as we have found, can the more Satanic or Davidian ‘fall guy’ types,
roughly corresponding to the so-called ‘Father’ under the so-called ‘Risen
Virgin’ of Catholic triangularity (once the so-called ‘Sacred Heart of the
Risen Christ’ is also taken into account), escape from their denigrated
position while the criteria which keep them there remain intact and have not
been rejected in favour of a more sensible re-birth. They, like their
female adversaries, are fated, in the meantime, to remain where and as they
are, with no prospect of redress.
88. Therefore everything traditionally Eastern, like everything
traditionally Western, will have to be rejected before global civilization can
expect to get properly into its universal stride and achieve something like an
evolutionary ascendancy, in transcendentalism, over its currently devolutionary
position in respect of antihumanism. How and when this will come
about remains to be seen, but we may expect ongoing reaction to the ‘march of
globalization’ from persons who cling, for reasons best known to themselves, to
their respective Eastern or Western traditions in the face of global change.
And yet global universality is the only solution to the religious problems and
ethnic conflicts besetting both the East and the West, since freedom is
impossible so long as traditions persist in existing which cling to
Creatoresque primitivity in deference to some cosmic First Mover which, in the
nature of the context, can only be more noumenally sensual and thus
stellaresque than noumenally sensible and Saturnian, even with the theological
arrogation to the former of attributes more sensibly befitting the latter, for
reasons of priestly expedience.
89. The strange and paradoxical fact of the matter is that
godliness has still to arise in anything approximating a genuine mode; for all
these centuries after Christ we are still in a position that defers to Devil
the Mother hyped as God, and even the Catholic Christ who sits, in
post-resurrectional vein, on the right hand of the so-called ‘Father’ On High,
corresponds to a postulate which is conditioned by such Creatoresque Old
Testament primitivity and therefore to one that is effectively a
pseudo-transcendentalist if not blatantly antifundamentalist and effectively
antimaterialist adjunct to Devil the Mother hyped as God, i.e. to Jehovah and
other such takes on a per se manifestation, in most (devolved) somatic
freedom, of noumenal sensuality, even if Catholicism also furnishes its own
‘Father’ in the antimetaphysical guise, under metachemistry, of a mankind-like
parallel to ears under eyes, which has been superimposed, New Testament-wise,
upon the older manifestations of perpendicular triangularity stretching back,
via David under Saul, to Satan under Jehovah, and which would not constitute
the upper plane in the co-existence of space with antitime so much as the
positions held, in the Old Testament, by David and Satan, the male positions
vis-à-vis a metachemical, and therefore female, hegemony in the forms,
effectively, of Saul and Jehovah, not to mention, where Catholic
triangularity is concerned, the so-called Risen Virgin – in actuality, a
vacuous postulate that does not coincide with antimetachemistry, as in the case
of the ‘Sacred Heart of the Risen Christ’, but with a sensual first mover
corresponding to Devil the Mother.
90. And yet antimetachemistry is characterized by Antidevil the
Antimother in bound soma and is therefore germane to the heart and its spirit,
the blood, viz. Antihell the Unclear Spirit, as well as to such free ego and
free soul as can be postulated in relation to the Antidaughter of the Antidevil
and the Unclear Soul of Antihell where psychic freedom of a secondary, compared
to metaphysics, church-hegemonic order is concerned. But a resurrected
Son identified with the ‘Sacred Heart’ does not help clarify the context and is
a consequence, in large part, of the extent to which Western religion remains
in the grip of metachemistry even as it aspires, somewhat paradoxically in the
guise of antimetachemistry, towards metaphysics, a metaphysics which does not
and cannot ‘come out’, in Buddhist-like meditatively transcendental vein, by dint
of the extent to which Old Testament criteria still obtain in respect of a
cosmic First Mover and hold the North East point of our axial compass back from
anything like a transcendent independence of not merely fundamentalist but, in
free metachemical soma, materialist criteria, the very criteria which are
rooted, Jehovah-like, in free will and which thereby constitute an evil
opposition to the prospect of anything gracefully content.
91. Evil, and its bound-psychic adjunct crime, will not cease to
rule over religion until the People democratically elect to break the
connection with it, with Devil the Mother hyped as God, by voting for religious
sovereignty in a paradoxical election commensurate, so I contend, with
Judgement and thus the prospect, in the event of a majority mandate, of what
has been called, somewhat paradoxically, ‘Kingdom Come’, meaning the
establishment, under Social Theocracy, of the Centre as the politico-religious
context in which religious sovereignty is encouraged to flourish and the
People’s rights in relation to such an ultimate sovereignty, the resolution and
redemption of political republicanism, are both protected and advanced.
92. A religiously sovereign People, destined for supra-human
transmutation with the development of cyborgization in conjunction with
hallucinogenic and psychogenic enlightenment for males coupled to what could be
called a somato-proscriptive curtailment of females with wider recourse,
overall, to tranquillizers and depressants than to stimulants, would thus be
delivered from all such Creatoresque primitivity, rooted in a cosmic first
mover, which continues to characterize traditional religion and to hold it back
from universalization within parameters which have been described as Eastern or
Western, as the case may be, and therefore of little or no consequence from a
global standpoint, a standpoint which is already well under way with
devolutionary antihumanism but which still remains to get under way in terms of
evolutionary supra-humanism and thus transcendentalism, as confirmed by the
absence, at this point in time, of religious sovereignty in the People due to
the want of Social Theocratic leadership.
93. But all that, I feel sure, will change in the decades and
centuries to come, and ‘humanity’ will embark, via antihumanism, on its
greatest task to-date, the task of building towards God, of establishing and
actually becoming God or, in the female case, the Antidevil in complete
independence of what has passed for God and the Devil up till now, and
therefore in categorical rejection of Devil the Mother and the Antison of
Antigod.
94. God, for these liberated persons, will not be there for his
own sake but to utilize whatever most approximates to the Son of God in
metaphysical bound will and to the Holy Spirit of Heaven in metaphysical bound
spirit to advance beyond metaphysical free ego to metaphysical free soul,
thereby achieving his redemption in Heaven. God the Father will lead to
Heaven the Holy Soul, and the knock-on effect of this on females will be that
Antidevil the Antimother in antimetachemical bound will and Antihell the
Unclear Spirit in antimetachemical bound spirit will come into play and act as
a support for the antimetachemical free ego of the Antidaughter of the Antidevil
and the antimetachemical free soul of the Unclear Soul of Antihell, thereby
completing the virtuous circle in which a beautiful approach to Truth and a
loving approach to Joy will complement Truth and Joy from a basis rooted in
Beauty and Love but stemming from the metaphysical impositions of the truthful
approach to Beauty and the joyful approach to Love of, respectively, the Son of
God and the Holy Spirit of Heaven.
95. In this ultimate religious scenario
it is evident that God, too, would have been liberated from all that, in the
past, held the concept and indeed actuality of God back from the possibility of
definitive realization and actualization. For under the pressure of
civilizations based in the Cosmos God was subsumed into the Devil, into Devil
the Mother hyped as God, and what, on the other hand, properly appertained to
God in his least evolved, or Saturn-like manifestation, would have counted for
little or nothing compared to the more prevalent arrogation of divine
attributes, admittedly on a somewhat selective and intermittent basis, to
stellar or, in elemental terms, fiery primacy.
96. Likewise, under the pressure of civilizations based in nature,
God was subsumed into woman, into Woman the Mother hyped as God, and what, on
the other hand, properly appertained to God in his less (compared to least)
evolved, or winged-seedpod, manifestation would have counted for little or
nothing compared to the more prevalent arrogation of divine attributes, again
on a rather selective basis, to feminine or, in elemental terms, watery
primacy. For here it is not the Creator, some creatoresque ‘Almighty’ in
noumenal sensuality, so much as the so-called ‘Mother of God’ who most
characterizes religion with this stage or type of civilization, while her male
counterpart is little more than a child on his mother’s knee in reflection of
the under-plane subservience of antiphysics to chemistry, antimass to volume,
in what we have identified as the phenomenally sensual/antiphenomenally
sensible South West point of our axial compass.
97. Similarly, if in contrary axial vein, God was subsumed, with
civilizations based urbanely in urban civility, into man, into the Son of Man
hyped as God, and what, on the other hand, properly appertained to God in his
more (compared to most) evolved, or transcendentally meditative, manifestation
would have counted for little or nothing compared to the more prevalent
arrogation of divine attributes, selectively and intermittently, to masculine
or, in elemental terms, vegetative supremacy. For here it is not the
‘Mother of God’, some semi-creatoresque extrapolation, in phenomenal
sensuality, from a noumenally sensual First Mover in the Cosmos, so much as the
so-called ‘Son of God’ who most characterizes religion at this stage or type of
civilization, while his female counterpart is little more than a textural
adjunct to the ‘Son of Man’ in reflection of the under-plane subservience of
antichemistry to physics, antivolume to mass, in what we have identified as the
phenomenally sensible/antiphenomenally sensual South East point of our axial
compass.
98. But neither the subsuming of the notion of God into the Devil,
woman, or man under cosmic, natural, or urban criteria can bring God to light
in his own independent right, and therefore the struggle to liberate God from
all other arrogations, not least, in respect of
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axial criteria, his subsuming within a
context dominated, in female vein, by nature, is what will constitute, in
reflection of my own intellectual struggles, the Social Theocratic dispensation
to come, as and when those who now exist under the dominion of the ‘Mother of
God’ can be democratically prevailed upon to vote for religious sovereignty and
elect to be saved and counter-damned more efficaciously from their
alpha-worldly and anti-omegaworldly positions at the foot of the axis in
question than would otherwise be possible, saved from antiphysics to a
metaphysics that is independent of Creatoresque subversion and arrogation, and
therefore capable of standing up for God as God actually is in relation to what
properly constitutes the godly in terms of a most evolved manifestation of
psychic freedom commensurate with airy supremacy.
99. For here it will not be some semi-messianic antithesis, in
phenomenal sensibility, to a phenomenally sensual first mover in nature, so
much as God the Father as such that will most characterize religion in this
stage or type of civilization, while his female counterpart will be little more
than a somato-proscriptive adjunct to such hallucinogenic and/or psychogenic
freedoms characterizing God per se in reflection of the
under-plane subservience of antimetachemistry to metaphysics, antispace to
time, in what has been identified with the noumenally sensible/antinoumenally
sensual North East point of our axial compass, the point absolutely
antithetical to everything noumenally sensual and anti-noumenally sensible and
therefore to the root subversion and arrogation of godly attributes by and to a
context dominated by Devil the Mother and, hence, the Devil per se,
whose creative instinct affirms free will in contradiction of all that is holy
and truly divine.
100. Therefore until the People come, via Social
Theocracy, to reject this Creatoresque impostor and fundamental lie at the
barbarous roots of both Eastern and, to a lesser extent, Western civilization,
they will not enter into that final liberation from evil which is commensurate
with deliverance from the alpha world and anti-omegaworld to one presided over
by a liberated godhead who is himself culturally independent of the
Devil, woman, and man or, as one could alternatively put it, of cosmic
barbarism, natural philistinism, and urban civility, in the supra-urban culture
of what properly appertains to God. Those who were ‘last’ in the
anti-omegaworld of antimasculine antiphysics will become ‘first’ in the
liberated Other World of divine metaphysics, while those who were ‘first’ in
the alpha-world of feminine chemistry will become ‘last’ in the liberated
anti-Nether World of antidiabolic antimetachemistry, becoming as the proverbial
‘antilion’ that ‘lies down’ with the ‘lamb’, the lamb of God the Father in his per se,
because most evolved, manifestation.