ON REVOLUTIONARY CHANGE
1. The only true and
worthwhile revolution is the one that changes everything, not just a few things
here and there! The Social
Transcendentalist revolution, if successful, will be the most radical and
far-reaching revolution ever. The
Kingdom or, rather, Centre that he who corresponds to a Second Coming/True
World Messiah intends to establish ... will be no mere continuation of
open-society democracy, but the radical break with tradition, nature, the
world, etc., that all true believers, whether Christian or Judaic, have awaited
for centuries - a break that will confirm them in their belief and test its
authenticity.
2. Those who oppose this revolution will be
judged severely, as they fully deserve!
The sword of truth will cleave the faithless from the faithful, the
liars from the true. Only those with
faith in my teachings will be saved for the Centre, the others ... damned to a banishment irrevocable!
And they include all those who appear Christian on the surface but, underneath,
would oppose the Second Coming and seek to protect the Church from criticism
and supersession, the false believers who have
substituted the institution of the Church for the living truth it exists to
convey, the truth of the 'kingdom within', and would consequently oppose
radical change, especially any radical change that threatens their vested
interests.
3. Christ taught that those who came unto Him
would have to abandon parents and family.
It is ever the same where a true revolutionary is concerned. You do not become a revolutionary by clinging
to tradition or by hanging-on to the luxuries of bourgeois life. You must be free, absolutely free, for the
cause, not be inhibited by concern for parents or family. You must be prepared, if necessary, to
sacrifice them for it!
4. If heterosexual behaviour is natural and
homosexual behaviour anti-natural, corresponding, in political terms, to a
communist opposition or alternative to liberal democracy, then anal intercourse
between women and men should be regarded as a kind of homosexual
heterosexuality, the sexual equivalent of democratic socialism, a sort of
relative or diluted anti-naturalism in between liberal and communist contexts. Alternatively, one could contend that, in the
evolution of anti-natural sexuality, anal 'heterosexuality' precedes
bisexuality, meaning an oscillation between straight heterosexuality and
homosexuality, a more extreme relativity than that evinced by the anal
violation of women, though a degree of this may still figure in bisexual
relations or practices.
5. Thus one would be distinguishing, to risk a
further political analogy, between a Democratic Socialist equivalent and a
Social Democratic equivalent, the one preceding the other as from early to late
stages of petty-bourgeois evolution.
6. If one were to return to the absolutist
inception of the democratic spectrum, one would probably be justified in also
speaking of Cromwellian or Whig lesbianism, but that
is another matter and now I only wish to add that, by contrast, a truly
theocratic sexuality, i.e. a supernatural sexuality, must involve recourse to
pornography of one degree or another, either with adults (soft or hard) or -
more for the transcendental future than the mundane present - the use, via
computers, of lawful teenage juveniles.
7. A supernatural sexuality is precisely one in
which there is still a natural relation between model and masturbator/voyeur,
as between female and male, vagina and penis, except that, the model being a
reproduction and not a real-life flesh-and-blood woman, the sexual
proceedings/relations are necessarily one-sided (absolutist) and
sublimated. Hence
supernatural.
8. The present age is
partial to much hard-core adult pornography, and this static mode of sublimated
sexuality can be contrasted with the video/film active mode which suggests a
sexual parallel with a military dictatorship, i.e. the pseudo-autocratic
successor to the autocratic rule of monarchs.
The sex film does not, as a rule, induce supernatural participation but,
rather, the subordination of the viewer to the passive role of voyeur of other
people's sexual activity. A contrast, no
doubt, with the pagan inception of autocratic sexuality in the worship of
erotic sculpture, some of which, being static, must have induced actual
copulation.
9. One wonders whether the numerous arms and
legs of certain oriental statues, for instance, were not specifically intended
to discourage active participation by suggesting animation, the ever-active
dance of sexual life. Speculation aside,
the significance of contemporary sublimated sexuality in the evolution of life
towards a theocratic climax cannot be underestimated, and, certainly,
pornographic erotica will continue to be respected wherever theocracy gains the
ascendancy, even, in some future societies, to the extent of completely
displacing other modes of sexuality, the democratic not excepted.
10. The genuine artist
is ever a law unto himself, a man who says what he wants to irrespective of
whether or not it will be appreciated by the majority of people. He is a kind of Arts Führer,
in whom creative sovereignty resides, and he leads from above, setting new
standards and creating fresh interpretative possibilities, which the public may
draw near to if they wish or, more correctly, are capable of appreciating what
he has suggested, achieved, or whatever.
11. Thus he is essentially theocratic, in
contrast to the bogus, or democratic, artist, who aims to please the broad
masses - whether bourgeois or proletarian - and thus prostitutes his creative
talent (such as it is) in the name of popularity and, by implication, financial
success. In a democratic society, the
genuine artist will always be the exception, doing his own thing at the expense
of popular acclamation and, hence, financial betterment. But an age is coming when no democratic art
will be available, and then, in the theocratic society that ensues, the
theocratic artist will be the rule - in fact, the only representative of
artistic endeavour.
12. Economics - politics - religion; science -
philosophy - art; autocratic - democratic - theocratic; aristocratic -
plutocratic - meritocratic; beauty - goodness -
truth; pleasure - love - happiness; Father - Son - Holy Ghost; protons -
neutrons - electrons; kingdom - state - centre; propitiation - worship -
self-realization; subego - ego - superego; soul -
matter - spirit; Hell - Purgatory - Heaven; child - youth - adult.
13. The aristocratic kingdom - the technocratic
church/plutocratic state - and the meritocratic
centre: from the autocratic to the theocratic via the bureaucratic/democratic,
paralleling an evolutionary progression from the Father to the Holy Spirit via
the Son, Who, in His humanistic relativity, embraces both the aristocratic and
the meritocratic, as a kind of diluted Father and
Holy Spirit respectively, but is not, in any absolute sense, aristocratic or meritocratic.
14. The next
civilization will be as much beyond Christ as the Christian one was beyond the
Father, or Creator. There can be no
literal Second Coming ... of Christ as a cross between alpha
and omega. Embodied Holy Spirit
does not acknowledge the Father, but champions an evolutionary course set on
the freeing of all spirit from the body.
He who corresponds to a Second Coming, i.e. the founder and teacher of
what, in its radical truthfulness, deserves to become a truly global religion,
does not bear the name 'Christ', and neither should he be regarded as
such. For that would be an insult to
peoples of non-Christian descent.
15. Those who believe in a literal return of
Christ are simply the dupes of theological expedience. No such Christ - transmuted into pure spirit
following His Ascension into Heaven - will ever return, for no such ascension
ever literally occurred. It was simply
theologically correct that the Church should have taught the Ascension into
Heaven (on the Third Day) in order to show simple humanity that there was more
to life than the body and its dying, that, due to evolutionary progress, a
dimension of life transcending the body had been discovered, as taught by
Christ, and that future progress for mankind lay in expanding the spiritual at
the expense of the sensual.
16. The Ascension served as a metaphor for this
divine possibility in man, as in evolution, and has accordingly been upheld
wherever Christian and equivalent religious teachings have prevailed. But in reality no man, not even Christ, can
ever literally ascend into Heaven, the realm of pure spirit. Evolution must pass through two post-human
life forms before transcendence becomes possible, and this contention is at the
core of my teachings, the teachings, as I said, of a new or second Christ-like
figure, less a Second Coming than - at any rate potentially - a True World
Messiah.
17. But there are vested
interests and fools who will cling to the past, seeking, in the process, to
deny or slander my teachings. It is
really amazing how many stupid people are in positions of traditional power,
people whose innate intelligence, even cleverness, has been stunted and limited
by their class allegiance to the doctrinal teachings of their faith and, not
least of all, by the influence of a rural or partly rural lifestyle, their
dependence on nature in natural or semi-natural surroundings precluding the
development of a truly radical, transcendental mentality!
18. Ah, the enemies of evolutionary progress are
legion, but Judgement must be severe if that progress is not to be held back
indefinitely by the purblind machinations of sophisticated fools! All power to the Centre! Let Social Transcendentalist truth spread
throughout the world, in order that it may eventually become united in the
faith of the ultimate theocracy!
