FROM CHAOS TO PARADISE

 

1.   Chaos, anarchy, and other crude manifestations of barbarism/philistinism, or undue naturalism, can have no place in a society unequivocally orientated towards the maximum of positive, or supreme, being.  Rather are they symptoms of pre-worldly societies whose primitivity necessarily fell short of culture/civilization.

 

2.   With culture/civilization and a positive commitment, institutionally upheld, to sensibility, one enters the world, which is to say, those societies given, in greater or lesser degree, to a sensible alternative to sensuality, and thus to the possibility of knowing right from wrong.

 

3.   Prior to the world of partial, or humanistic, adherence to culture/civilization, there was only the chaos and/or anarchy of unequivocally barbarous/philistine societies, which did not distinguish between right and wrong but effectively lived in the wrong as if it were right, knowing no better.

 

4.   To call such societies paradisiacal would indeed be to debase the concept of paradise, and to wrongly identify chaos with it!

 

5.   In reality, nothing could be further from paradise than the sort of primitive pre-worldly societies based in the irrational and altogether unconstitutional rule of chaos!

 

6.   If things proceed from alpha to omega, as from chaos to order, anarchy to polity, chance to determinism, freedom to binding, then they do so via the world and the transmutation of chaos in line with the development, on an alternative basis, of culture and civilization.

 

7.   It may even be that barbarism and philistinism are transmutations of chaos commensurate with the acceptance of culture and civilization, and are only properly recognizable as such in relation to the latter.

 

8.   Thus if barbarism and philistinism are only recognizable as such from the standpoints of culture and civilization, the cultural rejection of nature and the civil rejection of barbarity, the latter will have to have come officially to pass before the former can be evaluated and condemned for their opposition to sensibility from an overly sensual base, whether barbarous or natural.

 

9.   But worldly culture and civilization, as we have seen, will continue to be subject to periodic or intermittent outbreaks of barbarism and philistinism, to greater or lesser extents depending on the nature of the particular culture/civilization complex and the individuals of which it is composed.

 

10.  Only in a post-worldly culture/civilization complex, commensurate with 'Kingdom Come', would the development of cultural/civilized stability and continuity be substantially different from the worldly past, and then because such an omega-oriented society was sufficiently God-directed as to have post-human aspirations and the desire and capacity, in consequence, to engineer, at both alpha and omega levels, the artificial transmutation of life towards a much less relativistic end.

 

11.  And such societies would come, in the course of cyborg-to-post-human time, to resemble genuine paradises which, in their stability and positivity, were as far removed from the chaotic anarchy or anarchic chaos of primitive societies as to be their complete antitheses.

 

12.  They would even become antithetical to the Cosmos itself, as they gravitated, under technological and moral guidance, from being 'paradises on earth' to being 'paradises in Heaven', which is to say, set in space centres at a discreet remove from earthly gravity and, by implication, gravitas.

 

13.  One can speak, it seems to me, of devolution from alpha chaos in the Cosmos (Hell) to unequivocal barbarism/naturalism in the pre-world, and from worldly relativity in cultural/civilized opposition to barbarity/philistinism to unequivocal post-worldly evolution towards omega paradise in the Universe (Heaven), or space as a setting for that which, equivalent to omega points, was antithetical to the Cosmos, and therefore properly universal.

 

14.  One can contrast the convolutional nature of devolution from cosmic chaos with the involutional nature of evolution towards universal paradise, as one would contrast the centrifugal with the centripetal, whether objectively or subjectively, in relation to straight lines or to curves.

 

15.  Were paradise to slide back into chaos, the omega into the alpha, it would indeed be a grim joke and unfortunate irony of life, but I do not believe that it would or could, since it is something at the furthest possible remove from chaos, like an old person on the point of death from a baby on the point of birth.  The old person does not turn into the baby, or vice versa.

 

16.  The circle of life has gaps in it, both with regard to the furthest point of devolution vis-à-vis the hindmost point of evolution, and the furthermost point of evolution vis-à-vis the hinderleast point, so to speak, of devolution.

 

17.  Such gaps can only be bridged by revolution, since that removes what exists to either side of itself, and in the context of the Cosmos/Universe such a procedure could only be counter-revolutionary and therefore morally impermissible and unjustifiable.

 

18.  A revolution that leads from devolution to an evolutionary alternative to it which yet co-exists with the barbarous/philistine consequences of devolution is one thing; a counter-revolution that reverses what has been gained by culture/civilization at the expense of barbarism/philistinism or which strives, cold-bloodedly, to return from omega to the alpha beginnings of things again, descending from the heights of reason and morality to the depths, the alpha-most beginnings, of unreason and immorality would be the product of insanity and corruption, and could never, under any circumstances, be encouraged or condoned.

 

19.  One can only suppose the chances of that happening in a highly advanced culture/civilization complex to be extremely remote, given the rule of morality and preponderance, under evolutionary involution, of paradisiacal reason.

 

20.  For that which is most rational or logical is most wise, and contrasts, absolutely, with that which, having no reason or logic at all, is most irrational and illogical, and avowedly most evil.  God's utmost logicality contrasts, absolutely, with the Devil's utmost illogicality, as the most evolved philosopher with the least devolved poet, or paradise with chaos.