Preview the Centretruths eBook version of SPIRITUAL INTIMATIONS
Op.
29
SPIRITUAL
INTIMATIONS
Poems
Copyright
©
2011 John O'Loughlin
__________________
CONTENTS
1.
Illusion
and Truth
2.
A
True Fight
3.
The
Divine Right
4.
An
Absolute Sovereignty
5.
Centro-complexification
6.
Independent
Mind
7.
Questions
8.
Blessed
Cold
9.
Meritocratic
Affairs
10.
Self-Destructive
11.
Moral
Judgement
12.
The
Real Obstacle
13.
Supersex
14.
Alternative
Supersex
15.
Indirect
Approach
16.
Last-Ditch
Conservatism
17.
Supernatural
Synthesizer
18.
Antinatural
Art
19.
Supernatural
Art
20.
Supra-natural
Art
21.
Realist
Art
22.
Antinatural
Literature
23.
Supernatural
Literature
24.
Atomic
Dichotomy
25.
Relative
Atoms
26.
A
Relativistic Absolutism
27.
Barter
28.
Vouchers
29.
Money
30.
Above
Money
31.
Supernatural
Pitch
32.
Spiritual
Intimations
33.
Beyond
Christianity
34.
Last
Judgement
______________
ILLUSION
AND
TRUTH
There
are
two ways of looking at
The
origins
of the Universe according to
The
Big
Bang theory: either as
An
extrapolation
from Judaic monotheism or as
An
extrapolation
from the superconscious in deference
To
contemporary
transcendental requirement,
So
that
its origins are conceived
As
being
of nobler provenance
Than
perhaps
they actually were.
In
the
first instance, we have
A
Judaic
abstraction; in the second ...
An
example
of pseudo-scientific subjectivity.
A
Big
Bang, just imagine it!
A
divine
oneness to begin with!
But
we
ought to know by now
That
evil
is never solitary,
Always
acts
in competition with others,
Against
others,
whether on the stellar level
Of
absolute
evil, or on the organic level
Of
relative
evil - an evil, in other words,
Between
disparate
life forms,
Or
between
two or more racial variations on
The
same
life form, as in the case of man.
Absolute
evil
reacts in the guise of stars,
Which
diverge
from one another.
Why
should
they have begun in unity
And
duly
become many?
If
the
emergence in the void
Of
inflammable
gases was possible,
Why
should
it only have been so
In
one
part of the void?
What
was
there to prevent simultaneous or successive
Emergences
of
star embryos?
And
if
they subsequently grew into flaming stars,
What
was
there to prevent the birth of smaller stars
From
the
reactive frictions and clashes of
The
larger
primal ones - some of which
Would
eventually
cool and harden into planets,
To
bring
about the rudiments of
A
galactic
order, and so halt
The
everywhichway
divergence of anarchic stars?
We
know
that polytheism preceded monotheism,
Since
the
Jews were once pagan.
They
thought-up
the idea of
A
monotheistic
Creator, from which
All
the
other stars 'fell',
In
a
'fallen-angel' revolt against
The
'heavenly
unity' of the primary star.
No
doubt,
most small stars
Did
emerge from a larger source,
But
not
necessarily from only one
larger
source!
And
today,
when the Big Bang theory
Is
so
fashionable, we are induced to believe,
Compliments
of
pseudo-scientific subjectivity,
That
the
galactic universe is expanding (!)
Away
from
a central void
Which
is
assumed to be its place of origin,
Much
as
though an explosion
Once
took
place there
And
the
consequence, many millennia later,
Is
an
expanding universe of fully-formed galaxies,
Replete,
we
may suppose, with
Advanced
life
on certain planets!
Ah,
how
very neat from a mystical viewpoint,
But
(quite
apart from the fact that galaxies
Are
never
born fully-formed), somewhat baffling
From
a
rational or factual one!
For
what
is there about a central void
That
should
induce galaxies to tend away from it?
And
why
should such a divergence
Be
regarded
as an expansion?
And
how
do millions of galaxies
All
diverge
in the same way from a central source?
Ah,
we
should not be so churlish!
They
no
longer react against one another,
As
stars
used to do in the bad old days
Of
Newtonian
objectivity; on the contrary,
They
expand
mystically outward
Towards
some
as-yet-unglimpsed horizon
Which
-
though space is supposed to be curved -
They
will
never reach,
Since
that
would halt their expansion,
And
an
expanding universe
Cannot
suddenly
cease to expand.
Our
sun,
too, is apparently expanding outwards,
And
must
continue to expand until ... bah!
You
know
my views by now, and I won't conceive of
The
diabolic
universe in divine terms,
Lest
I
end-up regarding
The
divine
one diabolically,
Or
altogether
overlook
The
existence
and possibility of a divine universe!
Regarding
the
diabolic as though
it
were
divine
Is
a
poor substitute for a truly divine orientation,
And
indicates
an inability or unwillingness
To
abandon
evil for the realm of grace.
Those
of
us capable of a higher allegiance
Should
never
confound
That
which
contracts and diverges
With
that
which expands and converges.
We
shall
reserve the former tendencies
For
the
flaming stars
And
the
latter ones for pure spirit.
And
we
shall know that it is the destiny of
The
expanding/converging
universe to tend towards
The
divine
unity of 'Point Omega'.
A
TRUE
FIGHT
They
fight
for a hard-line People's Republic,
But
it
isn't from the Marxist illusion
That
the
truth can emerge, since Communism,
Whether
national
or international,
Prohibits
'God
building'
And
won't
hear of a theocratic way.
As
the
furthest reach of democracy,
The
pseudo-democracy
of a totalitarian exclusivity,
Communism
signifies
the materialist decadence of
A
state
absolutism, albeit a pseudo-state.
It
will
dismantle the 'bourgeois' state
In
the
name of the proletariat
And,
if
possible, destroy the Church,
Though
not
to put a successor in its place
(Since
it
regards religion as a closed issue,
Never
to
be resurrected
On
different
or superior terms).
There
is
only the people's state,
And
in
such a state only the spurious gods
Of
Marx
and Lenin count for anything -
A
pseudo-theocracy
dovetailed into
The
autocratic
essence of Communism.
Ah,
they
fight for a People's Republic,
Oblivious
of
the fact that such a republic,
Once
established,
would be a betrayal of
The
true
Irish people, with their theocratic bias,
Their
Catholic
opposition to Protestant mores.
If
Catholicism
were to survive in
A
People's
Republic of
An
illogicality,
Catholicism and Communism
Being
ideologically
incompatible.
If
truly
Communist, they would have no option but
To
root
it out in the name of the People,
So
that
only democratic materialism remained.
This
would
not be a popular move with
A
majority
of the Irish people, who more identify
With
the
Church than the State.
They
would
not like a materialist vacuum,
A
state
absolutism.
Only
the
decadent, the lowest elements,
The
enemies
of the true Irish people,
Would
be
content with that!
They
would
relish the triumph of Antichrist.
Not
I,
however! But then,
in all honesty,
I
don't
see a so-called People's Republic
Ever
coming
about in
The
majority
of Irishmen would never tolerate
The
undermining
of their religious bias,
Their
bias
for theocracy, but would resolutely oppose
Any
move
in that materialist direction.
What,
us,
sell-out to Protestants,
Socialists,
Communists?
Never!
Better
an
old, moth-eaten theocracy than
A
newfangled
democratic absolutism!
Ah,
I
can just hear them!
And talk of
A
hard-line
People's Republic with
Catholicism
-
What's
that
if not nonsense,
A
veritable
contradiction in terms?
We
have
had enough nonsense, in the past,
Not
to
want any more of it in the present!
We
will
stick to the existing soft-line republic
Which,
in
its liberal pluralism, at least
Allows
us
to stick to our religious bias.
In
fact,
the Church is stronger than the State in
The
way
it influences our lives.
This
is,
after all, the way we like it.
And
you? Well, what can I
tell them?
Those
others
fight in vain for a People's Republic.
Maybe
one
day I shall fight - democratically - for
The
dismantling
of republicanism in
The
interests
of an extension and expansion
Of
theocracy
towards the absolutist level of
A
Social
Transcendental Centre.
I
would
encourage the true Irish people
To
vote-out
democracy and vote-in
The
highest
theocracy, to extend their interests to
The
level
of the ultimate theocratic allegiance -
That
of
the Holy Spirit. I
shall know that
Those
who
have remained loyal
To
the
true Christian Church will favour
The
development
of transcendentalism,
Not
Marxist
fundamentalism,
Such
as
would seem to have been derived from
That
other
- and false - Church.
The
true
Irish people are a majority in the Republic,
And
a
majority of that majority
Will
favour
Centrist salvation to Communist damnation,
Thus
confirming
their theocratic bias.
The
Centre
would take over from the Catholic Church
And
arrogate
state responsibility to itself,
In
accordance
with the absolutist requirements of
A
free-electron
stage of evolution.
The
Centre
is the only means to
The
final
end of the State, to the overcoming
Of
state/church
relativity.
We
true
Irishmen of good faith should view
The
existing
state as the means to a higher end
And,
instead
of foolishly deriding it, utilize it
For
our
higher purposes.
The
Church
won't step down of its own accord,
Nor
should
it! We need the
Church,
Just
as
we need the existing state.
And
one
day the miraculous may come to pass:
The
Tonean
tricolour will be lowered
And
the
Y-like emblem of what is potentially,
If
not
at this point in time actually, the
True
world
religion of Social Transcendentalism
Be
raised
to take its bankrupt place.
The
liberal
state will have served its purpose,
And
the
Irish Social Transcendental Centre be born!
THE
DIVINE
RIGHT
Make
no
mistake, when sovereignty passes from
The
people
to a leader, when society passes from
The
neutron
level of Christ to
The
free-electron
level of the Holy Ghost,
It
is
'all up' with republicanism.
You
do
not have a republic in which
A
sovereign
leader exists.
The
emergence
of such a person presupposes
The
end
of democratic republicanism,
And
signifies
the beginning of
Theocratic
centrism
and the age of theocracy.
As
autocratic
sovereignty preceded republicanism,
So
should
theocratic sovereignty succeed it.
If
the
autocratic ruler, as the earthly embodiment of
The
Father,
ruled by so-called 'Divine Right',
Then
the
theocratic leader, as the earthly embodiment of
The
Holy
Spirit, leads by 'Divine Right'.
The
people's
representative represents the people by
Natural
right,
derived from the Christian notion of
The
equality
of all souls, and, in a sense,
He
may
be regarded as
The
earthly
embodiment of Christ, Who, likewise,
Must
be
crucified and resurrected,
Or
undergo
periodic General Elections which
May
result
in his removal from office (crucifixion)
And
due
replacement by
A
new
people's representative (resurrection)
Under
an
alternative government.
No
such
relativity, however, can apply to
A
leader,
who, on account of his 'Divine Right',
Isn't
democratically
accountable to the people,
But
uses
them to further his divine ends,
And
must
remain in power on a permanent basis,
Since
his
absolutist status entitles him to
An
'eternity'
commensurate with the Supernatural,
Is
but
a reflection of an Eternal Order
Beyond
the
comings and goings,
Risings
and
fallings of the temporal.
The
monarch
also has his 'eternity', derived from
A
so-called
'divine right' appertaining to the stars
And,
originally,
to the central star of the Galaxy.
He
is
akin to a quasar on earth,
And
his
noblemen derive their lordly sovereignty from
The
smaller
stars, directly ruling over a peasantry
In
microcosmic
reflection of
The
direct
rule of suns over planets.
Trees
also
reflect this galactic-world-order,
And
may,
in some degree, be regarded as
The
blueprint
for an autocratic society.
However,
at
the opposite extreme of evolution,
The
theocratic
society intimates of
The
otherworldly
Beyond,
The
leader
supremely sovereign
And
his
closest followers, or party comrades,
Deriving
their
regional sovereignty from him.
These
regional
leaders are responsible for
The
execution
of such administrative tasks as
The
leader
deems fit to authorize,
And
are
directly accountable to him,
Much
as
the feudal nobility
Were
accountable
to their monarch,
To
whom
they swore a direct oath of allegiance.
These
regional
leaders, on the other hand, lead the people
On
terms
specified by the leader.
In
a
democratic society, however,
The
representatives
of the people, including
The
Prime
Minister, are directly accountable to
Those
who
elected them
And
are
in no way entitled to sovereign judgements,
All
men
being considered equal in reflection of
The
humanist
criteria applicable to
A
natural
order, an order
Which,
with
the growth of antinaturalism, is
Steadily
undermined,
as some men (proletariat)
Are
considered
more equal than others (bourgeoisie),
And
a
class war duly ensues,
Resulting,
if
taken to its ultimate conclusion, in
A
communist
so-called democracy.
What
distinguishes
a divine right from
A
natural
right or, for that matter,
An
anti-natural
right ... is
The
absolutist
integrity of the former,
Whether
on
the subatomic proton level
Of
autocratic
rule or, alternatively, on
The
supra-atomic
electron level
Of
theocratic
leadership.
Divine
rights
are either instinctual or spiritual,
In
contrast
to the materialist relativity of
An
atomic
natural right of liberal representation
Or,
alternatively,
the materialist absolutism of
A
pseudo-atomic
(neo-proton) antinatural right
Of
communist
representation.
The
instinctual
so-called 'divine right'
Is
aristocratic
and feudal,
The
spiritual
'divine right'
Is
meritocratic
and centrist.
The
relative
materialist natural right
Is
plutocratic/capitalist,
and
The
absolute
materialist antinatural right
Is
bureaucratic/socialist.
Profane
rights,
whether natural or antinatural,
Take
place
within a republican context,
Where
the
People are politically sovereign.
Divine
rights,
whether instinctual or spiritual,
Take
place
outside such a context, either in
The
pre-democratic
Royalist context or in
The
post-democratic
Centrist one,
Where
the
People aren't politically sovereign,
Either
because
they are subjects of
The
reigning
monarch or because they are
Religiously
sovereign,
depending on the context.
The
end
of profanity is the beginning of divinity.
Where
the
Centre is concerned, it is
The
true
divinity inspired by the Leader
Rather
than
the false divinity accruing to the Ruler.
The
omega
divinity of the Holy Spirit
As
opposed
to the alpha divinity of the Father.
Self-realizing
salvation
of the People
And
not
their worshipful damnation.
We
have
lived long enough
In
the
purgatory of democratic profanity.
Let
us
now welcome
The
coming
salvation of the Leader's Heaven!
AN
ABSOLUTE
SOVEREIGNTY
A
leader
leads the People towards
The
goal
or goals he has set for them.
He
doesn't
consult them,
Like
a
People's Representative,
Because
he
isn't politically accountable to them
On
account
of sovereignty being vested
In
himself
instead of in the masses.
He
leads
by 'Divine Right', and is, in effect,
The
embodiment
of the Holy Spirit,
Free
from
earthly bourgeois attachments.
Thus
he
is the antithesis of a monarch,
Whose
sovereignty
derived from
A
very
different kind of divinity -
Namely,
that
of the Father - and whose status
Was
accordingly
autocratic rather than theocratic.
The
monarch
ruled, he didn't lead;
He
upheld
natural determinism, not free will;
Respect
for
the Creator,
Not
an
aspiration towards an Ultimate Creation.
A
leader,
appertaining to an antithetical absolutism,
Has
nothing
in common with a ruler
Other
than
his absolute sovereignty.
There
is
no point of contact
Between
the
two extremes.
The
Father
and the Holy Ghost must remain separate
And
indifferent
to each other,
The
former
symbolic of pure instinct,
The
latter
... of pure spirit;
The
one
reflecting a proton-proton reaction,
The
other
an electron-electron attraction;
The
former
before matter, the latter beyond it.
Whereas
Christ,
Who was said (with reason)
To
signify
the 'Three in One', was man
And
therefore
material,
A
combination
of protons and electrons,
A
synthesis
of instinct and spirit in the atomic flesh,
Closer
to
the proton-biased atomicity of
The
Mother
in the Catholic context,
A
diluted
Father and Holy Ghost, relative to
The
compromise
between state and church,
The
one
stemming from the autocratic Kingdom,
The
other
aspiring, no matter how indirectly, towards
The
theocratic
Centre,
A
democratic
materialism the mean,
Though
never
more so than in
The
preponderating
intellectuality of
The
Protestant
Christ, Who fights shy
Of
both
proton and electron extremes,
And
Whose
neutron bias accordingly elevates Him
Above
the
biased atomicity of the Mother in
A
uniquely
purgatorial materialism
Which
is
its own lunar end.
Thus
as
the 'Son of God',
The
second,
or democratic, deity in
The
evolution
of religion
From
autocratic
beginnings towards
A
theocratic
culmination, Christ symbolized
An
atomic
relativity appropriate to
A
materialist
age. Since
relativity is ever
A
compromise
between disparate interests,
Whether
state
and church
Or
party
within the State
And
denomination
within the Church,
There
can
be no absolute sovereignty on
The
Christian
level of evolution.
Sovereignty
is
accordingly relative,
Which
is
to say vested in the masses,
Who
are
broadly divisible
Between
bourgeois
and proletarian interests,
And
entitled
to elect representatives
To
govern
on their behalf.
As
Christ
taught that all men were equal
(Irrespective
of
their elemental bent),
No
one
man can rule or lead in
A
democratic
society, though
The
representation
of the People's sovereignty by
One
man,
functioning as prime minister or president,
Is
obviously
permissible.
And
this
no less in a radical democracy
Than
in
a liberal one.
Only
with
the emergence of a Messianic equivalent,
Appropriate
to
the absolutism of the Holy Ghost,
Does
this
notion of human equality and its
Political
concomitance
(of democratic sovereignty)
Become
questionable,
subject, in the event of
His
attaining
power, to refutation and abandonment.
Those
on
the side of theocracy
Will
approve
of an absolute sovereignty.
Those
on
the side of democracy
Will
reject
and try to prevent it.
He
will
know how and where to succeed, dividing
The
minority
democratic chaff from
The
majority
theocratic wheat, as he banishes
The
former
and leads the latter into
His
'Kingdom',
in accordance with
The
theocratic
principles of a Last Judgement.
Only
the
wheat shall be saved,
To
enter
the '
At
its
lowest level, which is to say,
The
Cent(e)rist
society of Social Transcendentalism,
The
Centre
succeeding both state and church.
CENTRO-COMPLEXIFICATION
Those
who
understand little about theocracy oppose
The
centripetal
principle of centro-complexification
With
the
centrifugal principle of decentralization,
Commensurate
with
the degeneration of politics
From
communist
and/or liberal to radical Marxist levels,
And
the
furtherance of participatory democracy.
Instead
of
encouraging an evolutionary progression
From
the
Many to the Few or, preferably, the One,
Such
political
degenerates favour
A
devolutionary
regression from the Few to the Many,
The
centre
to the periphery, which is to say, from
Government
to
themselves, politicians to people.
Little
do
they realize what degree of chaos
This
would
engender, though the poet W.B. Yeats
Had
some
inkling of it when, in The
Second
Coming,
He
wrote
of 'Mere anarchy' being 'loosed upon the world'
In
consequence
of things falling apart from 'the centre',
The
sort
of situation that would doubtless appeal to
An
undisciplined
mob, but hardly to men of good sense!
And
yet,
the 'centre' to which Yeats was alluding in
The
above-mentioned
poem wasn't the ultimate Centre,
Identified
by
me with Social Transcendentalism,
But,
rather,
a bourgeois democratic one,
And
it
is perhaps inevitable that before
A
new
and higher centre can be created,
The
old
one has to be undermined
Through
centrifugal
action, in accordance with
The
oscillatory
and relative progression of
Evolution
towards
a more absolutist goal.
What
one
must ensure is that such centrifugal action
Doesn't
get
completely out-of-hand,
Else
it
may become its own master
And
not
the unconscious servant of a superior end!
For,
eventually,
there must be a new centripetal principle,
Leading
to
the utmost centro-complexification of
A
civilization
superior, in every respect, to
The
previous
one, a truly theocratic civilization,
In
which
sovereignty is vested in the Centre,
In
the
person of the Leader, who becomes
The
executive
hub around which the various
Administrative
departments
of government
Revolve,
in
deference to his overall will.
In
such
a civilization, there can be only
One
leader,
one party, and one people - namely,
The
people
capable of theocratic upgrading
And
allegiance;
though, eventually, there is no reason
Why
other
such peoples shouldn't come under
A
similar
system within a supra-national framework of
Uniform
ideological
identification, so that
Centro-complexification
goes
ahead
On
a
world-wide basis under the aegis of
A
unified
regulatory body.
We
cannot,
in this overly nationalistic age, expect
Much
progress
towards supra-national unity just yet.
But
we
can certainly look towards a time
When,
with
the development of a more
Transcendent
consciousness,
nations draw closer to
That
ultimate
centro-complexification of global unity
In
the
most radical theocratic allegiance.
INDEPENDENT
MIND
Mind
is
in the brain and a part of the brain
No
less
than wavicles are in matter and
A
part
of matter, while yet being distinct from particles.
If
the
brain is material, then it, too, is divisible into
Particles
and
wavicles, particles predominating
In
the
old brain, wavicles in the new one,
The
brain
itself a combination of matter and mind,
Neither
wholly
one nor the other.
Without
brain
there is no mind.
Consequently
there
can be no mind
Without
brain
on the human level.
Every
brain
has a mind and every mind a brain.
One
day,
however, mind will be capable of
An
autonomous
existence, independent of the flesh,
And
then
it will be pure and truly divine.
The
salvation
that Christianity has long promised
And
prophesied
- namely, a brainless mind,
Commensurate
with
the Holy Spirit, in a free-electron,
Supra-atomic
blessedness
of absolute being,
The
pure
awareness of a wavicle absolutism.
Such
pure
mind won't arise, however, from man,
Who
is
ever atomic, but, more probably, from
The
second
of our two projected post-human life forms,
The
new-brain
collectivizations of the Superbeings,
Those
hypermeditating
successors to the
Hypercontemplative
Supermen,
or brain collectivizations.
This
second
millennial life form, antithetical to a tree,
Will
cultivate
the spirit to such an intense degree,
In
its
superconscious absolutism, that spirit will
Eventually
become
autonomous and break away
From
new-brain
matter, to float freely into space
Where,
in
conjunction with similar
Free-electron
transcendences,
it will converge
And
expand
into larger wholes, tending, in a process
Embracing
potentially
millions of spiritual globes
And
extending
over eternal tracts of heavenly time,
Towards
the
definitive unity of
The
ultimate
spiritual globe – universally complete.
The
objective
of evolutionary progress
Is
therefore
to free the wavicle essence of
The
new-brain
from its atomic appearance,
And
thus
bring about the independence of
Mind
from
brain. But,
before this can be achieved,
The
brain
will have to be made independent of the body
And
its
lower mind of sensations and emotions.
For
the
body/mind dichotomy,
No
less
than the brain/mind one,
Also
confirms
a particle/wavicle distinction,
Only,
one
in which there are more particles
And
fewer
wavicles, to the detriment of the brain/mind.
QUESTIONS
Are
you
defeated by the world
Or
do
you intend to conquer it?
Do
you
run away from evil
Or
will
you go forward to meet it?
Do
you
oppose the proletariat
Or
are
you their mate?
When
you
have your way, will it be
To
run
away from hammering noises
Or
to
have them banned?
Must
you
seek sanctuary,
In
the
country, from dogs,
Or
is
your hand destined to sign their doom?
Can
you
tell 'the low' from 'the high',
Or
are
you deaf and blind to both?
Have
you
settled accounts with your enemies
Or
is
that a future ambition?
Can
the
bad-natured see where you stand
Or
have
you been hiding away from them?
When
the
good-natured are in need of help,
Will
you
rush to their assistance
Or
leave
them to perish?
Does
the
world appeal to you
Or
are
you dedicated to its overthrow?
Could
you
put an end to evil
Or
will
evil put an end to you?
If
the
Truth is to be born,
Are
you
prepared to kill-off the Lie?
In
speaking
of salvation,
Are
you
also mindful of the Damned?
Is
your
hand destined
To
divide
the chaff from the wheat,
Or
will
some other do it for you?
BLESSED
COLD
My
writings
are always done
In
a
cold room in winter.
I
can
neither afford
Nor
do
I desire perpetual heat.
The
electric
fire I use
Would
inhibit
my creativity,
Counter
my
spiritual bias,
Drag
me
nearer the diabolic,
Which
is
ever hot.
I,
however,
require cold,
For
it
facilitates spiritual thought
And
enables
one to remain closer to the divine.
I
am
akin to Zarathustra,
With
his
cool-air heights,
And
I
wager that Nietzsche
Also
spent
many a day in a cold room.
Of
course,
I keep myself well-wrapped,
So
as
to ward off germs,
And
generally
I succeed in staying well.
But
I
would rather suffer
Periodic
ill-health
from the cold
Than
lasting
health
In
front
of the fire every day,
Since
such
a habit
Would
not
permit me to write as well
Or
as
profoundly as I do.
It
would
stultify me in no time,
Establishing,
in
place of my cool-air clarity,
A
hothouse
stuffiness
Injurious
to
clear thinking.
I
would
rather perish than become a vegetable.
MERITOCRATIC
AFFAIRS
As
politics
degenerates towards democratic anarchy,
So,
by
a counter principle, economics becomes
More
important
until, with the nadir of
Political
degeneration
in Marxist socialism, it becomes
All-important,
symptomatic
of the final decadence.
Contrary
to
this trend of the rise of the lowest
Towards
a
position of paramount importance,
Social
Transcendentalism
will champion
The
expansion
of religion at the expense of politics,
And
to
a point where economics would be
Firmly
subordinated
to theocratic requirement.
Instead
of
leading an independent life,
As
it
all-too-often does these days, economics
Would
become
the servant of religion,
While
Social
Transcendentalism strove to expand its base
And
further
Centrist civilization in the world generally
But
the
more theocratic parts of it in particular.
Ownership
of
the means of production
Would
no
longer be solely a plutocratic or even
A
bureaucratic
affair, but would pass, duly transmuted, to
The
meritocracy,
who alone would be responsible
For
the
allocation of funds, with particular emphasis
On
meritocratic
affairs, though with
Due
deference
to bureaucracy, albeit a minimum one.
SELF-DESTRUCTIVE
There
is
a self-destructive aspect to everyone,
By
dint
of the body having a proton ingredient.
But
so,
too, does everyone possess
A
self-constructive
aspect by dint of
The
body
having an electron ingredient
(Not
to
mention a self-instructive neutron
And
a
self-restrictive atomic ingredient).
Where
the
former contracts and reacts,
The
latter
expands and attracts, and we
Need
not
doubt that the more evolved the person
And
the
more civilized the civilization, the greater
Will
be
the preponderance of the self-constructive
Over
the
self-destructive, since evolution presupposes
The
furtherance
of electrons at the expense of protons,
And
this
no less in the individual than in society at large.
And
yet,
no matter how far man evolves
Within
his
human limitations, he will always retain
The
self-destructive
aspect to some extent,
If
to
a much lesser extent than his pagan forebears.
We
need
not regret this, for it also has its advantages,
Including
furtherance
of the spiritual life.
Without
a
self-destructive aspect it is doubtful that
Man
would
ever consent to becoming superman,
With
a
brain artificially supported and sustained.
MORAL
JUDGEMENT
Few
people
now believe that death
Leads
either
to Hell or to Heaven,
But
there
is a sense in which
The
manner
of a person's dying
Connotes
with
one or the other.
For
instance,
a painful death, sustained as
A
result
of injury or war, would suggest that
The
person
concerned went to Hell,
Whereas
a
painless death, attendant upon
Natural
circumstances,
would suggest the contrary -
Namely,
that
the person went to Heaven
Or,
at
any rate, was saved.
Think
of
the difference between the deaths
Of
Adolf
Hitler and Aldous Huxley,
And
you
get the impression that they died
According
to
the way they had lived -
The
one
through a bullet in the head,
The
other
with a shot of LSD.
So,
although
we have no reason to suppose
That
Hitler
is now roasting in Hell
Or
Huxley
freezing in Heaven,
Their
contrary
manners of dying
To
some
extent paralleled their respective lives,
Confirming
a
kind of moral judgement.
As
a
rule, 'the evil' die cruelly,
Whereas
'the
good' die peacefully.
The
former
are damned, the latter saved -
If
only
from a painful death.
THE
REAL
OBSTACLE
It
is
easy to mistake
The
apparent
for the essential,
To
confound
protons with electrons,
Particularly
when
the former
Take
on,
in human atomicity,
A
civilized
electron veneer,
And
the
latter, as masses,
Are
obliged
to work/behave in a forceful manner,
Thus
appearing
to have a proton bias.
It
is
even easier to discard
The
essential
for the apparent,
To
favour
an apparent absolutism,
Albeit
one
couched in essential terms,
So
that
the apparent appears complete in itself,
And
any
subsequent reference to
A
theocracy-biased,
free-electron aspiration is ruled out,
More
on
account of ignorance than wilful malice.
Thinking
on
apparent terms about the world
And
its
historical evolution can lead to
A
superficial
notion of what constitutes
The
main
motive or driving-force behind its
Historical
evolution
- namely the class war,
As
between
bourgeoisie and proletariat.
But
while
this is
indeed a
motive force for change,
It
is
only the apparent
one,
Born
of
contingent, ephemeral factors
Which
vary
according to epoch and environment.
The
essential
driving-force and focus of tension
In
the
world's historical evolution
Will
be
completely overlooked,
Being
something
that can only be grasped
From
a
theocratic standpoint.
And
what
is this something if not the 'sex war'
Between
selfless
women and selfish men,
The
apparent
bias of each sex
Paradoxically
belying
the essential one,
Which
in
women is particle-hard and in men wavicle-soft?
It
isn't
class division which is the real obstacle
To
a
brotherhood of men but ...
The
intrusion
of women between them,
Cutting
them
off from one another
As
a
possessive suspicion and sexual distrust
Condition
their
mutual relations.
Only
when
men are freed, by religion,
From
the
possessive clutches of women
Will
a
true 'brotherhood of man' be possible.
Yet
this
can only happen in a deeply theocratic society,
Where
the
essential will take
Considerable
precedence
over the apparent.
SUPERSEX
A
true
brotherhood of man
Doesn't
imply
that homosexuality
Should
come
to replace heterosexuality,
The
antinatural
the natural,
But,
rather,
that supernatural sex, or supersex,
Should
replace
natural sex,
And
thus
a sublimated heterosexuality ...
The
concrete
heterosexuality of before.
In
other
words, the absolute must take over
From
the
relative, as men and women
Cease
to
be directly dependent on each other
For
either
sexual or propagative satisfaction.
The
essence
of a brotherhood of man
Isn't,
of
course, sensual but ... spiritual,
And
signifies
an approximation to
The
indivisible
unity of the Holy Spirit.
A
spiritual
essence demands a spiritualized appearance,
And
so
all sex would have to be supernatural,
Reflecting
a
distinctive electron bias.
For
men-become-supermen,
this would entail recourse,
Via
VDU
screens, to higher types of pornography ...
From
soft-core
mature teenage supernaturalism
To
hard-core
mature teenage supra-naturalism (the latter
particularly
relevant
to the centripetal focus
of
a
radically theocratic society), and for
Women-become-supermen
it
would entail
The
use
of vibrators - a
supernatural penis,
Intended
to
function in succession to the natural one.
As
a
logical corollary of this, propagation would
Proceed
on
a supernatural basis,
The
female
supermen granted access
To
sperm
banks from which the appropriate sperm,
Donated
by
male supermen, would be extracted
And
artificially
inseminated into the mother-to-be,
Thereby
precluding
the necessity of direct involvement
Between
the
sexes, now having effectively
Become
one
sex (unisexual), neither of whom
Should
have
any intention of demeaning the other ...
Through
a
regression to naturalistic criteria.
ALTERNATIVE
SUPERSEX
'Supersex'
focusing
on the artificial extremes
Of
supernatural
sex - namely the lowest extreme
In
vibrator
stimulation, and the highest extreme
In
vagina-based
computer erotica.
There
are,
however, two types
Of
supersex
coming in-between these extremes -
Namely
a
higher, female-superman extreme
In
penis-based
computer erotica,
And
a
lower, male-superman extreme
In
plastic
inflatable intercourse.
Taking
a
type from each category separately,
One
could
distinguish between
Moderate
female-superman
sex, in vibrator stimulation,
And
radical
female-superman sex
In
penis-based
pornography, as intended for females;
Just
so,
one could distinguish between
Moderate
male-superman
sex in inflatable intercourse,
And
radical
male-superman sex
In
vagina-based
erotica, as intended for males.
Thus
each
gender, whether superhumanly female or male,
Would
have
a lower and a higher type of
Sexual
indulgence
from which to choose,
Depending
on
their temperaments and/or capabilities.
Just
as
vibrators and plastic inflatables are
Antithetical
equivalents
within
An
artificial
physical context, so penis- and vagina-based
Modes
of
computer erotica would be
Antithetical
equivalents
within
An
artificial
psychic context, the latter superior to
Their
respective
counterparts in the former context,
The
spiritual
morally preferable to the physical,
Sublimated
voyeuristic
stimulation morally preferable
To
artificial
physical stimulation.
So
for
the less intelligent and/or more physical
Male
supermen,
who may find the sublimated ideal
Too
transcendent,
there will be the lower male supersex
Of
artificial
intercourse to fall back on.
Conversely,
for
the more intelligent and/or less physical
Female
supermen,
who might find vibrator stimulation
A
bore,
there will be the higher female supersex
Of
penis-based
erotica to get into - assuming
The
superperson
in question wasn't already
More
disposed
to such a supersex in any case.
INDIRECT
APPROACH
You
use
words to express maximum theocratic meaning,
You
don't
pay too much attention
To
grammar
or technique.
You aren't
An
atomist,
torn between relativities, but
A
bound-electron
equivalent
Who
favours
a conceptual absolutism,
A
mind
given to essences to a much
Greater
extent
than to appearances.
Why,
you
don't even divide
Your
poetic
thoughts into stanzas, disdaining
The
relativity
such a procedure would reflect.
You
have
never consciously rhymed
Line-endings,
disdaining
the seduction
Of
the
eye to poetic appearances.
You
don't
much go on alliteration, onomatopoeia,
Or
assonance
either, and one would look in vain
For
a
regular, heart-like metre.
You
aren't
a practitioner of belle-lettres,
For
whom
beauty, and hence aesthetics, is
Of
consummate
importance.
You
know
that, taken to extremes, beauty and truth
Are
mutually
exclusive, and that you
Can't
get
to the poetic truth of theocratic essence
By
deferring
to literary beauty.
Not
that
your poems are ugly!
Ugliness
precedes
beauty and is, in any case,
Incompatible
with
truth.
Your
poems
must be judged
On
their
own poetic terms, as expressions of
The
highest
theocratic truth.
Expressions,
yes,
but not impressions!
For
you
always approach truth
From
a
sort of anti-philosophical angle,
Not
as
a free-electron equivalent in pure spirituality.
You
prefer
to intimate of the Divine Omega
Indirectly
rather
than directly ... through
A
contemplation-inducing
impressive style.
Your
metaphysical
poetry is generally
In
the
freest free-verse style, yet it is still
Bound
to
appearances, and so
It
must
remain while you continue to preach.
It's
just
possible that you will evolve
To
a
still freer style in due course, the verse
More
columnar,
and hence transcendent, than ever before.
But
will
you abandon expression, turning
To
abstract
impression in a superpoetical salvation?
LAST-DITCH
CONSERVATISM
You
cannot
be for both nature and
The
Supernatural
at the same time.
An
allegiance
to the former
Rules
out
supernatural allegiance.
You
may
oppose the anti-natural pollution of nature
By
modern
industry, but if you side too strongly
With
nature
against the latter, like an ecologist,
You
won't
be in the vanguard
Of
evolutionary
progress, but ...
A
kind
of modern reactionary,
The
new
form of conservatism.
Like
it
or not, ecologists are symptomatic
Of
last-ditch
conservatism,
A
decadent
conservatism obliged to champion
An
overt
concern for nature in
The
face
of anti-natural opposition,
A
kind
of bureaucratic conservatism
In
allegiance
to the lowest-common-denominator
Of
natural
identification - namely nature-in-the-raw.
Were
they
to succeed in preventing
The
continual
pollution/destruction of
The
natural
world, all aspirations toward
A
supernatural
one would be considerably undermined,
If
not
rendered entirely superfluous,
Since
people
would come to value nature too highly
Ever
to
wish to abandon it for
The
absolute
supernature of a free-electron spirituality.
Now
whilst
antinaturalism doesn't directly
Lead
to
the millennial Beyond, at least it reduces
Man's
dependence
on and respect for nature.
For
it
seems to me that only when
The
greater
part of the natural world
Is
thoroughly
uninhabitable
Will
man
have any real incentive to live
An
intensely
artificial, interiorized life in
A
civilization
the antithesis of
The
natural
one of autocratic antiquity.
Only
when
he is responsible for the production
Of
his
own light, heat, oxygen, food, and drink,
In
an
indoor context, will he come to aspire
More
intensely
towards the Supernatural,
And
thus
draw nearer to the first of
The
two
life forms of the post-human millennium,
A
life
form whose brain, derived from
Cyborg
'humanity',
would be artificially supported
And,
more
importantly, artificially sustained
By
manufactured
oxygen mechanically pumped
Through
it
in indoor collectivized contexts.
Ecologist,
you
are but nature's last spokesman,
On
whom
the Supernaturalist
Must
disdainfully
turn his back!
SUPERNATURAL
SYNTHESIZER
If
an
acoustic guitar is naturalistic,
Then
an
electric guitar will be antinaturalistic.
If
an
acoustic violin is naturalistic,
Then
an
electric violin will be antinaturalistic.
If
an
acoustic piano is naturalistic,
Then
an
electric piano will be antinaturalistic.
But
if
an electric piano is antinaturalistic,
Then
a
synthesized electric-piano
Will
be
anti-supernaturalistic.
And
if
a synthesized electric-piano
Is
anti-supernaturalistic,
Then
a
synthesizer will be supernaturalistic -
The
ultimate
electronic instrument.
ANTINATURAL
ART
Left-wing
antinatural
art will necessarily bring
The
lowest
to the fore at the expense of the highest,
Form
at
the expense of content, thereby creating
A
non-representational
art such as one finds
In
both
radical Expressionism and Abstract Expressionism.
It
is
as though the paint has been freed from
The
harness
of content and left to itself in
An
anarchic
mess of formless equalitarianism,
The
painterly
equivalent to Marxist purism,
A
sort
of petty-bourgeois participatory democracy
Without
representatives
and therefore
Non-representational,
the
degeneration of art
From
the
liberal representational level to
The
radical
democratic level of a painterly materialism.
However,
when
such formlessness is conceived
In
the
medium of light art, one can speak of
A
Marxist-Leninist
equivalent, since
A
supernatural
element, namely electric light,
Would
seem
to have been brought to bear
On
the
democratic formlessness of
The
non-representational
appearance.
SUPERNATURAL
ART
Right-wing
supernatural
art will transcend
The
liberal
dichotomy between form and content
By
making
the latter as formal as possible
And
thereby
creating a series
Of
well-ordered
abstract patterns such as
One
finds
in Neo-Plasticism and Op Art.
Having
freed
the form from liberal constraints,
The
right-wing
supernatural artist fills it
With
a
new abstract content, which elevates it
Above
the
representational to the transcendental,
Where
form
and content are one
In
a
conceptual absolutism.
Such
a
Supernaturalism can be taken
To
greater
heights through the theocratic medium
Of
conceptual
light art, which, in any case, is
Above
and
beyond the democratic medium of painting.
SUPRA-NATURAL
ART
Beyond
the
extreme supernatural art
Of
conceptual
light art lies
The
supra-natural
art of holography,
A
truly
radical theocratic art
Which,
taken
to abstract extremes, would confirm
A
free-electron
absolutism suited to
A
transcendental
age and society,
And
antithetical
to the inception of art
In
terms,
necessarily mundane, of representational sculpture.
If
holography
begins in the representational,
Relative
to
Social Transcendentalism,
It
must
culminate in the abstract,
In
deference
to the absolutist criteria of
A
more
extreme, or super-transcendental age.
Holograms
suggest
a kind of external tripping,
As
though
they were LSD visions outside
Rather
than
inside the mind.
Thus
they
would be appropriate to
The
hallucinogenic
phase of a theocratic age,
As
much
the converse of
The
internal
spiritual life of contemplation
As
television
is currently the converse of
The
internal
soulful life of dreams.
And
the
same would apply to
The
later,
hypermeditating phase of such an age,
When,
in
order to correspond with the internal world,
The
holograms
would have to be abstract -
Projections
into
space of abstract sculptural shapes,
Specifically
globular
in appearance,
The
better
to intimate of ultimate essence.
REALIST
ART
Like
non-representational
art,
Representational
art
can be either
Left
or
right wing, bourgeois or proletarian.
If
Modern
Realism conforms to
A
democratic
socialist status,
Then
Socialist
Realism,
An
altogether
more militantly committed art,
Conforms
to
a totalitarian socialist status,
Being
the
principal art of the (former)
A
right-wing
communist society
Which
officially
fought shy of abstract extremes.
By
contrast,
right-wing representational art
Will
have
Bourgeois Realism on the liberal plane
And
Fascist
Realism on the totalitarian plane,
This
latter
militant as opposed to urbane.
Thus
while
Bourgeois Realism depicts
Middle-class
complacency
and/or achievement
In
a
variety of representational contexts,
Modern
Realism
highlights
Working-class
oppression
under capitalism.
And
while
Socialist Realism depicts
Proletarian
solidarity
and achievement
In
a
variety of representational contexts,
Fascist
Realism
opposes the international proletariat
With
the
national interests of the militant folk community.
ANTINATURAL
LITERATURE
Degenerate
antinatural
literature
Will
still
be novelistic (for the novel is both
a
bureaucratic
and a democratic genre), but on
An
extreme
abstract, or non-expressive, level -
Words
freed
from grammatical constraints,
And
hence
meanings, and reduced to
The
lowest-common-denominator
of
An
anarchic
equalitarianism, in which, devoid of
An
hierarchic
significance, they're approximately equal.
Such
Marxist
literature will signify
The
nadir
of novelistic degeneration,
Relative
to
the Extreme Left.
Prose
poetry
composed in a similarly anarchic fashion
May
be
said to reflect a Marxist-Leninist integrity
To
the
extent that, poetry being a theocratic genre,
A
supernatural
form would thereby
Seem
to
have been brought to bear
On
an
extreme anti-natural content.
Again,
one
may speak of a distinction,
Within
Western
trends, between
Left-
and
right-wing communist integrities,
As
between
the antinatural and the anti-supernatural;
A
similar
distinction applying, for example,
To
painterly
Abstract Expressionism
And
to
Abstract Expressionist light art -
As,
for
that matter, to straight homosexuality
And
homosexual
pornography.
SUPERNATURAL
LITERATURE
Supernatural
literature
can only be poetic (for poetry
is
a
theocratic genre), but of a well-ordered and
Impressive
abstract
style, such as induces contemplation.
The
words
must be arranged in such a manner as
To
form
a series of patterns and/or blocks
Which
the
eye will be obliged to accommodate
In
much
the same way as with a Neo-Plastic painting.
When
there
is nothing to read the intellect is transcended,
And
the
mind becomes the passive receptacle of
The
optical
impressions impinging upon consciousness
And
thereby
directly appealing to the majority
Electron
content
of the new brain, the superconscious,
Rather
than
indirectly, as in read literature, through
The
intellectual
medium of the
New-brain's
minority
neutron content.
ATOMIC
DICHOTOMY
When
we
distinguish between
The
old
brain and the subconscious,
We
are
effectively alluding to
An
atomic-particle/electron-wavicle
dichotomy,
In
which
the proton and neutron particles of
The
former
preponderate over
The
electron
wavicles of the latter.
Conversely,
the
distinction between
The
new
brain and the superconscious
Is
of
an atomic dichotomy in which
Electron
wavicles
preponderate over
Proton
and
neutron particles,
The
theocratic
Right over
The
autocratic
and/or democratic Left.
All
consciousness
(whether sub, average, or super)
Has
to
do with electrons, which exist within
The
atomic
structure of each brain.
Thus,
in
sleep, it is the subconscious, situated
In
the
old brain, which contemplates the dream activity
Of
the
neutron/proton content of the old brain.
The
antithesis
to this is the contemplation, during
LSD
tripping,
of the visionary passivity
Of
the
neutron/proton content of the new brain
By
the
superconscious, situated in the new brain.
And
yet
both subconscious and superconscious
Are
distinct
from their respective brains,
The
psychological
and the physiological akin to
The
wavicle/particle
dichotomy in matter.
RELATIVE
ATOMS
It
is
of course an oversimplification
To
suppose
that protons are always particles
And
electrons
invariably wavicles.
There
is
a wavicle aspect to every proton,
A
particle
aspect to every electron.
And
yet
such obverse aspects are
Ever
subordinate
to the principal aspects
Of
the
atomic divide - protons as particles
And
electrons
as wavicles, just as
The
feminine
element in every man
And
the
masculine element in every woman
Is
subordinate
to their respective sexual essences.
Women
are
generally soft outside but hard inside,
Men
...
hard outside but soft inside,
The
former
with a wavicle appearance and
A
particle
essence, the latter with
A
particle
appearance and a wavicle essence.
Nonetheless
there
are
'women'
whom we
Can
regard
as hard outside and soft inside,
Just
as
there are
'men' with
a soft outside
But
a
hard inside - essentially feminine
In
their
psychic make-up, born to rule over other men.
Similarly,
every
ideological movement,
Whether
Left
or Right, contains its opposite within itself -
Communism
a
right wing no less than fascism a left.
Protons
are
predominantly particles
And
therefore
painful, but they can
Also
be
wavicles and thus visionary.
Electrons
are
predominantly wavicles
And
therefore
aware, but they can
Also
be
particles and thus pleasurable;
And
precisely
because each component of
The
atomic
divide influences the other -
Protons
dragging
particles from electrons,
Electrons
dragging
wavicles from protons.
Only
in
the subatomic and supra-atomic domains
Of
proton
soul and electron spirit can protons
And
electrons
be absolute, since independent
Of
each
other and existing in an elemental purism
Of
either
particle pain or wavicle bliss,
The
respective
essences of alpha and omega,
The
Father
and the Holy Ghost.
A
RELATIVISTIC
ABSOLUTISM
Left
is
appearance, Right is essence.
Left
is
vision or pain, Right is pleasure or awareness.
Left
is
beauty, Right is truth.
Right-wing
communism
is essential appearance.
Left-wing
transcendentalism
is apparent essence,
The
former
pleasure, the latter vision.
Left
is
superficial, Right is profound.
Right-wing
transcendentalism
will embrace
Essential
essence,
or awareness.
There
will
be a progression
From
the
apparent essence of 'the trip'
To
the
essential essence of hypermeditation,
As
from
Social Transcendentalism
To
Super-transcendentalism,
from Left to Right,
From
the
wavicle appearance of protons and/or neutrons
To
the
wavicle essence of electrons,
In
a
relativistic absolutism of wavicles.
There
will
be no absolute relativity of particles,
Neither
pleasure
nor pain.
BARTER
Only
social
degenerates would have us
Return
to
barter ... in a neo-pagan
Exchange
of
goods, or products for products,
In
wholesale
materialism.
Little
do
they appreciate the moral value of money,
Whereby
an
abstraction is exchanged for a product.
VOUCHERS
Better
by
far than numerous national currencies
Would
be
one supra-national currency, pending
An
ideological
unification of, first, Europe
And,
then,
the rest of the world.
But
if
money is ever transcended, it will be
Through
vouchers,
including credit cards,
Which
confirm
a theocratic bias
At
two
removes from materialism.
MONEY
In
money,
the distinction between
Coins
and
notes is akin
To
particles
and wavicles in the atom.
An
atomic
society will always
Uphold
such
a distinction,
Even
if,
in its bureaucratic decadence,
It
produces
more coins than notes.
For
coins
correspond, in their concrete realism, to
The
particle
aspect of the atom, whereas
Notes
correspond,
in their abstract naturalism,
To
its
wavicle aspect.
The
former
are phenomenal, the latter noumenal;
Although
the
latter in some sense precede the former
In
regard
to their autocratic essence.
ABOVE
MONEY
In
stark
contrast to an alpha-stemming society,
An
omega-oriented
society will be above money,
Which,
in
regard to notes and coins, it will despise
As
a
kind of autocratic/bureaucratic redundancy.
Instead,
it
will be partial to cheques and
Credit
cards,
or plastic vouchers -
The
former
phenomenal, the latter noumenal,
Chequebooks
indicative
of democratic materialism,
Credit
cards
indicative of theocratic idealism.
SUPERNATURAL
PITCH
Wherever
they
have had the natural
We
shall
put the Supernatural,
In
sport
no less than sex, economics,
Religion,
or
anything else.
Assuming
football
survives into the future,
Plastic
pitches
will supersede
The
grass/earth
pitches of
The
traditional
all-too-often mud-caked football field.
Not
only
do they make for a more exciting, because
Quicker
game;
they make for a more civilized,
Because
cleaner,
game to boot!
A
game,
moreover, that can be played
Indoors
instead
of outdoors.
SPIRITUAL
INTIMATIONS
Balloons
are
a good way of intimating of pure spirit,
And
this
is why, at Christmas,
People
tend
to attach balloons to
The
ceiling
of their rooms.
As
though
globes of pure spirit
Were
hovering
above them,
Suggestive
of
the heavenly Beyond.
BEYOND
CHRISTIANITY
In
the
future there will be
Neither
Christmas
nor Easter
Because
no
Christian civilization.
It
is
perhaps appropriate that Christianity,
An
atomic
religion, should have
Two
main
festivals - the first, corresponding
To
the
atom's proton aspect, a celebration
Of
Christ's
birth, and the second, corresponding
To
its
electron aspect, a celebration
Of
His
death and resurrection,
The
death
of the body and
The
resurrection
of the spirit.
Easter
is
more important than Christmas,
But
not
even that will survive
Into
the
future of a free-electron civilization,
Above
and
beyond all relativity!
LAST
JUDGEMENT
Some
must
die ... that others may be reborn
Into
the
Life Eternal, the life of the spirit
Made
eternal
through the brain ultimately
Being
artificially
supported and sustained
In
the
collectivized contexts
Of
a
post-human millennium.
