Op. 97
THE VIRTUOUS CIRCLES
Aphoristic Philosophy
Copyright © 2013 John
O'Loughlin
______________
CONTENTS
Aphs. 1–106
_____________
1. That which
is sensual and characterized by free soma, whether on primary (female) or
secondary (male) terms, is of necessity convolutional,
since it reflects a devolutionary divergence from the self to the not-self,
from psyche to soma, and accordingly attests to either a criminal (female) or a
sinful (male) disposition, the former objectively, and therefore directly,
diverging from a vacuum in straight-line fashion, the latter subjectively, and
therefore indirectly, diverging from a plenum in curved-line fashion.
2. That,
by contrast, which is sensible and characterized by free psyche, whether on
primary (male) or secondary (female) terms, is of necessity involutional,
since it reflects an evolutionary convergence from the not-self to the self,
from soma to psyche, and accordingly attests to either a graceful (male) or a
punishing (female) disposition, the former subjectively, and therefore
directly, converging from a plenum in curved-line fashion, the latter
objectively, and therefore indirectly, converging from a vacuum in
straight-line fashion.
3. Therefore
since convolution is primarily objective it is primarily female and only
secondarily male, subjective convolution being a paradoxical approach to free
soma which appertains, in male vein, to the physical and metaphysical Elements
of vegetation and air rather than to the chemical and metachemical
Elements of water and fire.
4. Likewise
since involution is primarily subjective it is primarily male and only
secondarily female, objective involution being a paradoxical approach to free
psyche which appertains, in female vein, to the chemical and metachemical Elements of water and fire rather than to the
physical and metaphysical Elements of vegetation and air.
5. Females
are by nature convolutional and only involutional on the objectively paradoxical terms of
psychic emphasis under sensible pressure of male hegemonies in either physics
or metaphysics which has the effect of compelling either a strong approach to
knowledge in chemistry or a beautiful approach to truth in metachemistry,
so that psyche is approached from a fundamentally objective, rather than
properly subjective, standpoint.
6. Males
are by nature or, rather, nurture involutional
and only convolutional on the subjectively
paradoxical terms of somatic emphasis under sensual pressure of female
hegemonies in either chemistry or metachemistry which
has the effect of compelling either an ignorant approach to weakness in physics
or an illusory approach to ugliness in metaphysics, so that soma is approached
from a fundamentally subjective, rather than properly objective, standpoint.
7. For
females remain persons for whom soma precedes and predominates over psyche on
either the relative or absolute, chemical or metachemical,
terms of more (relative to most) particles/less (relative to least) wavicles or most particles/least wavicles
even in sensibility, and therefore even under pressure from hegemonic males to
emphasize psyche at the expense of soma.
8. Conversely,
males remain persons for whom psyche precedes and predominates over soma on
either the relative or absolute, physical or metaphysical, terms of more
(relative to most) wavicles/less (relative to least)
particles or most wavicles/least particles even in
sensuality, and therefore even under pressure from hegemonic females to
emphasize soma at the expense of psyche.
9. Broadly
the distinction between soma and psyche, free soma in female sensual hegemonies
and free psyche in male sensible hegemonies, is between state and church, and
one can believe that the State, when free, attests to a female hegemony and the
Church, when free, to a male one, with corollaries of church subordination to
the State in the somatic contexts of sensuality, and state subordination to the
Church in the psychic contexts of sensibility.
10. The
free state is naturally female, and therefore compulsion tends to be
directed at males as persons for whom psyche precedes and predominates over
soma and any somatic emphasis on the not-self at the expense of the self, on 'selfless'
service, accordingly does not come nurturally, so to
speak, but may require some degree of natural compulsion.
11. By
contrast, the free church is, if you will, nurturally
male, and therefore compulsion tends to be directed at females as persons for
whom soma precedes and predominates over psyche and any psychic emphasis on the
self at the expense of the not-self, on 'selfish' devotion, accordingly does
not come naturally, so to speak, but may require some degree of 'nurtural' compulsion.
12. The
compulsion directed at males from female hegemonies in objectively free soma
tends to oppress what characterizes the male gender in free psyche and
therefore to bind it to foolish acquiescence in the sinfulness of somatic
freedom conceived, in relation to physics or metaphysics, as a secondary order
of convolution and therefore of viciousness which, whilst it might provide some
satisfaction to the not-self, affords little comfort to the self, which is
likely to become depressive in consequence of having been denied free
expression on either intellectual or emotional terms.
13. By
contrast, the compulsion directed at females from male hegemonies in
subjectively free psyche tends to repress what characterizes the female
gender in free soma and therefore to bind it to modest (goodly) acquiescence in
the punishingness of psychic freedom conceived, in
relation to chemistry or metachemistry, as a
secondary order of involution and therefore of virtuousness which, whilst it
might provide some satisfaction to the self, affords little comfort to the
not-self, which is likely to become compressive in consequence of having
been denied free expression on either
spiritual or instinctual terms.
14. That which
is free is expressive, whether in soma or in psyche, whereas that which is
bound is impressive, whether in psyche or in soma, so that we may contrast the
primary expressive nature of chemical and metachemical
free soma with the primary impressive quasi-nature of chemical and metachemical bound psyche in relation to females, and the
secondary expressive nature of physical and metaphysical free soma with the
secondary impressive quasi-nature of physical and metaphysical bound psyche in
relation to males, the former freedom expressive in crime and the latter
freedom expressive in sin.
15. Likewise
we may contrast the primary expressive nurture of physical and metaphysical
free psyche with the primary impressive quasi-nurture of physical and
metaphysical bound soma in relation to males, and the secondary expressive
nurture of chemical and metachemical free psyche with
the secondary impressive quasi-nurture of chemical and metachemical
bound soma in relation to females, the former freedom expressive in grace and
the latter freedom expressive in punishment.
16. Therefore
there is a correlation between expression and freedom, whether for better
(virtue) or worse (vice), on both primary and secondary terms, and a
like-correlation between impression and binding, whether for better (morality)
or worse (immorality), on both primary and secondary terms.
17. One
could argue that somatic expression, being sensual, is predominantly negative,
whereas psychic expression, being sensible, is predominantly positive, though
this would more apply to the representatively particle and wavicle
alternatives within each context than right across the sensual/sensible board.
18. Likewise,
one could argue that psychic impression, being sensual, is predominantly
negative, whereas somatic impression, being sensible, is predominantly
positive, though this would apply to the particle and wavicle
subversions of essentially wavicle and particle
alternatives within each context rather than to the nurture of psyche or to the
nature of soma as such.
19. For psyche, when free, is much more wavicle
centred than particle oriented, whereas soma, when free, is much more particle
based than wavicle oriented.
20. The
subversion of male psyche in terms of binding, on the other hand, has the effect
of rendering such psyche quasi-natural and therefore particle oriented, whether
on the instinctual terms of the id conceived as the subversion of soul from the
female standpoint of free will, or on the spiritual terms of the superego
conceived as the subversion of ego from the female standpoint of free spirit,
the former of which will acquiesce in free will as an elemental-particle
absolute and the latter of which in free spirit as a molecular-particle
relativity, and therefore contrary to the elemental-wavicle
and molecular-wavicle orientations of free soul and
free ego, respectively, as male realities.
21. By
contrast, the subversion of female soma in terms of binding has the effect of
rendering such soma quasi-nurtural, so to speak, and
therefore wavicle oriented, whether on the
intellectualized instinctual terms of natural will (natwill)
conceived as the subversion of will from the male standpoint of free ego, or on
the emotionalized spiritual terms of subnatural
spirit (subspirit) conceived as the subversion of
spirit from the male standpoint of free soul, the former of which will
acquiesce in free ego as a molecular-wavicle
relativity and the latter of which in free soul as an elemental-wavicle absolute, and therefore contrary to the
elemental-particle and molecular-particle orientations of free will and free
spirit, respectively, as female realities.
22. Granted
that female bound psyche will be more directly particle oriented and therefore
quasi-natural than its male counterpart, which follows from the outflanking of
soul and/or ego by the id and/or superego of that which directly stems from
free will and/or spirit in females, it will be less partial to depressive
tendencies in consequence of its binding, since the female gender reality of
soma preceding and predominating over psyche will leave it readily acquiescent
in somatic freedom and thus evilly passive, or primarily immoral, before the
primary viciousness of criminal activity.
23. With
the male, however, such depressive tendencies in consequence of the oppression
of psyche from the directly-bound psychic standpoint of females are more likely
to emerge as a symptom of disillusionment with somatic freedom and the foolish
acquiescence in the secondary viciousness of sin which, in its activity, renders
the bound psyche secondarily immoral, which is to say, of a secondary order of
immorality compared to its evil counterpart on the female side of the gender
fence.
24. Should
such disillusionment with sinful somatic freedom lead to an emphasis on the folly
of bound psyche in relation to free soma, it will not be an ignorant approach
to weakness in physics or an illusory (false) approach to ugliness in
metaphysics that will obtain so much as either ignorance or illusion, neither
of which could be described as quasi-natural in particle-oriented vein but,
rather, as pseudo-nurtural in wavicle-centred
vein, albeit the wavicles appertaining to
disillusioned ego and/or soul will have reference to a context in which either
molecular or elemental criteria obtain in relation to sensuality, and thus as
pseudo-free expressions rather than genuine free expressions.
25. Only
the rejection of such ignorant or illusory pseudo-free expressions can lead the
disillusioned psyche to gravitate to either knowledge or truth in sensibility,
as to molecular-wavicle or elemental-wavicle modes of genuinely free expression according to
whether physical or metaphysical, lower- or upper-class male criteria
ensue. For neither knowledge nor truth
will properly pertain to sensuality, but at best only ignorance or illusion as
the necessary preconditions of knowledge or truth should the mind be so
determined that sensible psychic freedom is of paramount importance in view of
its correspondence to male gender reality and should therefore be pursued at
the expense not merely of the folly of sensual psychic pseudo-freedom in
ignorance or illusion but, more significantly, of the enslavement of psyche to
weakness and ugliness which sinfully follows from psychic binding to free soma
at the behest of hegemonic female freedoms in respect of either weakness
(chemical) or ugliness (metachemical).
26. Therefore
the male elects to return to gender sync by gravitating from sensuality to
sensibility in either class context, up diagonally from mass to volume, as from
phallus to brain, in vegetative physics, or up diagonally from time to space,
as from ears to lungs, in airy metaphysics, so that knowledge may progressively
ensue upon ignorance in the one Element, and truth upon illusion in the other.
27. But
such a deliverance from immorality and vice to virtue and morality means that
the male will then be in hegemonic positions over the female, as the latter
falls diagonally either from volume to mass, tongue to womb, in watery
chemistry, or from space to time, eyes to heart, in fiery metachemistry,
becoming subject to secondary orders of bound soma and free psyche which,
unlike her male counterpart, are conditioned from the bottom up, which is to
say, from soma conditioning psyche, given her gender reality of soma preceding
and predominating over psyche, which means that such free psyche as sensibly
comes to pass requires to have been prepared by the indirect binding of soma
via male bound soma directly stemming, in either of the subjective Elemental
contexts, from free psyche, which is the opposite, after all, of the indirect
binding of male psyche via bound psyche directly stemming, in the objective
Elemental contexts ... of chemistry or metachemistry,
from female free soma.
28. Now the
subversion of female soma in terms of binding has the effect, as we have seen,
of rendering such soma quasi-nurtural and therefore wavicle oriented, whether on the intellectualized terms of
natural will conceived as the subversion of will from the male standpoint of
free ego, or on the emotionalized terms of subnatural
spirit conceived as the subversion of spirit from the male standpoint of free
soul, the former of which will acquiesce in free ego as a molecular-wavicle relativity and the latter of which in free soul as
an elemental-wavicle absolute, and therefore contrary
to the elemental-particle and molecular-particle orientations of free will and
free spirit, respectively, as female realities.
29. Granted
that male bound soma will be more directly wavicle
oriented and therefore quasi-nurtural than its female
counterpart, which follows from the inflanking, so to
speak, of will and/or spirit by the natwill and/or subspirit of that which directly stems from free ego and/or
soul in males, it will be less partial to compressive tendencies in consequence
of its binding, since the male gender reality of psyche preceding and
predominating over soma will make it readily acquiescent in psychic freedom and
thus wisely passive, or primarily moral, before the primary virtuousness of
graceful activity.
30. With
the female, however, such compressive tendencies in consequence of the
repression of soma from the directly-bound somatic standpoint of males are more
likely to emerge as a symptom of disillusionment with psychic freedom and the
modest acquiescence in the secondary virtuousness of punishment or, rather, the
punishing virtue of psychic emphasis (contrary to gender reality) which, in its
activity, renders the bound soma secondarily moral, which is to say, of a secondary
order of morality compared to its wise counterpart on the male side of the
gender fence.
31. Should
such disillusionment with punishing psychic freedom lead to an emphasis on the
modesty, or goodness, of bound soma at the expense of free psyche, it will not
be a strong approach to knowledge or a beautiful approach to truth that will
paradoxically obtain so much as either strength or beauty, the one chemical and
the other metachemical, neither of which could be
described as quasi-nurtural in wavicle-oriented
vein but, rather, as pseudo-natural in particle-based vein, albeit the
particles appertaining to disillusioned will and/or spirit will have reference
to a context in which either elemental or molecular criteria obtain in relation
to sensibility and thus as pseudo-free expressions rather than genuine free
expressions.
32. Only
the rejection of such strong or beautiful pseudo-free expressions can lead the
disillusioned soma to gravitate to either weakness or ugliness in sensuality,
as to molecular-particle or elemental-particle modes of genuinely free
expression according to whether chemical or metachemical,
lower- or upper-class female criteria ensue.
For neither weakness nor ugliness will properly pertain to sensibility,
but at best only strength or beauty as the necessary preconditions of weakness
or ugliness should the body be so determined that sensual somatic freedom is of
paramount importance in view of its correspondence to female gender reality and
should therefore be pursued at the expense not merely of the modesty or,
rather, immodesty of sensible somatic pseudo-freedom in strength or beauty but,
more significantly, of the paradoxical enslavement of soma to knowledge and
truth which punishingly follows from somatic binding
to free psyche at the behest of hegemonic male freedoms in respect of either
knowledge (physical) or truth (metaphysical).
33. Therefore
the female elects to return to gender sync by gravitating from sensibility to
sensuality in either class context, up diagonally from mass to volume, as from
womb to tongue, in watery chemistry, or up diagonally from time to space, as
from heart to eyes, in fiery metachemistry, so that
weakness may regressively ensue upon strength in the one Element, and ugliness
upon beauty in the other.
34. But
such a deliverance from morality and virtue to vice and immorality means that
the female will then be in hegemonic positions over the male, as the latter
falls diagonally either from volume to mass, brain to phallus, in vegetative
physics, or from space to time, lungs to ears, in airy metaphysics, becoming
subject to secondary orders of bound psyche and free soma which, unlike his
female counterpart, are conditioned from the top down, which is to say, from
psyche conditioning soma, given his gender reality of psyche preceding and
predominating over soma, which means that such free soma as sensually comes to
pass requires to have been prepared by the indirect binding of psyche via
female bound psyche directly stemming, in either of the objective Elemental
contexts, from free soma, which is the opposite, after all, of the indirect
binding of female soma via bound soma directly stemming, in the subjective
Elemental contexts ... of physics or metaphysics, from male free psyche.
35. Be
that as it may, neither ignorance nor illusion are particularly desirable from
the female hegemonic standpoints of ugliness and weakness, since that which is
not, in secondary free soma, indicative of either an ignorant approach to
weakness or an illusory approach to ugliness can only be a precondition, as
disillusioned ignorance or illusion, of knowledge or truth which, far from
being pseudo-expressive, are genuine manifestations of free expression in
relation to the male hegemonic standpoints, in sensibility, of free psyche.
36. Conversely,
neither strength nor beauty are particularly desirable from the male hegemonic
standpoints of knowledge and truth, since that which is not, in secondary free
psyche, indicative of either a strong approach to knowledge or a beautiful approach
to truth can only be a precondition, as disillusioned strength or beauty, of
weakness or ugliness which, far from being pseudo-expressive, are genuine
manifestations of free expression in relation to the female hegemonic
standpoints, in sensuality, of free soma.
37. Thus
ignorance and illusion are as undesirable from a hegemonically
female standpoint in sensuality ... as strength and beauty from a hegemonically male standpoint in sensibility, since the
former options, subject to class and Elemental differentiation, are as
subversive of the attempt to maintain a somatic monism on both female and male
terms as the latter options, likewise subject to class and Elemental
differentiation, of the attempt to maintain a psychic monism on both male and
female terms.
38. What
is required in the sensual contexts is that males remain paradoxically somatic
in either an ignorant approach to weakness if physical or an illusory approach
to ugliness if metaphysical, and thus mirror, on subjectively distorted terms,
the prevailing chemical weakness and metachemical
ugliness of hegemonic females, whose objectivity in regard to these realities
will make for a criminal rather than a sinful order of free soma.
39. Conversely,
what is required in the sensible contexts is that females remain paradoxically
psychic in either a strong approach to knowledge if chemical or a beautiful
approach to truth if metachemical, and thus mirror,
on objectively distorted terms, the prevailing physical knowledge and
metaphysical truth of hegemonic males, whose subjectivity in regard to these idealities will make for a graceful rather than a punishing
order of free psyche.
40. Obviously,
from a genuinely philosophical standpoint, wherein one is primarily concerned
with Truth and thus a sort of infinite knowledge which seeks to understand
metaphysics and the means and terms by which God, or godliness, exists and
justifies His existence to His Self
solely and ultimately in relation to Heaven and the joyful vindication
of Truth, there can be no question of illusion, much less ignorance, being
advocated or endorsed, since while the former is at best a precondition of
knowledge of an infinite order (truth) if the male disillusioned with an
illusory approach to ugliness in free soma opts to gravitate from bound psyche
or, rather, pseudo-free psyche to free psyche, as from sensuality to
sensibility, in metaphysics, the latter is merely the precondition of truth of
a finite order (knowledge) if the male disillusioned with an ignorant approach
to weakness in free soma opts to gravitate from bound psyche or, rather,
pseudo-free psyche to free psyche, as from sensuality to sensibility, in
physics, which, frankly, has little or nothing to do with metaphysics and thus
genuine philosophy.
41. Thus the
genuine philosopher, the truthful one who, in truth, is more godly than manly,
can never be in favour of that which would hamper or oppose the pursuit and
realization of Truth, and therefore will ever reject societies based in free
soma as enemies of Truth and upholders of that which lyingly
deludes from a hegemonically female standpoint rooted
in either ugliness, if metachemical, or weakness, if
chemical.
42. Such
societies, even when nominally civilized, will be fundamentally barbarous and
philistine, characterized not by culture and civility, virtue and morality,
free psyche and bound soma, but by vice and immorality, allowing somatic freedom to have its way at
the expense of psychic freedom and thus, inevitably, at the expense of males
and all that most typifies reason.
43. The
philosopher who is worth his claim to truth, to virtue, to grace, to godliness
and, above all, to heavenliness, cannot condone such societies, characterized,
as they invariably are, by the selfless, but must persist in advocating the
proprieties of truth and, for females, the paradox of a beautiful approach to
truth, as well, for the lower orders, as knowledge (deferential to Truth) and,
for females, the paradox of a strong approach to knowledge (deferential to
Truth), so that civilization comes to resemble not all that is worst in society
but all that is best in the individual, be it male or female, and the self
accordingly takes precedence over the not-self, even to the extent, I have
argued, of modifying the not-self towards the self in what effectively becomes
a psychic monism having its fulcrum in Truth.
44. Such
a civilization will not be characterized by state freedom, which panders to
free soma, but by church freedom, albeit the type of free psyche to which it
will chiefly subscribe, centred in Truth, will mean that the Church, to use a
conveniently intelligible term, will be more than Christian and therefore other
than Christian which, even at its best, never transcends man-hype-as-God in
Christ, and therefore remains rooted in the masses in terms of a sort of
co-operative collectivism.
45. Such
a more evolved 'Church', on the other hand, will be Centrist, centred in the
concept of 'the Centre', and it will effectively be what I have characterized
in the past as Social Transcendentalist, having to do with the transmutation of
Socialism in and by Transcendentalism, and the elevation of religion from the
co-operative collectivism alluded to above to the genuinely divine ideal of
cooperative individualism, in which the individual is responsible, via
religious sovereignty, to his self, and thus to the cultivation of self on as
virtuous a basis as is compatible with his/her gender capacity and inclination.
46. Obviously,
the masses, the lower orders, characterized by an adherence to mass/volume as
opposed to time/space, will still be by nature or, rather, nurture ...
co-operatively collectivistic in contexts largely conditioned by physics and,
affiliated to that, modified chemistry, but in a civilization which emphasizes Truth
at the expense of knowledge, God at the expense of man, Heaven at the expense
of the earth, and therefore joy at the expense of pleasure, they will
nevertheless be encouraged to transcend the collective in as co-operatively
individualistic a manner as would be commensurate with their limitations
compared to those who actually were of the metaphysical and modified metachemical orientations within the wider framework of
'Kingdom Come', as previously defined in relation to a triadic Beyond, duly subsectioned, and an administrative aside whose duty or
responsibility it would be to maintain and advance the religiously sovereign
People and to sustain them in their various modes of psychic monism, sustain
them, not least, against the threat posed to culture and civility, free psyche
and bound soma, by strength and beauty cultivated or affirmed independently of
knowledge and truth, the presiding ideals of the type of civilization in
question.
47. For
no less than sensual civilization, dominated by female criteria in typically
vicious fashion, is characterized by weakness and ugliness, whether directly in
relation to the female criminality of objectively free soma or indirectly in
relation to the male sinfulness of subjectively free soma, so any sensible
alternative to such a heathenistic civilization,
which could only be led by male criteria in typically virtuous fashion, would
be characterized by knowledge and truth, whether directly in relation to the
male gracefulness of subjectively free psyche or indirectly in relation to the
female punishingness (relative to a psychic emphasis
contrary to gender reality) of objectively free psyche.
48. Thus
while the former type of civilization, ever barbarous and philistine, strives
to prevent ignorance and illusion from becoming independent of weakness and
ugliness, thereby maintaining a somatic monism favourable to female freedom and
the overall rule of convolutional objectivity, the
latter type, properly civilized in terms of its commitment to culture and
civility, will endeavour to prevent strength and beauty from becoming
independent of knowledge and truth, thereby maintaining a psychic monism
favourable to male freedom and the overall lead of involutional
subjectivity.
49. If we
distinguish the sensual types of civilization from their sensible counterparts
on a terminological basis favourable to religion (excluding for the moment
their soulful and/or antisoulful and spiritual and/or
antispiritual counterparts), we shall find that the
ugliness conditioning an ugly approach to illusion in metachemical
free soma and bound psyche, as germane to an upper-class female standpoint, can
be characterized in terms of the criminal activity, in absolute objective
viciousness, of Devil the Mother vis-à-vis the evil passivity, in absolute
objective immorality, of the Daughter of the Devil, with the subordinate male
positions in illusion and an illusory approach to ugliness of metaphysical
bound psyche and free soma being characterized in terms of the foolish
passivity, in absolute subjective immorality, of Antigod
the Antifather vis-à-vis the sinful activity, in
absolute subjective viciousness, of the Antison of Antigod.
50. Likewise
we shall find that the weakness conditioning a weak approach to ignorance in
chemical free soma and bound psyche, as germane to a lower-class female standpoint, can be
characterized in terms of the criminal activity, in relative objective
viciousness, of Woman the Mother vis-à-vis the evil passivity, in relative objective
immorality, of the Daughter of Woman, with the subordinate male positions in
ignorance and an ignorant approach to weakness of physical bound psyche and
free soma being characterized in terms of the foolish passivity, in relative
subjective immorality, of Antiman the Antifather vis-à-vis the sinful activity, in relative
subjective viciousness, of the Antison of Antiman.
51. Transferring
from sensuality to sensibility, and thus from vice and immorality to virtue and
morality, we shall find (again excluding their spiritual and/or antispiritual and soulful and/or antisoulful
counterparts) that the knowledge conditioning a knowledgeable approach to
ignorance or, rather, strength in physical free psyche and bound soma, as
germane to a lower-class male
standpoint, can be characterized in terms of the graceful activity, in relative
subjective virtuousness, of Man the Father vis-à-vis the wise passivity, in
relative subjective morality, of the Son of Man, with the subordinate female
positions in strength and a strong approach to knowledge of chemical bound soma
and free psyche being characterized in terms of the modest (good) passivity, in
relative objective morality, of Antiwoman the Antimother vis-à-vis the punishing activity, in relative
objective virtuousness, of the Antidaughter of Antiwoman.
52. Transferring
up from phenomenal collectivism to noumenal
individualism, as from the sensible Many to the sensible Few, we shall find
that the truth conditioning a truthful approach to illusion or, rather, beauty
in metaphysical free psyche and bound soma, as germane to an upper-class male
standpoint, can be characterized in terms of the graceful activity, in absolute
subjective virtuousness, of God the Father vis-à-vis the wise passivity, in
absolute subjective morality, of the Son of God, with the subordinate female
positions in beauty and a beautiful approach to truth of metachemical
bound soma and free psyche being characterized in terms of the modest (good)
passivity, in absolute objective morality, of Antidevil
the Antimother vis-à-vis the punishing activity, in
absolute objective virtuousness, of the Antidaughter
of the Antidevil.
53. So
much for religious terminology! Suffice
it to say that God the Father, which is God, and the Son of God,
which - contrary to Christian idolatry of a 'person' stemming, in linear
fashion, from 'the Creator' - is the bound soma correlative with free psyche in
a metaphysically sensible context, be it cosmic and least evolved, natural and
less (relative to least) evolved, human and more (relative to most) evolved, or
(to anticipate the future) cyborg and most evolved,
is not found just anywhere or everywhere, despite an existence in different
parallel contexts of life (as alluded to above), and that very often - and not
only in the Christian West - what is claimed for and as God is really not
godly, or metaphysically sensible, at all, but really something quite distinct
from and even, in some contexts, antithetical to God or godliness, as and when
such an ideal is usurped by metachemical sensuality
in the most basic of all religious contexts and God is somehow thought of as
being a stellar-like 'first mover' in the Cosmos, 'all powerful', 'almighty',
'vengeful', 'jealous', 'wrathful', 'fiery', and any number of other ungodly
things which have nothing whatsoever to do with supreme being or, rather, taking
of a metaphysically sensible order of self such that leads to or implies, in
the course of its redemption through heavenly resurrection, being of a
supreme, or metaphysically sensible, order of self, as a divine ego is eclipsed
by a sublime soul.
54. I
shan't go into that subject in too much detail, but suffice it to say that
societies or civilizations characterized by state freedom, and therefore state
power, will be all too ready to believe that 'God is on their side' and akin,
in His instincts and capacities, to them, which is to say, to an immensely
powerful force which can conquer and tyrannize over weaker peoples, countries,
societies, etc., and all with the clear conscience of 'doing God's work' and
effectively 'advancing a godly cause'.
The State, when free, has a vested interest in - one might even say a
need - to officially maintain a notion of God, or godliness, which accords with
its own power and authority, and can therefore be called upon to justify
whatever it wills.
55. But
instead of what is literally God, in metaphysical sensibility, irrespective of
at what evolutionary level of life, it will be worshipping and devoting
energies to Devil the Mother regarded as God, or to Woman the Mother regarded as
God, not to mention, contrary to church freedom, to the Son of Man (Christ)
regarded as God at the expense of Man the Father (falsely) regarded as God, or
even upended deities of a subordinate gender position for better (sensible) or,
more usually, for worse (sensual).
56. In
short, if the Church, not least in its properly Christian and therefore
Catholic manifestations, cannot be trusted to speak honestly and accurately of
what pertains to God, how much less can the State be trusted to speak honestly
and accurately of God, when it is not bound, like soma, to the psychic freedom
of the Church but freely independent of church leadership and able to rule
and/or govern in its own interests, whether such interests be autocratic or
democratic, competitively individualistic or competitively collectivistic,
scientific or political?
57. God,
to be blunt, can only get a raw deal whenever the State is independent of the
Church, and even the more genuinely Christian Church has shown itself incapable
of giving God a fair deal due to its worldly limitations in affirming Christ as
the Son of God or even as God the Son (!), and making man the measure of god
and earth the measure of heaven in all too European fashion, the middling-down
of criteria from time/space to mass/volume nonetheless effectively hyped as
time/space in relation to a largely temperate, verdant, lowlands environment
being not a little significant in this respect, irrespective of whatever
paradoxical claims to Bible- and, in particular, Old Testament-inspired heights
Christianity may formerly have made before it went to the dogs of pope- and
monarch-defying promiscuity which inevitably paved the way for democracy and
thus the secular sovereignties, rooted in politics, which characterize our own
more worldly time.
58. Now
that the world has triumphed and, not altogether surprisingly, the politically
sovereign 'meek' have effectively inherited the earth, there is seemingly
little but the world in existence, and people blandly speak of 'saving the
world' rather than of being saved from the world, as to some otherworldly
alternative which would restore or, more correctly, elevate and bring the
People to God and downgrade man and his knowledgeable pretensions to some kind
of deferential subordination within the overall framework of a God-centred
civilization.... Though, in point of fact, there are still parts of the globe
not subject to the governance of man or, alternatively, which signify man
having gone to the dogs of woman and/or the Devil in some sensual set-up which
represents either the decadence of liberal civilization or, coupled and often extricably if not inextricably mixed up with that, the
genesis of some new civilization which is still somewhat formative in character
and not yet consciously aware of its true destiny in relation to 'Kingdom
Come'.
59. For
of course there is a sort of liberal bourgeois/people overlap, not to mention
clerical/people and feudal/people overlaps, that typify the paradoxical and
even, if I may be so bold, transitional nature of the age, with the People
themselves divisible, in all contexts, between folksy 'sheep' and proletarian
'goats', or those who openly defer to the liberal or clerical or feudal
controlling classes and those, on the contrary, that do not, and are consequently
rock 'n' roll rebels and outsiders, whether in the West or the East, whose
orientation is more global and thus effectively independent of traditional
civilization in whatever of its several permutations, and precisely because
they are sufficiently proletarian in their urban cosmopolitanism and windy-city
transcendentalism as to be largely if not wholly indifferent to suburban, town,
or rural criteria such that typify traditional class relations and fall well
short, in their various ways, of that synthetic artificiality which is the
hallmark of contemporary 'civilization', making of the proletariat, whether
blue- or white-collar, manual or mental, labouring or clerical, a
post-humankind species of 'humanity' which finds itself in the vanguard of the
'overcoming of man' and potentially capable of opting for the civilized
successor to man as and when they are brought to a realization and acceptance
of their true destiny.
60. For a
vote on behalf of religious sovereignty in a paradoxical election, following
prior consideration of the options at stake, could lead, in the not-impossible
event of a majority mandate, to 'Kingdom Come', and thus to the establishment
not only of a triadic Beyond and administrative aside, as the pluralistic
framework of such a religious civilization, but to acceptance of 'man's
overcoming' on terms that leave very little doubt that, at the end of the day,
it will be cyborg-oriented divine rights and not
human rights which characterize the civilization in question, and that the transmutation
of mankind, or rather of the post-humankind we have identified with the urban
proletariat, into godkind, into the most evolved
manifestation of godliness/heavenliness possible to evolving life, should be
regarded as an inevitable process in the evolution of global civilization
towards a universal resolution in the utmost unity of cooperative individualism
set not on earth, in blue-collar affirming Marxist fashion, but in space, where
it would constitute the transcendence of what remained of the collective, and
thus of socialism, in what would be the omega point of a divinity/sublimity supreme.
61. Obviously
we are a long way from that point at present; for even globalization is not
independent of either the West or the East to a degree whereby it rejects both
in the interests of its own coming into full self-conscious recognition of its
godly potential, which can only happen with or following 'judgement', and the
paradoxical election for religious sovereignty that, in the event of a positive
outcome, would signal the true beginnings of global civilization in relation to
culture and civility, not merely in potentia as a sort of adjunct to
the existing civilizations, an unofficial offshoot of Western or Eastern
imperialism and decadence, but as something that was about to come into its
religious own in relation to the rights accruing to religious sovereignty, and
thus to reject what was not global and properly universal in the interests of
its own further development.
62. In
short, so long as both the West and the East exist as distinct civilizations,
with their feudal, clerical, liberal controlling traditions, which constrain a
not-inconsiderable proportion of the People to folksy acquiescence in their
cultural or social limitations, global civilization is latent rather than
actual. For no matter how independent of
the bourgeoisie or priesthood or aristocracy one may consider oneself to be as
a self-respecting proletarian, one is not properly civilized until one has a
religious identity and allegiance, institutionally upheld, commensurate with
one's environmental position, with one's class orientation, and with one's
cultural predilection. Rather, one is a
sort of barbarian or savage whom the traditionally civilized classes, and even
their folksy dupes or lickspittles, prefer to despise and denigrate, regarding
that which they can't control or which is outside the sphere of their authority
as socially and morally of little or no account rather than - exceptions to the
rule notwithstanding - as a potential threat to their vested interests, to be
guarded against with whatever means lie within their power.
63. Thus
they take a dim view of the proletariat, preferring to regard them as riffraff,
mob, rabble, simpletons, yobs, louts, thugs, uneducated people, irresponsibly
self-serving people, and so on, in order to make it easier to denigrate them
and dismiss any suggestion that they should be taken seriously as a potential
threat to the status quo. As far as they
are concerned, globalization means the expansion of Western interests at the
expense of the East or vice versa, not a completely new and independent
civilization that can only come properly to pass, in religious plenitude, at
the expense of both the West and the East and therefore, ipso facto, at their expense,
as of all who would block religious progress in favour of the economic status
quo or the political status quo or the scientific status quo and the sorts of 'bovaryized' and inherently false religions - and churches -
which have a subordinate place in the overall set-up, be it feudal and fiery or
clerical and watery or liberal and vegetative.
64. But
the People, the urban proletariat, are essentially religious,
especially in their mind-oriented, white-collar permutations, and therefore they,
alone, are such as would not be satisfied with any of the traditional gods,
whether fiery, watery, or vegetative, but only with an airy god such that
accorded with their environmental experiences in the windy-city streets of the
cosmopolitan universality which circles all around them, their music vocal by
choice, since it is a form of airiness which is compatible with electric
instrumentation and which lies beyond the folksy conservatism of acoustic
instrumentation no matter how wind or pipe orientated that may happen to
be.
65. The
folk are of course charming after a fashion, but their music, like the
religious traditions to which they more openly and uncritically subscribe, has
little or nothing to say to an urban proletariat caught up in the gathering
storm of their global momentum, most of whom are avowedly atheist in their
rejection of 'the old gods', as Nietzsche would say, and therefore bereft of
God as things stand at this juncture in time, arguably a good thing as far as
religious falsehoods are concerned, yet somewhat problematic for a class with
the potential not only for genuine godliness, but for the most evolved
manifestation of genuine godliness there could ever be!
66. By
which I mean a manifestation of godliness leaving even transcendental
meditation behind as something more evolved, in humankind (Buddhist)
affiliation, than its natural (winged seed-pods on trees?) or cosmic (Saturn?)
manifestations inviting, through the overall dominance of objectivity in those
female-dominated contexts, mere worship, but not as subjectively evolved as
what is surely to come within the necessarily synthetically artificial
framework of a post-humankind coming to terms with its true destiny in relation
to the cyborg possibilities that a more transcendental
future would inevitably open up, pending a positive outcome to 'judgement', or
the democratically-mandated option on religious sovereignty at the expense of
political sovereignty in a paradoxical election conducted under the auspices of
Social Transcendentalism, the ideological psychology, one could say, conceived
by one who effectively corresponds, in his Messianic otherworldliness, to a
sort of Second Coming that would lead the People into 'Kingdom Come' and thus
out of the worldly pits in which they now exist, complements of liberal
democracy and its man-affirming falsehoods, of which economics is currently
paramount.
67. For
unless the People do get a chance, or several chances if it takes as
much, to vote for religious sovereignty, there can be no end to the worldly
sins and/or crimes, according to ethnicity and effective gender, of the
political sovereignty in which they find themselves increasingly bogged down to
the detriment of self-respect, and no deliverance, correlatively, from the
false and hyped gods which still officially prevail, ruling over them through
their various religious representatives long after the demise, following
political struggle, of the authoritarian rulers to which they were once more
subject and who were very often in collusion with the more tyrannical
manifestations of religious falsehood in the interests, chiefly, of their own
state power, conveniently receiving sanction, so to speak, from 'On High' for
the various oppressions and crimes which their regimes carried out at the
expense of both their own and foreign peoples, and largely in the interests of
material gain.
68. Therefore
it is of the utmost importance that the People, by which is primarily meant the
urban proletariat, come to know about Social Transcendentalism and to support
Social Transcendentalism and to vote, when the opportunity comes to pass, for
Social Transcendentalism, that they may be delivered both from the worldly bog
of their own political sin and/or crime and the religious falsehoods which
still officially and somewhat paradoxically prevail in relation to it, and
which can be foisted upon them at the drop of a hat, obliging them to accept
the Bible and its infantile teachings long after such an anachronistic
compendium of disparate writings, many of which would disgust even a bourgeois,
have ceased to have any meaning or relevance to their synthetically artificial
lives and lifestyles!
69. Rest
assured that in the event of a majority mandate for Social Transcendentalism,
which is to say, for religious sovereignty at the expense of political
sovereignty in a paradoxical election which could, were judgemental results to
favour progress beyond 'the world', put an end to elections altogether, the
exchanged sovereignty being collectively born in a Christ-like sacrifice by the
state-like aspect of the Centre, steps would subsequently have to be taken to
remove the Bible and other such grossly obsolete texts from society so that the
Church, conceived when free as an antithesis to the free state, could be
delivered from its Christian past and take on an entirely new form and
character, one that required a whole new architectural and emblematic and
intellectual and cultural and emotional approach in what has been described as
the triadic Beyond ... of 'Kingdom Come', and which would have its own bound
state in the Centrist form of the administrative aside to the said entity, the
focus of such 'sins and/or crimes of the world' as had been democratically
fobbed off on to the Social Transcendentalist leadership in exchange for
religious sovereignty and the self-oriented divine rights which would accrue to
it, and which derive, together with the sovereignty itself, from recognition of
the Truth about God and religion and Heaven and destiny in relation to Social
Transcendentalism and the teacher and founder of Social Transcendentalism as
one who is therefore credibly Messianic and worthy of being taken seriously as
the effective gateway to 'Kingdom Come', to that which lies beyond the world in
suitably synthetically artificial terms for the urban proletariat, the majority
electorate in mature democracies, and can only be comprehended and justified on
the basis of religious sovereignty, the otherworldly sovereignty that alone can
make global unversality truly possible.
70. But
not at first, nor for a long time to come, bearing in mind the diverse nature
of the world and the fact that not all peoples could opt for religious
sovereignty at this point in time, whether because they were not in a position
to, given the want of democratic plurality or freedom in their countries in
relation to corporate economics, or because, even with democratic
accountability and relative freedom from political or religious or scientific
tyranny, they were too decadent and corrupt to be likely to want religious
sovereignty - a fact not altogether without ironic significance where some of
the more inveterately democratic nations are concerned!
71. The
reader familiar with earlier texts will know that I have provisionally
earmarked the Gaelic or Celtic countries of Ireland, Scotland, Wales, and the
Isle of Man for 'Kingdom Come' in inceptive or formative terms, partly because
I want to see a united Ireland and believe that a new union involving Scotland
and kindred countries in a federal arrangement is the best and most logical way
of going about that, and partly too because I want to see an end to the hideous
Catholic/Protestant dichotomy which has bedevilled relations between Britain
and Ireland for centuries, but also because I believe that, quite apart from
the political and moral desirability of both the United Kingdom and Eire being
democratically superseded and effectively supplanted by a Gaelic federation of
Ireland, Scotland, etc., the Celtic countries would be 'up to' the intellectual
demands which an understanding of my texts requires and should therefore be
considered among the peoples most likely, at present or in the near future, to
want religious sovereignty and deliverance, in consequence, from the schismatic
world, with its ideological ambiguities and amoral relativities, traditionally
compounded by the divide-and-rule ethos of English imperialism.
72. Certainly
there are enough reasons why certain peoples should want to move forward out of
the worldly status quo into a better age and society, whether or not it was
capable of being genuinely universal at this point in time, and I foresee that,
with the requisite education in Social Transcendentalism and what this ideological
psychology of psychosynthetic self-harmony, this
philosophy of ultimate truth, has to say, many more peoples besides the Gaels
will come on board in the course of time, not least on the European Continent,
where there is ever a capacity, it seems to me, for a more than empirical
approach to philosophy and, by extrapolation, life in general, thanks, it may
be, to a land-based cultural tradition more favourable to male hegemonies, not
to mention international relations.
73. But
this new and ultimate religion, which transcends both Catholicism and
Protestantism, not to mention West and East, must ultimately be universal or
not at all, in which case it is to be hoped that every people on earth will
come to an understanding of and accommodation with it in the fullness of time,
so that, from a want of democracy, people achieve a democratic precondition of
subsequently being able to democratically exchange political sovereignty for
religious sovereignty at what I am fond of equating with 'judgement', when a people,
however the opportunity arises, decide for themselves whether they want to move
beyond worldly sovereignty to an otherworldly sovereignty that would not only
deliver them from the 'sins and/or crimes of the world' (to the graces and/or
punishments, depending upon gender, of the otherworldly context of 'Kingdom
Come', as from sensuality to sensibility, triangularity
to non-triangularity, female hegemonies to male
hegemonies), but from the religious falsehoods and shortfalls from genuine
divinity which, exceptions to the rule notwithstanding, have tended to
characterize traditional religions, with consequences all too predictable as
far as the advancement or consolidation of state power was concerned.
74. And
even those who, in their environmentally-conditioned want of devotional
self-respect, have worshipped with a metaphysically sensible sense of what God
is and have expected nothing more than a sense of calmness and beingfulness of a joyful, and therefore supreme, order from
putting themselves in mind of godliness ... even they have lagged naturally or,
more usually, cosmically behind the humanistic devotees of self-development in
terms of transcendental meditation who are themselves, despite their
evolutionary superiority to the worshippers, socially behind the atheistic
urban proletariat and their entitlement, through synthetic artificiality, to an
entirely new approach to metaphysical sensibility, one, as I have said, which
would ultimately entail the cyborgization of mankind
to a degree hitherto unimagined and well-nigh unimaginable, so that death is
ultimately defeated and life comes to resemble Eternal Life in its visionary
and/or unitive knowledge of the self, the former
eventually giving place to the latter as a more genuinely heavenly order of afterlife-type
experience, cited in space and essentially synthetic, becomes the general rule,
a rule more germane to cooperative individualism than to cooperative
collectivism, and thus to truth than to knowledge.
75. Be
that as it may, it is the urban proletariat who, in their synthetic
artificiality, are in the vanguard of evolution, and it is for them that the
concept of religious sovereignty has been devised and to them that Social
Transcendentalism must primarily appeal if 'Kingdom Come' is to become an
actuality and not simply remain a pious hope of what formerly would have been
called 'the faithful' but which, these days, has to be associated for the most
part with those who are comparatively faithless in relation to traditional
faiths but hopeful, all the same, of a better deal and better world further up
the line, a deal which has to be more than simply economic or materialistic, if
global universality is properly to emerge.
76. For
the economic status quo which has emerged out of the more scientific and
political forms of People's struggle has an inbuilt fatality to exploit science
and technology for its own financial benefit and thus to inflict upon the
People, not least when proletarian and properly urban, a plethora of bewitching
products which, geared to commercial viability in competition with other such
artefacts, tend to seduce them from their selves towards an almost heliotropic sucking-up to fundamentally barbarous and
philistine sensualities which constrain them from the possibility of developing
a more cultural and civil outlook on life such that only a new and ultimate
religion, dedicated to sensibility, could encourage.
77. Blinded
by the free force and bound light 'above' or the free motion and bound heat
'below' of these expedient fantasies, the People are simply exploited by the
Rich and Powerful and prevented from achieving
that inner calm which comes from self-respect of an intellectual or
emotional order in relation to free heat and bound force in the lower-class
contexts or to free light and bound motion in the upper-class ones - a
situation which, whilst it might suit the selfless nature of a majority of
females, can only prove detrimental to the selfish nurture of the majority of
males.
78. For
this is no simple problem the solution to which will suit everyone everywhere,
but an aspect of the gender struggle which takes the form of a capitalistic
deference to diabolic female hegemonies rather than a socialistic deference to
divine male hegemonies, so that far from being Social Transcendentalist it is
effectively Capital Fundamentalist or, rather, Materialist, Liberal
Materialist, and thus a formula not for heavenly redemption of the world, but
for worldly perdition in Hell, the Western-dominated actuality of the heathenistic present.
79. Therefore
the principal enemy of global progress towards heavenly redemption and
resolution is the Liberal Materialist, the female-oriented capitalist whose
designs on the world, within the more international parameters of a corporate
economy by no means invariably commensurate with him, are perforce also global,
though less in respect of God than of His arch-enemy, the Devil, and the Devil
not as 'fall guy for slag', as Biblical tradition would have us believe, but as
sensual 'first mover', as metachemical sensuality, as
photonic elemental particles, as soma preceding and predominating over psyche
to an absolute extent of most particles/least wavicles
in upper-class female guise, and therefore as one who glories in free will to
an extent which can only prove attractive to anyone whose will has been
habitually thwarted and constrained by free ego.
80. But
that is, of course, to hark back to an earlier text, where I dealt with the
different modes of Fascism and Socialism and Capitalism and Communism, dividing
them between national and international, female and male, alternatives in which
national capitalism was drawn towards national fascism and international
fascism towards international capitalism, while national communism was drawn
towards national socialism and international socialism towards international
communism, pretty much as the sensibly bound towards the sensually free and the
sensually bound towards the sensibly free, whether in relation to will and
spirit in sensuality or to ego and soul in sensibility.
81. Therefore
it cannot be categorically maintained that corporate capitalism, the
contemporary hegemonic form of capitalism, is guilty of the retrogressive
deference alluded to above when, with an egoistic freedom that constrains free will,
it is the male form of capitalism par excellence and thus that which opens out towards a global
prospect of egocentric free enterprise in Liberal Humanism or, more correctly,
post-Humanism rather than harks, like certain cultural forms of Liberal Materialism,
after free will from dissatisfaction with its own constraints upon force in the
shadow of global capitalism.
82. But
while corporate capitalism may, in its egocentric free heat, be a much less heliotropic proposition than its nationalistic counterpart,
its global aspirations and confidences nonetheless inspire not a little
uncertainty as to its long-term viability in a world which ultimately cannot be
reconciled to unity along lines which operate only lower down the human or
post-human scale of cultural options, having been derived from a tradition
largely rooted in lower-class values in due Western fashion.
83. The
egocentric free enterprise of Liberal post-Humanism may be 'good' on its own
relative terms, but it is not and cannot be absolutely 'good' and therefore
appropriate to global unity in any ultimate sense. Only the psychocentric
free enterprise, as it were, of Social Transcendentalism would be absolutely
'good' because not about hyped personality, which in a post-humanist guise
tends to give itself universal airs in post-liberal and effectively
totalitarian vein, but about genuine universality, and thus the reconciliation
of mankind to God in a civilization centred not in knowledge but in Truth, which,
like the urban proletariat, tends to be an airy thing.
84. In
short, only the coming to pass of a religiously sovereign People can pave the
way for the dawn of genuine universality and the end to the reign of man and,
by implication, economics as an effective ne plus ultra, something, alas, which a tradition rooted in
man-hype-as-God and earth-hype-as-Heaven - and therefore in
knowledge-hype-as-Truth and pleasure-hype-as-Joy - will tend to take for
granted, never considering for a moment that there could be anything higher
than a global economy in which egocentric free enterprise was able to flourish,
and to flourish, moreover, without competition or the threat of supersession and curtailment of its freedom from some
superior 'good'.
85. Alas,
for the well-meaning lowland dupes of global post-humanism, there is something
higher and that is the psychocentric free enterprise
which requires that religion supersedes economics and puts economics in its
place as a subordinate ideal in a world or civilization led not by knowledge
but by Truth, not by pleasure but by Joy, not by ego but by soul, not by man
but by God. And not only economics but
also the residues of politics and science, so that woman and the Devil or, rather,
the antiwoman and the Antidevil
of upended female realities in sensibility are duly subordinated to the overall
lead of God, as that which appertains, in synthetic artificiality, to
metaphysical sensibility, and therefore to such sensibility at a level and
stage of godliness/heavenliness subjectively beyond anything to be found,
working backwards, in humankind, nature, or the Cosmos, where we could speak
not of the most evolved manifestation of God/Heaven but of more (relative to
most), less (relative to least), and least evolved manifestations of
God/Heaven, as already described in this and earlier texts.
86. But,
of course, most of what has religiously obtained in the past hasn't even been
godly/heavenly at less or least evolved levels but, rather, not godly/heavenly
at all, whether in relation to man (Christ) or, worse again, to either woman
(and nature) or the Devil (and the Cosmos), with physical, chemical, and metachemical implications that do little if anything for
metaphysics, particularly when such a term is perversely subsumed into some
other-than-metaphysical reality and the result is the hype of metachemistry or chemistry or physics in respect of God or
godly attributes, with painfully paradoxical consequences, not the least of
which will be a disrespect for religion and an unwillingness on the part of
many people to take God seriously in view of the kinds of realities and
circumstances with which He has been - and still is - falsely associated.
87. But
because God has nothing to do with illusion, still less with ugliness, nor even
with beauty, but only with truth, He cannot be found and should not be looked
for outside the bounds of metaphysical sensibility, and then only on terms
which are likely to accord with the synthetic artificiality of the urban
proletariat, the majority population of the globe, who at this moment in time
are largely if not entirely atheistic and therefore in need of being saved or
delivered from their atheism to a new theism, so to speak, a concept of deity
owing little or nothing to the subversions of theism which occur under a
plutocratic hegemony or under a democratic hegemony or under an autocratic
hegemony, as the class case may be, wherein religion is subordinated to either
economic, political, or scientific interests and, exceptions to the general rule
notwithstanding, ceases to be anything more than a convenient excuse for some
other ideality or reality.
88. Only
when the proletariat elect for religious sovereignty at 'judgement' will there
be any prospect of an end to the reign of economics, politics, or science and
any likelihood of the beginning of an age of genuine religion as germane to
'Kingdom Come', in which economics, politics, and science will be subordinated
to the reign of God, as an expression of People's religious sovereignty, and thus
to the triumph of Truth - something, alas, which is far from being the case at
present!
89. For
at present it is not even knowledge, in any genuinely subjective sense having
more relevance to the Christian - and in particular Catholic - Church than to
economic free enterprise, which prevails but, rather, both ugliness and
weakness, the free metachemical soma of Devil the
Mother and the free chemical soma of Woman the Mother, coupled in their
respective types of bound psyche to an ugly approach to illusion with the
Daughter of the Devil and a weak approach to ignorance with the Daughter of
Woman, so that absolute and relative modes of evil are acquiescent in absolute
and relative modes of crime and able to dominate and constrain males, or the
generality of males loyal to metaphysics and
physics, to their hegemonic freedoms, the factual freedoms of an
objective sanity whose clearness is the product of free will and free spirit
operating within their per se
manifestations at the expense of both soul and ego.
90. But
such ugliness and weakness that is primary and in keeping with soma preceding
and predominating over psyche in female vein, wherein nature has the better of
nurture, also has its secondary counterpart in relation to males being
compelled to emphasize soma at the expense of psyche contrary to their gender
reality, so that they proceed to foolishly acquiesce, from the illusory bound
psychic standpoint of Antigod the Antifather
or from the ignorant bound psychic standpoint of Antiman
the Antifather, in the sinfulness of either the
metaphysical free soma which is the Antison of Antigod or the physical free soma which is the Antison of Antiman, the former
indicative of an illusory approach to ugliness and the latter of an ignorant
approach to weakness, albeit both alike are symptomatic of a subjective
insanity whose unholiness owes much to the bound soul
and bound ego which, under female hegemonies, foolishly acquiesce in their
instinctual and spiritual freedoms.
91. Therefore
while the female is factually sane in her objective freedoms of soma in both metachemical and chemical not-selves, the male is
illusorily insane in his subjective freedoms of soma in both metaphysical and
physical not-selves, his approach to ugliness and weakness being subjectively indirect
via illusion and ignorance rather than objectively direct, and therefore no
more than a sinful shortfall from crime, coupled, in bound psyche, to a foolish
shortfall from evil, both of which can only be subordinate to their female
counterparts.
92. Thus
the male has even more need of salvation, or deliverance from sensuality to
sensibility, immorality and vice to virtue and morality, than the female, who
is by nature more attuned to sensuality than to sensibility and therefore
better able to cope with the negative realities of free soma. Religion, when genuine, is a male solution to
the problem of female dominion in either free science or politics, with
economics being a worldly, albeit somewhat inferior, second. For knowledge, as we have seen, can easily
'go to the dogs' of technological freedom in a sort of Faustian pact with the
Devil which makes financial gain at any price the goal irrespective of the
consequences, some of which directly fly in the face of male virtue and
morality, grace and wisdom.
93. But
if metaphysical males are to get back on track of being loyal to themselves or,
rather, their selves, the brain stem and/or spinal cord of the psyche, then
they will have to reject the elemental-particle subversion of soul from the
hegemonic female standpoint in sensuality of free will and turn from an
illusory approach to ugliness to a disillusionment with free soma and desire,
on the part of self, to pseudo-freely reject bound psyche for the free psyche
of an elemental-wavicle soulfulness the product of a
return to metaphysical sensibility and thus to their rightful senses, so to
speak, in the formal grace of God the Father and the contented grace of Heaven
the Holy Soul, the reward for an ego whose raison d'être is not egocentric but aimed, via the relevant
not-selves of lungs and breath (or, in the future, some artificial
equivalents), the Son of God and the Holy Spirit of Heaven, at its redemption
in psychocentric blessedness, the joyful contentment
of a being most supreme.
94. Likewise
if physical males are to get back on track of being loyal to themselves or,
rather, their selves, the brain stem and/or spinal cord of the psyche, then
they will have to reject the molecular-particle subversion of ego from the
hegemonic female standpoint in sensuality of free spirit and turn from an
ignorant approach to weakness to a disillusionment with free soma and desire,
on the part of self, to pseudo-freely
reject bound psyche for the free psyche of a molecular-wavicle
mindfulness the product of a return to physical sensibility and thus to their
rightful senses, so to speak, in the formal grace of Man the Father and the
contented grace of Earth the Holy Soul, the reward for an ego whose raison d'être would normally have been
egocentric but, under metaphysical pressure and example from above, would now
be aimed, via the relevant not-selves of brain-proper and thought (or, in the
future, some artificial equivalents), the Son of Man and the Holy Spirit of the
Earth, at its redemption in some degree of psychocentric
blessedness, the pleasurable contentment of a being more (relative to most)
supreme.
95. Obviously,
while the majority of males in the former context will be Catholic and thus
affiliated with the sensual decadence of perpendicular triangularity,
the majority in the latter context will be Protestant and thus affiliated with
the sensual heresy (from a traditional Catholic point of view) of inverted triangularity, and thus more physical than metaphysical,
but now subject, unlike before, to a redefinition of Man in relation to God, to
a modification of intellectual shortfalls from the Truth and its soulful
vindication which now rendered them deferential to the reign of God and thus to
an accommodation of Truth from the standpoint, by and large, of knowledge,
albeit of a knowledge renewed in God and no longer either Christian or
capitalist, as traditionally, but effectively Social Transcendentalist in its
willingness to let Truth reign and fit everything else, as best as possible,
around and beneath it, the only guarantee, in the end, of a lasting victory for
the male values of knowledge and truth, ego and soul, form and contentment,
pleasure and joy.
96. Yet
even females will be brought to a moral and virtuous accommodation with knowledge and truth through
the paradoxical approaches of strength and beauty; for they can no more
approach knowledge and truth directly, in subjective vein, than males approach
weakness and ugliness directly, in objective vein, but must do so via the
objective distorting lens, as it were, of a bound soma, a soma which has been
effectively 'inflanked' by the bound soma directly
stemming, in male vein, from free psyche, and therefore subjected to a
molecular-wavicle subversion of will and an
elemental-wavicle subversion of spirit, so that, far
from being either elemental-particle or molecular-particle manifestations of
free will and free spirit, the respective entities are paradoxically
acquiescent in the molecular-wavicle ideality of free ego and the elemental-wavicle
ideality of free soul, if from an objective basis in
chemical and metachemical soma which makes for the
aforementioned strong approach to knowledge in the case of chemical, or
lower-class, females and beautiful approach to truth in the case of metachemical, or upper-class, females, the majority of whom
are likely to come, as though in highland vein, from the perpendicular triangularity of Catholic decadence than from the inverted triangularity of Protestant heresy (or departure from
brain-over-womb non-triangular sensibility of the Catholic tradition).
97. Be
that as it may, we can identify, as before, the strength and pride of secondary
bound soma, which stems in females from a knowledgeable approach to strength
and a pleasurable approach to pride on the part of physical males, with Antiwoman the Antimother and Antipurgatory the Unclear Spirit, and the strong approach
to knowledge and proud approach to pleasure which arises from this in respect
of psyche of a secondary free order with the Antidaughter
of Antiwoman and the Unclear Soul of Antipurgatory, so that both modes of chemical unweakness/unclearness (strength/pride) are complementary
to the male idealities, in relative truth/holiness
(knowledge/pleasure) through physical free psyche and bound soma, of Man the Father
and Earth the Holy Soul on the one hand, and the Son of Man and the Holy Soul
of the Earth on the other.
98. Likewise,
we can identify the beauty and love of secondary bound soma, which stems in
females from a true approach to beauty and a joyful approach to love on the
part of metaphysical males, with Antidevil the Antimother and Antihell the
Unclear Spirit, and the beautiful approach to truth and loving approach to joy
which arises from this in respect of psyche of a secondary free order with the Antidaughter of the Antidevil and
the Unclear Soul of Antihell, so that both modes of metachemical un-ugliness/unclearness (beauty/love) are
complementary to the male idealities, in absolute
knowledge/holiness (truth/joy) through metaphysical free psyche and bound soma,
of God the Father and Heaven the Holy Soul on the one hand, and the Son of God
and the Holy Spirit of Heaven on the other.
99. In
respect of the complementary orders of will and/or antiwill
or ego and/or anti-ego, it is not illusion deferring to fact, as in male
subjective insanity subordinated to female objective sanity, but fiction
deferring to truth, as in female objective insanity subordinated to male
subjective sanity, so that far from female-hegemonic vicious circles, as it
were, of ugliness (Devil the Mother) conditioning an ugly approach to illusion
(the Daughter of the Devil) which conditions illusion (Antigod
the Antifather) conditioning an illusory approach to
ugliness (the Antison of Antigod)
in sensual metachemistry and metaphysics, or of
weakness (Woman the Mother) conditioning a weak approach to ignorance (the
Daughter of Woman) which conditions ignorance (Antiman
the Antifather) conditioning an ignorant approach to
weakness (the Antison of Antiman)
in sensual chemistry and physics, we find male-hegemonic virtuous circles, by
contrast, of knowledge (Man the Father) conditioning a knowledgeable approach
to strength (the Son of Man) which conditions strength (Antiwoman
the Antimother) conditioning a strong approach to
knowledge (the Antidaughter of Antiwoman)
in sensible physics and chemistry, or of truth (God the Father) conditioning a
true approach to beauty (the Son of God) which conditions beauty (Antidevil the Antimother)
conditioning a beautiful approach to truth (the Antidaughter
of the Antidevil) in sensible metaphysics and metachemistry.
100. Likewise
in respect of the complementary orders of spirit and/or antispirit
and soul and/or antisoul, it is not illusion
deferring to fact, as in male subjective insanity subordinated to female
objective sanity, but fiction deferring to truth, as in female objective
insanity subordinated to male subjective sanity, so that far from
female-hegemonic vicious circles, as it were, of hate (Hell the Clear Spirit)
conditioning a hateful approach to woe (the Clear Soul of Hell) which
conditions woe (Antiheaven the Unholy Soul)
conditioning a woeful approach to hatred (the Unholy Spirit of Antiheaven) in sensual metachemistry
and metaphysics, or of humility (Purgatory the Clear Spirit) conditioning a
humble approach to pain (the Clear Soul of Purgatory) which conditions pain
(Anti-earth the Unholy Soul) conditioning a painful approach to humility (the
Unholy Spirit of Anti-earth) in sensual chemistry and physics, we find male-hegemonic virtuous circles, by contrast,
of pleasure (Earth the Holy Soul) conditioning a pleasurable approach to pride
(the Holy Spirit of the Earth) which conditions pride (Antipurgatory
the Unclear Spirit) conditioning a proud approach to pleasure (the Unclear Soul
of Antipurgatory) in sensible physics and chemistry,
or of joy (Heaven the Holy Soul) conditioning a joyful approach to love (the
Holy Spirit of Heaven) which conditions love (Antihell
the Unclear Spirit) conditioning a loving approach to joy (the Unclear Soul of Antihell) in sensible metaphysics and metachemistry.
101. In a choice between the vicious circles of factual sanity
and illusory insanity and the virtuous circles of truthful sanity and fictional
insanity, few males in their right minds would opt for the latter. And yet that is precisely the situation in
which males more usually find themselves these days, as the triumph of ugliness
and weakness over illusion and ignorance, not to mention hatred and humility
(if not humiliation) over woe and pain, is paraded before our eyes on a daily
basis, and the notion of freedom is reduced to soma in respect primarily of
both non-synthetic and synthetic modes of metachemistry
and chemistry, eyes and tongue, and secondarily in respect of both
non-synthetic and synthetic modes of metaphysics and physics, ears and phallus,
in bourgeois/proletarian overlap between Western (or Eastern) decadence and
inceptive globalization.
102. Civilization
has been reduced, in Anglo-American vein, to free looks and free speech, and in
neither context, whether of the press or parliament, of eyes or tongue, of
cameras or microphones, does one hear the authentic voice of male freedom, but
all-too-often the rejection or belittling or even repudiation of such freedom
from a standpoint rooted, objectively, in female realities whose interests are
not about form and contentment, ego and soul, but, on the contrary, about power
and glory, will and spirit, and the subversion of ego and soul to suit a
powerful or a glorious end as nature, in whatever guise, gets the better of
nurture.
103. Such
a reality has to be rejected if we are to extricate ourselves from the heathenistic mess of modernity/post-modernity and progress,
in freely democratic terms, to the deliverance from negative worldly-to-netherworldly crime and sin, fact and illusion, which
implies not a vicious circle but a virtuous circle of positive
worldly-to-otherworldly grace and punishment, truth and fiction, in which male
values will be sensibly hegemonic primarily in terms of Truth and such beauty
and strength, not to mention respectful knowledge, as that permits or
encourages are brought to a paradoxical or, in the latter case, deferential
accommodation with the sole guarantor of contentment and holy bulwark against
all that is disruptive or subversive of genuine universality in God and Heaven
- namely, the metaphysical free psyche.
104. Yet
for that to transpire there must first be an accommodation with genuine
religion on the part of the People and therefore a willingness not only to reject
their worldly sovereignties, such that hold back or detract from godliness, but
to reject the false gods that have tended to reign over them, or their
ancestors, in the past and permitted or encouraged the State to have its way at
their expense, often under pretext of doing the Church's work but, in reality,
as the antithesis, when free, to all that the Church is or should stand for ...
in the freeing of males principally from the dominion of power and glory, free
will and free spirit, as female realities rooted, selflessly, in not-self and
therefore in all that is contrary to self-interest conceived primarily, though
by no means exclusively, as a male ideal for the advancement of cultural virtue
and, as a corollary to that, moral civility, whether on primary (male) or
secondary (female) terms.
105. Therefore
until the People come to vote for religious sovereignty, and not only to vote
for it but to vote in sufficient numbers that a majority mandate for the kinds
of divine rights appertaining to religious sovereignty ensues, there can be no
end to the dominion of negative worldly and/or netherworldly
powers, but only a continuing obstacle to the form and contentment, free ego
and, most especially, free soul that is the otherworldly destiny of the Church,
albeit in relation to the Social Transcendentalist Centre of 'Kingdom Come' and
not in relation to the played-out and decadent Roman Catholic Church which rots
away in the background to secular modernity/post-modernity,
bourgeois/proletarian transitional overlap as a clerical anachronism which can
only be given the coup de grace once the
atheistic People, the urban proletariat, democratically opt for religious
sovereignty and thus pave the way for its removal in the interests of the New
Church which won't be just another Church, in Nonconformist Protestant fashion,
but a Church to end all Churches, a Church which will have a right, for
religiously sovereign peoples, to become truly global and incorporate its own
State in the shape of the administrative aside of collectivized responsibility
to the triadic Beyond of 'Kingdom Come', so that never again will the State
exist as a free agent to wreak powerful or glorious havoc at the expense not
merely of Christian form but to the effective exclusion of that ultimate
contentment which we have identified with the Social Transcendentalist Centre,
as it pushes the development of psychic freedom beyond anything previously
achieved even by those who were godly and therefore committed, whether in
self-devotion or through worship of anterior manifestations of godliness in
nature or the Cosmos, to the realm of metaphysical sensibility, which is the
only realm that deserves to reign in relation to what is truly God and Heaven.
106. Let
it be hoped that the Messianic advocate of God and Heaven in the stage of life
beyond humankind and even, for the genuinely religious upper-class male, his
transcendental meditation as something peripheral to the manly per se of Christian prayer ... has left no
room for doubt that only with the religious empowering via judgmental
enfranchisement of the urban proletariat will it be possible for that which is
most supreme, because most evolved, to stand any chance of coming to pass, to
lead the People out of their post-modern wilderness into an eternal paradise in
which global unity is but a stage on the road to true universality in the most
cooperative individualism of which it were possible to conceive - that of the cyborg God and Heaven whose final end, arising out of
cooperative collectivism, is not on earth, but in the space-centre omega
point(s) of a transcendence supreme.
LONDON 2003 (Revised
2012)