CYCLE TWENTY-TWO

 

1.   If the electron is the element of nature, then nature is qualitative, and hence phenomenally subjective, which is to say, relatively good.

 

2.   If the neutron is the element of antinature, then antinature is quantitative, and hence phenomenally objective, which is to say, relatively evil.

 

3.   Hence whatever goes against nature, as antinature, is relatively evil, the evil of the purgatorial Overworld in opposition to the mundane World, or man to woman.

 

4.   If the photon is the element of supernature, then supernature is essential, and hence noumenally subjective, which is to say, absolutely good.

 

5.   If the proton is the element of anti-supernature, then anti-supernature is apparent, and hence noumenally objective, which is to say, absolutely evil.

 

6.   Hence whatever goes against supernature, as anti-supernature, is absolutely evil, the evil of Hell in diabolic opposition to divine Heaven, or the Devil to God.

 

7.   To contrast the eccentricity (soul) of the Father with the psycho-centricity (spirit) of the Holy Ghost on the one hand, but the egocentricity of the Son (intellect) with the concentricity of the Mother (will) on the other hand.

 

8.   Eccentricity, being apparent, is diabolic, whereas psycho-centricity, being essential, is divine.

 

9.   Egocentricity, being quantitative, is purgatorial, whereas concentricity, being qualitative, is mundane.

 

10.  Nonconformism contrasts with Humanism as antinature with nature, whereas Fundamentalism contrasts with Transcendentalism as anti-supernature with supernature.

 

11.  The eccentric person has no spiritual self, whereas the psycho-centric person is all spiritual self, the former being a fundamentalist Devil and the latter a transcendentalist God.

 

12.  The egocentric person has, relatively speaking, no physical self and the concentric person is, relatively speaking, all physical self, the former being a nonconformist Half-Devil (man) and the latter a humanist Half-God (woman).

 

13.  Lacking spiritual self, the eccentric person is damned to the emotional not-self of perceptual appearances.

 

14.  Lacking physical (wilful) self, the egocentric person is confined to the intellectual not-self of perceptual quantities.

 

15.  The emotional not-self of perceptual appearances contrasts absolutely with the spiritual self of conceptual essences, as noumenal objectivity with noumenal subjectivity.

 

16.  The intellectual not-self of perceptual quantities contrasts relatively with the instinctual self of conceptual qualities, as phenomenal objectivity with phenomenal subjectivity.