TUESDAY
21st SEPTEMBER
Yes, there are
basically two types of young lonely women: those who bear you a grudge because
your reticence in making their acquaintance only serves to emphasize their
plainness and, conversely, those who bear you a grudge because your reticence
in making their acquaintance only serves to undermine their beauty. In passing judgement on themselves, such
women almost invariably fit into one or other of these categories. Of course, there are also two ways of looking
at them; either as their slave or as their tyrant.
Now if, for example, a young man considers himself a slave of
such women, he may feel disinclined to stare at female strangers because he
imagines himself to be a perpetual victim of their attractiveness and
consequently imprisoned by the desire or need to make love. Such a man might well imagine himself
subsequently sweating away for them like a phallic puppet on a vaginal string. A female stranger who smiled to herself when
he noticed her for the first time might well suggest something despicable - for
instance, a personal vanity concerning her looks from which he can derive no
consolation, since there is nothing in it which would indicate direct interest
in him. If, in public, this young man prefers not to
stare at women, you may be fairly confident that he is busy safeguarding his
dignity and independence; that he prefers to avoid compromising himself, to
making a fool of himself in the presence of largely indifferent or even
potentially hostile strangers.
Naturally, there is always the possibility that a fair percentage of the
young women he encounters will leave him cold, in consequence of which he would
never think of taking a second look at them.
But even if he happens to encounter somebody highly attractive or, more
accurately, somebody who corresponds to his ideal, the chances are pretty high
that he will prefer not to tantalize himself, to commit himself to the
conspicuously vulnerable category of 'men without women.'
As far as the tyrant is concerned, however, the roles are
completely reversed. He wishes to
exploit women, to descend upon them like a beast of prey and utilize them for
his own predatory ends. A young woman
who smiled to herself when he first noticed her would indicate that he had influence, that he pleased her and, consequently, that
further developments were not inconceivable.
In short, he accepts appearances on a more optimistic, not to say
self-aggrandizing, basis, without ambiguity or paradox. Ideas concerning the tragedy of sex are if
not downright repugnant to him then, at any rate, mostly alien. After all, as he sees it, the female exists
to mollify and divert the male and therefore his natural optimism, in this
regard, will lead him to dominate and subjugate her for her own good as much as
for his, or so the story goes.
Now these two contradictory points of view, taken together,
constitute the essential difference between the sexual attitudes of Baudelaire
and de Sade, to take two convenient examples from the
archives of prominent literary figures.
The former considered man, and by implication himself, to be 'a slave of
a slave', while the latter, spurred on by his strange perversions, sought to dominate
and subjugate women to his own sadistic ends.
It depends, I suppose, whether you possess an inferiority complex or a
superiority complex, whether you consider yourself a slave or a tyrant in this
respect, and to some extent whether you happen to be in a pessimistic or an
optimistic frame-of-mind at the time.
Without going into unnecessary details, one can surmise that
Baudelaire's syphilis played some part in shaping his general attitude towards
women, in developing what could be seen as an effort to avoid normal sexual
relations, in view of the fact that such a highly contagious and virulent
disease would inevitably turn a man of Baudelaire's sensitivity into a kind of
island and thus prohibit the natural fulfilment of his amorous desires,
particularly with regard to those types of women who, for cultural and social
reasons as well as looks, would ordinarily have appealed to him. But, of course, that is quite another matter,
scarcely one to which I need dedicate any more time here, in this humble
journal. Baudelaire and de Sade only concern me insofar as their respective attitudes
to women and, by implication, sex are concerned, which
is why I drew attention to them in the first place. A majority of men probably oscillate between
these two extremes, depending on their mood.
Indeed, you could almost use your attitude towards women, at any
given time, as a sort of barometer or guide to the nature of your prevailing
mood. I mean if, like me, you went out
feeling rather glum, the chances are pretty high that you wouldn't want to look
too closely at anybody, that you would rather drift past others undetected,
without any verbal or visual commitments.
You might even have got the impression that people were closing-in on
you, knew all about you, and were only too aware that the slightest slip on
your part would give the whole game away: they could classify you as a victim
or even as a pervert.
Yes, they would know that you had taken to the streets because
your room had become too constrictive and depressing. They would see, from the sullen expression on
your face, that things weren't quite running according to plan, that something
was seriously amiss, that you didn't have any female company and were only out
in the vain hope of encountering somebody worth getting to know.
Yes, you might well imagine it like that, depending, as I say,
on your prevailing mood. Still, the
chances are that people won't consider any of those things at all but will just
brush past your arm as stranger to stranger, not even bothering or daring to
look you in the eye. For all they knew,
you might be a madman, a potential rapist, a thief, a simpleton, an atheist, an
ignoramus, a syphilitic, a homosexual, or one of the legions of the unemployed
and, worse still, unemployable. You
might be 'on the make' and, as such, the most sensible thing that an innocent
young woman could do, in the circumstances, would be to mind her own business
in case you transpired to being someone it was difficult to get along with,
someone who approximated to one or more of the above categories and therefore
wouldn't make life any easier for her.
Besides, if she really wanted to take a closer look at you she could
always do it on the sly, when you weren't looking, were side-by-side, or had
hurried past each other in a rush to avoid mutual embarrassment. Once off stage, so to speak, she could afford
to relax again. She needn't feel
constrained to make your acquaintance; she would be out of harm's reach and
able, in consequence, to assess you at leisure.
But if you suddenly glanced back at her, as though to imply knowledge of
her little subterfuge, she would instinctively look away. You would know that it should be regarded as
idle curiosity on her part, the sort of mindless trap into which a young lady
of curious disposition occasionally falls.
Needless to say, strangers can be awfully suspicious of one another!
So you continue on your way, inhaling the obnoxious odour of
whatever happens to pervade your nostrils, whether it be
the accumulated residue of a day's traffic pollution or the acrid stench of
somebody's alcoholic breath. You walk
down one street and up another, following a familiar route rather than one
which might lead you astray and cause you to scratch your head in puzzlement as
to where exactly you were. Between the
couples and the groups of people who occasionally brush past your arm you
detect the odd solitary wanderer like yourself, but you don't stare too
closely. You realize that it wouldn't do
you any good, since you would only feel humiliated by the sight of your social
reflection. Now if, by any chance, this
solitary wanderer were to mumble something as you drew near him, you wouldn't
allow yourself to become intrigued, embarrassed, or annoyed by the fact; on the
contrary, you would simply ignore him.
You would know from experience that such mumblings were usually
negative, the derogatory implications of which engendered guilty feelings. So if you didn't want to become a martyr to
your own guilt, and weren't particularly paranoid, you would have to relegate
the person concerned to the maniac level, the irresponsible level, the
disturbed level, or, more effectively still from your standpoint, the bum
level. That would certainly be one way
to defend yourself from such extraneous intrusions!
And so you continue to walk along the pavement as though nothing
had happened, nothing was wrong with the world or with your life, and you were
only enjoying the harmless pleasure, after all, of a leisurely neighbourhood
stroll. You pass thousands of monotonous
brick-leaden houses which have been strung together in the name of urban
civilization: empty houses, brightly-lit houses, old houses, dark houses, new
houses, small houses, derelict houses, large houses, renovated houses, even a
few blocks of flats, where the inhabitants (if any) are almost invariably
locked away in their separate rooms and nestling in nocturnal somnolence,
watching TV or listening to the radio, knitting winter clothes or reading the
daily paper, washing their hair or complaining about the weather, dozing by the
fire or eating their evening meal, and your glum mood goes out to these houses,
incorporates them into its silent diatribe, dismisses them as so many
residential eyesores, and defensively curls-up, like a threatened hedgehog, in
order to retreat into its lone chamber of psychic despair.
Yes, you may well wonder, in this negative frame-of-mind, how it
is that these wretched houses don't suddenly disgorge people in a furious riot,
or why their inhabitants don't suddenly break out in one ultimate revolt
against the overwhelming narrowness of things, as though in defiance of the
claustrophobic atmosphere of their tepid lives!
If you had a lethal weapon in your hands, at this juncture, you would
almost be capable of using it, of doing somebody a favour by ridding him of his
daily humiliations, freeing him, once and for all, from the implacable clutches
of his glorified nest, routine chores, nagging wife, importunate kids, numerous
disappointments, frustrations, worries, obsessions, depressions, and physical
ailments. Of course, you would almost
certainly be considered a criminal and be trodden underfoot. But what else could you reasonably expect
from people who are so accustomed to domestic deprivation that they inevitably
become resigned to it and end-up regarding their perseverance as a sort of
moral triumph? Nevertheless, you would
have more sense than to cause a neighbourhood scandal, to give vent to your
transient spleen in such a barbarous fashion!
You would sooner beat a hasty retreat back to your single room, lock
yourself in, like everybody else, and then pretend that consolation can be
found in a few cheap cigarettes which, after a while, might even lead to an
illusion of pleasure.
Without too great a stretch of the imagination, one can quite understand
how certain traditional religious beliefs came to have such a lasting
influence, how people were gradually seduced into regarding their life as a
penitence, an atonement for that indiscretion of indiscretions - original sin! When one is trapped in such a depressing
world, it seems only too logical that certain people should attribute a form of
Divine Retribution to the problems with which humanity are daily
confronted. They may be inclined to
associate the world's shortcomings with a continuous punishment (for original
sin) simply because the essential nature of things seems too disconcerting to
be wholly attributable to anything else, least of all a Supreme Being.
Yes, but when you realize, in light of original sin, that these
shortcomings are partly attributable to yourself and partly to the world in
general, to those people you often come into contact with, then you have
nothing to fall back on but yourself, nothing to do but stare yourself in the face
and admit to your mirrored reflection that no traditional deity, whether now or
in a thousand years' time, is going to tell you what to do, since that is
largely if not entirely your own responsibility. If you 'wimp out' and convince yourself that
life would be intolerable without some form of conventional religious faith, a
faith built upon the foundation of certain extraterrestrial beliefs which
necessarily presuppose the existence of a Supreme Being behind
all Creation, then you can either do away with yourself or, alternatively, seek
consolation in the relative knowledge that a traditional religious faith is
better than no faith, with the implication, willy-nilly, that you would rather
go to the grave superstitious and deluded than face up to the reality of living
in a purely humanized world, a world where it is up to you personally. There is no alternative. Either you seek the delusive consolations of
conventional religious faith at the expense of your self-determination, or you
refuse to be so consoled. Anything else
is presumptuous.
Indeed, it's as presumptuous or, more correctly, deceitful as
was some religious lecturer who once informed me (I had been foolish enough to
allow myself to be dragged along to a lecture by some Christian organization
one Saturday afternoon) that many young people were going through life with a
terrible depression weighing upon their minds simply because they refused to
allow Jesus Christ into their lives, a Christ Who would purify and redeem them
as long as they put their trust in Him, a Christ Who would stand by them in
times of need, etc. Well, much as there
was some truth in what I heard that afternoon, I walked out just before the
lecture had finished and the collection box come all
the way around. I walked out and didn't
look back, and not simply because I was privately disgusted with the
limitations of the lecturer's argument but, more importantly, because I had
previously arranged to meet a friend at another part of town and had been
assured, when first accosted with intent to being driven to the lecture, that I
would be returned to my pick-up point in good time in order to be able to keep
my rendezvous. As it happened, that
didn't transpire, since they probably thought I was bluffing in the first place
and had no control over the lecturer's timing, in any case. Someone informed me whilst I was on my way
down the steps of the building, already over fifteen minutes late for the
rendezvous, that no transport facilities had been provided for the return journey and that I
would therefore, and much to their regret, have to make my own way back to the
centre of town. That did it! Not only had I been tricked into attending a
superfluous lecture but, to cap it all, I had been cheated out of the return
journey, to boot! I was furious with
myself for not having had more sense in the first place, for not having
forbidden myself to be seduced into attending such a thing simply because some
of them were French, and I had foolishly succumbed to their charm and language
at a time when my admiration for all things French was probably at or near its
peak.
However that may be, I eventually found my own way back to the
centre of town. Though
I wasn't exactly in a state of euphoria about it, despite the far-from
insignificant consideration that I had managed to get away from the place
before things there became unduly oppressive and, as far as I was concerned,
repressive. On the way, I turned
the essential substance of the lecture over and over in my mind and, in doing
so, I realized how tactfully, craftily, perhaps even unwittingly, its
perpetrator was deceiving people.
Oh yes, many youths and, for that matter, adults were going
through modern life with a terrible depression on their minds all right, of
that I knew only too well! For I was
suffering from just such a depression myself, one doubtless born of loneliness
and an inability to meet anyone with whom I could merge or, rather, submerge
myself and possibly re-emerge a new man a few hours or even days later.
Oh yes, I knew all about social loneliness and sexual
frustration, ostracism and rejection, the plight of the intelligent individual
in the urban wilderness, ethnic exile in an alien environment, an environment
at loggerheads with my natural and cultural instincts. I knew about as much as a young person could
know about such things without going completely crazy and attempting to do away
with himself or, failing that, with certain others.
Oh yes, absolutely! But
that didn't alter anything, that wasn't enough to erase the years of depression
overnight. And neither were those
flagrant lies about Jesus Christ!
Whatever simple or conservative people might think, it wasn't Christ who
would make war on depression or, for that matter, on the numerous other
afflictions, misfortunes, disasters, and diseases with which modern man was
confronted. It wasn't Christ who would
stand by you in times of need, even if some of his teachings did. Christ was dead, crucified, finished! Killed once by the ancient world and killed
again by the modern one, with its rampant barbarism and concomitant disregard
for inner truth, its heathen idolatry before a plethora of superhuman 'stars'
... from film and pop to sport and glamour.
Christ was simply the pretext certain people needed for getting
together, forming a sort of social club where it was assumed, for purposes of
convenience, that he or, rather, He (with a capital 'H') was still alive.
No doubt, such people required an ulterior motive to drag their
humiliated bodies and souls together once or twice a week, in order to perform
special ceremonies for one another. And
when they had performed their various religious duties, sung Christ's praises,
listened to the same old sermon as though it were totally new to them, made a
donation to the church coffers, and received the clergyman's dutiful blessing,
they could rub shoulders on a more down-to-earth and mutually acceptable
basis. They could ease their minds by
discussing Mozart's piano sonatas, the history of French Impressionism, the immorality
of contemporary cinema, the joys of a country picnic, the fallacies of
Nietzsche's philosophy, the irreverence of Bertrand Russell, the latest African
famine, the inferiority of other so-called World Religions, or the futility of
atheism. But if these and other such
subjects began to wear thin or to lose their cutting edge, they could always
let themselves go in a lengthy bout of unrestrained hymn-singing, or even take
it upon themselves to wander about preaching the Good News to people.
Yes, they could tell all those poor ignorant souls, the legions
of unbelieving atheists, about the great advantage of belief in Christ, His
ability to transform souls, to erase depression, give one new strength, hope,
life, etc. And if that didn't work, they
could always resort to someone great, like Napoleon: 'The Bible is no mere book
but a living power that conquers all who oppose it.' Indeed, they could even resort to Queen
Victoria who, on being questioned, one day, as to the secret of
So the church-goers have their weekly get-together which allows
them to bolster one another up and even gives some of them an opportunity to
meet somebody of the opposite sex who may subsequently prove more beneficial
than anything else - a woman, say, who may give the interested man access to a
pleasure that will fill his soul with well-being and thereby enable him to
travel around the world condemning alcoholics, smokers, drug addicts, and
atheists with a new ardour in his veins, born of the conviction that love is
all it takes.
But it's not Jesus Christ who can work the miracle, it's not
Christ who can authorize their social and/or sex lives (though even if he could one would have
to accept the possibility that he also helps unbelievers too, since they often
have successful social and/or sex lives as well). No, Christ doesn't know of their existence,
and even if, by some incredibly remote chance, he did, he would probably feel
indifferent towards them or downright upset that they were using his name to
further their own ungodly ends. For
whatever they've achieved, by way of social and/or sexual advancement, they
have authorized by themselves, granting themselves a social life which is built
upon the foundations of a few expedient delusions without wishing, for obvious
reasons, to accept or admit to the fact that they are actually deluded. After all, a fair number of them would have
to face-up to the fact that they are really pharisees
who had opted to make a deal with religion out of ignorance or fear or some
private ulterior motive as often as not connected with sex.
Yet such a confrontation with the self, such an admission of
moral weakness, would doubtless prove undesirable, if not downright unbearable,
to most of them. It would raise too many
awkward questions, questions which were better left not only unanswered but
safely buried beneath a mass of lies and expedient delusions. For whether or not one is consciously aware
of the fact, it is an implicit law of nature that whatever one does, over an
extended period of time, one must acquiesce in it wholeheartedly, else risk
going insane. Even a thief, an embezzler,
a liar, or a pervert must fully acquiesce in what he is doing if he wishes to
maintain his psychic equilibrium.
Otherwise he will sooner or later make a mistake, give himself away,
become paranoid, nervous, unstable, and thereby turn his life into a neurotic
hell-on-earth in no time. There is no
alternative.
So a man who refuses to join what he regards as a glorified
social club simply because he believes that it is fundamentally a self-deluding
lie, has no real option but to shun it.
He is either compelled to acknowledge God in his own fashion and on his
own evolutionary terms or, alternatively, to remain agnostic or even
atheistic. Naturally, if he wishes to
remain intellectually even-handed, he may opt for agnosticism. But if he is goaded-on by a fierce hatred of
the world's injustice, cruelty, hypocrisy, prejudice, narrow-mindedness, and
deceit, then he'll probably opt for atheism.
A philosopher who can't disprove the assumed divinity of Christ
or, for that matter, concepts like the Immaculate Conception and the
Resurrection, because he concedes to the irrelevance of logic in dealing with
such concepts, is by no means intellectually defeated. On the contrary, such a concession would be
intellectually positive, an assertion, in complete honesty, that a given
proposition of, say, 2 x 2 = 4 cannot be altered to 5 or 6, no matter what one
might personally prefer. In fact, it
would be an indication of intellectual integrity derived from a given premise:
namely, the claims of the Scriptures taken at face-value and with due regard to
the validity of faith. Naturally, I'm
not concerned, in this journal, with the evolution of the Scriptures under the
aegis of medieval scholasticism. I am
not contending that various parts of the Scriptures were carefully revised or
reinterpreted in order to strengthen the foundations of otherworldly supremacy
and simultaneously safeguard the authoritarian power of the Church; though I'm
well aware that such a procedure may have been in accordance with theological requirement. No, the point is that certain aspects of the
Scriptures prompt one to say either 'Yes' or 'No', not to disprove them. And we also know that some of the more subtly
transcendental doctrines of the Church are completely meaningless before a man
who 'lacks the faith', since he can't acquire religious faith once he assumes
that it is only the faith itself which works the transformation in people and
not the possibility of there being anything tangible behind it - a living deity
to whom it should directly relate.
Indeed, any aspiration which religions like Christianity might
make towards universal supremacy is both illogical and unjust. Yet the more theological gaps one can expose
in them, the greater is the possibility of their sinking into the vast realm of
long-accepted myth, along with the Nordic, Celtic, Roman,
Greek, Chinese, Indian, and Persian myths of old. That must surely be the fate of an official
religion whose devotees and doctrines prove insufficiently convincing to
attract the huge numbers of disillusioned unbelievers who remain firmly
anchored to the world of the faithless, and whose need for a more relevant and
credible religion remains sadly neglected.
When ordinary people treat the established Church lightly, when
they see the duplicity and hypocrisy of its principal upholders all too
clearly, then its end is surely in sight.
Needless to say, it will be a true Day of Judgement when the people
democratically cast off this anachronistic burden and thereby relegate it to
the subterranean archives of old-world mythology. Until then, those who are unable to
prostitute themselves upon the altar of expedient superstition must continue to
avert their eyes from the sordid cobwebs of their age, depressions or not!
TUESDAY
EVENING
I have allowed my pen
to wander on at some length on this vexed subject of religion and, since I
still haven't exhausted what I wish to say, I shall now allow it to wander on a
little further. To begin with, I am
going to remind myself that I was indoctrinated so persistently, rigorously,
and methodically with Christianity that, for several years, I almost saw it
coming out of my eyes. As a Roman
Catholic, I was brought up, until my tenth year, in regular service of the
Church. I attended Holy Communion and Confession
unfailingly every week. I was
well-versed in the Catechism and other teachings before I really acquired so
much as the faintest notion of what it was all about. There were always so many words to memorize
that one hardly had time to reflect on exactly why one was memorizing them in
the first place. One just took it all
for granted.
Anyway, at the age of eight or nine I became an altar boy at St
Joseph's in Aldershot and proceeded to assist the priest with the tasks usually
associated with such a position, viz. praying at Holy Communion, opening and
closing the altar gates, carrying a large Bible, swinging the censer, kneeling
before the altar, holding the Cross, and so on.
I even wore the obligatory black-and-white frocks which, as I recall, were
invariably too long for me and usually tripped me up whenever I got up off my
knees or walked around. In truth, I was
mortally afraid of disappointing the Blessed Virgin, that mother-substitute on
these occasions. Everything would go
against me if I had the misfortune to drop something, to fart, cough, or sneeze
during prayers or, worse still, stumble down the altar steps onto the rails
below. It was of the utmost importance
to remain composed, in order to prevent oneself from doing anything unseemly in
front of the congregation, especially once they had flocked to the rails with
their mouths open and their tongues lolling out to receive the blessed
sacrament, when an indiscretion on one's part could have been so costly to
priest and communicant alike!
Now this ordeal lasted, as I said, until my tenth year when,
following the death of my maternal grandmother, with whom I had always been
pretty close, my mother summarily dispatched me to a Protestant Children's Home
in Surrey, doubtless grateful for the opportunity to get me out of the way at
last and start again with someone else, a new husband whom the existence of her
mother had previously denied her. From
then on it was a question of Baptist inculcation, the rites of which were so
different from all that I had already learnt, since the Blessed Virgin scarcely
figured at all and, by way of contrast, the baptismal font was of supreme
importance. In actual fact, it wasn't a
font at all, in the Catholic sense, so much as a rectangular trough in which an
adult could be totally submerged whenever there was the prospect of a new and
sincere declaration of loyalty to Christ.
The 'convert', already effectively a practising Christian, was simply
formalizing his declaration so that, through a sort of symbolic rebirth, people
would come to know of his earnestness.
Whenever this happened, and the vicar had just lowered someone into the
water backwards, you realized that the Baptists had acquired a staunch
supporter and that nothing would deter the person concerned from following in
Christ's hallowed footsteps. It was an
extremely important occasion in Baptist ritual.
Well, I remained Baptist property, if unwillingly and
unofficially so, until I left high school at seventeen. There was no possibility of my avoiding the
Sunday services - absolutely none! As a
rule, you attended church once in the morning, followed by Sunday school, and,
assuming you didn't go to Crusaders that afternoon, once in the evening,
followed by coffee and relaxation in the adjacent Youth Club. However, if you wanted to play football in
the local park, as I usually did on Sunday afternoons, you had to smuggle your
boots out of the house and wear such kit as could be mustered for the occasion
under your Sunday best. There could be
no question of getting too dirty anyway.
For indiscretions of that crass order were strictly taboo and, in the
unfortunate event of being discovered, would have met with severe
repercussions, including the possibility of a sound thrashing, coupled to a
cold bath. Now if you wanted to watch
TV, as I occasionally did in the evening, you were severely admonished and
absolutely forbidden to do any such thing.
Sunday was the Lord's day and nothing
else. The most you could hope for -
other, that is, than a succulent roast lunch and the sight of some pretty girls
in church - was a game of chess, draughts, ludo, or
snakes and ladders; though it was also permissible to play the piano, provided
you didn't play for too long and only kept to the more conservative, and hence
religiously-orientated, pieces.
Absolutely no jazz or boogie-woogie!
Well, as far as the rest of the week was concerned (and
excluding the compulsory religious education acquired at school, which, I
guess, was more Anglican than Baptist), the most you could be thankful for was
the fact that you didn't have to go to church.
Early-morning prayer meetings were held, without fail, at 7.15 and
usually lasted between fifteen and twenty minutes. They generally consisted of Bible readings
interspersed with routine prayers, though occasionally the Bible was dropped in
favour of anti-drug reports, crime surveys, The Pilgrim's Progress, or missionary
stories. But never for very long, since
it was always regarded by the house parents as the real cynosure of such
meetings, their veritable raison d'être.
Before and after these prayer meetings, however, you did some
housework, which included hoovering the numerous
carpets and/or dusting the even more numerous items of furniture to be found
throughout the spacious old semidetached house (the house parents' private
living quarters on the second floor excepted), and when the time came for
breakfast - as, indeed, for lunch and tea - you knew in advance that nothing could
be eaten before someone had said grace.
A boy who refused to say grace when his turn came would be refused any food, it was as simple as that. You had to be grateful for everything, even
the badly cooked stuff! Naturally, my
appreciation of the food was somewhat compromised by the unflagging persistence
of this mechanical routine, this "For what we are about to receive ...", which made a religion out of gratitude and elevated
food to the status of a benediction.
So at the end of the day, when you were weighed down by homework
and there seemed to be nothing under the sun to be really grateful for, you
said your prayers in an equally mechanical fashion, before climbing wearily
into bed. Then it was that, with the
withdrawal of one or other of the house parents from the dormitory, you grabbed
a pornographic magazine from whichever of your fellow sufferers had managed to
secure anything from school-friends that day, ducked under the blankets with a
diminutive torch, and began to scrutinize its erotic contents with a lively if
nervous curiosity. Oddly enough, this
little clandestine episode was the most you could expect in the world of sexual
experience since, if by some remote chance you had managed to find a girlfriend
in the outside world, it was strictly against the house regulations to bring
her into the dormitory or into any other room where there was no houseparent on
duty to keep a protective eye on things.
She would have to sit downstairs in the crowded living-room, where the
possibility of sex of any description was virtually nil. The house parents provided little incentive
for the indulgence of appetites which ran contrary to the Lord's will and,
consequently, such appetites were starved and perverted, in true puritanical
fashion!
Well, if that kind of upbringing wasn't designed to turn any reasonably
intelligent person off Christianity for life, I wonder what would! If its persistence wasn't guaranteed to
produce a negative effect on anyone over an extended period of time I can only
regard the person concerned as either mad or stupid, and perhaps even a born
saint. Indeed, if there is one episode
that stands out in my memory above all others, in connection with my life at
that time, it has to do with the day Dr Spovey, the
Home's legal inspector, having got nowhere in an attempt to make me see the
error of my ungodly ways, called the male houseparent aside and informed him
that I "will be a tough nut to crack". Imagine it!
They wanted to subjugate me, to brainwash me into becoming an obedient
slave of the Baptist faith in order, presumably, to continue exploiting me both
emotionally and financially in years to come.
The mugs! If there's one thing
they'll regret, it's that they never cracked me. And I hope they fucking-well choke on the
fact!
So there you are. I have
described some of the influences which helped me on the way to my current
position, turning me against Christianity, particularly its Baptist
manifestation, which was, after all, the thing I was really in rebellion
against; though I didn't fully realize that fact at the time and, even if I
had, I doubt very much that, after so many years of anti-Baptist revolt, I
would have walked straight back into the arms of the Catholic Church again, as
though nothing had happened in the meantime, no modification of knowledge or
awareness taken place in consequence of my enforced sojourn in the enemy
camp. Time cannot be reversed, and
therefore I could no more return to my Catholic roots than to my childhood in
For the next link in the chain of my anti-Christian progress,
however, I had to wait until, as a humble drudge-ridden clerk in a prestigious
West End office, I made the mistake of falling in love with a beautiful young
woman who confessed, one fine day, to having been a practising Christian before
she took up with or, rather, gravitated to some kind of Buddhist commitment to
Transcendental Meditation instead. For
me, who had only loved her from a distance and idealized her beyond all imaginings, that was like a slap in the face. A practising Christian? What-on-earth could she mean, I
wondered. Though I was presently to get
an idea when, making the most of the opportunity circumstances now provided me
with, I finally got round to asking her out, only to be informed that she was
engaged all week and, given the nature of her social commitments, would
probably remain engaged for some time to come.
Not only was she regularly practising TM in the evenings but, as I now
learnt to my utter amazement, she was still associated with her church, her
father being a vicar, and would consequently be singing in the choir, learning
new hymns for the forthcoming services, helping him prepare his sermon, etc.,
so that there was hardly any time to spare on more earthly matters.
Well, that certainly stumped me!
I had waited patiently for a young woman who not only effectively kept
me chained to an uncongenial office job for several years but made it extremely
difficult for me to get to know anything much about her, on account of the fact
that, with the exception of periodic visits to London at the end of each
university term, she spent most of the year elsewhere. It was fairly evident that these private
commitments - this Transcendental Meditation, the hymns she was learning, etc.
- were of more importance to her than the love of a self-confessed admirer;
that the singing of esoteric verses was of greater importance than putting an
end to someone's unrequited love; that the mechanical rituals associated with
the worship of a divinity who only existed in the mind of certain people was
more important than the amorous desires of somebody whose existence was
all-too-physically manifest. The fact
that she had dedicated her spare time to TM and the Church, in that order,
meant that certain other persons would have to suffer the consequences. For her attentions were evidently focused on
things of greater import than the all-too-mundane desires of some rash and
impudent male who had unfortunately fallen victim to sexual ambitions beyond
his station!
To be sure, it would be much wiser for a young woman like her to
dedicate herself more exclusively to people within the confines of the
religious clique than to allow herself to be senselessly drawn over to the
service of outsiders. One can imagine
the voice of her conscience or, rather, conscience-substitute (guru?) saying:
"He was obviously deluded. One just
cannot be too sure of the uninitiated; they're full of faults. It's wiser to avoid such people. Yes, it's wiser to establish an esoteric
morality, a morality in direct opposition to nature. It's wiser to avoid all those who question
us, who doubt us, for the simple reason that if they're not with us, they must
be against us! We must fortify ourselves
against the monotonous encroachments of the outside world. Be civil, not servile! Be brave, not grave! If you can win fresh devotees to the path,
particularly young ones, so much the better!
Bring them along! Introduce
them! We can use their help to further
our interests. Transcendental Meditation
is now practised in over seven-hundred major cities throughout the world by
about one percent of their respective populations. As a result of this remarkable breakthrough,
the crime rate in these cities has fallen by approximately the same
percentage...." From which
remarkable coincidence we should deduce that the people formerly responsible
for one percent of the crime have now turned to TM instead!
So some sanctimonious guru with a Cosmic obsession with the
astral plane is gradually worming his way into the hearts and minds of his
devotees, is slowly but surely remoulding their views according to the dictates
of his personal whim, intimating to them that private opinions are superfluous
to one who is striving towards the Clear Light.
Meantime, in another part of town, a minister is informing someone that
he can have Eternal Life if only he gives his heart to the Lord and refrains
from sinful habits. Whilst in yet
another part of town a young woman is selling introductory magazines which
advertise her sect. She is quite pretty
as well as disarmingly charming, and whenever she stops a young man (as
frequently happens) and makes a sale, she calmly informs him, albeit with a
degree of pride faintly mingled with condescension, that she loves him, even
though nothing could literally be further from the truth. "I love you," she says again,
staring into his rather startled eyes with all the professional candour she can
muster. Yet if, by some remote chance,
one of these young men should thereupon reply: "If that's the case, why
don't you come home with me and prove it, then?",
she would probably blush and scuttle away like a panic-stricken crab. She would wonder who-the-devil he thought he
was!
Yes, quite so! But life
goes on pretty much as before, despite all the apparent and relatively
superficial changes in evidence. Eminent
clergymen invoke the rain during a period of severe drought. No, they don't do a rain dance, for that
would be pagan. They simply recite
certain prayers in the hope that God will hear them and make the rain fall!
However, in returning to the subject of that girl I fell in love
with, a girl who, in her own words, had been a practising Christian, I can't
pretend that I now hate her for having spurned my advances and harboured
certain unsympathetic delusions about me.
Hate would be too strong a word and, besides, how can you seriously hate
someone with whom you were or had been in love?
With a clergyman father, that girl couldn't avoid being indoctrinated in
Christian, and more specifically Protestant, beliefs. She was bound to be deeply influenced by the
various religious practices and theories of her church and, as such, she can
even be regarded as a victim, one of many hundreds of thousands, if not
millions, of victims who, even in adulthood, are rarely more than someone
else's mouthpiece, a sort of puppet galvanized into action by some worshipful
autocrat who looks like purity personified but mentally rapes the sexier of his
female followers and actually succeeds with one or two of them every so often,
forcing her legs wide apart and pumping away like a dog in heat.
Yes, she would probably think that he was being kind to her,
that they were fulfilling part of their daily devotions to The Almighty by
regularly making direct contact with the life force. All the same, she wouldn't have the nerve to
look into his big wild eyes too often; she would be concentrating on the
numbing effects of his blood-engorged penis, on his sexual assault which almost
seemed to be rupturing the walls of her vagina as he manipulated her with
savage intent, as though he wanted to carve her in two, putting an end to both
of them in one long orgasmic passion of sexual oblivion. But when he had lapped up her juices, like a
grateful dog, and left her to stagger into what remained of her clothing, she
would never attribute cruel or brutal motives to this 'man of God', this 'leader
and teacher'. How could she? They had only been making love, after all,
and that was sufficiently self-explanatory.
She, too, could afford to avoid proposals from the outside world!
