CYCLE 89
1. FOUR DIFFERENT MODES OF CHRISTIANITY. Because Catholicism is the true mode of
Christianity, or that which encourages respect for the truth of the Holy Ghost
via the quasi-truthful understanding, or inner prayer, of the Christ Child, it
cannot be the beautiful or the good or the strong mode of Christianity. On the contrary, the 'beautiful' mode of
Christianity, rooted in the aesthetics of the Mother, is Anglicanism, whereas
its 'good' mode, centred in the epistolary understanding of New-Testament
ethics, is Puritanism, and its 'strong' mode, rooted in the poetic emotion of
Old-Testament ethnicity, is Presbyterianism, or Dissenter Nonconformism. In fact, so much does each of these
denominational subdivisions of the overall Christian Church correspond to a
separate ideal, or virtue, that it is inconceivable they could be confounded or
treated as equal. Catholicism is as much
true Christianity per
se as Anglicanism is beautiful Christianity per se, Puritanism ...
good Christianity per se and Presbyterianism ... strong Christianity per
se. Yet only Catholicism is strictly
Christian, since the Beautiful, the Good, and the Strong are less Christian
than Heathen virtues which correspond to the Mother, the Son, and the Father
... as opposed to the Holy Ghost achieved via the quasi-true 'bovaryization' of the intellect through prayer, that
attribute of the Christ Child Who, being what Christ Himself said one would
have to become in order to enter the 'Kingdom of Heaven', is a precondition of
spiritual peace. The other deities, on
the contrary, correspond to speaking, writing, and reading, or that which is
quasi-sensual, strictly intellectual, and quasi-emotional respectively. Hence they typify the Protestant alternative,
and opposition, to properly Christian, and Catholic, criteria.
2. TIMELESS ETERNITY. Nevertheless 'Kingdom Come', as taught by he
who corresponds to a Second Coming, the Messianic prophet of the triadic
Beyond, is not just a matter of Heaven, and thus the truth, as a vehicle for
achieving it. If I used to think that
way, then these days I am a lot more 'liberal' and, I hope, wiser in my
attitude as to what constitutes the Beyond.
The student of my work will know, if he has progressed thus far, that
the Beyond is subdivisible between three verities,
arranged in separate tiers - namely, the Beautiful, the Good, and the True, the
first corresponding to a 'New Earth', the second to a 'New Purgatory', and the
third to a 'New Heaven', this latter presided over by the Holy Spirit of
Heaven, while the former two options are presided over by the Mary Child (or
refined Virgin/Mother of synthetic resurrection) and the Second Coming
respectively. Hence while there is room
in the Beyond for the salvation of those whose Christian affiliation, as
church-goers, is either to the Beautiful, the Good, or to the True, namely to
Anglicans, Puritans, and Catholics, there can be no place in it for those whose
Christian affiliation is to the Strong, or all who, as Dissenters, are
effectively fundamentalist, their allegiance being primarily, though not of
course exclusively, to the Father as opposed to the Mother, the Son, or the
Holy Ghost. What you can't have in
'Kingdom Come' is a 'New Hell' of Father Time, and therefore it must follow
that unless fundamentalist Dissenters convert, in due course, to one of the
denominations which do, in fact, primarily correspond to the Beautiful, the
Good, or the True, the Second Coming will have no option but to have them
banished from his 'Kingdom', the 'Kingdom of the triadic Beyond' which a
majority mandate from the People would permit the establishment of ... with
regard to a democratically-expressed wish, on their part, for religious
sovereignty and the 'rights', appertaining to self-realization at any of our
three projected millennial levels, which such a sovereignty would confer. Thus Dissenters will have to face the truth
about themselves and come to a decision in due
course. Only Mass, Volume, and Space can
have any place in 'Kingdom Come', since it will signal the end of Time, and
hence the dominion of all that is effectively, if not literally, hellish.
3. CASE FOR
4. PASSING DIRECTLY AND/OR INDIRECTLY INTO THE
BEYOND. Thus those whose affiliation,
irrespective of country, is to the Beautiful, the Good, or the True can pass
democratically into the Beyond, wherein they will be transmuted and elevated to
manifestations of their respective virtues corresponding to the Mary Child, the
Second Coming, and the Holy Spirit of Heaven, if not directly for Anglicans and
Catholics then, at any rate, indirectly, following a period in the 'New
Purgatory' of the Second Coming ... until such time as they may decide and/or
are adjudged fit for either the 'New Earth' below or the 'New Heaven' above or,
indeed, decide and/or are adjudged fit to remain in the 'New Purgatory' for
ever (as, presumably, would especially apply to ex-Puritans ... with their
overly intellectual bias). Certainly, it
has been a logically-underpinned belief of mine that Christians cannot be saved
directly to the 'New Earth' or the 'New Heaven', since logic would suggest that
only Superheathens, including non-practising so-called
Christians, are in a position to gravitate straight from
personality/emotionality to humility/universality, as the (largely
gender-based) case may be, while practising Christians, given traditionally to
sexual chastity and prayerful spirituality, will have to spend some time in the
'New Purgatory' as a precondition of subsequent movement. Yet, even if this still applies (though the
final decision as to who goes where should rest, circumstances allowing, with
the religiously-sovereign individual himself), those who had been Anglican
should have priority access to the beauty of its transmuted poetry; while those
who had been Puritan should have priority access to the goodness of its
transmuted fiction; and those who had been Catholic should have priority access
to the truth of its transmuted philosophy.
Now such will continue to be the most likely scenario until the case for
'earthly beauty' with regard to ex-Anglicans or 'heavenly truth' with regard to
ex-Catholics is firmly established, and they move down or up, as the case may
be. Doubtless those ex-Christians with
LSD and/or cocaine habits would be eligible, sooner than later, for the 'New
Earth', whatever their denominational background, while those who could prove a
long-term commitment to aerobics and/or transcendental meditation would
presently, if not directly, pass into the 'New Heaven' of the third tier of
'Kingdom Come'.
5. CLASS AND CLASSLESS. With regard to the three tiers of 'Kingdom
Come', the first would effectively be a lower-class tier, the second a
middle-class tier, and the third ... a classless tier. What one would not have is an upper-class
tier, since that which is 'upper class' connotes with the Father, whose Time
can have no place in the Eternity of the Beyond. Hence while the 'New Earth' would be lower
class in its visionary beauty, the 'New Purgatory' would be middle class in its
intellectual goodness, and the 'New Heaven' alone classless in its spiritual
truth, the truth of the Holy Spirit of Heaven as proclaimed by he who corresponds
to a Second Coming and will complete, if allowed to, what the 'First Coming'
started - namely the freeing of mankind from the dominion of the Father and
their release, in consequence, from the bondage of Time. Only thus will there be Eternal Life in the
triadic Beyond.