25-27/09/12
Where flat-screen TVs are concerned, I guess
'gogglebox' would be an anachronistic form of slang.
If a young female adult is any good, so to
speak, she should be aspiring downwards from metachemistry to chemistry, as
from beauty and love (coupled subconsciously with ugliness and hatred) to pride
and strength (coupled unconsciously with humility and weakness), thereby
abandoning – if only temporarily – the objective ethereal for the
objective corporeal and the attendant acquirement, in consequence, of a
surrogate plenum, namely the child, to alleviate the vacuousness or emptiness
of her fundamental (free somatically-materialist/bound
psychically-fundamentalist) condition.
If a young male adult is any good, so to speak,
he should be aspiring upwards from physics to metaphysics, as from knowledge
and pleasure (coupled unsensuously with ignorance and pain) to joy and truth
(coupled subsensuously with woe and illusion), thereby abandoning – if
only intermittently – the subjective corporeal for the subjective
ethereal and the attainment, in consequence, of that grace (coupled
subordinately to wisdom) which is salvation from the world … of being
vulnerable to female predation (necessity) and, hence, domination within the
context, most especially, of family ties. All of which, were it to succeed even
temporarily, would be very much against the natural grain and therefore an
extremely difficult not to say uphill task, requiring an exceptional degree of
determination and even, in some paradoxical way, luck, since this is not the
'way of the world' but, on the contrary, the only way out of the world in terms
of otherworldly values which, taken to their logical conclusion, would also
require the neutralized subordination of females to the paramount or hegemonic
sway of Heaven, as germane to the achievement of metaphysical salvation. Such
subordination I have termed pseudo-metachemical, and I identify it with
counter-damnation as the necessary corollary of the salvation of males to
metaphysics.
This, I am afraid, is the truth about religious
salvation … as the prerogative and preserve of adult males who have the
ability to leave females behind in their determination to 'take up the Cross',
as it were, and follow Christ into Heaven. That, to be sure, was the Christian
age and civilization. The coming age of what Oswald Spengler, the philosopher
of history, calls 'Second Religiousness', will require a more evolved approach
to salvation (coupled, for females, with counter-damnation) in order to
establish anything remotely resembling 'Kingdom Come', the Superchristian
outcome, so to speak, of all previous efforts in the direction of such an
otherworldly paradise. This more evolved approach to salvation, commensurate
with global requirement, I identify with Social Theocracy and/or Social
Transcendentalism, the means whereby 'Kingdom Come' may be achieved.
But don't, for one moment, underestimate the
immense difficulty of such a task, even if, at the same time, that would not
necessarily be a good enough reason to dismiss the prospect of salvation as
unattainable, because the only alternative is then the world and the
everlasting perpetuation of female domination through reproduction. If you are
resigned to that, as many if not most males tend to be, then you are not
aspiring upwards from physics to metaphysics but, in all probability, following
the female around in subordinate vein as a kind of pseudo-metaphysical and/or
pseudo-physical 'sonofabitch' ever beholden to the hegemonic sway of both
metachemistry and chemistry, which is, after all, where we began this article.
Night in, morning out, afternoon in, evening
out – the cycle of my days with regard to the use of malleable wax
earplugs, which I have been dependent on since coming to London in 1974.
It's not about how many books you sell; it is
about what kind of books you write and, secondarily, how they are published,
whether as hardbacks, softbacks (paperbacks), audio books, or eBooks.