1. From
time to time it becomes philosophically expedient to defer to the colourful
slang or casual obscenities of life such that echo in the streets and rooms all
around one, in order to encapsulate and expound the philosophical or moral
implications of what, to their users, are incontrovertible evidence of a
particular disposition, be it fiery, watery, earthy, or airy, which may or may
not warrant censure or rebuke.
2. What
follows, not for the first time in my work, is a determined effort to do
justice to the full-gamut of descriptive and/or denigratory
expressions which may - and hopefully will - lead to fresh insights and
understandings likely to impact upon my philosophy in general.
3. To
contrast the fiery 'pus' (scum?) of 'frigg***
jerks' with the earthy 'shit' of 'sodd*** pricks', as
one would contrast metachemical objectivity with physical
subjectivity, or autocracy with democracy.
4. To
contrast the watery 'piss' of 'fuck*** cunts' with the airy 'gas' of 'snogg*** bums', as one would contrast chemical objectivity
with metaphysical subjectivity, or bureaucracy with theocracy.
5. This
recourse to the colourful language of the masses is not, admittedly, in quite
the best taste; but it goes some way towards highlighting a more logical
approach to such categories which, frankly, with the majority of swearers are much less methodically employed and much more partisanly upheld, as when the word 'fucking' is used
indiscriminately, as though in reflection of a specific class and/or gender
standpoint which is characteristically more representative of certain types of
societies or environments than others.
6. But
really, from a more sophisticated philosophical perspective, whereby one is
determined to do logical justice to each and every context of life, it stands to
reason that no single category can be wholly representative of every situation
and that, as people speak, so they betray their limitations and/or
affiliations.
7. Frankly,
use of words like 'pus', 'piss', 'shit', and 'gas' boils down to a colloquial
'take' on the Elements, as alluded to above, and reveals the manner in which
fire, water, earth (vegetation), and air are regarded from different class
and/or gender points of view when the object of their employment is to
denigrate that which is deemed unrepresentative or unattractive, as the case
may be.
8. Of
course, in the wider framework described above, I have purposely broadened the
terms of reference in order to do justice to the Elemental totality of denigratory or descriptive possibilities, and the reader
familiar with certain of my earlier attempts, expressed in a variety of mature
texts, to standardize such verb-noun combinations in the interests of a more
comprehensively exacting interpretation of their applicability may be aware
that, hitherto, I have not spoken of 'fuck*** cunts' or 'sodd***
pricks' but, on the contrary, of 'sodd*** cunts' and
'fuck*** pricks'.
9. Was I
wrong, then, to employ such paradoxical terminology in relation to the
respective Elemental contexts - chemical and physical - being
described? Clearly, the answer must be
'yes', but not wholly so. For these
terminological combinations cut both ways, if from different points of view.
10. As
described in my previous text, the distinction between the falling axis of
autocracy-democracy and the rising axis of bureaucracy-theocracy, as in general
terms between Britain and Ireland, is that of State and Church, with the Church
subordinate to the State in the autocratic-democratic axis, but the State
subordinate to the Church in the bureaucratic-theocratic axis.
11. Thus
when we examine the relevant expletive verb-noun pairings to each axis, we find
that the autocratic-democratic axis, characterized by a state hegemony, has
reference to the fiery 'pus' of 'frigg***jerks' on
the one hand and to the earthy 'shit' of 'sodd***
pricks' on the other hand, whereas the bureaucratic-theocratic axis,
characterized by a church hegemony, has reference to the watery 'piss' of
'fuck*** cunts' on the one hand and to the airy 'gas' of 'snogg***
bums' on the other hand.
12. When
we examine the terms of each axis more closely, we find that the
autocratic-democratic axis has been characterized in relation to 'frigging' and
'sodding', which are in effect descriptions of
anti-sexual behaviour, one might almost say of negative sexual behaviour,
whereas the bureaucratic-theocratic axis has been characterized in relation to
'fucking' and 'snogging', which are effectively
descriptions of positive sexual behaviour, of pro-sexual behaviour which does
not skirt around the edges of sex but, rather, dives straight into it, in a
life-affirming manner.
13. Therefore
it should be evident that whereas such terms as 'frigging' and 'sodding' are primarily identifiable with the State, or with
a state hegemony along autocratic-democratic lines, terms like 'fucking' and 'snogging' can be identified with the Church, or with a
church hegemony along bureaucratic-theocratic lines, since they are the more
positive and life-affirming expletives which serve to highlight a pro-sexual
attitude on both chemical and metaphysical, watery and airy, terms.
14. Consequently
the positivity of such pro-sex expletives as 'fucking' and 'snogging'
must be contrasted with the negativity of such anti-sex expletives as
'frigging' and 'sodding', as one would contrast the
positivity of the rising bureaucratic-theocratic axis of the Church with the
negativity of the falling autocratic-democratic axis of the State. But that is only in relation to the primary
aspects of each axis, or to each axis regarded solely in relation to its
primary functions.
15. There
is ever a secondary Church to be reckoned with where autocracy and democracy
are concerned, and, by contrast, a secondary State to be considered in relation
to bureaucracy and theocracy; for neither type of society can be exclusively
one thing or the other but will combine Church and State to different extents
and on differing terms.
16. Thus
while we might logically satisfy ourselves that the autocratic-democratic axis
deserves to be primarily identified with 'frigg***
jerks' on the one hand and with 'sodd*** pricks' on
the other, we cannot dismiss the secondary possibility of 'snogg***
jerks' in relation to the autocratic form of the Church and of 'fuck*** pricks'
in relation to the democratic form of the Church, so that such paradoxical
terms, used in connection with predominantly fiery and earthy contexts
respectively, need to be considered in a subordinate, or secondary,
relationship to the aforementioned primary terms which, with their anti-sexual
implications, stand closer to the State, as to a society or civilization which
is primarily of the State, whether along autocratic or democratic lines, and
only secondarily of the Church.
17. Conversely,
while we might logically satisfy ourselves that the bureaucratic-theocratic
axis deserves to be primarily identified with 'fuck*** cunts' on the one hand
and with 'snogg*** bums' on the other, we cannot
dismiss the secondary possibility of 'sodd*** cunts'
in relation to the bureaucratic form of the State and of 'frigg***
bums' in relation to the theocratic form of the State, so that such paradoxical
terms, used in connection with predominantly watery and airy contexts
respectively, need to be considered in a subordinate, or secondary,
relationship to the aforementioned primary terms which, with their pro-sexual
implications, stand closer to the Church, as to a society or civilization which
is primarily of the Church, whether along bureaucratic or theocratic lines, and
only secondarily of the State.
18. Clearly,
whilst it would be logically consistent to identify the former type of
civilization with Protestant Britain, which is primarily of the State and only
secondarily of the Church, the theocracy of which is either autocratically or
democratically subverted in fundamentalist and humanist vein, one would have to
identify the latter type of civilization with Catholic Ireland, which is only
secondarily of the State because primarily of the Church, the theocracy of
which is bureaucratically subverted in nonconformist vein.
19. But even Irish Protestants must be given the benefit of the
doubt and identified with either autocratic or democratic subversions of
theocracy which yet leave them primarily Anglicans or Puritans rather than
primarily royalists or parliamentarians in British, and especially English,
vein. For Ireland, being largely Celtic,
is a case apart from England, and one can believe that, in Ireland, God and the
Church come first irrespective of whether one is Catholic or Protestant, just
as the descriptions of people in terms of 'Catholic' or 'Protestant' tend to
take precedence over their political counterparts in relation to either Royalism or Parliamentarianism.
20. Be that
as it may, I have no doubt that whereas 'jerks' are primarily 'frigging' and
only secondarily 'snogging', their democratic
inferiors are no-less primarily 'sodding' and only
secondarily 'fucking' orders of 'prick', insofar as in each case the State takes
precedence over the Church in respect of a civilization primarily characterized
by anti-sexual attitudes and behaviour relative to an autocratic and/or
democratic disposition in society as a whole.
21. Likewise,
if from a contrary standpoint, I have no doubt that whereas 'cunts' are
primarily 'fucking' and only secondarily 'sodding',
their theocratic superiors are no-less primarily 'snogging'
and only secondarily 'frigging' orders of 'bum', insofar as in each case the
Church takes precedence over the State in respect of a civilization primarily
characterized by pro-sexual behaviour and attitudes relative to a bureaucratic
and/or theocratic disposition in society as a whole.
22. Granted
a distinction, then, between the sex-affirming attitudes of Church hegemonic
societies and the sex-denying attitudes of societies characterized by State
hegemonies, it must follow that there is something better, spiritually and
emotionally, about the former than the latter, which are more partial to
instinctual and intellectual corruptions of sexuality in State-oriented vein,
with 'frigging' and 'sodding' implications in respect
of 'jerks' and 'pricks', neither of whom can be equated with a positive
attitude to sex, while the 'positivity' of their secondary church counterparts
must remain questionable in view of the extents to which such people are still
'jerks' or 'pricks' even when they approach their respective bents from a
paradoxically fundamentalist or humanist point of view, and 'snoggingly' or 'fuckingly' inform
their carnal appetites accordingly.
23. But
of course the secondary church paradox of a 'snogg***
jerk' will involve a quasi-masturbatory approach to sex which, whilst
incontrovertibly preferable to or, rather, less bad than onanism
as such, is unlikely to embrace much beyond oral sex, whether in terms of
fellatio or, more especially in view of the female nature of the context in
question, cunnilingus, and therefore to remain basically fundamentalist.
24. Likewise
the secondary church paradox of a 'fuck*** prick' will involve a quasi-sodomitic approach to sex which, whilst incontrovertibly
preferable to sodomy as such, is unlikely to embrace much beyond coital
pleasure, especially through recourse to male contraception, and therefore to
remain basically humanist.
25. For
while the former type of people, more usually autocratic, are basically fiery
and voyeuristic, the latter type will, in their democratic bent, be more earthy
and hedonistic, given to pleasure as a raison d'être, and therefore determined to keep sex pegged to
the earth and not to become the basis of subsequent flowering in conceptual
vein.