1. There are four main contexts of
gender/class interrelationship, and they are the contexts of noumenal
sensuality, of phenomenal sensuality, of phenomenal sensibility, and of
noumenal sensibility. Let us examine each of these four contexts
separately.
2. Noumenal sensuality is divisible
between the spatial space of metachemistry and the sequential time of
antimetaphysics, the context of metachemistry, which is upper-class female,
being further divisible between somatic materialism and psychic fundamentalism,
while the context of antimetaphysics, being upper-class male, is further
divisible between somatic anti-idealism and psychic antitranscendentalism.
3. Phenomenal sensuality is
divisible between the volumetric volume of chemistry and the massive mass of
antiphysics, the context of chemistry, which is lower-class female, being
further divisible between somatic realism and psychic nonconformism, while the
context of antiphysics, being lower-class male, is further divisible between
somatic antinaturalism and psychic antihumanism.
4. Phenomenal sensibility is
divisible between the voluminous volume of physics and the massed mass of
antichemistry, the context of physics, which is lower-class male, being further
divisible between psychic humanism and somatic naturalism, while the context of
antichemistry, being lower-class female, is further divisible between psychic
antinonconformism and somatic antirealism.
5. Noumenal sensibility is
divisible between the spaced space of metaphysics and the repetitive time of
antimetachemistry, the context of metaphysics, which is upper-class male, being
further divisible between psychic transcendentalism and somatic idealism, while
the context of antimetachemistry, being upper-class female, is further
divisible between psychic antifundamentalism and somatic antimaterialism.
6. In
sensuality, female criteria are hegemonic, which means that soma takes
precedence over psyche, whereas in sensibility it is male criteria which are
hegemonic, meaning, as intimated above, that psyche takes precedence over soma.
7. Only in noumenal sensuality or
sensibility is this gender division ever unequivocal; for there is nothing
above metachemistry to prevent it from conditioning antimetaphysics after its
own gender actuality of soma preceding and predominating over psyche on the 3:1
absolute terms of most particles/least wavicles, just as there is nothing, in
sensibility, above metaphysics to prevent it from conditioning
antimetachemistry after its own gender actuality of psyche preceding and
predominating over soma on the 3:1 absolute terms of most wavicles/least
particles.
8. With phenomenal sensuality and
sensibility, however, this gender division is rarely unequivocal but, like the
phenomenal contexts of worldly relativity in which a 2½: 1½ ratio of more
particles/less wavicles or, for males, more wavicles/less particles is the
average mean, more usually equivocal in respect of the hegemonic gender
nominally conditioning the subordinate gender in terms of its own actuality but
the subordinate, or mass-under-volume lower-plane gender, being able to
determine the emphasis towards either psyche or soma with the assistance of the
noumenal gender-counterpart to itself which will be unequivocally hegemonic
over time in either spatial sensuality (metachemistry) or spaced sensibility
(metaphysics), and therefore either somatically free to permit of the
antichemical subversion of physics in respect of somatic emphasis or, in the
case of metaphysics, psychically free to permit of the antiphysical subversion
of chemistry in respect of psychic emphasis, neither of which emphases would
ordinarily obtain in relation to purely phenomenal, or worldly, criteria but
either an emphasis on somatic primacy in phenomenal sensuality or an emphasis
on psychic primacy in phenomenal sensibility.
9. The former emphasis would make
for a narrowly heathen disposition in which free soma took precedence over
bound psyche not only for the phenomenally hegemonic context, viz. chemistry,
but, by dint of female pressure, for the phenomenally subordinate context, viz.
antiphysics, in which antimasculine males would be encouraged to emphasize soma
contrary to their gender actuality of psyche both relatively preceding and
predominating over soma, the latter emphasis, by contrast, for a narrowly
Christian disposition in which free psyche took precedence over bound soma not
only for the phenomenally hegemonic context, viz. physics, but, by dint of male
pressure, for the phenomenally subordinate context, viz. antichemistry, in
which antifeminine females would be encouraged to emphasize psyche contrary to
their gender actuality of soma both relatively preceding and predominating over
psyche.
10. Neither type of phenomenal hegemony
would conduce towards worldly stability or compromise, which is precisely what
the worldly contexts require in the relativity of their phenomenal dispositions
if subordinate gender unrest and even tyrannical opposition to such unrest on
the part of the hegemonic gender is not to ensue, with potentially disastrous
consequences for all concerned!
11. Therefore it is fitting that, in the
interests of worldly stability, the subordinate gender, though conditioned
according to the hegemonic gender's intrinsic somatic/psychic actuality, is
able to subvert the ensuing reality on terms reflective of its own gender
actuality, and all because it does not exist in isolation from a noumenal
controlling and overall conditioning influence, unequivocally hegemonic in its
own context, but is able to avail of its kindred gender disposition to effect
the necessary modification in favour of either psyche or soma, as the case may
be, and thereby partake of phenomenal compromise in the interests not only of
worldly stability but to the advantage, more significantly, of the noumenal
controlling and overall conditioning influence, which is able to sustain its
own unequivocal hegemonic control from standpoints of either somatic freedom
or, in the case of metaphysics, psychic freedom which, unlike those obtaining
in the world ... of phenomenal relativity, have an absolute right to existence
as the epitome of antithetical modes of eternity - alpha and omega, outer and
inner, sensual and sensible.
12. Before we discuss that further, let
us return to the four gender/class contexts, which have been distinguished from
one another in terms of a division between noumenal and phenomenal sensuality
on the one hand, and a division between phenomenal and noumenal sensibility on
the other hand.
13. Not only does soma not prevail over
psyche in phenomenal sensuality because of the countervailing influence, in
free psyche, of noumenal sensibility, specifically with regard to the influence
of metaphysics on antiphysics, but the female modes of bound psyche and free
soma do not prevail over their male counterparts, despite the nominal hegemony
of chemistry over antiphysics, but are encouraged to take an inferior status in
which the bound psyche of nonconformism exists in a secondary relationship to
the bound psyche of antihumanism, and the free soma of realism in a secondary
relationship to the free soma of antinaturalism, so that the resulting
diagonally-ascending axial integrity from phenomenal sensuality to noumenal
sensibility follows from the unequivocal hegemony, in the latter context, of
metaphysics over antimetachemistry, and makes for a progression, in psyche,
from antihumanism to transcendentalism in respect of primary church-hegemonic
criteria (male) and from nonconformism to antifundamentalism in respect of
secondary church-hegemonic criteria (female), while simultaneously making for a
progression or, more correctly, counter-regression, in soma, from
antinaturalism to idealism in respect of primary state-subordinate criteria
(male) and from realism to antimaterialism in respect of secondary
state-subordinate criteria (female) - the church-hegemonic progressions
commensurate with salvation from sin to grace on primary terms and from
pseudo-crime to pseudo-punishment on secondary terms, the state-subordinate
counter-regressions commensurate with counter-damnation from folly to wisdom on
primary terms and from pseudo-evil to pseudo-good on secondary terms.
14. Contrariwise, not only does psyche
not prevail over soma in phenomenal sensibility because of the countervailing
influence, in free soma, of noumenal sensuality, specifically with regard to
the influence of metachemistry on antichemistry, but the male modes of bound
soma and free psyche do not prevail over their female counterparts, despite the
nominal hegemony of physics over antichemistry, but are encouraged to take an
inferior status in which the bound soma of naturalism exists in a secondary
relationship to the bound soma of antirealism, and the free psyche of humanism
in a secondary relationship to the free psyche of antinonconformism, so that
the resulting diagonally-descending axial integrity from noumenal sensuality to
phenomenal sensibility follows from the unequivocal hegemony, in the former
context, of metachemistry over antimetaphysics, and makes for a regression, in
soma, from materialism to antirealism in respect of primary state-hegemonic
criteria (female) and from anti-idealism to naturalism in respect of secondary
state-hegemonic criteria (male), while simultaneously making for a regression
or, more correctly, counter-progression, in psyche, from fundamentalism to
antinonconformism in respect of primary church-subordinate criteria (female)
and from antitranscendentalism to humanism in respect of secondary church-subordinate
criteria (male) - the state-hegemonic regressions commensurate with damnation
from evil to good on primary terms and from pseudo-folly to pseudo-wisdom
on secondary terms, the church-subordinate counter-progressions commensurate
with counter-salvation from crime to punishment on primary terms and from
pseudo-sin to pseudo-grace on secondary terms.
15. I have gone into the whys and
wherefores of these axial distinctions often enough in my writings before, so I
shall not waste time explaining the reasons why salvation and counter-damnation
in respect of the diagonally ascending axis should be sharply distinguished
from damnation and counter-salvation in respect of its diagonally descending
counterpart, the axis characterized by somatic primacy on account of female
hegemonic criteria which put it for ever at loggerheads with everything
permitting, in male hegemonic vein, of moral redemption in free psyche.
16. I shall return, instead, to the four
main gender/class contexts, as outlined at the beginning, and endeavour to show
what corresponds to what in terms of state or church, soma or psyche, when we
analyze each one in relation to such symbolically metaphorical terms for the
precedence of soma by psyche or succeedence of psyche by soma as God the Father
or the Son of God, Man the Father or the Son of Man, not to mention for the
precedence of psyche by soma or succeedence of soma by psyche in respect of
terms like Devil the Mother or the Daughter of the Devil, Woman the Mother or
the Daughter of Woman, and so on, starting with the noumenally sensual context
of metachemistry and antimetaphysics in which, as we have seen, the materialism
and fundamentalism of the one have to be contrasted with the anti-idealism and
antitranscendentalism of the other.
17. Therefore where the distinction in
metachemistry between free soma and bound psyche is concerned, we have to
distinguish not only between materialism and fundamentalism but ... the free
will and spirit of the one and the bound ego and soul of the other, as between
Devil the Mother and Hell the Clear Spirit in respect of materialism, and the
Daughter of the Devil and the Clear Soul of Hell in respect of fundamentalism,
the former pairing commensurate with state-hegemonic criteria on primary terms,
the latter pairing with church-subordinate criteria on such terms.
18. Likewise where the distinction in
antimetaphysics between free soma and bound psyche is concerned, we have to
distinguish not only between anti-idealism and antitranscendentalism but ...
the free will and spirit of the one and the bound ego and soul of the other, as
between the Antison of Antigod and the Unholy Spirit of Antiheaven in respect
of anti-idealism, and Antigod the Antifather and Antihell the Unholy Soul in
respect of antitranscendentalism, the former pairing commensurate with
state-hegemonic criteria on secondary terms, the latter pairing with
church-subordinate criteria on such terms.
19. Therefore the context of noumenal
sensuality presents us with an overall state-hegemonic distinction between the
primacy of Devil the Mother and Hell the Clear Spirit in relation to
materialism, and the secondariness of the Antison of Antigod and the Unholy
Spirit of Antiheaven in relation to anti-idealism, but with an overall
church-subordinate distinction between the primacy of the Daughter of the Devil
and the Clear Soul of Hell in relation to fundamentalism, and the secondariness
of Antigod the Antifather and Antiheaven the Unholy Soul in relation to
antitranscendentalism.
20. Where the distinction in
antichemistry between bound soma and free psyche is concerned, we have to
distinguish not only between antirealism and antinonconformism but ... the
bound will and spirit of the one and the free ego and soul of the other, as
between Antiwoman the Antimother and Antipurgatory the Unclear Spirit in
respect of antirealism, and the Antidaughter of Antiwoman and the Unclear Soul
of Antipurgatory in respect of antinonconformism, the former pairing
commensurate with state-hegemonic criteria on primary terms, the latter pairing
with church-subordinate criteria on such terms.
21. Likewise where the distinction in
physics between bound soma and free psyche is concerned, we have to distinguish
not only between naturalism and humanism but ... the bound will and spirit of
the one and the free ego and soul of the other, as between the Son of Man and
the Holy Spirit of Earth in respect of naturalism, and Man the Father and Earth
the Holy Soul in respect of humanism, the former pairing commensurate with state-hegemonic
criteria on secondary terms, the latter pairing with church-subordinate
criteria on such terms.
22. Therefore the context of phenomenal
sensibility presents us with an overall state-hegemonic distinction between the
primacy of Woman the Mother and Antipurgatory the Unclear Spirit in
relation to antirealism, and the secondariness of the Son of Man and the
Holy Spirit of Earth in relation to naturalism, but with an overall
church-subordinate distinction between the primacy of the Antidaughter of
Antiwoman and the Unclear Soul of Antipurgatory in relation to
antinonconformism, and the secondariness of Man the Father and Earth the Holy
Soul in relation to humanism.
23. Let us now turn from the
state-hegemonic and church-subordinate alternatives of the diagonally
descending axis to the church-hegemonic and state-subordinate alternatives of
the diagonally ascending one, starting with the context of phenomenal
sensuality.
24. Where the distinction in antiphysics
between bound psyche and free soma is concerned, we have to distinguish not
only between antihumanism and antinaturalism but ... the bound ego and soul of
the one and the free will and spirit of the other, as between Antiman the
Antifather and Anti-earth the Unholy Soul in respect of antihumanism, and the
Antison of Antiman and the Unholy Spirit of Anti-earth in respect of
antinaturalism, the former pairing commensurate with church-hegemonic criteria
on primary terms, the latter pairing with state-subordinate criteria on such
terms.
25. Likewise, where the distinction in
chemistry between bound psyche and free soma is concerned, we have to
distinguish not only between nonconformism and realism but ... the bound ego
and soul of the one and the free will and spirit of the other, as between the
Daughter of Woman and the Unclear Soul of Purgatory in respect of
nonconformism, and Woman the Mother and Purgatory the Unclear Spirit in respect
of realism, the former pairing commensurate with church-hegemonic criteria on
secondary terms, the latter pairing with state-subordinate criteria on such
terms.