ON IDEOLOGICAL SPECTRA
1. From the autocratic
and the democratic to the theocratic; from the monarch and the prime minister
and/or president to the dictator.
2. From the monarchic
and the prime ministerial and/or presidential to the dictatorial; from rule and
representation to service.
3. From autocratic and
democratic economics to theocratic economics; from Feudalism and Capitalism
and/or Socialism to Centrism (Centre trusteeship of the means of production).
4. From autocratic and
democratic politics to theocratic politics; from Authoritarianism and
Parliamentarianism to Totalitarianism.
5. From autocratic and
democratic religion to theocratic religion; from Paganism and/or Roman
Catholicism and Protestantism and/or Communism to Social Transcendentalism
and/or Super-transcendentalism.
6. From autocratic
economics and democratic politics to theocratic religion; from Feudalism and
Parliamentarianism to Social Transcendentalism.
7. From autocratic
politics and democratic religion to theocratic economics; from Authoritarianism
and Protestantism and/or Communism to Centrism.
8. From autocratic
religion and democratic economics to theocratic politics; from Paganism and/or
Roman Catholicism and Capitalism and/or Socialism to Totalitarianism.
9. From autocratic
economics and politics to autocratic religion; from Feudalism and
Authoritarianism to Roman Catholicism.
10. From democratic
economics and politics to democratic religion; from Capitalism and/or Socialism
and Parliamentarianism to Protestantism and/or Communism.
11. From theocratic
economics and politics to theocratic religion; from Centrism and
Totalitarianism to Social Transcendentalism.
12. From an economic
(proton) root and a political (atomic) stem to a religious (electron) flower;
from soul and matter to spirit.
13. In Ireland, where
Social Transcendentalism should first take root, economics and politics will be
subordinated to religion. Hence, while
being centrist and totalitarian, Social Transcendentalism should remain primarily
religious. In other words, Social
Transcendentalism comes first, because in
14. Social Transcendentalism is the first phase
of a proletarian religion, the relative (LSD-induced visionary awareness) phase
leading, in due course, to Super-transcendentalism, in which hypermeditation becomes the absolute focus of religious
endeavour.
15. With the attainment
to the second phase of proletarian religion, both economics and politics will
effectively cease to exist in any recognizable sense. However, while Social Transcendentalism is
the order of the day, centrism and totalitarianism will continue to prevail,
though in a subordinate capacity to the religious essence of the movement. Social Transcendentalism is not politically
centrist (in the middle-ground sense of that term), but religiously cent(e)rist. For the Centre, as defined by me in relation
to Social Transcendentalism, is the most radically omega-orientated of all
phenomena.
16. Although embracing both economic and
political responsibilities, the Social Transcendentalist leader will
predominantly remain what he had been (before assuming office), namely an
electron equivalent, and this because he is not simply a dictator but, more
importantly, a religious guide, the embodiment, as it were, of the Holy
Spirit. Thus his sovereignty is
primarily justified on religious grounds, in contrast to the sovereignty of a
political and/or economic dictator like Hitler or Mussolini, who puts politics
first, whether in terms of Nazism or Fascism.
17. Instead of subordinating religion - Protestant
and/or Catholic - to politics, as did Fascism, Social Transcendentalism will
subordinate politics to religion and economics to politics. Both of these fundamentally diabolical
phenomena will be eclipsed by religion and absorbed into the Leader, who,
alone, should have the moral and spiritual strength to bear them in the name of
truth and the concomitant development by the People of their spiritual
potential. Neither economics nor
politics can corrupt the Social Transcendental Messiah, who will subordinate
these proton and atomic phenomena to his electron will, which is divine.
18. Thus he who represents the Divine Will is the
true approximation to the Second Coming and/or True World Messiah. Neither Hitler nor Mussolini can be said to
have done so! Only the Leader of Social
Transcendentalism can be accredited true messianic status; for he is
essentially an electron equivalent, who must subordinate politics and economics
to his will.
19. Consequently, he forms an antithesis to the
true kings of autocratic antiquity, monarchs who were proton equivalents ruling
the populace in their own, largely soulful interests. Such kings may have been surrounded, in time,
by an electron-biased ruling nobility, or aristocracy, but their
responsibilities of state ensured a less hedonistic, and therefore more
stoical, lifestyle. Likewise the leader
of a Social Transcendentalist society may find himself,
in the relative nature of things, surrounded by a proton-biased serving
nobility, or bureaucracy, who must execute his will and thus serve the
People. But for all his dictatorial
responsibilities, he will remain predominantly an electron equivalent, in
spiritual touch with the electron-biased proletariat to a no-less significant
extent than (was) the ruling monarch of autocratic antiquity in soulful touch
with the proton-biased peasantry of his kingdom.
20. Monarch - aristocracy - peasantry/soldiery: a
proton - electron - proton-biased atomicity indicating a distinct bias for the
proton side of matter. Leader -
bureaucracy - proletariat/police: an electron - proton - electron-biased
atomicity indicating a distinct bias for the electron side of matter. The former stemming from
the proton-proton reactions of pure soul; the latter aspiring towards the
electron-electron attractions of pure spirit. From the Father to the Holy
Ghost, as from the First Cause to the Final Effect.
21. And yet one should never forget that such
atomic divisions and structures are but rough guides to basic realities rather
than immutable absolutes. There is an
electron side to every proton equivalent; a proton side to every electron
equivalent. The king, too, can be
hedonistically self-indulgent when it suits him. The leader can also be ruthlessly dictatorial
when he considers it appropriate to be so.
True absolutes are both anterior and posterior to material evolution,
though flame can consume it. The real
purpose of our being here is to get spirit beyond material constraints and,
worse still, its exposure to soul. For
pure spirit is indestructible!
22. Ideal slogan for the true Irish people:
Forever theocratic!
23. Militant propaganda slogan against the false
Irish people: Democrats beware, theocrats are here!
24. Just as, for the revolutionary democrat
struggling on behalf of socialist ideology in a liberal democracy, the most
appropriate slogan would be: Forward to a People’s democracy! so, for the revolutionary theocrat struggling on behalf of
Social Transcendentalism in a Catholic theocracy, the most appropriate slogan
must be: Forward to a People’s theocracy!
25. As liberal democracy
to the socialist revolutionary, so Roman Catholicism to the revolutionary
theocrat. You do not extend the
democratic spectrum (from liberal to social democracy) without a struggle with
the liberal status quo. Similarly, you
will not extend the theocratic spectrum (from Roman Catholicism to Social
Transcendentalism) without a struggle with the Catholic status quo. Needless to say, both struggles are mutually
exclusive.
26. Catholicism corresponds to a grand-bourgeois
autocratic (feudal) theocracy. By
contrast, Social Transcendentalism will correspond to a proletarian theocratic
(centrist) theocracy. There is all the difference
between the Middle Ages and the twenty-first century
in these two theocracies.
27. People have often spoken of a Jewish world
conspiracy, but, in reality, there can be no such thing. The Jew will never dominate the world, for
the simple reason that we are evolving towards an ideological identification
and away, in consequence, from tribal roots.
Social Transcendentalists of Jewish descent may well be in highly
influential positions in the world to-come, but to regard them as Jews would be
to fall into an anachronistic trap nothing short of slanderous!
28. An Israeli Social Transcendentalist would be
as far from being a Jew as an Irish Social Transcendentalist from being a
Celt. As far as I am concerned, Israelis
and Irishmen are but passing (nationalist) phenomena in between tribal and
ideological extremes. In the coming age,
there will be neither Jews nor Celts, neither Israelis nor Irishmen, but
regional components of supra-national federations of Social Transcendental
Centres.
29. One should perhaps distinguish between worker
and proletarian, reserving the use of the latter term for citizens of socialist
states, with the implication that they signify a transformation from the proton
to the electron side of an atomic integrity, and are therefore essentially
different from and superior to the proton-biased masses of a bourgeois state
who, by contrast, are but an evolutionary stage further along from peasants
(serfs), as a liberal manifestation of proton enslavement.
30. In this respect, nothing could be more subjective
and slanderous than to refer to proletarians in socialist states as 'mob',
'rabble', 'herd', etc., as some Western writers, of liberal tendency, are only
too disposed to doing. If such terms are
ever applicable to the people at all, they would seem more relevant to the
proton masses, or workers, of a liberal society, who are simply the exploited
and exploitable victims of a bourgeois elite, and may accordingly come to
reflect this fact, from time to time, in uncivilized conduct and speech.
31. Social Transcendentalism in Ireland cannot
solely appeal to proletarians, but must be regarded as an Irish Movement, a
movement intended to extend theocracy in a Social Transcendentalist direction,
rather than to extend democracy in a socialist one, and consequently aimed at
the supersession of all democracy and, by
implication, republicanism, which is but an acknowledgement of the People’s
political sovereignty, the very sovereignty Social Transcendentalism looks down
upon from its theocratic vantage-point.
32. For its founder knows that religious
sovereignty signifies a superior evolutionary development, being a reflection
of post-republican and truly theocratic
thinking, in which the Leader comes to embody and/or intimate of the Holy
Spirit in his correspondence to a Second Coming, beyond and above any
democratic sovereignty, the kind that every true Irishman will know, in his
heart of hearts, to be a Protestant phenomenon, more relevant to the British
than to the time-honoured upholders of a theocratic bias.
