CYCLE
TWENTY-TWO
1. If the electron is
the element of nature, then nature is qualitative, and hence phenomenally subjective,
which is to say, relatively good.
2. If the neutron is the element of antinature, then antinature is
quantitative, and hence phenomenally objective, which is to say, relatively
evil.
3. Hence whatever goes against nature, as antinature, is relatively evil, the evil of the purgatorial
Overworld in opposition to the mundane World, or man
to woman.
4. If the photon is the
element of supernature, then supernature
is essential, and hence noumenally subjective, which
is to say, absolutely good.
5. If the proton is the element of anti-supernature, then anti-supernature
is apparent, and hence noumenally objective, which is
to say, absolutely evil.
6. Hence whatever goes against supernature, as anti-supernature, is absolutely evil, the
evil of Hell in diabolic opposition to divine Heaven, or the Devil to God.
7. To contrast the eccentricity (soul) of the
Father with the psycho-centricity (spirit) of the Holy Ghost on the one hand,
but the egocentricity of the Son (intellect) with the concentricity of the
Mother (will) on the other hand.
8. Eccentricity, being apparent, is diabolic,
whereas psycho-centricity, being essential, is divine.
9. Egocentricity, being quantitative, is
purgatorial, whereas concentricity, being qualitative, is mundane.
10. Nonconformism
contrasts with Humanism as antinature with nature,
whereas Fundamentalism contrasts with Transcendentalism as anti-supernature with supernature.
11. The eccentric person
has no spiritual self, whereas the psycho-centric person is all spiritual self, the
former being a fundamentalist Devil and the latter a transcendentalist God.
12. The egocentric person has, relatively
speaking, no physical self and the concentric person is, relatively speaking, all physical self, the
former being a nonconformist Half-Devil (man) and the latter a humanist
Half-God (woman).
13. Lacking spiritual self, the eccentric person
is damned to the emotional not-self of perceptual appearances.
14. Lacking physical (wilful) self, the egocentric
person is confined to the intellectual not-self of perceptual quantities.
15. The emotional not-self of perceptual
appearances contrasts absolutely with the spiritual self of conceptual
essences, as noumenal objectivity with noumenal subjectivity.
16. The intellectual not-self of perceptual
quantities contrasts relatively with the instinctual self of conceptual
qualities, as phenomenal objectivity with phenomenal subjectivity.