19
Have just finished reading, in fairly quick
succession, Backroads
Guide to Germany, which is fine if you happen to own a car or can
drive, and Walking Dublin, for which all that is required is a steady
pair of legs and, notwithstanding the likelihood of one's getting wet, the
ability to follow complex road and pavement directions in order to track down
significant or interesting destinations.
Travelling around out-of-the-way places in
Germany is, frankly, beyond me, since I don't possess a car and, even if I
could afford to rent one, have never driven anywhere under any circumstances.
But walking around Dublin is something that I did, on several occasions, in the
past, so I have some experience of what it takes, though not necessarily in
relation to some of the places outlined in the aforementioned book which, in
any case, is a comparatively recent publication. I can still remember, however,
the thrill I got on first sighting, almost by accident, the Spire as I
approached it from Henry Street, only noticing it when a few yards from where
it stands in the middle of O'Connell Street. Such a thrill, or buzz of
excitement, can only happen once.
These days, traipsing around
++++++
Rarely do I have a thought that goes
uncensored, as it were, from some bimbo of a neighbour, be it juvenile or adult,
whose extraordinary sensitivity to thought, or at any rate to my predilection
for thinking, results in a fit of stamping or banging or whatever. It almost
makes one afraid to think, though I shall not be put off that easily, given my
understanding of life as a gender war in which will and spirit, germane to what
is properly female, objectively war on ego and soul, germane, by contrast, to
all that is properly, and therefore subjectively, male. You simply cannot give
in or surrender. You have to keep on fighting … in my case the 'good fight' for
the eventual triumph of soul in what is loosely termed 'Kingdom Come'.
To that end I have dedicated the greater part
of my life's work, which has included the ideological invention, as it were, of
Social Theocracy as the precondition of Social Transcendentalism and everything
that it morally stands for, not least the eventual democratic superseding, in
countries with the right kind of (church-hegemonic) axial preconditions, of
political sovereignty in the mass by religious sovereignty and the exchange of
rights accruing to the former for rights accruing to the latter in what will
necessarily have to be a male-dominated society in which 'the world' of or,
rather, as an expression of female domination has been 'overcome', to use a Nietzschean term, and man or, more correctly, what is
properly male has been set free of, in particular, wilful subversion,
culminating in a social structure analogous to that of the proverbial Saint and
(neutralized) Dragon, that is, metaphysical male and pseudo-metachemical
pseudo-female distinctions in which whatever is predatory 'lies down', through
neutralization, with whatever has traditionally, in its soul-oriented
subjectivity, been the victim of female predation, or predation motivated by
reproductive need, and this despite appearances or presumptions on the part of
many males (especially pseudo-males) to the contrary!
In the meantime the fight goes on, at least
with me, who knows full well that peace will not come until victory has been
won and one's soul-mind is free to be true to itself, as 'God in Heaven',
without fear or proof, based in evidence and experience, of external subversion
and censure.
++++++
Now that women are rampant, liberated from
gender subordination and glorying in their somatic freedoms, it is difficult to
find anyone with a genuine sense of what it means to be religious and therefore
engaged in 'fighting the good fight', as the saying goes. Easier
to find accomplices to if not champions of female liberation and effective
gender domination. Pseudo-males, who 'suck up' to women, having 'made
their peace', such as it is, with 'the world' and consequently turned their
backs on, if not overtly repudiated, any otherworldly aspiration, deeming it
fanciful or unrealistic or somehow 'contrary to nature' and at loggerheads with
what lies behind Nature in the Cosmos....Which, however, is what true religion
should be, if less, for me, from a Christian standpoint than, hopefully in the
future, from a kind of Superchristian one that I, of
course, would identify with Social Theocracy, conceiving of it as the logical
successor, as it were, to what I have customarily identified as properly
Christian, namely Roman Catholicism, with its axial purchase (southwest to
northeast points of the intercardinal axial compass)
on metaphysics, albeit a necessarily and, in a sense, regrettably truncated
metaphysics in consequence of the Creator-esque
prevalence, in back (effectively corresponding to the northwest point of the intercardinal axial compass), of metachemistry
and all that has anchored, in Judaic vein, the Christian extrapolation, in New
Testament fashion, of what is broadly termed the Judeo-Christian tradition,
even though, except in the case of Protestants, the principal components of
that tradition, namely Judaism and Roman Catholicism, are at axial loggerheads
and in no wise compatible.
In fact, they are mutually irreconcilable, like
the alpha and omega of the Middle East and what, in the case of Western Europe,
could be called the Middle West respectively, the former autocratically rooted
in Creator-ism (Jehovah), the latter straining on a theocratic leash, as it
were, towards the Crucifixional paradigm of bound
metaphysical soma in respect of Christ, the one necessarily precluding, by its
very existence, any possibility of free metaphysical psyche on the part of the
other, since metaphysical free psyche, the preponderating ratio aspect (3:1) of
metaphysics, is only possible in the event of metaphysical freedom from metachemistry and a repudiation, in consequence, of
everything associated with Creator-ism, that is, with God as Creator or First
Mover or so-called Father in back of Nature and the world in general. Such a repudiation might be considered atheist by some, but to me
it is the precondition of a truly divine orientation in relation to both the
bound soma and, more importantly, the free psyche of metaphysics as the
prerogative of saved males.
******