CHAPTER 12
The Enduring
Influence
All those far seas and
shores that must be crossed,
They terrify me;
yet
Go you, my son, swift be your cleaving prow
And do not quite forget
– Colman, c. 7th century
During the millennium covered in this book - from the 700's
to the 1800's - men and women from Ireland had a steady influence on the
formation of Europe. It was during this
millennium that the origins of Western culture were laid in the Carolingian
Renaissance, Christianity took root throughout Europe, universities were
founded, the bases of science were established, nations were formed, democracy
was established, and the various states of Europe became interrelated by
diplomatic and economic activity. Irish
émigrés had significant, and in some cases major, parts in each of these
developments in the formation of Europe.
The unusual
aspect of this steady, multifarious and identifiable influence of the Irish is
that they did not bring anything essentially novel to Europe. Irish lore and activities stimulated the
seeds of Celtic culture which remained in Europe after the Roman Empire
collapsed and during the barbarian invasions and rule. The re-emergence of fundamentals of Celtic
culture in Europe from the influence of the Irish émigrés was not so strong
that these fundamentals supplanted aspects of Roman civilization and barbarian
culture which had taken root. But the
spirituality and knowledge the Irish related, the skills they taught and the
effects of their activities ensured that Celtic culture, along with classical
and northern barbarian culture, would play a permanent and central part in
Europe's history and cultural development.
The
remarkable influence of the Irish in Europe stemmed not only from the qualities
the Irish émigrés brought with them - qualities that were primarily reflections
of ancient Celtic culture. It also
stemmed from the pattern of Irish emigration over the millennium, plus the
numbers of Irish in this pattern.
Although there were dips in this pattern of emigration - most notably the
period from the waning of the Carolingian Renaissance (c. 900) until the late
Middle Ages (c. 1300) - over the entire millennium, the Irish influence is seen
as continual. Although the numbers of
Irish émigrés - almost all monks - fell markedly in the late 800's, the
influence of generations of monks up until this time was such that it remained
strong and formative despite not being regularly reinforced or extended by the
fewer numbers of monks who came to Europe afterwards.
One of the
principal reasons the monks journeying to Europe towards the end of the Dark
Ages had such a long-lasting influence was the sturdy monasteries they built
which became spiritual and educational centres for the surrounding
populations. A number of these
monasteries survive today, engaged in the same spiritual and educational work
as they were in the time when they were founded. The early Irish monks determined the purpose
and set the tone for these early medieval monasteries, establishing customs and
observances continued by following generations of monks whether they were from
Ireland or not. Another reason the
influence of the early monks lasted beyond their time is that they taught the
rudiments of practical activities such as growing crops and animal
husbandry. During the Middle Ages, such
practices continued virtually unchanged, so that the methods taught by the
monks remained in use for centuries. A
third reason why the influence of the monks persisted is that the monks influenced
the spirituality, interests such as education, and other aspects of the manner
of rule of petty kings in different parts of Europe. This manner of rule adopted by the petty
kings in the period of change from the Dark Ages to the Middle Ages continued
long into the Middle Ages, thus prolonging the influence of the early Irish
monks.
Another
important reason that their influence continued was that the Middle Ages were
an embodiment of basic cultural elements that were strongly influenced by the
monks, and in some cases were almost direct reflections of them. The monks had a strong influence on the
development of the Christian spirituality which became bound in the Middle
Ages. The closeness between the
spiritual leaders and temporal rulers had its basis in the relationship between
the Irish monks and the petty kings. But
more than this, the monasteries founded by the Irish monks were the models for
the manors upon which feudalism - the foundation of the Middle Ages - was
based. Like the monasteries, the manors
were meant to be self-sufficient. The
manors were meant to provide for the spiritual concerns as well as the
practical needs of the people involved in them.
The variety of skills possessed among groups of monks who founded a
monastery - such as stone masonry, woodcraft, animal husbandry - were possessed
by the varied persons who belonged to a manor.
The class structure with its reciprocal obligations by which a manor's
self-sufficiency could be maintained was a more complex and explicit representation
of the organization of a monastery. The
influence of the Irish monks in the beginnings of the Middle Ages shaped the
spirituality and way of life which came to be the main feature of the Middle
Ages. Since the Middle Ages were a long
period of stability during which there was no significant change in the
spirituality or the way of life, the influence of the Irish lasted long beyond
their appearance in Europe.
When Irish
émigrés again began arriving in Europe in appreciable numbers towards the end
of the Middle Ages - in the 1400's - they readily adapted to the broad changes
underway in the culture of Europe which was moving into the Renaissance and the
modern era. Whereas the monks of the
late Dark Ages and early Middle Ages had come to Europe primarily for spiritual
motives, the later generations of émigrés were soldiers, merchants, farmers,
nobles, artisans and teachers, along with some priests and nuns. This diversity of positions and occupations
enabled the latest Irish émigrés to integrate into varied positions in European
societies when the feudal system was breaking up, cities were growing, ties
between different regions and different countries were forming, and
secularization was altering perspectives.
Because the Irish had not been involved in the feudal system, they often
brought fresh ideas and new practices to the fields they became engaged in; and
some of the émigrés became leaders in those fields. Apart from the ideas and practices the later
émigrés brought with them, they were accepted because of the favourable memory of
the monks who had long age preceded them and because, like the monks, they
touched vestiges of the ancient Celtic culture they shared with the Europeans.
New émigrés
and descendants of previous émigrés from Ireland were involved in the trends
shaping the Europe of the modern world during the Renaissance. The central movement shaping Europe at this
time was the Protestant Reformation.
Although Irish émigrés and their descendants played only a small role in
those European countries that largely became Protestant, the Irish helped
Catholicism to remain vibrant and dominant in those European countries which
resisted the Reformation. The numbers of
Irish lay persons who were staunchly Catholic, along with the activities of
Irish clergy, contributed to the strengthening of Catholicism in countries such
as France and Austria which had sizeable Protestant minorities. Many émigrés played roles in shaping the
responses of these countries to Protestantism, which responses figured heavily
into the nature of these countries in the modern world. For instance, in helping certain countries of
Europe remain Catholic, the Irish also played a role in their
secularization. The Irish had never been
authoritarian, hierarchical or ceremonious in their practice of Catholicism. Yet they had always been defenders of
Catholicism. In the close
interrelationship between Church and State in the Middle Ages, it had been
bishops, cardinals and popes representing Roman Catholicism, not Celtic
Christianity, which influenced the kings and nobility that ruled a
country. Even though many countries in
Europe remained Catholic, despite the major historical movement of the
Protestant Reformation, they were nevertheless inevitably much affected by the
trends of secularism of the time. When
such trends brought about the increasing separation of Church and State, the
influence of the Irish émigrés and their descendants grew. Although strong Catholics, the Irish always
had a more practical and democratic approach to daily life, political and
social matters, as well as religious views.
This practical and democratic approach was more in tune with the
secularization of the era, and therefore the Irish often had considerable
influence with a country's ruler and in the fields such as business and
medicine which were developing as a part of the secularization.
Besides
secularization, nationalism was another movement which emerged following the
Middle Ages. The Irish, with their sense
of individuality and concept of clan loyalty, played substantial parts in the
nationalistic trends shaping a number of the countries of Europe. These parts were played not only by Irish
counsellors, diplomats, statesmen and government officials, but also by Irish
military leaders and soldiers. The
exploits of military units led by Irish officers or all-Irish military units
helped Spain from being conquered by Napoleon's forces, Portugal from losing
territory to Spain, and Austria from being defeated by Frederick the Great of
Prussia. Such exploits not only
epitomized the nationalistic spirit, but also led to the geographic shape of a
number of the nations of modern Europe.
Although
the Irish émigrés had a capacity for adaptability which allowed them to
cope with changing social conditions and historical developments over centuries
in Europe, they also had a worldview which gave them a stability in particular
circumstances and in the course of historical changes. The Irish had a holistic worldview that had
its origins in Celtic culture. As with
the ancient Celts, the Irish saw knowledge, spirituality, and practical
abilities and skills as interrelated.
This worldview enabled Irish émigrés to offer solutions to the problems
perceived by rulers and local populations of Europe. There were times when the solutions offered
could seem almost visionary. But besides
this practical dimension of the worldview, it also afforded the émigrés and
their descendants a position in the changing circumstances which kept them from
adopting absolutist forms or radical ideas for dealing with the changing
circumstances and problems they became involved in. Thus, while genuinely and firmly Catholic,
the Irish never completely accepted the doctrines or the absolutist authority
of the Pope. With their Catholicism, the
earlier émigrés were welcomed across Europe; and then when the influence of
Catholicism began to wane with the Protestant Reformation, the Irish did not
undergo a change in their principles or beliefs in order to play a role in the
secularization of the countries which remained Catholic. They played their influential role without
having to change the Catholicism they always practised and by resisting the
Protestant Reformation. This unique
position the Irish would hold in historical changes occurring in Europe is
perhaps best evidences in the reliance of different European monarchs on the
Irish as counsellors and diplomats in the transition of their countries from
kingdoms into nations and also as advisors and political leaders for reforms in
response to the movement of democracy.
While being mostly egalitarian and democratic from their Celtic roots,
émigrés nonetheless served rulers and nobility loyally and effectively. When democratic tendencies grew in European
societies, the émigrés were well suited to serve a country's monarchs by
helping in their response to these tendencies.
In these circumstances, the Irish acted on their inherent beliefs and
principles without joining the revolutionary movements growing in the countries
of Europe.
Despite
their exceptional capacity for adaptability and their focus on particular
problems or needs in various European societies at different times, the Irish
worldview remained constant during the centuries of emigration. It had the effect of reinforcing the
accomplishments and qualities of earlier generations of émigrés, which
substantiated the Irish influence on Europe.
Not only
the pattern of the generations of Irish émigrés, but their number accounted for
their exceptional influence. Their
numbers were not so large that they could not be absorbed by the countries they
went to, but not so small that they were assimilated without a trace. Because their numbers were not so large and
were spread out over the whole period of emigration and several countries,
following generations of Irish were welcome in countries favoured by the
émigrés. In these countries, since the
numbers of previous émigrés had been enough so that there was nonetheless an
Irish presence, following generations of émigrés were attracted to them. The intermediate number of émigrés also
enabled particular Irish who became distinguished in different fields to gain
their prominent and influential positions.
There were never so many Irish in any one country that its rulers and
other leaders or its native population were concerned that Irish who rose to
prominence were leading the way for an Irish take-over of a field.
The basis
for the Irish influence was not only the interaction between Irish émigrés and
populations of the countries they went to, but also the interaction among Irish
within a country and between generations of émigrés. This basis can be illuminated by a comparison
of the Irish with both the barbarian tribes of northern Europe and the Jews. The barbarians of northern Europe came to
Europe in such numbers that they overturned the societies based on Roman
administration and reflecting the Roman domination. They replaced this Roman system with their
own hodgepodge of petty kingdoms. These
kingdoms were basically warrior societies in which the crafts and arts slipped
into desuetude and spiritual inclinations had no outlet. The culture and characteristics of the
barbarians obviously dominated Europe.
But the Irish never came to Europe, or any part of it, in such hordes
that they had such a totally transforming effect. Rather, the Irish were like waters of
nourishment or were innovators in various fields, usually fields they were
assigned to or allowed to enter by the rulers of a country.
When
compared to the Jews, the Irish were present in greater numbers, and over a
considerably broader range of fields.
Thus, although particular Jews made notable or outstanding achievements
in certain fields, these achievements were based on the particular qualities of
the individual, not cultural attributes.
Thus where Jews had exceptional influence over a field of the broader
culture, this is seen as reflecting practices of the existing culture, not
materially contributing qualities or capacities of Jewish culture to the
traditional culture of a country. Jewish
culture was just not compatible with the culture of Europe in the essential way
that the Irish culture was with its Celtic roots. Besides, there were not following numbers of
Jewish émigrés to reinforce and substantiate the achievements of individual
Jews.
Besides the
qualities, enterprise and innovative spirit of the Irish émigrés which were
reflections of their culture of Celtic origin, their emigration pattern over
the geography of Europe and the numbers of émigrés spread over the centuries of
emigration were factors in their identifiable, unique and enduring influence on
European history and culture.
To note
this exceptional influence of the Irish émigrés on the formation of Europe as
we have in this book is not to minimize or disregard the influence of national
characteristics, ethnic traits, or other immigrant groups. To note this Irish influence, however, is to
point to the common ground of Celtic culture from which their particular
influences arose. The story of the
influence of outstanding Irish individuals and descendants and the numbers of
Irish émigrés is to bring to light a significant influence on the formation and
nature of Europe; and it also discloses its foundation in Celtic culture and
the reawakening and ongoing influence of this culture which was represented
most clearly by the Irish.