PART
ONE: EVALUATIONS
*
1. People may be categorized as historically
falling into one of four main subatomic categories, viz. proton particles,
proton wavicles, electron particles, and electron wavicles. The first category is widely prevalent in a
pagan age, when man is aligned with the Kingdom. The second category is widely prevalent in a
Christian age, when man is aligned with the Church. The third category is widely prevalent in a
secular age, when man is aligned with the State. And the fourth category is, or will be,
widely prevalent in a transcendental age, when man is, or will be, aligned with
the Centre. Currently it is the third
category that predominates; for whereas the State may, in most countries, have
superseded both the Kingdom and the Church, it has yet to be superseded by the
Centre.
2. Proton-particle types are generally
aristocrats and peasants, proton-wavicle types generally plutocrats and
white-collar workers; electron-particle types are generally bureaucrats and
blue-collar workers, electron-wavicle types generally meritocrats and folk.
3. Proton particles reflect a subatomic
absolutism, proton wavicles an atomic relativity biased towards protons;
electron particles reflect an atomic relativity biased towards electrons,
electron wavicles a supra-atomic absolutism.
4. Whereas proton particles and electron
wavicles are absolutely antithetical, being akin to alpha and omega, proton and
electron particles, together with proton and electron wavicles, are
antithetical equivalents, corresponding to two distinct stages of particle and
wavicle evolution, while proton particles and wavicles, proton wavicles and
electron particles, and electron particles and wavicles are relatively antithetical,
because contiguous.
5. Particles make for separatism and violence;
wavicles for cohesion and peace. Proton
particles, being the most separate, are also the most violent. Electron particles are not so much physically
violent as ... mentally violent, full of verbal abuse towards and cynical
estimation of others, particularly when of an alien class. Proton wavicles tend to cohere on an emotional
and a physical level. Electron wavicles
tend to cohere on a spiritual level.
6. Proletariat and folk co-exist to the extent
that the People may be divided into bad and good, particles and wavicles,
violent and peaceful, Marxist and transcendentalist, physical and spiritual.
7. The proletariat can and must be redeemed, but
this can only come about through Centrism and the consequent elevation of the
proletariat from electron particles to wavicles, commensurate with the
supersession of the State by the Centre.
Hence Centrism, or, to give it its politico-religious name, Social
Transcendentalism, must appeal to the People, not excepting the proletariat,
through the democratic machinery of the Irish State, and endeavour to win as
many of them to its cause as possible, in order that Social Transcendentalism
may become the legitimate expression of the People's will.
8. Thus Social Transcendentalism makes no appeal
to die-hard Catholics, or people who may be equated with proton wavicles. Still less does it appeal to proton-particle
equivalents, such as aristocrats and tribalists. It appeals solely to the electorate of the
(republican) State, and it wishes to redeem these electron-particle equivalents
through the electron wavicles of the Social Transcendental Centre, in order
that civilization may be re-established on the highest wavicle terms of a
transcendent aspiration, commensurate with the third 'Person' of the Trinity.
9. Thus Social Transcendentalism must use the
existing State as a springboard to its politico-religious objectives, including
the supersession of the Church, both Catholic and Protestant, by the
transcendent Centre, such a Centre becoming the focal-point of religious
devotion. By appealing to the
electron-particle electorate over the heads, as it were, of the more
conservative members of the church hierarchy, Social Transcendentalism intends
to circumvent the authority of religious tradition and bring the People to the
higher freedom of an electron-wavicle identification.
10. Yet, despite this, Social Transcendentalism
knows that the electorate it is appealing to are ever conscious of the
authority of the Church and remain loyal, in varying degrees, to its
teachings. Paradoxically it welcomes
this state-of-affairs as indicative of their innate wavicle bias, a bias still
extant despite all republican appearances to the contrary, and one which
justifies Social Transcendentalism in appealing to them in the name of higher
wavicle values ... such as a deeply and genuinely electron-particle people,
like the Americans, would reject, having failed to understand the values in
question.
11. Thus whilst electron particles are the appearance of the Irish
electorate, proton wavicles are their essence, their soul, and this
in spite of all republican gains to the contrary. Given their innate wavicle bias, it is
inconceivable that the true Irish people would be resigned to an indefinite
republicanism, least of all to one that stemmed from a socialist
take-over! They cling to traditional
wavicles for want of revolutionary guidance, and will continue to do so until
such guidance is provided, which can only be when Social Transcendentalism is
put across to them in the name of a wavicle upgrading, compatible with an
evolutionary progression from the soul to the spirit, from the lower (proton)
essence of a Catholic allegiance to the higher (electron) essence of a Centrist
one.
12. Hence we are faced with the curious paradox
that, as electorate, the Irish people are both free of the Church and yet
still, in a majority of cases, loyal to it, if on a comparatively superficial
basis in this electron-particle age.
Thus they are free, in the electoral context, to opt for a higher
'church' not only in the interests of evolutionary progress, but also in order
that they may become fully restored to a wavicle bias ... such as is consonant
with their essential natures as true Irish people. Naturally, certain vested interests higher up
the traditional church may seek to dissuade them from making full use of their
republican freedom in this electoral manner.
But such interests will not be on very firm ground in the face of
evolutionary requirement and a doctrine that speaks directly in the name of the
true interests of the majority Irish people!
It will be a test of the People's conscience that they should make up
their own minds in this very important matter and thus confirm their
suitability for a new wavicle alignment, consonant with the true religion
(potentially) of Social Transcendental Centrism, as taught by he who
corresponds to a Second Coming and inevitably appeals to his own to follow him.
13. Therefore any view of the true Irish people
which regards them in either an exclusively proton-wavicle light or an
exclusively electron-particle light is fundamentally misguided. Social Transcendentalism delves beneath the
superficial appearance to the profound essence and appeals to the latter
through the former, exploiting the democratic process for its own theocratic
ends. Only with the Centre will
14. Thus through the will of the Second Coming,
who more corresponds to the Jewish concept of a true (world) messiah than to
any literal return of Christ, should part of the world be redeemed in the
spirit of Social Transcendentalism, to morally confront that other part of the
world falsely redeemed in the body of Transcendental Socialism or, as it is
better known, Marxist Communism, preparatory to the eventual ideological
unification of the world under the guidance of the utmost supertheocratic
purism.
15. It may be that
16. To the extent that the Republic takes action
against Marxists and Communists, it is unwittingly serving our interests. For Social Transcendentalism can have no
truck with terrorism, least of all of a radically republican kind! Anything that leads towards socialist purism
is regarded by me as a betrayal of the theocratic essence of the true Irish
people, a kind of traitorous allegiance to materialist criteria. Efforts to overturn the existing state from a
Communist point-of-view are equally doomed to failure, and one can only applaud
the Irish authorities for their successes in combating subversive
activities. But I would think poorly of
action by the State to prevent Social Transcendentalism from having its say in
regard to the democratic supersession of republicanism by Centrism, which is
alone capable of overcoming republicanism in the way most guaranteed to suit
the interests of a majority of the Irish people - namely through supertheocratic
upgrading and with the minimum of violence.
17. It is inevitable that the chief opposition to
Social Transcendentalism will come from the republican parties, both within and
without the Dàil, since they are the ones most concerned with the protection of
state materialism and republican criteria of government. Fianna Fàil will almost certainly oppose the
ideology wherever and whenever it can.
For, besides being fiercely republican, it is strongly nationalist,
dedicated to the establishment of a united republican
18. Democratic centrality is the ruling principle
of both Liberalism and Communism, the only difference being that whereas, in a liberal
democracy, there are two ruling parties for two categories of electorate,
broadly classifiable as bourgeois and proletarian, the proletariat alone are
sovereign in a socialist democracy, and are thus governed by a single party. Thus whereas Liberalism implies a Christian
democracy ... reflecting an atomic relativity, Communism implies an
anti-Christian democracy ... reflecting an electron absolutism. Judged from the standpoint of the former, the
latter is not democratic at all but ... anti-democratic or, what amounts to the
same thing, totalitarian. In signifying
a balance between opposing interests, it is liberal democracy which is
'classical' and thus, by implication, genuine, whereas socialist democracy, in
reflecting an absolutist imbalance, is 'romantic' and hence spurious. Electron particles succeeding the
proton-wavicle/electron-particle compromise of atomic Liberalism. Anti-Christ succeeding Christ.
19. Theocratic centrality is the ruling principle
of both Conservatism and Centrism, the one atomic, and therefore relative; the
other post-atomic and therefore absolute, which is to say, beyond all
democratic compromise. Whereas
Conservatism equates with Christian theocracy, Centrism equates with the supertheocracy
of the Second Coming, electron wavicles succeeding proton wavicles, Social
Transcendentalism succeeding Roman Catholicism.
Paradoxically, while Conservatism is ideologically absolute but
politically relative, capitalist but democratic, Centrism is politically
absolute but ideologically relative, totalitarian but given to a mixed economy
divisible between bureaucratic planning and meritocratic guidance. Similarly, Fabianism (democratic socialism)
is ideologically absolute but politically relative, whereas Communism is
politically absolute but, if to a rather limited extent, ideologically
relative, divisible between predominant bureaucratic planning and subordinate
meritocratic guidance, the ratio in inverse proportion to the mixed-economy
ideal of Centrism, which aims to give the meritocracy maximum freedom for
purposes of religious expansion and spiritual elevation of the (folkish)
masses.
20. Since the political is the appearance and the
ideological the essence, it follows that Conservatism has a theocratic essence
and a democratic appearance, Centrism a supertheocratic essence and an
anti-democratic appearance, Fabianism an anti-theocratic essence and a
democratic appearance, and Communism an anti-supertheocratic essence and an
anti-democratic appearance.
21. As a balance between free enterprise and state
planning, proton wavicles and electron particles, Liberalism signifies a
quintessentially Christian relativity, the essence of democracy, Christ
balanced between church and state in an atomic compromise, the Church and the
State flanked on either side by the Kingdom and the Centre, the Father and the
Holy Ghost. Whereas the Church by itself
equals the Virgin and the State by itself equals the Anti-Christ. Ideologically considered, the Conservative
(Tory) Party stems from the Church but achieves a Christ-like atomicity through
political compromise with the State. In
a democratic system, the State is not in direct opposition to the church/state
compromise but to the Church, as between an Anti-Christ/Anti-Virgin antagonism,
so that Liberalism and Fabianism are rather more contiguous than antithetical.
22. It is not enough to know truth. Only he is Messiah who has Supertruth, and
thus points humanity towards the artificially-engineered life forms of the
post-Human Millennium.
23. If Social Transcendentalism is against the
international proletariat, it is because it is for the supra-national
folk. Being anti-proletarian does not
make it anti-People. On the contrary, it
has a higher concept of the People.
24. Although primarily appealing to that broad
stratum of the People which is potentially if not actually classless, Social
Transcendentalism will, nonetheless, seek to convert as many of the proletariat
to its cause as possible, seeing in flexibility the possibility of proletarian
redemption.
25. Ever opposed to republicanism, Social
Transcendentalism will strive to extend its influence at democracy's expense,
tackling first the liberal and then the socialist democracies, until both
Christ and Anti-Christ are driven from the world and only the Second Coming
remains.
26. Those that are not for the true messiah are
against him. Those who seek to thwart
his Divine Will must sooner or later pay the penalty at the hands of his
followers.
27. If Social Transcendentalism is not fascist, it
is because it is more than fascist, the Centrist successor to Fascism - not
politically relative but absolute.
28. Both Communism and Centrism posit millennial
salvations in the future; but whereas Communism posits an objective millennium
centred on the proletariat, Centrism posits a subjective millennium stemming
from the (classless) People and embracing post-human life forms.
29. Just as one Protestant denomination spawned
another, so one socialist party leads to another in a seemingly never-ending
proliferation of schisms and factions.
But the irony is that none of them will get anywhere!
30. A decadent age or society is necessarily
centrifugal, with de-centralizing tendencies in constant proliferation. The fight against decadence, whether from a
traditional or a revolutionary point-of-view (though particularly the latter),
is conducted on a centripetal basis, with centro-complexification as the
motivating ideal. It is only in the
maximum centro-complexification that civilization attains to its classical
zenith, with the highest civilization being the most centralized.
31. Subordination of the parts to the whole - the
divine principle (wavicle) of classical perfection. Rebellion of the parts against the whole and
increasing fragmentation - the diabolic principle (particle) of romantic
decadence.
32. Aristocracy and materialist submen of a feudal
age; plutocracy and soulful submen/men of a capitalist age; bureaucracy and
materialist men/Supermen of a socialist age; meritocracy and spiritual Supermen
of a centrist age - the ideological evolution of man in the mass under minority
rule and/or leadership.
33. Submen - a proton absolutism; Supermen - an
electron absolutism; men - balanced, in one way/degree or another, between
protons and electrons in an atomic compromise.
Materialist submen are pagan, soulful submen ... Roman Catholic; soulful
men are Protestant, materialist men ... democratic; materialist Supermen are
Communist, spiritual Supermen ... transcendentalist.
34. Particles and wavicles, yin and yang, bad and
good, in a continuous struggle of world-historical unfolding, until the final
overcoming of antinomies (men) in the electron-wavicle absolutism of the
ultimate divinity, which begins with the establishment on earth of the Centrist
'Kingdom of Heaven' and ends, or rather culminates, in the transcendent spirit
of the Omega Point (de Chardin) - the evolutionary climax of a supreme level of
being.
35. Like Puritanism, Socialism easily becomes a
mask behind which philistine mediocrity hides its ugly face. Indeed, a socialist society, like a puritan
one, may well be largely composed of philistine types who justify their
mediocrity through an ideological facade, which alone sanctifies it.
36. A 'fall' from Culture to Civilization
(Spengler) and a 'rise', via republican neo-barbarism, from Civilization to
Second Culture. Thus from the Church to
the State, and from the State, via the Anti-State, to the Centre.
37. The Church equals the Virgin; the Anti-Church
equals the Anti-Virgin (Calvin); the State equals Christ; the Anti-State equals
the Anti-Christ (Marx); the Pseudo-Centre equals the bogus Second Coming
(Hitler); the Centre equals the Second Coming.
38. The Holy Ghost - an approximate Christian
equivalent to the Omega Point, but inadequate for Social Transcendentalism,
which demands its own universal terminology.
Hence the Omega Point instead of the Holy Ghost.
39. If, habitually, I use both traditional
Christian and revolutionary Centrist terminology (though not usually at once!),
it is because I see my role as transitional between the Second Coming and the
True World Messiah, since I am obliged to speak to peoples of both Christian
descent (Irish/Spanish Catholics, etc.) and non-Christian descent (Israelis,
Asians, etc.), each of whom will have a bias one way or the other.
40. A truly supertheocratic society will be above
all bourgeois democratic traditions; it will not continue to tolerate obsolete
or anachronistic phenomena. Orchestras
and concert halls, no less than collars and ties, relativistic suits and
leather shoes, skirts and stockings, acoustic instruments and conductors, will
be consigned to the rubbish heap of bourgeois history.
41. Revolutionary change should be thorough but
not everlasting; once the old order is out of the way the new one will come
into its own and remain valid for a long time.
You do not quickly dispose of one-piece zipper suits! They will last humanity through to the
post-Human Millennium and thus to the 'final overcoming' of man in the first of
two artificially-engineered life forms - the brain collectivizations of
hypertripping Superbeings (formerly Supermen).
42. Constant change is both vulgar and
barbarous. All higher civilization is
determined to adhere to the ideal of passive permanence, fighting shy of active
change. And yet, even then, change does
and must come by degrees.
43. The higher poet is too antithetical to
academic philosophy to have anything to do with it. Alpha and omega of 'literary' evolution, the
one bound to nature, the other free for the supernatural, scorning contact with
the autocratic, not to mention (with regard to literature-proper), the
democratic.
44. The higher poet is a supertheocratic abstractionist
who has freed words (electron equivalents) from proton and/or neutron dominion
(emotions and meanings) in order that they may be elevated to the
contemplation-inducing abstraction of an electron-wavicle impression. Not a barbarous disorder of
abstract-expressionist anarchy, but a civilized New Order of impressionistic
purism. The Superpoetry of a Superpoet!
45. Poet and Superpoet - Christ and Second Coming,
neutron wavicles and electron wavicles.
The poet - a Liberal phenomenon torn between essential appearances and
apparent essences. The anti-poet - a
Socialist phenomenon given to apparent essences, whether in prose verse or,
more radically, in prose poems. The
anti-Superpoet - a Communist phenomenon given to apparent essences in an anti-superpoetic
abstract expressionism. The Superpoet -
a Centrist noumenon given to essential essences through the utmost
impressionistic abstraction.
46. Yeats - essentially a bourgeois poet; Eliot -
basically a petty-bourgeois anti-poet.
Those radically prose-biased 'poets' who scorn stanza divisions -
proletarian anti-poets. Totally abstract
'poets', whose work nevertheless still induces reading, since arranged on a
line-to-line basis - proletarian anti-Superpoets. Totally abstract 'poets' whose work
transcends line-to-line arrangements on the basis of a patterned order -
classless Superpoets ... on the ideological level of Social Transcendentalism.
47. Hence Conservative bourgeois rhyming/stanza
poets; Liberal bourgeois rhyming poets; Fabian petty-bourgeois prose/stanza
anti-poets; Marxist proletarian prose anti-poets; Communist proletarian
abstract-expressionist anti-Superpoets; and Centrist classless
abstract-impressionist Superpoets. A
further distinction could also be drawn between Liberal rhyming poets whose
work assumes a non-stanza, albeit narrowly vertical, free-verse arrangement,
and Social and/or Liberal Democratic poets whose work, while retaining the
vertical arrangement of unbroken free verse, eschews rhyme. Yet this should not be confused with Marxist
prose poems which, whilst eschewing rhyme, make no pretence at being vertical
but, on the contrary, reflect a horizontal prose style in keeping with their
Anti-State decadence.
48. Interesting how decadence and degeneration
pertain to the Anti-Church/Anti-State ideologies of Protestantism and Socialism
respectively. First the Protestant
revolt against the True Church which in due course leads to Puritanism, the
overtly Anti-Virginal manifestation of Protestantism that puts itself beneath
the pale of the Church in the quasi-secular independence of continuous
ideological splintering and proliferation of denominations. Then the Socialist revolt against the State
which in due course leads to Communism (in its pure form), the overtly Anti-Christic
manifestation of Socialism that puts itself beneath the pale of the State in
the quasi-religious independence of continuous ideological splintering and
proliferation of parties. In each case,
degeneration within the rebellious ideology culminating, after due splittings,
in the factional squabblings and alternative fake panaceas of the numerous
purist sects. A 'fall' from the
rebellious One to the revolutionary Many, while, ironically, the original
institution rebelled against remains intact in its pristine unity - the Liberal
State no less than the Catholic Church, both bodies renewed through Liberal
Democracy and neo-Catholicism.
49. To some extent parliamentary Conservatism was
a rebellion, under the banner of Christ, against Puritan decadence ... not to
say powerlessness, entailing an Anti-Virginal/pseudo-Christic compromise which,
transposed from the symbolic to the literal, betokens a Calvin/Cromwell
relativistic integrity commensurate with the Pseudo-State, a phenomenon soon to
be challenged by Liberalism, as the genuine state gets properly under way
through the parliamentary Liberal Party.
50. Similarly Communism to some extent signifies a
rebellion, under the banner of Marx, against Marxist factionalism and
powerlessness, entailing a kind of Anti-Christic/pseudo-Messianic (Second
Coming) compromise which, transposed from the symbolic to the literal, betokens
a Marx/Lenin relativistic absolutism commensurate with the Pseudo-Centre, a
phenomenon destined to be challenged by Social Transcendentalism, as genuine
Centrism gets properly under way.
51. The spirit, through dialectical materialism,
of socialist intellectuality to be challenged, in due time, by the spirit,
through Centrist freedom, of messianic spirituality - the pure spirit of the
true religion of Social Transcendentalism - electron wavicles superseding
particles in the post-atomic evolution of man (superman) towards divinity.
52. No less than parliamentary democracy precedes
People’s democracy, messianic theocracy precedes People’s theocracy, the
worship of Christ preceding self-realization of the People, Christianity
preceding Centrism. The messianic
equivalent of the Second Coming does not want to be worshipped like Christ, in
the form of humanist idolatry, but followed and obeyed. He may, one day, become politically sovereign
over the People, but the latter should be religiously sovereign in their
selves. No less than political
(democratic) sovereignty passes to the People, religious (theocratic)
sovereignty must do likewise, else they will be enslaved to something external
to themselves and cease evolving. Yet if
they are to acquire religious sovereignty, they must forfeit political
sovereignty and thus, through popular consent, transfer political power to the
Leader (or messianic equivalent) in order that he may rule on their behalf and
thereby free (save) them for spiritual self-realization.
53. Hence a supertheocracy, in which the People
are religiously sovereign, is necessarily totalitarian, with political
sovereignty in the hands of the Leader, who leads as embodied Holy Ghost. Consequently the period of Social
Transcendentalism's duration will witness the totalitarian dictatorship of the
Leader in what may appear to be a messianic theocracy, while supertheocracy is
being consolidated and developed. Only
on the purer, supra-theocratic plane of Centrism's evolution could this
dictatorship wither ... as meritocratic guidance increasingly comes to the fore
in an unequivocal manifestation of People’s theocracy conducted on the basis of
hypermeditation.
54. Sovereign in their deepest selves, the People
are destined to become divine no less than the monarchs of autocratic antiquity
symbolized the Father and were accordingly sovereign by so-called 'Divine
Right'. In contrast to a monarch, a
Leader is not sovereign in an essential but in an apparent way, with regard to
his political responsibilities, and so he cannot expect men to worship him on
his own account, but only to obey him for what he signifies. No matter how much they may publicly defer to
the Leader, the People will know that his authority is apparent; for they are
sovereign essentially, and what he does is done in the service of
this spiritual sovereignty, which alone resides in the People but is not of
them.
55. Just as the God-Kings who were worshipped as
God (the Father) preceded the secular kings, so the God-Leaders who are
hero-worshipped as God (the Holy Ghost) precede the secular leaders, whether in
Communism or Fascism. Thus were Lenin
and Stalin God-Leaders who paved the way, through dictatorship, for Khrushchev,
Brezhnev, Andropov, et al. of the (at that time potentially if not actually)
People’s democracy. Similarly, Hitler
was a God-Leader and so, in a certain sense, was Goebbels, who was nominated
'chancellor' by the Führer. But Adenauer
was simply a leader, and a bourgeois democratic one at that! The God-Leaders - Lenin, Stalin, Mao, Hitler,
Mussolini, et al., tend to originate revolution on either a Communist or a
Fascist basis. They could well be regarded
as crude approximations to the Second Coming.
For the true equivalent of the Second Coming, who alone will have the
truth about evolution and the ultimate destiny of mankind, has yet to
materialize, being destined to lead the ultimate revolution in neither
Communism nor Fascism but Social Transcendental Centrism.
56. Obviously the sovereignty of the true
God-Leader is distinct from that of both false God-Leaders and human leaders,
to the extent that he approximates more closely to the Holy Spirit and may
consequently be said to symbolize its political embodiment. The true God-Leader is both bureaucrat and
meritocrat in one, politician and artist, and so, paradoxically, he is closer
to the People than are either false God-Leaders like Lenin and Mao, or human
leaders like Khrushchev and Deng Xiaoping, by dint of his artistic bent and
penchant for cultural self-indulgence.
Probably Hitler, with his love of music and art, was the closest of them
all to a true God-Leader, since National Socialism indicated a radically
theocratic rather than radically democratic bias, conceiving of the People in
the most spiritual, and hence artistic, terms of the 'volk', i.e. folk, as
germane to Fascism.
57. The closeness of the God-Leader to the People and
the recognition of the God-Leader by the People in the raised arm salute of
Fascism, acknowledging the right of the true God-Leader to 'save' them from
democratic and/or autocratic tradition ... for supertheocratic
self-realization. Such a salute, albeit
modified to suit the context, would be no less relevant to Centrism, and the
true God-Leader would regard it as both a confirmation of his own and the
People's theocratic sovereignty, the People having entrusted political
sovereignty to him because they can trust him to use it in order to further,
one way or another, their own theocratic sovereignty in the establishment and
development, through Social Transcendentalism, of Centrism. No messianic theocracy of man bowing to
Christ in prayerful worship, but a People’s theocracy of man free to realize
his own divinity through meditative self-contemplation. Freed from Christ by the Second Coming. Freed for ... the Holy Spirit, an aspiration
and progression towards the culmination of evolution in the Omega Point, a
journey destined to culminate in spiritual bliss.
58. Distinguish carefully between particle and
wavicle music, evil and good in music.
If the age of the Church reflected a proton-wavicle bias of sustained
harmonies on acoustic instruments, particularly the organ, then the age of the
State has witnessed a descent into neutron and/or electron-particle melodic
notation on electric instruments, especially guitars and keyboards, while the
Anti-State Marxist rebellion against this has spawned a proliferation of
highly-rhythmic electric music, suggestive, in its particle absolutism, of
neo-paganism. And yet ... concurrently
with this rhythmic degeneration we find the growth of electron-wavicle music,
approximating to the Centre, in the form of synthesizer harmonic sustains
accompanied by pitch-oriented notational sequences suggestive of a transmuted
State, as though corresponding to the 'social' aspect of Social
Transcendentalism.
59. An attempt to ascribe a political equivalence
to modern music, i.e. music of the State, Anti-State, and Centre: Liberal
classical; Fabian classical rock (rock 'n' roll); Liberal Democratic rock
classical; Marxist punk rock; Communist jazz-rock; Social Transcendentalist
rock-jazz. Additionally one could speak
of Conservative opera; Fascist modern jazz; Centrist (hypertheocratic) pure
jazz.
60. If rock, of whichever manifestation, is
pre-eminently a proletarian and, hence, Anti-State music, it is tempting to
regard jazz, in all its modern permutations, as pre-eminently a classless and,
hence, Centrist music. And yet, the same
surely holds true - and probably with more justification - of pop, which seems
a quintessentially folksy medium of musical expression appealing to that broad
stratum of the People who cannot, by any stretch of the ideological
imagination, be regarded as politically militant, but who tend, on the
contrary, towards an a-political stance.
Thus a distinction arises between rock-loving proletariat and pop-loving
folk, as between electron particles and wavicles, with the latter preponderant
over the former who, with due respect, would appear to correspond to the
hard-line republican stratum of the People.
As an alternative to the aforementioned list of political ascriptions,
we would therefore find: Fascist pop; Socialist pop-rock; Social
Transcendentalist rock-pop; and Centrist pure pop (superpop), which would
approximate to a synthesizer exclusivity of maximum electron-wavicle 'harmonic'
sustains. Rather than being conceived as
a kind of uncivilized modern folk-music, pop would thus appear to be the
civilized successor to folk music, electric instead of acoustic, the turned-on
folk of an electron-wavicle disposition, becoming ever more partial to
synthesizer sustain.
61. Conceived thus, pop assumes a loosely
supertheocratic status placing it above and beyond the pale of anti-democratic
rock. If pop-rock is predominantly
rhythmic, then rock-pop, its Social Transcendentalist parallel, is
predominantly harmonic. Similarly, if
jazz-rock is predominantly rhythmic, then rock-jazz is predominantly
tonal. Considered as separate class
levels of the same ideology, pop-rock would be the music of the proletarian
majority within a hard-line republican society, whereas jazz-rock would be the
music of the bureaucratic elite.
Similarly, rock-pop would be the music of the folksy majority within a
soft-line republican and/or Social Transcendentalist society, whereas rock-jazz
would be the music of the meritocratic elite.
Of course, such divisions already exist within the late open-societies
of the contemporary West, not to mention within the socialist societies of the
contemporary East. But it is probable
that they will be refined upon and perfected in the future, and to a point where
music considered incompatible with a given radical ideological bias is
proscribed.
62. Thus, to take a Social Transcendentalist
integrity as the conditioning factor in decisions relating to the suitability
of certain types of music and, conversely, the unsuitability of certain other
types, it should transpire that while rock-pop for the masses and rock-jazz for
the elite ... would be suitable, nothing below these levels would be, so that
classical, rock, rock classical, punk, jazz-rock, and pop-rock, not to mention
opera, jazz, and folk music, would have to be discouraged in accordance with
the closed-society requirements of a supertheocratic bias. No doubt, there would be borderline cases,
including music permissible in Russia, like certain kinds of pop-rock and
jazz-rock. But, exceptions aside, the
rule would hold good, since alien types of recorded music would be deleted or
withdrawn from stock and only the higher music made available to the public,
which, in any case, would be a People’s public partial to the type of music in
question.
63. An ideological distinction should be noted
between records and cassettes. For
whereas records correspond to a socialist status on account of their particle
grooves played horizontally in a materialist context, cassettes, being smaller
and lighter while suggestive (in their tape essence) of a wavicle bias capable
of vertical play, would seem to correspond to a Centrist status, as though
symptomatic of a supertheocratic bias the ideological successor to fascistic
tape-recorders. Thus whereas records are
relevant to an open or democratic society, they would be irrelevant to a Social
Transcendentalist one, which, after all, would be above the democratic
pale. Consequently records, albums,
discs, etc., would be withdrawn, though compact discs, which are activated
through laser technology, would doubtless continue to be available, since
suggestive of a more transcendental bias compatible with Social
Transcendentalism, if only with regard to its 'social' aspect, as indicative of
a transmuted Socialism.
64. The genuine writer does not write for others,
but from his self. He is not concerned
whether others like or approve of what he writes. He just gets down and writes it.
65. The masses of an inner-city area have a
closed-society mentality attributable to the absolutist nature of their urban
environment. They are more inclined to
regard a man who dresses in a bourgeois manner, with, say, knee-length
mackintosh and baggy trousers, as a 'berk' ... than as someone whose criteria
are different from their own, because appertaining to middle-class values. In other words, they evaluate others from
their own proletarian standpoint, and he who is not, for one reason or another,
on their level, with short zipper-jacket, jeans, etc., is, willy-nilly, beneath
it, and consequently a fool. Strictly
speaking, this is the correct, because subjective, attitude. Things proceed from proton to electron
levels, and if the provincial and/or suburban bourgeoisie cling to feminine
appearances, in their closer proximity to nature, then the urban proletariat
are distinctly masculine, with scant regard for 'skirts'.
66. If in their electron-particle identification
the proletariat are masculine, if not crudely supermasculine, then the folk of
an electron-wavicle identification must become hypermasculine, and thus given
to the exclusive use of one-piece zipper suits ... such as are destined to
supersede all jacket/trouser relativities, including that of the proletariat,
which, in its leather/denim manifestation, more accords with an extreme
democratic equivalence than with an extreme theocratic one. As the antithesis to autocratic dresses,
one-piece zipper suits will be symptomatic of the transcendental absolutism
towards which human evolution, in the guise of the People, is slowly advancing,
an absolutism which should be universal by the time Centrism enters its pure or
hypertheocratic stage. In the meantime a
relativistic absolutism will suffice, provided it is in black and some
synthetic material like PVC. Thus a
short black plastic-zipper with long black plastic pants ... symptomatic, I
suspect, of a Social Transcendentalist integrity. For, in all probability, the variety of
colours and natural materials available these days will be transcended in
favour of a synthetic standardization favouring black or, at the very least,
dark colours in general. It could
transpire that while some people were entitled, by their status, to dress in
black, others would be required to dress in brown or grey or blue, as the case
may be, so that colour indicated one's class - people, police, bureaucracy,
meritocracy, etc., much as industrial workers are associated with blue and
clerical workers with white.
67. A truly classless society would have to be one
in which everybody was the same as everybody else, with no hierarchical or
professional distinctions between people.
Impossible to realize on the human level, but destined to materialize, I
am confident, in the post-Human Millennium, with particular reference to the
ultimate corporeal life-form of hypermeditating new-brain collectivizations -
namely, the Superbeings. However,
whilst, on the human level, one can get rid of class in the traditional sense
of a division between exploiters and exploited, bourgeoisie and proletariat,
there is no possibility of one's doing away with distinctions between leaders
and led, police and masses, professionals and lay, etc., since society requires
such distinctions if it is to function.
A society without police would quickly degenerate into crime and
violence. A society without leaders
would become anarchic and chaotic. A
society without professionals - particularly doctors, teachers, spiritual
guides, and lawyers - would succumb to disease, ignorance, paganism, and
lawlessness. Certain basic class
divisions there have to be, and these must remain immutable, else all hell will
erupt! You cannot turn a fool into a
doctor or a teacher. Neither can you
expect every man to be a soldier or a policeman, still less a leader. Those who are not born to lead must follow. Those who are of the masses must remain in
the masses and thus be served by the exceptional. For it is from the masses that the
artificially-engineered life forms of the post-Human Millennium will emerge,
and they in turn will lead to God (the Holy Spirit). A gardener tends his flowers until they grow
to full stature. Just so, a leader tends
his flock until it sprouts spiritual blossoms.
Gardener and plants are not interchangeable. Neither are leader and led, police and
people, professionals and lay!
Ideological hubris will reap its own chaotic reward.
68. The reason why socialist anarchists oppose the
concept and reality of leadership, particularly when it is in an unequivocally
dictatorial mould, is that they are totally ignorant of theocratic or, rather,
supertheocratic criteria, since living, if only in theory, on the lower plane
of mass-participatory democracy, which is nothing short of democratic chaos,
the 'fall' from the centre to the periphery, from parliament to mob rule. Were they less ignorant of a supertheocratic
prerogative, they would not slander it as 'dictatorial oppression' or
'tyrannical leaderism' or whatever comes into their evidently limited
minds. But as degenerate democrats they
cannot be expected to appreciate the merits of a fascistic line, since
seemingly totally bereft of a supertheocratic perspective. All they can do is bleat in the wilderness of
their own anarchy, like the lost sheep they are, and reap the same disdain from
centrist Communists (fascist Reds) as the Puritans doubtless reaped from
parliamentary Conservatives (democratic Blues).
69. But never forget that while fascist Reds are
one thing and Fascists quite another, Social Transcendentalists would be
different again, being the logical extension beyond petty-bourgeois folkism to
the proletarian classlessness of the Centre, more radical and absolutist in
every respect. Only with Centrism does
the Second Coming properly materialize on a level approximating to the true messiah
of transcendent salvation, the ultimate human salvation of ... true religion,
beyond and above the Western pale and superior to anything the fundamentalist
East has to offer. Only that man will
acknowledge me who has the interests of true religion at heart, who is not a
slave to democratic tradition, but is free to further the salvation of the
world in the name of the Second Coming and spiritual interests of the great
electron masses of people, with particular reference to the folk, or would-be
folk, of countries destined for supertheocratic revolution. Let the Word go out to the world and let the
'
