APOCALYPSO -
The New Revelation
Aphoristic Philosophy
Copyright © 2012 John
O'Loughlin
_______________
1. The
English only appear radical to themselves; when confronted by the more genuine
radicalism of an Irishman, an Arab, an Indian, or what have you, they quickly
return to their true colours, which are invariably conservative.
2. The Englishman is not even a bureaucratic conservative
fundamentally, or perhaps I should say nonconformistically, so to speak, but
the worst possible sort of conservative: an autocrat.
3. Even
in left-wing parliamentary democracy, the neo-autocratic beast has raised its
ugly head before the extreme left-wing social democracy can get a look in;
though when it does, as on extra-parliamentary terms, such a beast is more
inclined to 'give and/or take head', in homosexual fellatio, than to 'give
and/or take arse' in homosexual sodomy.
4. Of
course, the 'arse' cannot be ruled out.
But it is just that neo-autocratic tendencies display a marked
predilection towards, if not preference for, homosexual fellatio over
homosexual sodomy, so that one might speak rather colloquially of a neo-'pus'
correction of, and even alternative to, outright homosexual 'shit'.
5. Of
course, homosexual fellatio is what could, in ideological terms, be called
rather more secondary 'church' than primary state in respect of Social
Democracy, and thus less characteristic of a social democratic bent per se than
would be masturbation involving homosexual pornography, both of which need to
be distinguished from the parliamentary parallels of heterosexual fellatio as
secondary to heterosexual pornography.
6. For
liberal, or parliamentary, democracy remains broadly heterosexual, if within a
markedly male-oriented context, and therefore such pornography or oral sex as
might be said to parallel it will likewise be broadly heterosexual, even if
containing a homosexual element on the parliamentary Left, which veers towards,
though remains apart from, the social democratic radical Left of an outright
homosexual orientation in both pornography and fellatio, not to mention sodomy
in general.
7. One
fancies that female-oriented heterosexual cunnilingus would be autocratically
secondary to female masturbation in an outright autocratic context, where the
State would necessarily take precedence over the Church, and 'frigging'
tendencies accordingly pull rank on 'snogging' ones within a context typified,
in metachemically sensual vein, by the 'jerk', who will be 'frigging' first and
foremost and only 'snogging' on a rather subordinate basis, analogous to religious
fundamentalism.
8. In
liberal democratic societies, by contrast, it is the 'sodding' tendencies which
pull rank on 'fucking' ones, given that one is dealing with a context typified,
in physically sensible vein, by the 'prick', who will be 'sodding' first and
foremost and only 'fucking' on a subordinate basis, analogous to religious
humanism.
9. Terrestrial
television would stand to cinema pretty much as neo-autocratic to autocratic, or
neo-'frigging' to 'frigging', and thus pretty much within a left-wing
parliamentary to social-democratic extreme-left
context, where, one fancies, it also enters the realm of cable TV.
10. The
democratic extreme Left are paradoxically the distorted mirror image of the
autocratic extreme Right, for they are of the resurrection of autocratic
tendencies within a broadly social-democratic context, which fights shy of
parliamentary de-centralizing in favour of a centralized state totalitarianism.
11. In Britain, mention of the word 'left' automatically confers
a democratic connotation which is so much taken for granted that no other
concept of the Left is ever mooted.
12. But, of course, the Left in Britain, particularly in
England, are merely democratic Left.
They are not theocratic Left, and the concept of such a Left would be
completely alien to the British, and likely to be dismissed as aberrant and
subversive of genuine left-wing values.
13. Which
is a sad testimony of the extent to which
14. Strange
irony that the extreme Left of a social democratic persuasion assume a
neo-autocratic character in the context of state totalitarianism, with its
centralizing tendencies guaranteed to resurrect, within male-oriented terms, all that most typified autocratic authoritarianism.
15. The
left-wing Englishman can be so democratic that even bureaucratic and theocratic
affiliations seem autocratic to him, and something to dismiss as right wing and
reactionary.
16. Little
does he realize the extent to which affiliation with an autocratic-democratic
axis, falling from the one to the other, as from Hell in the sky to hell on
earth, has blinded him to the reality of the bureaucratic-theocratic axis
typifying countries like Eire, in which there is a rise from heaven in the
water, so to speak, to Heaven in the sky, and where a clean break with
bureaucratic conservatism would be no-less radically left-wing, in its own
context, than a clean break with autocratic conservatism in respect of social
democracy.
17. Such
a clean break with bureaucratic conservatism I call Social Theocracy, and it
stands to Social Democracy, the extra-parliamentary mode of democracy, as the
Second Coming to the Antichrist, or Heaven in the sky to hell on earth, or the
saving of souls to the savouring of 'arseholes', or, in simple elemental terms,
air to earth, and, in colloquial parlance, 'gas' to 'shit'.
18. How
the two peoples diverge! The English down to the lowest depths of earthly equalitarianism,
the Irish up towards the highest heights of heavenly elitism, as between
salvation and damnation, heaven and hell.
19. Celts,
more generally, will have to know where they are at and take a stand on it, not
sit on the 'British' fence between English Protestant and Irish Catholic
extremes as though it didn't matter. For,
in truth, nothing matters more!
20. On the basis one would argue that there can't be any
practice, or praxis, without theory, it could be maintained that there can't be
any gnosis without knowledge.
21. Which
in metaphysical terms would be equivalent to saying that there can't be any
theosophy without theology, any 'love' of God without 'knowledge' of God, as to
what constitutes God.
22. Likewise,
in physical terms, such a contention would be equivalent to saying that there can't
be any philosophy without philology, any 'love' of knowledge without
'knowledge' of language, as to what constitutes logic.
23. Thus I argue for a parallel between theology and theosophy on the
one hand, that of metaphysics, and for a like-parallel between philology and
philosophy on the other hand, that of physics.
24. In
both cases, theology and philology are the theory that leads to or makes
possible a theosophical or philosophical praxis, depending whether one is
metaphysical or physical, heavenly or earthy, upper-class male or lower-class
male, highlander or lowlander, which is to say, divine or masculine, godly or
manly.
25. Love
of, or concern with, God must rank higher than love of, or concern with, human
knowledge, and therefore one can safely maintain that the theosophist, or
theosopher, is as superior, in male terms, to the philosopher as the theologian
to the philologist, or philologian, since he represents the higher discipline,
which has intimate associations with metaphysics rather than mere physics.
26. Frankly,
metaphysics in connection with philosophy is something of a hype; for if you
are genuinely metaphysical you will be a theosophist or, as I prefer to say,
theosopher, whose 'love' of God leads to Heaven no less surely than 'love' of
human knowledge, as of man, keeps one pegged to the earth in consequence of
one's want of divine prospects and besottedness with what the Bible calls 'the
forbidden tree of knowledge', and with good reason!
27. But
how could the theosopher not be a theologian, or someone concerned with
knowledge of God, so that such divine knowledge can bear theosophical fruit in
respect of heavenly redemption, the sort of joyful praxis that stems from a
truthful theory.
28. Likewise,
how could the philosopher not be a philologian, or someone concerned with
knowledge of man, so that such human knowledge can bear philosophical fruit in
respect of earthly redemption, the sort of pleasurable praxis that stems from a
knowledgeable theory.
29. There
will be societies who, overly earthly and lower-class, will prefer to hype
philology and philosophy in consequence of a want of theology and theosophy;
for they have put man on the throne of life and, to the extent that they
acknowledge religion at all, have allowed man to pass muster as God, and
knowledge to be hyped as truth, with a consequence that what passes for Heaven
is really only the earth.
30. Such
human-all-too-human societies and peoples make a heaven out of the earth, and
therefore reduce life to the parameters of earthly criteria, content that they
have done their duty and achieved all that is necessary when once they have
sufficiently 'got on in the world' to have created a sort of earthly paradise
for themselves from which anything more genuinely heavenly, or paradisiacal, is
rigorously excluded, as a subversive threat to the earthly status quo.
31. For
they will not hear it said, these apologists of the earthly paradise, that they
are merely worldly and have reduced everything, including God and Heaven, to the
parameters of man and the earth, allowing philology to eclipse theology and, as
a practical reward for that, philosophy to eclipse theosophy.
32. And
when they are unequivocally so, these earthly apologists, they will not even
speak of God in terms of man or Heaven in terms of the earth, much less
theology in terms of philology or theosophy in terms of philosophy, but will
eschew all mention of God and Heaven, theology and theosophy, in favour of
secular values appertaining to man and the earth alone, so that only philology
and philosophy will be countenanced by them, and these will be encouraged to
develop along their own necessarily physical lines independently of
metaphysics, which will simply be excluded as irrelevant or even fanciful.
33. One
might say that these unequivocally manly and earthly souls are of the
democratic Left, whether in liberal terms or, beyond parliament, in the social
democratic terms of the extreme Left, for whom such philological and
philosophical absolutism will, however, be complicated
by neo-autocratic tendencies symptomatic of state totalitarianism and the
resurrection, in modified form, of centralization.
34. A
philology and philosophy complicated, then, not by sociological and what could,
on analogical terms, be called sociosophical factors, in neo-bureaucratic vein,
but by psychological and what we shall call psychosophical factors in
neo-autocratic vein, such that seek to 'brainwash' the People to conform to
social democratic criteria by bombarding them with a plethora of
ideologically-motivated facts and figures doctored to suit the cause, in this
case of a triumphant proletarian humanism premised upon blue-collar
participation.
35. In short,
through propaganda, which is to the ideological Left what commercial
advertising is to the liberal Right and even, in somewhat ambiguous vein,
liberal centre, albeit that exists within a largely de-centralized context of
non-participatory democracy which seeks further de-centralizing measures, to
counter the centralizing threat from the Left.
36. Be
that as it may, the sort of human-all-too-human societies which strive to make
a heaven out of the earth and even, on the Left, to exclude heaven from the
earth altogether, are run by 'pricks' for the 'sodding' advantage of 'pricks'
to reduce everything to 'shit', their sexuality not excepted, and have no
bearing on the elevation of life to anything heavenly, not least in respect of
metaphysics.
37. On
the contrary, by excluding heaven from their earthy partisanship, the extreme
Left pave the way for the subversion of the earth by hell and turn their
secular paradise into a sort of hell on earth in which the 'sodding' advantage
of 'pricks' becomes compromised by the disadvantages accruing to a
neo-'frigging' recrudescence of 'pus', as the centralizing of power resurrects
the need for a psychological control of the masses which will counter any
pluralism stemming from liberal democracy and ensure that they conform to the
totalitarianism which strives to sugar-coat the bitter pill of democratic
'shit' in the 'pus' of its neo-'frigging' propaganda.
38. Thus
the informing of 'shit' by 'pus' ensures that the 'pricks' continue to be
'jerked off' in a manner guaranteed to lead from psychology to psychosophia, or
complacent acceptance of the centralized retort to democracy which
paradoxically has the effect of resurrecting notions of paradise in terms of
heaven on earth, albeit it is really hell on earth by dint of the
neo-autocratic ingredients typifying all social democratic revolutions, which
kow-tow, in untransvaluated vein, to the conservative equation of the Devil and
Hell with God and Heaven, by which I mean to the equation of anything
metachemical with metaphysics, as of autocratic and aristocratic criteria with
their theocratic and technocratic counterparts.
39. And this despite a formal rejection of autocracy and
aristocracy, as of authoritarianism, in the name of the extension of democracy
to the most radical level of the hard-line proletarian blue-collar left.
40. Of
course, metachemistry and metaphysics are two entirely different, one might
feasibly say antithetical, things, and whenever and wherever metachemistry is
sensually triumphant, there can be only antimetaphysics in subordinate paradox
of the Antison of Antigod to Devil the Mother and the Unholy Spirit of
Antiheaven to Hell the Clear Spirit, taking the more representatively somatic
factors in each context alone.
41. Conversely,
wherever and whenever metaphysics is sensibly triumphant, there can be only
antimetachemistry in subordinate paradox of the Antidaughter of Antihell to God
the Father and the Unclear Soul of Antihell to Heaven the Holy Soul, taking the
more representatively psychic factors in each context alone.
42. For
no less than hegemonic metachemistry tends to make for a psychic binding in
subordination to free soma, on both primary (metachemical) and secondary
(antimetaphysical) terms, a hegemonic metaphysics, by contrast, tends to make
for a somatic binding in subordination to free psyche, on both primary
(metaphysical) and secondary (antimetachemical) terms.
43. And
what applies to metachemistry and metaphysics, as to antimetaphysics and
antimetachemistry, also applies to chemistry and physics, as to antiphysics and
antichemistry - their lower-class counterparts, wherein we are not concerned
with the Devil or God, Hell or Heaven, but with woman and man, purgatory and
the earth, as with their respective anti-manifestations.
44. Therefore
whenever and wherever chemistry is sensually triumphant, there can be only
antiphysics in subordinate paradox of the Antison of Antiman to Woman the
Mother and the Unholy Spirit of Anti-earth to Purgatory the Clear Spirit,
taking the more representatively somatic factors in each context alone.
45. Conversely,
wherever and whenever physics is sensibly triumphant, there can only be
antichemistry in subordinate paradox of the Antidaughter of Antipurgatory to
Man the Father and the Unclear Soul of Antipurgatory to Earth the Holy Soul,
taking the more representatively psychic factors in each context alone.
46. For
no less than hegemonic chemistry tends to make for a psychic binding in
subordination to free soma, on both primary (chemical) and secondary (antiphysical)
terms, a hegemonic physics, by contrast, tends to make for a somatic binding in
subordination to free psyche, on both primary (physical) and secondary
(antichemical) terms.
47. Where
there is doing, as in metachemical objectivity, there is antibeing, as in
antimetaphysical subjectivity, and, conversely, where there is being, as in
metaphysical subjectivity, there is antidoing, as in antimetachemical
objectivity.
48. Where
there is giving, as in chemical objectivity, there is antitaking, as in
antiphysical subjectivity, and, conversely, where there is taking, as in
physical subjectivity, there is antigiving, as in antichemical objectivity.
49. Consequently,
it follows that where Devil the Mother is hegemonic in metachemical doing, there
will be a subordinate Antiheaven the Unholy Soul in antimetaphysical antibeing,
and, conversely, where Heaven the Holy Soul is hegemonic in metaphysical being,
there will be a subordinate Antidevil the Antimother in antimetachemical
antidoing.
50. Likewise
it follows that where Purgatory the Clear Spirit is hegemonic in chemical
giving, there will be a subordinate Antiman the Antifather in antiphysical
antitaking, and, conversely, where Man the Father is hegemonic in physical
taking, there will be a subordinate Antipurgatory the Unclear Spirit in
antichemical antigiving.
51. Of
course, all the above pairings are very partial, in that they focus on the
main, or principal, aspect of every context, not on all the aspects of each
context treated individually.
52. Therefore
although we can generalize in terms of doing for metachemistry, being for
metaphysics, giving for chemistry, and taking for physics, not to mention in
respect of their antimetachemical, antimetaphysical, antichemical, and
antiphysical parallels, it nonetheless remains incontrovertibly evident that
each Elemental context contains the full-gamut of options in respect of either
will and spirit plus anti-ego and antisoul or, conversely, ego and soul plus
antiwill and antispirit.
53. Therefore
where there is doing as a primary somatic aspect, there will also be giving as
a primary somatic aspect and antitaking and antibeing as primary psychic
aspects, as in metachemistry and chemistry, doing as the principal aspect of
the one and giving as the principal aspect of the other.
54. Conversely,
where there is being as a primary psychic aspect there will also be taking as a
primary psychic aspect and antidoing and antigiving as primary somatic aspects,
as in metaphysics and physics, being as the principal aspect of the one and
taking as the principal aspect of the other.
55. This
also applies on an overall secondary basis to the subordinate gender in any
context, antimetaphysics being characterized in terms of secondary orders of
antitaking and antibeing vis-à-vis the primary antitaking and antibeing of
metachemistry, as well as secondary orders of doing and giving vis-à-vis the
primary doing and giving of metachemistry, but antimetachemistry being
characterized in terms of secondary orders of taking and being vis-à-vis the
primary taking and being of metaphysics, as well as secondary orders of
antidoing and antigiving vis-à-vis the primary antidoing and antigiving of
metaphysics.
56. Similarly,
we may speak of antiphysics being characterized in terms of secondary orders of
antitaking and antibeing vis-à-vis the primary antitaking and antibeing of
chemistry, as well as secondary orders of doing and giving vis-à-vis the
primary doing and giving of chemistry, but antichemistry being characterized in
terms of secondary orders of taking and being vis-à-vis the primary taking and
being of physics, as well as secondary orders of antidoing and antigiving
vis-à-vis the primary antidoing and antigiving of physics.
57. Therefore
just as metachemistry has apparently to do with Devil the Mother in
metachemical doing, it is also quantitatively about Hell the Clear Spirit in
metachemical giving, as well as antiqualitatively about the Daughter of the
Devil in metachemical antitaking and anti-essentially about the Clear Soul of
Hell in metachemical antibeing, and is therefore divisible between ugliness,
hatred, an ugly approach to illusion, and a hateful approach to woe, as between
free soma in will and spirit, and bound psyche in ego or, rather, anti-ego and
antisoul.
58. Conversely
just as metaphysics has essentially to do with Heaven the Holy Soul in
metaphysical being, it is also qualitatively about God the Father in
metaphysical taking, as well as antiquantitatively about the Holy Spirit of
Heaven in metaphysical antigiving and anti-apparently about the Son of God in
metaphysical antidoing, and is therefore divisible between joy, truth, a joyful
approach to love, and a true approach to beauty, as between free psyche in soul
and ego, and bound soma in spirit or, rather, antispirit and antiwill.
59. Just
as chemistry has quantitatively to do with Purgatory the Clear Spirit in
chemical giving, it is also apparently about Woman the Mother in chemical
doing, as well as anti-essentially about the Clear Soul of Purgatory in
chemical antibeing and antiqualitatively about the Daughter of Woman in
chemical antitaking, and is therefore divisible between humility, weakness, a
humble approach to pain, and a weak approach to ignorance, as between free soma
in spirit and will, and bound psyche in soul or, rather, antisoul and anti-ego.
60. Conversely
just as physics has qualitatively to do with Man the Father in physical taking,
it is also essentially about Earth the Holy Soul in physical being, as well as
anti-apparently about the Son of Man in physical antidoing and
antiquantitatively about the Holy Spirit of Earth in physical antigiving, and
is therefore divisible between knowledge, pleasure, a knowledgeable approach to
strength, and a pleasurable approach to pride, as between free psyche in ego
and soul, and bound soma in will or, rather, antiwill and antispirit.
61. Now
just as antimetachemistry has anti-apparently to do with Antidevil the
Antimother in antimetachemical antidoing, it is also antiquantitatively about
Antihell the Unclear Spirit in antimetachemical antigiving, as well as
qualitatively about the Antidaughter of the Antidevil in antimetachemical
taking and essentially about the Unclear Soul of Antihell in antimetachemical
being, and is therefore divisible between beauty, love, a beautiful approach to
truth, and a loving approach to joy, as between bound soma in will or, rather,
antiwill and antispirit, and free psyche in ego and soul.
62. Conversely,
just as antimetaphysics has anti-essentially to do with Antiheaven the Unholy
Soul in antimetaphysical antibeing, it is also antiqualitatively about Antigod
the Antifather in antimetaphysical antitaking, as well as quantitatively about
the Unholy Spirit of Antiheaven in antimetaphysical giving and apparently about
the Antison of Antigod in antimetaphysical doing, and is therefore divisible
between woe, illusion, a woeful approach to hatred, and an illusory approach to
ugliness, as between bound psyche in soul or, rather, antisoul and anti-ego,
and free soma in spirit and will.
63. Now
just as antichemistry has antiquantitatively to do with Antipurgatory the
Unclear Spirit in antichemical antigiving, it is also anti-apparently about
Antiwoman the Antimother in antichemical antidoing, as well as essentially
about the Unclear Soul of Antipurgatory in antichemical being and qualitatively
about the Antidaughter of Antiwoman in antichemical taking, and is therefore
divisible between pride, strength, a proud approach to pleasure, and a strong
approach to knowledge, as between bound soma in spirit or, rather, antispirit
and antiwill, and free psyche in soul and ego.
64. Conversely,
just as antiphysics has antiqualitatively to do with Antiman the Antifather in
antiphysical antitaking, it is also anti-essentially about Anti-earth the
Unholy Soul in antiphysical antibeing, as well as apparently about the Antison
of Antiman in antiphysical doing and quantitatively about the Unholy Spirit of
Anti-earth in antiphysical giving, and is therefore divisible between
ignorance, pain, an ignorant approach to weakness, and a painful approach to
humility, as between bound psyche in ego or, rather, anti-ego and antisoul, and
free soma in will and spirit.
65. When
we pair metachemistry and antimetaphysics, the former appertaining to spatial
space and the latter to sequential time, we find the following: that while
metachemistry has apparently to do with Devil the Mother in metachemical doing,
it is also quantitatively about Hell the Clear Spirit in metachemical giving,
as well as antiqualitatively about the Daughter of the Devil in metachemical
antitaking and anti-essentially about the Clear Soul of Hell in metachemical
antibeing, and is therefore divisible between ugliness, hatred, an ugly
approach to illusion, and a hateful approach to woe, as between free soma in
will and spirit, and bound psyche in ego or, rather, anti-ego and antisoul, in
contrast to the absolute fact or, rather, illusion (falsehood) that whilst
antimetaphysics has anti-essentially to do with Antiheaven the Unholy Soul in
antimetaphysical antibeing, it is also antiqualitatively about Antigod the
Antifather in antimetaphysical antitaking, as well as quantitatively about the
Unholy Spirit of Antiheaven in antimetaphysical giving and apparently about the
Antison of Antigod in antimetaphysical doing, and is therefore divisible
between woe, illusion, a woeful approach to hate, and an illusory approach to
ugliness, as between bound psyche in soul or, rather, antisoul and anti-ego,
and free soma in spirit and will.
66. Therefore
a pattern emerges in which the primary doing and giving of free metachemical
soma condition the primary antitaking and antibeing of bound metachemical
psyche, which in turn condition the secondary antitaking and antibeing of bound
antimetaphysical psyche to acquiesce in the secondary doing and giving of free
antimetaphysical soma, in such fashion that ugliness and hatred conditioning an
ugly approach to illusion and a hateful approach to woe condition illusion and
woe to acquiesce in an illusory approach to ugliness and a woeful approach to
hatred in what transpires to be a vicious circle of absolute crime/evil and
absolute folly/sin.
67. When,
on the other hand, we pair chemistry and antiphysics, the former appertaining
to volumetric volume and the latter to massive mass, we find the following:
that while chemistry has quantitatively to do with Purgatory the Clear Spirit
in chemical giving, it is also apparently about Woman the Mother in chemical doing,
as well as anti-essentially about the Clear Soul of Purgatory in chemical
antibeing and antiqualitatively about the Daughter of Woman in chemical
antitaking, and is therefore divisible between humility, weakness, a humble
approach to pain, and a weak approach to ignorance, as between free soma in
spirit and will, and bound psyche in soul or, rather, antisoul and anti-ego, in
contrast to the relative fact or, rather, illusion (falsehood) that whilst
antiphysics has antiqualitatively to do with Antiman the Antifather in
antiphysical antitaking, it is also anti-essentially about Anti-earth the
Unholy Soul in antiphysical antibeing, as well as apparently about the Antison
of Antiman in antiphysical doing and quantitatively about the Unholy Spirit of
Anti-earth in antiphysical giving, and is therefore divisible between
ignorance, pain, an ignorant approach to weakness, and a painful approach to
humility, as between bound psyche in ego or, rather, anti-ego and antisoul, and
free soma in will and spirit.
68. Therefore
a pattern emerges in which the primary doing and giving of free chemical soma
condition the primary antitaking and antibeing of bound chemical psyche, which
in turn condition the secondary antitaking and antibeing of bound antiphysical
psyche to acquiesce in the secondary doing and giving of free antiphysical
soma, in such fashion that weakness and humility conditioning a weak approach
to ignorance and a humble approach to pain condition ignorance and pain to
acquiesce in an ignorant approach to weakness and a painful approach to
humility in what transpires to be a vicious circle of relative crime/evil and
relative folly/sin.
69. When,
by contrast, we pair physics and antichemistry, the former appertaining to
voluminous volume and the latter to massed mass, we find the following: that
while physics has qualitatively to do with Man the Father in physical taking,
it is also essentially about Earth the Holy Soul in physical being, as well as
anti-apparently about the Son of Man in physical antidoing and
antiquantitatively about the Holy Spirit of Earth in physical antigiving, and
is therefore divisible between knowledge, pleasure, a knowledgeable approach to
strength, and a pleasurable approach to pride, as between free psyche in ego
and soul, and bound soma in will or, rather, antiwill and antispirit, in
contrast to the relative truth or, rather, fiction (as opposed to fact) that
whilst antichemistry has antiquantitatively to do with Antipurgatory the
Unclear Spirit in antichemical antigiving, it is also anti-apparently about
Antiwoman the Antimother in antichemical antidoing, as well as essentially
about the Unclear Soul of Antipurgatory in antichemical being and qualitatively
about the Antidaughter of Antiwoman in antichemical taking, and is therefore divisible
between pride, strength, a proud approach to pleasure, and a strong approach to
knowledge, as between bound soma in spirit or, rather, antispirit and antiwill,
and free psyche in soul and ego.
70. Therefore
a pattern emerges in which the primary taking and being of free physical psyche
condition the primary antidoing and antigiving of bound physical soma, which in
turn condition the secondary antidoing and antigiving of bound antichemical
soma to acquiesce in the secondary taking and being of free antichemical
psyche, in such fashion that knowledge and pleasure conditioning a
knowledgeable approach to strength and a pleasurable approach to pride
condition strength and pride to acquiesce in a strong approach to knowledge and
a proud approach to pleasure in what transpires to be a virtuous circle of
relative grace/wisdom and relative goodness/punishment.
71. When,
on the other hand, we pair metaphysics and antimetachemistry, the former
appertaining to spaced space and the latter to repetitive time, we find the
following: that while metaphysics has essentially to do with Heaven the Holy
Soul in metaphysical being, it is also qualitatively about God the Father in
metaphysical taking, as well as antiquantitatively about the Holy Spirit of
Heaven in metaphysical antigiving and anti-apparently about the Son of God in
metaphysical antidoing, and is therefore divisible between joy, truth, a joyful
approach to love, and a true approach to beauty, as between free psyche in soul
and ego, and bound soma in spirit or, rather, antispirit and antiwill, in
contrast to the absolute truth or, rather, fiction (as opposed to fact) that
whilst antimetachemistry has anti-apparently to do with Antidevil the
Antimother in antimetachemical antidoing, it is also antiquantitatively about
Antihell the Unclear Spirit in antimetachemical antigiving, as well as
qualitatively about the Antidaughter of the Antidevil in antimetachemical
taking and essentially about the Unclear Soul of Antihell in antimetachemical
being, and is therefore divisible between beauty, love, a beautiful approach to
truth, and a loving approach to joy, as between bound soma in will or, rather,
antiwill and antispirit, and free psyche in ego and soul.
72. Therefore
a pattern emerges in which the primary taking and being of free metaphysical
psyche condition the primary antidoing and antigiving of bound metaphysical
soma, which in turn condition the secondary antidoing and antigiving of bound
antimetachemical soma to acquiesce in the secondary taking and being of free
antimetachemical psyche, in such fashion that truth and joy conditioning a
truthful approach to beauty and a joyful approach to love condition beauty and
love to acquiesce in a beautiful approach to truth and a loving approach to joy
in what transpires to be a virtuous circle of absolute grace/wisdom and
absolute goodness/punishment.
73. In
the case of metachemistry and antimetaphysics, we find that while metachemistry
has apparently to do with Devil the Mother in metachemical doing and
quantitatively to do with Hell the Clear Spirit in metachemical giving,
antimetaphysics is encouraged, under a metachemical hegemony, to emphasize the
Antison of Antigod in antimetaphysical doing and the Unholy Spirit of
Antiheaven in antimetaphysical giving, neither of which somatic factors accord
with the metaphysical actuality of psyche preceding and predominating over soma
in the ratio of 3:1, or most wavicles/least particles, but rather paradoxically
accrue to an emphasis on free soma at the expense of bound psyche in shadow
metachemical vein.
74. Consequently
the upended reality of antimetaphysics is so contrary to the metaphysical mean
that it would not be sustainable without metachemical pressure persisting from
above, in spatial space over sequential time, which continues to oppress
antimetaphysical psyche in the interests of somatic freedom of impression and
to maintain a situation which, in metaphysical terms, can only lead to
disillusionment with free soma and to a progressive return, in sensibility, to
absolute psychic freedom, the divine right of metaphysics, as of metaphysical
males, in respect of truth/joy.
75. In
the case of chemistry and antiphysics, we find that while chemistry has
quantitatively to do with Purgatory the Clear Spirit in chemical giving and
apparently to do with Woman the Mother in chemical doing, antiphysics is
encouraged, under a chemical hegemony, to emphasize the Unholy Spirit of
Anti-earth in antiphysical giving and the Antison of Antiman in antiphysical
doing, neither of which somatic factors accord with the physical actuality of
psyche preceding and predominating over soma in the ratio of 2½:1½, or more
(relative to most) wavicles/less (relative to least) particles, but rather
paradoxically accrue to an emphasis on free soma at the expense of bound psyche
in shadow chemical vein.
76. Consequently
the upended reality of antiphysics is so contrary to the physical mean that it
would not be sustainable without chemical pressure persisting from above, in volumetric
volume over massive mass, which continues to oppress antiphysical psyche in the
interests of somatic freedom of impression and to maintain a situation which,
in physical terms, can only lead to disillusionment with free soma and to a
progressive return, in sensibility, to relative psychic freedom, the masculine
right of physics, as of physical males, in respect of knowledge/pleasure.
77. In
the case, by contrast, of physics and antichemistry, we find that while physics
has qualitatively to do with Man the Father in physical taking and essentially
to do with Earth the Holy Soul in physical being, antichemistry is encouraged,
under a physical hegemony, to emphasize the Antidaughter of Antiwoman in
antichemical taking and the Unclear Soul of Antipurgatory in antichemical
being, neither of which psychic factors accord with the chemical actuality of
soma preceding and predominating over psyche in the ratio of 2½:1½, or more
(relative to most) particles/less (relative to least) wavicles, but rather paradoxically
accrue to an emphasis on free psyche at the expense of bound soma in shadow
physical vein.
78. Consequently
the upended reality or, rather, ideality of antichemistry is so contrary to the
chemical mean that it would not be sustainable without physical pressure
persisting from above, in voluminous volume over massed mass, which continues
to repress antichemical soma in the interests of psychic freedom of expression
and to maintain a situation which, in chemical terms, can only lead to
disillusionment with free psyche and to a regressive return, in sensuality, to
relative somatic freedom, the feminine right of chemistry, as of chemical
females, in respect of weakness/humility.
79. In
the case of metaphysics and antimetachemistry, we find that while metaphysics
has essentially to do with Heaven the Holy Soul in metaphysical being and
qualitatively to do with God the Father in metaphysical taking,
antimetachemistry is encouraged, under a metaphysical hegemony, to emphasize
the Unclear Soul of Antihell in antimetachemical being and the Antidaughter of
the Antidevil in antimetachemical taking, neither of which psychic factors
accord with the metachemical actuality of soma preceding and predominating over
psyche in the ratio of 3:1, or most particles/least wavicles, but rather
paradoxically accrue to an emphasis on free psyche at the expense of bound soma
in shadow metaphysical vein.
80. Consequently
the upended ideality of antimetachemistry is so contrary to the metachemical
mean that it would not be sustainable without metaphysical pressure persisting
from above, in spaced space over repetitive time, which continues to repress
antimetachemical soma in the interests of psychic freedom of expression and to
maintain a situation which, in metachemical terms, can only lead to
disillusionment with free psyche and to a regressive return, in sensuality, to
absolute somatic freedom, the diabolic right of metachemistry, as of
metachemical females, in respect of ugliness/hatred.
81. Males
and females are so different, so contrary, that what suits the one gender will
be unsuitable to the other, since females can only be hegemonic in respect of
free soma and males hegemonic in respect of free psyche, neither of which types
of freedom are sustainable without the exclusion, to all intents and purposes,
of their opposite - psychic freedom in the case of free females, somatic
freedom in the case of free males, so that male psyche will be oppressed by
free somatic pressures issuing from a female hegemony in either metachemistry
or chemistry, and female soma repressed by free psychic pressures issuing from
a male hegemony in either physics or metaphysics.
82. Societies
characterized by a female hegemony, whether metachemical or chemical, will be
objective and therefore primarily impressive of vacuous divergence (or
divergence in straight-line fashion) whereas their physical and metaphysical
counterparts, characterized by a male hegemony, will be subjective and
therefore primarily expressive of plenumous convergence (or convergence in
curved-line fashion).
83. Impressive
societies are fundamentally barbarous and philistine in respect of free soma
and bound psyche, on both a primary basis in terms of crime and evil, and a
secondary basis in terms of sin and folly - the former pair either metachemical
or chemical, the latter pair either antimetaphysical or antiphysical, so that
we may discern a gender distinction between the female primary barbarism and
philistinism of crime and evil, which diverge objectively, and the male secondary
barbarism and philistinism of sin and folly, which diverge subjectively.
84. Expressive
societies are essentially cultural and civil in respect of free psyche and
bound soma, on both a primary basis in terms of grace and wisdom, and a
secondary basis in terms of punishment and goodness - the former pair either
physical or metaphysical, the latter pair either antichemical or
antimetachemical, so that we may discern a gender distinction between the male
primary culture and civility of grace and wisdom, which converge subjectively,
and the female secondary culture and civility of punishment and goodness, which
converge objectively.
85. For
a male, the philistinism of bound psyche is so contrary to his grain of psyche
preceding and predominating over soma that it would not be sustainable without
a primary barbarous pressure emanating from free soma in respect of female
hegemonies in either metachemistry or chemistry which indirectly conditions him
to a foolish acquiescence in sin, or antimetaphysical and/or antiphysical free
soma, via the bound psyche directly stemming, in metachemical or chemical vein,
from primary free soma.
86. Thus
the criminal ugliness of metachemical soma conditions an ugly approach to
illusion, which is the metachemical psyche that evilly conditions illusion, as
antimetaphysical psyche foolishly acquiescing in the illusory approach to
ugliness which is the sin of antimetaphysical soma, and, as a corollary to the
above, the criminal hate of metachemical soma conditions a hateful approach to
woe, which is the metachemical psyche that evilly conditions woe, as
antimetaphysical psyche foolishly acquiescing in the woeful approach to hatred
which is the sin of antimetaphysical soma.
87. Likewise
the criminal weakness of chemical soma conditions a weak approach to ignorance, which is the chemical
psyche that evilly conditions ignorance, as antiphysical psyche foolishly
acquiescing in the ignorant approach to weakness which is the sin of
antiphysical soma, and, as a corollary to the above, the criminal humility of
chemical soma conditions a humble approach to pain, which is the chemical
psyche that evilly conditions pain, as antiphysical psyche foolishly
acquiescing in the painful approach to humility which is the sin of
antiphysical soma.
88. In
both of the above class contexts - the noumenal, or upper-class, context of
metachemistry and antimetaphysics, and the phenomenal, or lower-class, context
of chemistry and antiphysics - the original crime of objective free soma in
metachemistry and chemistry conditions a vicious circle in which either
ugliness and hatred indirectly condition illusion and woe or weakness and
humility indirectly condition ignorance and pain.
89. In fact,
it would be more accurate, in respect of the upper-class context, to speak of a
vicious/cursed and immoral/damned circle between negative free soma and
negative bound psyche in which the noumenally objective somatic viciousness and
cursedness, or primary barbarism, of ugliness and hatred in metachemical will
and spirit, which are criminal, condition the noumenally objective psychic
immorality and damnation, or primary philistinism, of an ugly approach to
illusion and a hateful approach to woe of metachemical anti-ego and antisoul,
the evil of which in turn condition the noumenally subjective psychic
immorality and damnation, or secondary philistinism, of illusion and woe in
antimetaphysical anti-ego and antisoul to foolishly acquiesce in the noumenally
subjective somatic viciousness and cursedness, or secondary barbarism, of an
illusory approach to ugliness and a woeful approach to hatred in the sinfulness
of antimetaphysical will and spirit.
90. Likewise,
it would be more accurate, in respect of the lower-class context, to speak of a
vicious/cursed and immoral/damned circle between negative free soma and
negative bound psyche in which the phenomenally objective somatic viciousness
and cursedness, or primary barbarism, of weakness and humility in chemical will
and spirit, which are criminal, condition the phenomenally objective psychic
immorality and damnation, or primary philistinism, of a weak approach to
ignorance and a humble approach to pain of chemical anti-ego and antisoul, the
evil of which in turn condition the phenomenally subjective psychic immorality
and damnation, or secondary philistinism, of ignorance and pain in antiphysical
anti-ego and antisoul to foolishly acquiesce in the phenomenally subjective
somatic viciousness and cursedness, or secondary barbarism, of an ignorant
approach to weakness and a painful approach to humility in the sinfulness of
antiphysical will and spirit.
91. So
much for the vicious/cursed and immoral/damned circles of impressive societies,
in which the viciousness of free will and the cursedness of free spirit take
precedence over the immorality of bound ego and the damnation of bound
soul!
92. Let
us now turn to their expressive counterparts, which are rather more typified by
what may be called moral/saved and virtuous/blessed circles in which not
primary and secondary modes of barbarism and philistinism prevail under female
hegemonies in sensuality but, rather, primary and secondary modes of culture
and civility under male hegemonies in sensibility, wherein the ideal of a
psychic monism is paramount.
93. However,
for a female, the civility of bound soma is so contrary to her grain of soma
preceding and predominating over psyche that it would not be sustainable
without a primary cultural pressure emanating from free psyche in respect of
male hegemonies in either physics or metaphysics which indirectly conditions
her to a modest acquiescence in punishment, or antichemical and/or
antimetachemical free psyche, via the bound soma directly stemming, in physical
or metaphysical vein, from primary free psyche.
94. Thus
the graceful knowledge of physical psyche conditions a knowledgeable approach
to strength, which is the physical soma that wisely conditions strength, as
antichemical soma modestly acquiescing in the strong approach to knowledge
which is the punishment of antichemical psyche, and, as a corollary to the
above, the graceful pleasure of physical psyche conditions a pleasurable
approach to pride, which is the physical soma that wisely conditions pride, as
antichemical soma modestly acquiescing in the proud approach to pleasure which
is the punishment of antichemical psyche.
95. Likewise
the graceful truth of metaphysical psyche conditions a true approach to beauty,
which is the metaphysical soma that wisely conditions beauty, as
antimetachemical soma modestly acquiescing in the beautiful approach to truth
which is the punishment of antimetachemical psyche, and, as a corollary to the
above, the graceful joy of metaphysical psyche conditions a joyful approach to love,
which is the metaphysical soma that wisely conditions love, as antimetachemical
soma modestly acquiescing in the loving approach to joy which is the punishment
of antimetachemical psyche.
96. In
both of the above class contexts - the phenomenal, or lower-class, context of
physics and antichemistry, and the noumenal, or upper-class, context of metaphysics and
antimetachemistry - the original grace of subjective free psyche in physics and
metaphysics conditions a virtuous circle
in which either knowledge and pleasure indirectly condition strength and pride
or truth and joy indirectly condition beauty and love.
97. In
fact or, rather, truth, it would be more accurate, in respect of the
lower-class context, to speak of a moral/saved and virtuous/blessed circle
between positive free psyche and positive bound soma in which the phenomenally
subjective psychic morality and salvation, or primary culture, of knowledge and
pleasure in physical ego and soul, which are graceful, condition the
phenomenally subjective somatic virtue and blessedness, or primary civility, of
a knowledgeable approach to strength and a pleasurable approach to pride of
physical antiwill and antispirit, the wisdom of which in turn condition the
phenomenally objective somatic virtue and blessedness, or secondary civility,
of strength and pride in antichemical antiwill and antispirit to modestly
acquiesce in the phenomenally objective psychic morality and salvation, or
secondary culture, of a strong approach to knowledge and a proud approach to
pleasure in the punishment of antichemical ego and soul.
98. Likewise,
it would be more accurate, in respect of the upper-class context, to speak of a
moral/saved and virtuous/blessed circle between positive free psyche and
positive bound soma in which the noumenally subjective psychic morality and
salvation, or primary culture, of truth and joy in metaphysical ego and soul,
which are graceful, condition the noumenally subjective somatic virtue and
blessedness, or primary civility, of a true approach to beauty and a joyful
approach to love of metaphysical antiwill and antispirit, the wisdom of which
in turn condition the noumenally objective somatic virtue and blessedness, or
secondary civility, of beauty and love in antimetachemical antiwill and antispirit
to modestly acquiesce in the noumenally objective psychic morality and
salvation, or secondary culture, of a beautiful approach to truth and a loving
approach to joy in the punishment of antimetachemical ego and soul.
99. How
much more sensibly desirable are the moral/saved and virtuous/blessed circles
of expressive societies, in which the morality of free ego and the salvation of
free soul take precedence over the virtue of bound will and the blessedness of
bound spirit!
100. Therefore,
contrary to how I formerly thought, it would seem more feasible, in the
interests of certainty and the avoidance or at least minimization of ambiguity
and ambivalence, to equate morality and salvation, or the state of having been
saved, with free psyche, and virtue and blessedness, by contrast, with bound
soma, so that we may further contrast the morality of sensibly free ego with
the immorality of sensually bound ego, and the salvation of sensibly free soul
with the damnation of sensually bound soul, as well, in soma, as the
virtuousness of sensibly bound will with the viciousness of sensually free
will, and the blessedness of sensibly bound spirit with the cursedness of
sensually free spirit.
101. Hence
to contrast the immorality of the anti-ego with the morality of the ego and the
damnation of the antisoul with the salvation of the soul in respect of the
antithesis, whether on primary or secondary terms in either class context,
between bound psyche and free psyche, self-oriented sensuality and sensibility.
102. Likewise,
to contrast the viciousness of will with the virtuousness of antiwill and the
cursedness of spirit with the blessedness of antispirit in respect of the
antithesis, whether on primary or secondary terms in either class context,
between free soma and bound soma, not-self oriented sensuality and sensibility.
103. To distinguish, therefore, between the vicious in free will
and the virtuous in bound will, as between the cursed in free spirit and the blessed
in bound spirit, as one would distinguish free soma from bound soma.
104. Likewise
to distinguish between the immoral in bound ego and the moral in free ego, as
between the damned in bound soul and the saved in free soul, as one would
distinguish bound psyche from free psyche.
105. One
thing we can be absolutely sure of: free soma and bound psyche are undesirable
from a positive standpoint, as are free psyche and bound soma from a negative
point of view.
106. However,
it does not follow that the antiforms of any given Element, whether
antimetachemical, antichemical, antiphysical, or antimetaphysical will be
invariably negative and their conventional forms, by contrast, positive. For, as we have argued, only the sensual
manifestations of any given Element are negative, while their sensible
counterparts remain largely positive.
107. Hence
one should contrast the noumenal negativity of metachemistry and
antimetaphysics with the noumenal positivity of metaphysics and
antimetachemistry, as one would contrast ugliness and hatred conditioning an
ugly approach to illusion and a hateful approach to woe in relation to illusion
and woe acquiescing in an illusory approach to ugliness and a woeful approach
to hatred ... with truth and joy conditioning a truthful approach to beauty and
a joyful approach to love in relation to beauty and love acquiescing in a
beautiful approach to truth and a loving approach to joy.
108. Similarly
one should contrast the phenomenal negativity of chemistry and antiphysics with
the phenomenal positivity of physics and antichemistry, as one would contrast
weakness and humility conditioning a weak approach to ignorance and a humble
approach to pain in relation to ignorance and pain acquiescing in an ignorant
approach to weakness and a painful approach to humility ... with knowledge and
pleasure conditioning a knowledgeable approach to strength and a pleasurable
approach to pride in relation to strength and pride acquiescing in a strong
approach to knowledge and a proud approach to pleasure.
109. Such
neat logical structures as have been outlined above do not invariably accord
with what actually conditions what; for, in actuality, each Element is
characterized by a different principal conditioning factor, be it will in
respect of metachemistry, spirit in respect of chemistry, ego in respect of
physics, or soul in respect of metaphysics, which in turn affects the
immediately subordinate Element, be it antimetaphysical, antiphysical,
antichemical, or antimetachemical, and then contrary to its principal
characteristic, which, in human terms, is of course the source of the
disillusionments with either free soma or free psyche which, in the one case,
lead males to reject bound psyche in favour of free psyche and, in the other
case, lead females to reject bound soma in favour of free soma.
110. Nevertheless,
logic sometimes has to be economical with the truth, and in this case it was
expedient to be economical with truth in the interests of as logically
consistent a structural comprehensiveness as was possible to me at the time,
even if such a procedure may seem somewhat over-pedantic.
111. In
point of fact or, depending on your gender and/or elemental standpoint, truth
... no one Element behaves in exactly the same way as another, and therefore
the viciousness of metachemistry has to be contrasted, within objectively
impressive parameters, with the cursedness of chemistry, whilst, on the other
side of the gender fence, the morality or moralizing of physics has to be
contrasted, within subjectively expressive parameters, with the salvation of
metaphysics.
112. For
if it is one thing to be instinctually wilful, or full of free will, it is
quite another to be spiritually spirited, or full of free spirit, while, from a
converse perspective, if it is one thing to be intellectually egocentric, or
full of free ego, it is quite another to be emotionally psychocentric, or
centred in free soul.
113. Despite
its other factors, criminal viciousness in free will will always be the
principal characteristic of metachemistry, while, despite other factors,
criminal cursedness in free spirit will always be the principal characteristic
of chemistry, neither of which are centred in psyche but, rather, rooted,
female-wise, in soma, and thus nature.
114. And
despite its other factors, graceful morality in free ego will always be the
principal characteristic of physics, while, despite other factors, graceful
salvation in free soul will always be the principal characteristic of
metaphysics, neither of which are rooted in soma but, rather, centred,
male-wise, in psyche, and thus nurture.
115. Hence
the battle or struggle of the genders is always between the viciousness and
cursedness of free soma and the morality and salvation of free psyche, as
between nature and nurture, will and/or spirit vis-à-vis ego and/or soul, with
the criminality of will and/or spirit dominating and conditioning the sinful
folly of anti-ego and/or antisoul (to foolishly acquiesce, from a male
standpoint, in the sinfulness of secondary will and/or spirit) and, by
contrast, the gracefulness of ego and/or soul dominating and conditioning the
punishing modesty of antiwill and/or antispirit (to modestly acquiesce, from a
female point of view, in the punishingness of secondary ego and/or soul).
116. By
and large, the gender struggle takes two divergent forms - the upper-class
female to lower-class male form of will and ego, viciousness and morality, and
the lower-class female to upper-class male form of spirit and soul, cursedness
and salvation - the former to be characterized as signifying a descending axial
distinction between autocracy and democracy, the latter characterizable as
signifying an ascending axial distinction between bureaucracy and theocracy, as
described in previous texts, in which it was also established that aristocracy
was the corollary of autocracy no less than plutocracy of democracy, whilst, on
the ascending axis, meritocracy was the corollary of bureaucracy no less than
technocracy of theocracy.
117. In
analogical terms, it could be argued that the descending axis of
autocracy-democracy is that of brollies, from conventional brollies on the
autocratic Right to collapsibles on the democratic Left, so that one might note
a distinction between the centrifugal and the centripetal in relation to
diabolic female noumenal objectivity and masculine male phenomenal
subjectivity, while the ascending axis of bureaucracy-theocracy is that of
hoods, from conventional hoods on the bureaucratic Right to fold-ins on the
theocratic Left, so that one might note a distinction between the centrifugal
and the centripetal in relation to feminine female phenomenal objectivity and
divine male noumenal subjectivity.
118. In
plain parlance, one would be distinguishing the conventional umbrellas of
'jerks' from the sheathed collapsibles of 'pricks', and the conventional hoods
of 'cunts' from the fold-ins of 'bums', give or take a church/state variation
in each context according to the style or structural integrity of any specific
type of brolly or hood, i.e. whether, for instance, fold-in hoods have a stud
in the neck in state-like vein or are contained by a zipper in church-like
vein, so that one can note a particle/wavicle distinction between the two types
of fold-ins, as between 'frigg*** bums' and 'snogg*** bums', the latter pretty
much the theocratic norm.
119. Be
that as it may, the autocratic-democratic axis is such that typifies a
'frigging'/'sodding' dichotomy in state hegemonic vein (in which work of one
sort or another generally takes precedence over play), whereas the
bureaucratic-theocratic axis is such that typifies a 'fucking'/'snogging'
dichotomy in church hegemonic vein (in which play of one sort or another
generally takes precedence over work), so that there is always a distinction
between that which is either for or against the not-self in respect of the one
and that which is either against or for the self in respect of the other, as
between crime and punishment in the former case, and sin and grace in the
latter.
120. But
to be against the not-self in the case of democracy is not the same as to be
for the self, as with theocracy, and therefore the democratic retort to
autocracy does not make for contentment in the self but, rather, perpetuates a
demonstrative situation in which concern with placing limitations upon not-self
freedom of action tends to take precedence over the welfare of the self, in
complete contrast to the theocratic retort to bureaucracy which seeks to put an
end to the sinfulness of self-abuse in the interests of self-enhancement
through joy.
121. For
the self that is overly preoccupied with sin is not in a position to be true to
itself and live for the sake of grace, specifically with respect to joy, but is
symptomatic of what happens when the not-self becomes the focus of attention in
consequence of hegemonic female pressures in metachemical and/or chemical free
soma which condition the self against its own interests by rendering it
subordinate, in antimetaphysical and/or antiphysical vein, to the not-self.
122. Hence
the bureaucratic aspect of 'Mother Church', the very fact that conditions the
concept of such a Church, is ever that which should be opposed from a
theocratic standpoint, and not merely in liberal relative vein but to the
absolute extent of Social Theocracy, and thus to a world-overcoming resolve to
lift life beyond sin and a subordinate grace to the properly theocratic heights
of grace and a subordinate sin, so that it might be said to signify 'earth in
Heaven' rather than 'heaven on earth' and thus contrast with what could be
called the Social Democratic tendency to establish 'hell on earth' as a retort
to the 'earth in Hell' of autocracy.
123. For
while the autocratic-democratic axis descends from Hell earthily to the earth
hellishly, the bureaucratic-theocratic axis ascends from the earth heavenishly
to Heaven earthily, which is a reversal of the situation normally obtaining in
both the autocratic and bureaucratic contexts, the context of 'Father State'
and of 'Mother Church', which tends to lead to either 'Mother State' or 'Father
Church', depending whether democratic or theocratic criteria are paramount.
124. Hence
a descent from the autocracy of 'Father State' to the democracy of 'Mother
State' along the autocratic-democratic axis, and, by contrast, an ascent from
the bureaucracy of 'Mother Church' to the theocracy of 'Father Church' along
the bureaucratic-theocratic axis, so that things either progress down to the
earth or progress up to Heaven, as the axial case might be.
125. But,
in truth, 'Father State' is less male than female in character, and 'Mother
State' less female than male, so that the distinction between autocracy and
democracy, 'jerks' and 'pricks', is rather one between an upper-class female,
or metachemical, context, and a lower-class male, or physical, context, with
diabolic and masculine distinctions between a 'frigging' hegemony, equivalent
to crime, in the one case, and a 'sodding' hegemony, equivalent to punishment,
in the other, both of which are rather more work- than play-orientated, if on
very different terms.
126. On
the other hand, 'Mother Church' is largely female in
character, and 'Father Church' largely male, so that the distinction between
bureaucracy and theocracy, 'cunts' and 'bums', is rather one between a
lower-class female, or chemical, context, and an upper-class male, or
metaphysical, context, with feminine and divine distinctions between a
'fucking' hegemony, equivalent to sin, in the one case, and a 'snogging'
hegemony, equivalent to grace, in the other, both of which are rather more
play- than work-orientated, if on very different terms.
127. Therefore
while the bureaucratic-theocratic axis properly accords with a female/male
distinction, the autocratic-democratic axis is actually not male/female but
also female/male in character, except that it signifies a situation in which
the female aspect is pro-notself and the male aspect anti-notself, in criminal
and punishing vein, so that it falls diagonally from a context in which there
is imperfect harmony with not-self in crime to one in which there is opposition
to not-self in punishment, as though from competitive individualism to
competitive collectivism, in contrast to the anti-self and pro-self
dispositions of the bureaucratic-theocratic axis which rises diagonally from a
context in which there is abuse of self in sin to one in which there is the
possibility of perfect harmony with self in grace, as though from co-operative
collectivism to co-operative individualism.
128. How
different are the two axes! And how important
it is that Life should triumph over Death, that the world should come to a
situation in which Eternal Life takes precedence not only over death-in-life,
the sinful abuse of self which accords with Church bureaucracy, but over the
life-in-death punishing retort to Eternal Death which accords with State
democracy and thus with the reduction of the world to the
lowest-common-denominator of opposition to the not-self.
129. To
be punishingly against the not-self, as against death, from a stance in life-in-death
in one thing, to be gracefully for the self, as for life, from a stance in
Eternal Life is quite another, and it is all the difference between Social
Democracy and Social Theocracy, 'hell on earth' and 'earth in Heaven'.
130. Therefore
'the world' must choose, at judgement (or the paradoxical election for
religious sovereignty at the expense of political sovereignty which I have long
contended to be the precondition of progress from a worldly context to the
otherworldly one identified with 'Kingdom Come'), which path it wishes to take,
the path that leads down to loss of self in the punishing of not-self freedom
of action or the path that leads up to growth of self, to self-enhancement in
the most perfect grace of which the self were freely capable, the soulful grace
of Heaven.
131. But
'the world', as a context of the earth, is effectively purgatorial in its
opposite ways, the antiheavenly way of being bureaucratically purgatorial and
the antihellish way of being democratically purgatorial, neither of which are
commensurate with paradise, but rather contrary manifestations of the earth
which fight shy, in their antithetical ways, of paradise - the heavenly
paradise which is theocratically pro-self and the hellish paradise which is
autocratically pro-notself, the former divinely male and the latter
diabolically female.
132. For
that which, in Church bureaucracy, is anti-self can only be contrary to that
which is pro-self, as sin to grace, and therefore will continue to fight shy of
Heaven even as it proclaims its hope in the Resurrection and the correlative
prospect of 'Kingdom Come', being quantitatively germane to a context in which
the cursed criminality of free chemical soma conditions the ego of physics to
an anti-egocentric acquiescence in the cursed sinfulness of free antiphysical
soma, and therefore puts the male sex at loggerheads with their gender
actuality of psyche preceding and predominating over soma.
133. And
that which, in State democracy, is anti-notself can only be contrary to that
which is pro-notself, as punishment to crime, and therefore will continue to
fight shy of the Resurrection even as it proclaims its fear of Hell and the
correlative insurrectional prospect of what could be called 'Kingdom Gone',
being qualitatively germane to a context in which the moral gracefulness of
free physical psyche conditions the spirit of chemistry to an antispiritual
acquiescence in the blessed modesty of bound antichemical soma, and therefore
puts the female sex at loggerheads with their gender actuality of soma
preceding and predominating over psyche.
134. Both
the above notes are, of course, constructed on a necessarily simplified basis
relative to the full-gamut of class possibilities; for the triumph of 'the
meek', of the world, of the earth, whether in antiheavenly or antihellish
purgatorial terms, implies the sway of the collectivistic Many at the expense
of the individualistic Few, of the phenomenal in mass or volume at the expense
of the noumenal in time or space, and for them there is only a building from
the bottom up, as co-operatively from bureaucracy-theocracy, or from the top
down, as competitively from autocracy-democracy, not a building from either the
top in free theocracy or from the bottom in free democracy, such as would be
commensurate with Social Theocracy and Social Democracy, the former likely to
culminate in Heaven, the latter in a new order of hell commensurate with the
earth.
135. For
whilst one can build from the bottom up in bureaucracy-theocracy, one does not
and cannot achieve pure grace except via someone who is already at the top
independently of the bottom and who brings revelation to earth in Messianic
vein, thereby signalling the possibility of 'Kingdom Come' and the resurrection
of the dead-in-life, the sinful antiheavenly, to the Life Eternal, wherein not
the cursedness of free spirit in Roman Catholicism, but the salvation of free
soul in Social Theocracy will rule the religious roost for all eternity,
elevating life to timeless bliss.
136. Contrariwise,
whilst one can build from the top down in autocracy-democracy, one does not and
cannot achieve pure punishment except via someone who is already at the bottom
independently of the top and who brings devastation to earth in Antichristic
vein, thereby signalling the blue-collar-oriented possibility of proletarian
millennialism and the insurrectional counter-resurrection of the live-in-death,
the punishing antihellish, to the neo-death eternal, wherein not the morality
of free ego in parliamentary democracy, but the viciousness of neo-free will in
Social Democracy will rule the political roost for all counter-eternity,
reducing life to hateful time in social democratic vein.
137. That
paradoxical scenario has already come to pass in a number of countries over the
past century or two and requires no elaboration here, though the scenario for
'Kingdom Come' is an altogether different proposition which remains to be
proved.
138. Suffice
it to say that building from the bottom up in bureaucracy-theocracy does not
uproot worldly sin but leaves it intact, as a shame to be repented of through
confession to clerical representatives of the theocratic.
139. Guilt
for sin is indeed appropriate to the male sex; for they are at cross-purposes
with their gender actuality (of psyche preceding and predominating over soma)
when they sin, and should be ashamed of the fact of somatic licence ... unlike
their female counterparts, who are instrumental, through the weakness and
humility of their own original somatic freedom, in criminally bringing males to
sin in the first place, and thus of weakly and humbly compounding their
ignorance and pain.
140. In
truth, there is no original sin but only original crime which indirectly, via
the evil of bound female psyche, conditions males to foolishly acquiesce in
what could be called unoriginal sin, or a secondary order of somatic freedom
germane to antimetaphysics and/or antiphysics which follows from the pressures
indirectly being applied by the primary order of somatic freedom which, unlike
its male counterparts, has reference to metachemistry and chemistry, the
elemental realities which turn males from the original grace in sensibility of
metaphysics or physics, depending on their prevailing class and/or elemental
disposition, to the sensual corruptions of sin as an unoriginal consequence of
gender subordination.
141. Thus
males are not naturally sinful, but are driven unnaturally, or perhaps I should
say 'unnurturally', and therefore contrary to their hegemonic nurture, to sin
in consequence of criminal pressures naturally applied from above by their
female counterparts - metachemical over antimetaphysical in the noumenal
context of upper-class females and males in spatial space and repetitive time,
chemical over antiphysical in the phenomenal context of lower-class females and
males in volumetric volume and massive mass which, because of its bureaucratic
associations, is the context of sin par excellence.
142. Therefore
it is right and proper that males, in particular, should be made to feel guilty
for their sins and be expected to repent of them in the interests of a return
to grace, to their original high sensible estate in psyche preceding and
predominating over soma, as nurture over nature. Such is the dictum of the self-respecting
male who builds from or acquiesces in the bureaucratic-theocratic axis of
things proceeding from the bottom up.
143. Yet
for one who is at the top independently of the bottom, who is no liberal theocrat held in the grip of bureaucratic
precedent, as by 'Mother Church', but freely theocratic in what he calls, in
his Messianic wisdom, Social Theocracy, there can be no acquiescing in a system
of church hegemony which defers, in bureaucratic vein, to authentic sinfulness
while marginalizing grace to the inauthentic periphery of priestly absolution
for penitential contrition; for such a system does not and cannot permit of
authentic grace, which rather follows from a lifestyle dedicated to
transcendentalism, specifically with regard to transcendental meditation, but
betrays its worldly origins and want of theocratic freedom, being, in effect,
the institutional embodiment of bureaucratic reaction to such freedom such as
follows from an effectively lower-class premise allied to criteria which
generally stem from or pertain to the sorts of temperate, verdant climates and
environments especially germane to the West, and traditionally to West Europe
in particular.
144. In
short, 'Mother Church' is the conservative champion of the sinful lowly at the
expense of the graceful elect, and thus betrays its worldly origins as
something germane, in its co-operative collectivism, to the bureaucratic Many,
which can only be overcome by the co-operative individualism of the theocratic
Few if they determine that the world should be overcome in the interests of
otherworldly criteria, in which authentic grace will take precedence over
inauthentic sin, and something emerge which is closer to the best of what the
East traditionally has to offer without being Eastern, and for the simple
reason that it must be universal in the global unfolding of evolutionary
progress towards its consummation in some transcendent omega point of timeless
bliss.
145. The
only way the sinful world can be overcome is if the graceful elect decide that
the time has come for such an overcoming because it is no longer feasible or
tolerable or permissible to carry-on pandering to the sinful 'meek' in the same
old fashion year after year, decade after decade, century after century, millennium
after millennium, world without 'fucking' end, but, rather, time for them, as
electorate, to be granted the opportunity to throw off the yoke of their sinful
habits and elect, in judgmental vein, for Eternity, elect to become an elect in
their own right, who will have rights in relation to grace and even punishment
(as a secondary form of grace for females pressured into psychic emphasis under
a male hegemony and contrary to their gender actuality of soma preceding and
predominating over psyche), commensurate with the lifting or raising of the
'earthly meek' into Heaven, and thus with the Resurrection as such, as and when
a majority mandate for religious sovereignty, the sovereignty of 'Kingdom
Come', paves the way for the overcoming of 'the world', as of man, and for the
establishment, as its freely theocratic successor, of the otherworldly reign of
God in Heaven, a reign sanctified by the Second Coming as One Who comes from
'On High' with a Messianic message of theocratic freedom which owes nothing to
the bureaucratic limitations of 'Mother Church', but is rather the
revelationary means to an anti-bureaucratic and pro-theocratic End.
146. Such
a message is something to rejoice in; for it does away with the need for and
reality of guilt in the face of behaviour which sinfully transgresses
self-interest, restoring to males a freedom from guilt which is the reward for
self-harmony in graceful unison with the self, not least in respect of the
timeless bliss of soulful redemption of the ego which is commensurate with
salvation, as of God in Heaven.
147. Therefore
it is fitting and proper that people should dance and sing their way into
'Kingdom Come' and not regret the passing of 'the world', as of the sinful
guilt which was not original to males but foisted upon them from a hegemonic
female vantage-point in original crime, a legacy, in itself, of the 'fall' from
autocracy to bureaucracy, as from vice to cursedness, free will to free spirit,
aristocracy to meritocracy, the outer light to the outer darkness, ugliness and
hatred to weakness and humility.
148. For
what is important is that they should relish the
prospect of being delivered from the outer darkness of sin to the inner light
of grace, not least in respect of the soul and the prospect of Eternity, and
ultimately of an eternity independent of time past, future, and present, so
that it is more than simply post-historical but properly eternal.
149. For
you can intermittently enter Eternity, after a meditative fashion, in life, but
to enter it independently of the usual kinds of moral-saved/virtuous-blessed
circles which involve both genders is to be dead to life as we ordinarily
understand it and fully commensurate with the Afterlife, albeit such a
definitive manifestation of Eternity will no longer pertain to the
non-synthetic - and possibly analytic - artificiality of mankind but become
synthetically artificial in respect of Godkind, Who will be more than
post-human or post-modern or post-historical as and when circumstances permit a
more sensibly extensive and intensive
cyborgization, as it were, of the urban proletariat to take its rightful
place at the head of the evolutionary thrust that leads to the omega point of
universal consummation.
150. Therefore
to live eternally is not to live as men do, nor even as godly males who
meditate on penultimate heavenliness, but to live beyond life in the
timelessness of Eternity whereby it was as though one were dead (to the world)
and only alive to Heaven.
151. For Heaven is the true end of life ... for males,
specifically those with a metaphysically upper-class, or noumenally subjective,
disposition. But it can only be attained
by rejecting life as we know it, which is characterized by time, and embracing
the timeless universality of the Eternal, in which the self, the brain stem and
spinal cord, will receive a synthetically artificial inducement to take and/or
be, as God and Heaven attain to their most evolved manifestations progressively
beyond humankind, nature, and the Cosmos, and accordingly become properly
universal, which is to say, germane to the nurture of metaphysical sensibility
at its most evolved, and therefore per se, level, a level in which the co-operative individualism
of perfect self-harmony is at or near its playful peak and blissfully
independent of anything that would undermine the salvation of the soul, be it
egocentric in non-synthetic (analytic) artificiality (for which read: the
competitive collectivism of physical nurture), spiritualistic in synthetic
naturalness (for which read: the co-operative collectivism of chemical nature),
or wilfully instinctual in non-synthetic (analytic) naturalness (for which
read: the competitive individualism of metachemical nature).
152. Verily,
the dance of the soul is something worth crooning about! For the soul is the one thing in life that is
worth dying for, albeit the death must be to life as we know it, so that people
do not continue to die naturally and to either pass away into nothingness like,
one fancies, the majority of females, or be reborn into a limited eternity
(which can be rudely interrupted in secular vein), but to live artificially, to
live nurturally, so to speak, to a greater extent and in a superior way than
would otherwise be the case, with an afterlife that is no less synthetically
enhanced and truly worthy to be called eternal ... as something which, whilst
it may or may not be a permanent condition, can be made to last for ever, as
befitting God in Heaven, as metaphysical criteria increasingly prevail and all
that can be made One with Heaven, no matter how gradual or complicated the
process, is so made. So may it be!
LONDON 2003 (Revised
2012)
