Op.
126
THEOSOPHICAL
ILLUMINATIONS
Aphoristic Philosophy
Copyright © 2013 John O’Loughlin
_______________
CONTENTS:-
01. Axial Divergence
02. Heat, Motion, Force and Light
03. Pitch and Antirhythm
04. Rhythm and Antipitch
05. Melody and Antiharmony
06. Harmony and Antimelody
07. Space and Time
08. Antitime and Antispace
09. Volume and Mass
10. Antimass and Antivolume
11. Noumenal Absolutism vis-à-vis Phenomenal
Relativity
12. Noumenal Ethical Antitheses
13. Phenomenal Ethical Antitheses
14. Relativistic Amorality of the World
15. Contrary Fates of the Antiphysical and Chemical
vis-à-vis the Metaphysical and Antimetachemical
16. Contrary Fates of the Metachemical and
Antimetaphysical vis-à-vis the Antichemical and Physical
17. The Church-hegemonic/State-subordinate Axial
Polarities
18. The State-hegemonic/Church-subordinate Axial
Polarities
19. The Respective Gender terms of Existence on the
Church-hegemonic/State-subordinate Axis
20. The Respective Gender terms of Existence on the
State-hegemonic/Church-subordinate Axis
21. Time Flies Metaphysically
22. Time Drags Antimetaphysically
23. Where One Finds Heaven
24. Low and High Divisions within both the Noumenal
and the Phenomenal
25. Noumenal Lowness and Noumenal Antihighness
26. Noumenal Highness and Noumenal Antilowness
27. Phenomenal Lowness and Phenomenal Antihighness
28. Phenomenal Highness and Phenomenal Antilowness
29. Axial Subversion and Inversion doesn’t change
the Fundamental Status of Phenomenal Hegemonic Positions
30. Sanity and Freedom
31. Elemental Sanity vis-à-vis Anti-elemental
Antisanity
32. The Madness of Antisanity
33. The Really Interesting Question
34. Perpetuation of Antisanity in the interests of
Axial Stability
35. How We Perceive Space
36. Space as Spatial Vacuum or Spaced Antivacuum
37. Protons and Antiphotons
38. Photons and Antiprotons
39. Electrons and Antineutrons
40. Neutrons and Anti-electrons
41. Axial Overview of Subatomic Elements and
Anti-elements
42. Protons to Anti-electrons and Antiphotons to
Neutrons
43. Antineutrons to Photons and Electrons to
Antiprotons
44. The Protons of Space vis-à-vis the Antiphotons
of Antitime
45. The Photons of Time vis-à-vis the Antiprotons
of Antispace
46. The Electrons of Volume vis-à-vis the
Antineutrons of Antimass
47. The Neutrons of Mass vis-à-vis the
Anti-electrons of Antivolume
48. Spatial Pitch vis-à-vis Sequential Antirhythm
49. Repetitive Rhythm vis-à-vis Spaced Antipitch
50. Volumetric Melody vis-à-vis Massed Antiharmony
51. Massive Harmony vis-à-vis Voluminous Antimelody
52. Supremacy and Primacy
53. Supremacy vis-à-vis Primacy in Metachemistry
54. Supremacy vis-à-vis Primacy in Chemistry
55. Supremacy vis-à-vis Primacy in Physics
56. Supremacy vis-à-vis Primacy in Metaphysics
57. Elemental Partialities to Will, Spirit, Ego, or
Soul
58. Order of Rank of Metachemical Partialities
59. Order of Rank of Chemical Partialities
60. Order of Rank of Physical Partialities
61. Order of Rank of Metaphysical Partialities
62. Metachemical Supremacy of Beauty and Love
63. Chemical Supremacy of Strength and Pride
64. Physical Supremacy of Knowledge and Pleasure
65. Metaphysical Supremacy of Truth and Joy
66. The Standings of Will and Spirit in
Metachemistry and Chemistry
67. The Standings of Ego and Soul in Physics and
Metaphysics
68. Antisupremacy and Antiprimacy in the
Anti-elements
69. Antimetaphysical Antisupremacy and Antiprimacy
70. Antiphysical Antisupremacy and Antiprimacy
71. Antichemical Antisupremacy and Antiprimacy
72. Antimetachemical Antisupremacy and Antiprimacy
73. Paradoxical Inversion of Gender Emphasis with
Axial Polarities
74. Close Proximity of Low with High and of High
with Low
75. Supreme Noumenal Lowness with Primal Noumenal
Highness
76. Supreme Phenomenal Lowness with Primal
Phenomenal Highness
77. Supreme Phenomenal Highness with Primal
Phenomenal Lowness
78. Supreme Noumenal Highness with Primal Noumenal
Lowness
79. Antisupreme Noumenal Antilowness with
Antiprimal Noumenal Antihighness
80. Antisupreme Phenomenal Antilowness with
Antiprimal Phenomenal Antihighness
81. Antisupreme Phenomenal Antihighness with
Antiprimal Phenomenal Antilowness
82. Antisupreme Noumenal Antihighness with
Antiprimal Noumenal Antilowness
83. Position of Anti-elements more than merely
Anti-elemental
84. Shadow Supremacy and Primacy of Antimetaphysics
85. Shadow Supremacy and Primacy of Antiphysics
86. Shadow Primacy and Supremacy of Antichemistry
87. Shadow Primacy and Supremacy of
Antimetachemistry
88. Hope and Fear in Supremacy and Primacy
89. Lesser Hope and Greater Fear of Shadow
Supremacy and Primacy
90. The Totality of Metachemical Factors
91. The Totality of Antimetaphysical Factors
92. The Totality of Chemical Factors
93. The Totality of Antiphysical Factors
94. The Totality of Physical Factors
95. The Totality of Antichemical Factors
96. The Totality of Metaphysical Factors
97. The Totality of Antimetachemical Factors
98. Somatic Precedence of Psyche with Metachemistry
and Chemistry
99. Psychic Precedence of Soma with Physics and
Metaphysics
100.
The
Paradoxical Justification of Axial Stability
101.
Apologia
for Social Theocracy
_______________
AXIAL DIVERGENCE
To fall, on the one hand, from synthetic nature
(supernature) to non-synthetic artificiality (culture), but to rise, on the other
hand, from non-synthetic nature (nature) to synthetic artificiality
(superculture).
HEAT, MOTION, FORCE AND LIGHT
To contrast, in noumenal absolutism, the heat
of space with the light of time and, down below in phenomenal relativity, the
motion of volume with the force of mass, as one would contrast metachemistry
with metaphysics and chemistry with physics. Hence space over antitime is
equivalent to heat over antilight, metachemistry over antimetaphysics; time
over antispace is equivalent to light over antiheat, metaphysics over
antimetachemistry; volume over antimass is equivalent to motion over antiforce,
chemistry over antiphysics; and mass over antivolume is equivalent to force
over antimotion, physics over antichemistry. In axial terms, heat and
antilight would be antithetical to force and antimotion, with a polar
continuity, within state-hegemonic/church-subordinate terms, established
between heat and antimotion on the one hand, and antilight and force on the
other hand; by contrast, light and antiheat would be antithetical to motion and
antiforce, with a polar continuity, within church-hegemonic/state-subordinate
terms, established between light and antiforce on the one hand, and antiheat
and motion on the other hand. Salvation, as properly germane to the
latter axis, is accordingly from antiforce to light, as from antiphysics to
metaphysics, whilst counter-damnation, its female corollary, is from motion to
antiheat, chemistry to antimetachemistry, the former constitutive of a rise
from antimass to time, the latter of a counter-fall from volume to antispace.
PITCH AND ANTIRHYTHM
The unequivocally hegemonic position of
metachemistry over antimetaphysics at the northwest point of the intercardinal
axial compass is commensurate not only with space (spatial) over antitime
(sequential), as of heat over antilight, but also, in musical terms, with pitch
over antirhythm, the former of which is spatial and the latter of which
sequential, as though subject to spatial pressures from the hegemonic element,
duly strung out, ‘on high’, which may well result in sustained rhythmic
sequences.
RHYTHM AND ANTIPITCH
The unequivocally hegemonic position of
metaphysics over antimetachemistry at the northeast point of the intercardinal
axial compass is commensurate not only with time (repetitive) over antispace
(spaced), as of light over antiheat, but also, in musical terms, with rhythm
over antipitch, the former of which is repetitive and the latter of which
spaced, as though subject to repetitive pressures from the hegemonic element,
tapping out a steady beat, ‘on high’, which may well result in fractured pitch.
MELODY AND ANTIHARMONY
The equivocally hegemonic position of chemistry
over antiphysics at the southwest point of the intercardinal axial compass is commensurate
not only with volume (volumetric) over antimass (massed), as of motion over
antiforce, but also, in musical terms, with melody over antiharmony, the former
of which is volumetric and the latter of which massed, as though subject to
volumetric pressures from the hegemonic element, duly flowing in free motion,
‘on high’, which results in spread chording or arpeggios.
HARMONY AND ANTIMELODY
The equivocally hegemonic position of physics
over antichemistry at the southeast point of the intercardinal axial compass is
commensurate not only with mass (massive) over antivolume (voluminous), as of
force over antimotion, but also, in musical terms, with harmony over
antimelody, the former of which is massive and the latter of which voluminous,
as though subject to massive pressures from the hegemonic element, given to
block chording, ‘on high’, which may well result in ‘block singing’, or vocal
harmonies.
SPACE AND TIME
To contrast the Infinity of Space, which is spatial,
with the Eternity of Time, which is repetitive, as one would contrast the
noumenal objectivity of metachemistry with the noumenal subjectivity of
metaphysics or, in other words, the Devil with God, Absolute Alpha with
Absolute Omega.
ANTITIME AND ANTISPACE
To contrast the Anti-Eternity of Antitime,
which is sequential, with the Anti-Infinity of Antispace, which is spaced, as
one would contrast the noumenal antisubjectivity of antimetaphysics with the
noumenal anti-objectivity of antimetachemistry or, in other words, Antigod with
the Antidevil, Absolute Anti-Omega with Absolute Anti-Alpha.
VOLUME AND MASS
To contrast the Finiteness (finity) of Volume,
which is volumetric, with the Temporality of Mass, which is massive, as one
would contrast the phenomenal objectivity of chemistry with the phenomenal
subjectivity of physics or, in other words, Woman with Man, Relative Alpha with
Relative Omega.
ANTIMASS AND ANTIVOLUME
To contrast the Antitemporality of Antimass, which is massed, with the Antifiniteness (antifinity) of
Antivolume, which is voluminous, as one would contrast the phenomenal
antisubjectivity of antiphysics with the phenomenal anti-objectivity of
antichemistry or, in other words, Antiman with Antiwoman, Relative Anti-Omega
with Relative Anti-Alpha.
NOUMENAL ABSOLUTISM VIS-À-VIS PHENOMENAL
RELATIVITY
In the absolute/relative distinction between
the noumenal and the phenomenal, we have a contrast not only between immorality
and morality in the alpha and omega of the noumenal, viz. metachemistry and
metaphysics, but between these reflections of an absolutist commitment and
their phenomenal counterparts within the relativity of chemistry and physics,
which rather make for opposing types of amorality when once inter-class axial
criteria have been brought to bear on what would otherwise be either relatively
immoral in the phenomenal objectivity of chemistry or relatively moral in the
phenomenal subjectivity of physics. Hence, in overall axial terms, the
worldly positions will tend towards amorality rather than reflect the
immorality or morality, according to axis, of the free and therefore
conditioning factors ‘on high’, in either noumenal objectivity (metachemistry)
or noumenal subjectivity (metaphysics), the former of which is effectively
netherworldly and the latter otherworldly.
NOUMENAL ETHICAL ANTITHESES
Metachemistry and antimetaphysics at the
northwest point of the intercardinal axial compass are symptomatic of immorality
and what could be called antimorality, whereas metaphysics and
antimetachemistry at the northeast point of the said compass are symptomatic of
morality and what could be called anti-immorality. For the former
context, dominated by metachemistry in female vein, is characterized by free
soma and bound psyche, whereas the latter one, dominated by metaphysics in male
vein, is characterized by free psyche and bound soma, since gender
incontrovertibly factors-in to the way in which each of these positions is
estimated. The immorality of metachemistry has to be contrasted with the
morality of metaphysics no less than the antimorality of antimetaphysics with
the anti-immorality of antimetachemistry.
PHENOMENAL ETHICAL ANTITHESES
Chemistry and antiphysics at the southwest
point of the intercardinal axial compass are symptomatic of relative immorality
(sensual amorality) and what could be called relative antimorality
(antisensible amorality), whereas physics and chemistry at the southeast point
of the said compass are symptomatic of relative morality (sensible amorality)
and what could be called relative anti-immorality (antisensual
amorality). For the former context is characterized, in female hegemonic
vein, by free soma and bound psyche (if paradoxically with psychic emphasis in
overall axial terms), whereas the latter one is characterized, in male
hegemonic vein, by free psyche and bound soma (if paradoxically with somatic
emphasis in overall axial terms), since gender factors-in to the way in which each
of these positions are estimated. The relative immorality turned alpha
amorality of chemistry has to be contrasted with the relative morality turned
omega amorality of physics, no less than the relative antimorality turned
anti-omega amorality of antiphysics with the relative anti-immorality turned
anti-alpha amorality of antichemistry.
RELATIVISTIC AMORALITY OF THE WORLD
Hence, in overall axial terms, the worldly
hegemonic positions are effectively amoral, whether on alpha or omega, sensual
or sensible, terms, with their upended gender counterparts being anti-amoral in
relation to the hegemonic amorality across the ethnic divide between the
sensual southwest and the sensible southeast of the intercardinal axial
compass. Relative immorality and relative morality are uncharacteristic
of either church-hegemonic or state-hegemonic axial criteria, because the
subversion to psychic emphasis of chemistry by antiphysics at the behest of
metaphysics over antimetachemistry in the one case, and the subversion to
somatic emphasis of physics by antichemistry at the behest of metachemistry
over antimetaphysics in the other case ensures that amoral binding remains more
characteristic of the phenomenal positions in polar relation to their noumenal
counterparts and effective controllers.
CONTRARY FATES OF THE ANTIPHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL
VIS-À-VIS THE METAPHYSICAL AND ANTIMETACHEMICAL
The antiphysically anti-omega amoral can be
saved to metaphysical morality on the primary church-hegemonic basis of
bound-psychic sin to free-psychic grace and the correlative primary
state-subordinate basis of free-somatic folly to bound-somatic wisdom, whereas
the chemically alpha amoral can only be counter-damned to antimetachemical
anti-immorality on the secondary church-hegemonic basis of bound-psychic
pseudo-crime to free-psychic pseudo-punishment and the correlative secondary
state-subordinate basis of free-somatic pseudo-evil to bound-somatic
pseudo-goodness.
CONTRARY FATES OF THE METACHEMICAL AND
ANTIMETAPHYSICAL VIS-À-VIS THE ANTICHEMICAL AND PHYSICAL
The metachemically immoral can be damned to
antichemical amorality on the primary state-hegemonic basis of free-somatic
evil to bound-somatic goodness and the correlative primary church-subordinate
basis of bound-psychic crime to free-psychic punishment, whereas the
antimetaphysically antimoral can only be counter-saved to physical amorality on
the secondary state-hegemonic basis of free-somatic pseudo-folly to
bound-somatic pseudo-wisdom and the correlative secondary church-subordinate
basis of bound-psychic pseudo-sin to free-psychic pseudo-grace.
THE CHURCH-HEGEMONIC/STATE-SUBORDINATE AXIAL
POLARITIES
That which has not been blessed with salvation
is unblessed with unsalvation, and is therefore antiphysical rather than metaphysical,
antimasculine rather than divine, whereas that which, in conjunction with the
above, has not been counter-cursed with counter-damnation is counter-uncursed
with counter-undamnation, and is therefore chemical rather than
antimetachemical, feminine rather than antidiabolic.
THE STATE-HEGEMONIC/CHURCH-SUBORDINATE AXIAL
POLARITIES
That which has not been cursed with damnation
is uncursed with undamnation, and is therefore metachemical rather than
antichemical, diabolic rather than antifeminine, whereas that which, in
conjunction with the above, has not been counter-blessed with counter-salvation
is counter-unblessed with counter-unsalvation, and is therefore
antimetaphysical rather than physical, antidivine rather than masculine.
THE RESPECTIVE GENDER TERMS OF EXISTENCE ON THE
CHURCH-HEGEMONIC/STATE-SUBORDINATE AXIS
One is saved to the holy blessedness of
absolute gender sync in relation to free psyche and bound soma of a
metaphysical order, whereas one is unsaved in the unholy unblessedness of
relative gender upendedness in relation to bound psyche and free soma of an
antiphysical order under the clear counter-uncursedness of relative gender sync
in relation to bound psyche and free soma of a chemical order of that which,
being counter-undamned, has not been counter-damned, in the wake of the
unblessed being saved, to the unclear counter-cursedness of absolute gender
upendedness in relation to free psyche and bound soma of an antimetachemical
order, as from the southwest to the northeast points of the intercardinal axial
compass on what has been described as the church-hegemonic/state-subordinate
axis of chemistry over antiphysics and metaphysics over antimetachemistry,
pretty much as volume over antimass and time over antispace.
THE RESPECTIVE GENDER TERMS OF EXISTENCE ON THE
STATE-HEGEMONIC/CHURCH-SUBORDINATE AXIS
One is damned to the unclear cursedness of
relative gender upendedness in relation to bound soma and free psyche of an
antichemical order, whereas one is undamned in the clear uncursedness of
absolute gender sync in relation to free soma and bound psyche of a
metachemical order over the unholy counter-unblessedness of absolute gender
upendedness in relation to free soma and bound psyche of an antimetaphysical
order of that which, being counter-unsaved, has not been counter-saved, in the
wake of the uncursed being damned, to the holy counter-blessedness of relative
gender sync in relation to bound soma and free psyche of a physical order, as
from the northwest to the southeast points of the intercardinal axial compass
on what has been described as the state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis of
metachemistry over antimetaphysics and physics over antichemistry, pretty much
as space over antitime and mass over antivolume.
TIME FLIES METAPHYSICALLY
Time flies metaphysically because it is
hegemonically free to be true to itself in the repetitive beat of its
transcendental advance.
TIME DRAGS ANTIMETAPHYSICALLY
Time drags antimetaphysically because it is sequentially
subject to the hegemonic sway of metachemical space and in no position to be
repetitively true to itself in consequence.
WHERE ONE FINDS HEAVEN
There are fools who believe that Heaven is
beyond time, as though Eternity were timeless! When time flies, as it
does metaphysically, it is no problem. It is only when, as antitime, it
is under the spatial heel of metachemistry that it drags (sequentially) and
becomes proportionately problematic. But if that is akin to Antigod under
the Devil (or Devil the Mother hyped as God over Antigod done down as the
Devil), it is not behind that in the infinity of metachemical space that one
finds Heaven but, contrary to traditional conventions, at the opposite noumenal
extreme to metachemistry which is metaphysics and, consequently, with the
hegemony of repetitive time over the antispace (spaced space) of
antimetachemistry which is akin to God over the Antidevil.
LOW AND HIGH DIVISIONS WITHIN BOTH THE NOUMENAL
AND THE PHENOMENAL
In distinguishing between the noumenal and the
phenomenal, the ethereal and the corporeal, I have tended, in comparative
terms, to regard the one as high and the other as low, if only because space
and time prevail over volume and mass, as fire and air over water and
earth. But in relation to either the noumenal or the phenomenal itself,
we can distinguish between the low and the high, not to mention, where the
subservient gender is concerned, between what could be called the antihigh and
the antilow, thereby bringing each point on the intercardinal axial compass
into line with the overall dichotomy between the hegemonic gender and its
upended counterpart, whether in terms of low and antihigh or, across the axial
divide, of high and antilow.
NOUMENAL LOWNESS AND NOUMENAL ANTIHIGHNESS
The distinction between metachemistry and
antimetaphysics at the northwest point of the intercardinal axial compass is
therefore one between the noumenal low and the noumenal antihigh,
superheathenism and anti-superchristianity, supernature and anti-superartifice,
insofar as, in gender representative terms, what constitutes lowness in the one
case, namely somatic freedom, is complemented by what constitutes antihighness
in the other case, namely psychic binding.
NOUMENAL HIGHNESS AND NOUMENAL ANTILOWNESS
The distinction between metaphysics and
antimetachemistry at the northeast point of the intercardinal axial compass is
therefore one between the noumenal high and the noumenal antilow,
superchristianity and anti-superheathenism, superartifice and anti-supernature,
insofar as, in gender representative terms, what constitutes highness in the
one case, namely psychic freedom, is complemented by what constitutes
antilowness in the other case, namely somatic binding.
PHENOMENAL LOWNESS AND PHENOMENAL ANTIHIGHNESS
The distinction between chemistry and
antiphysics at the southwest point of the intercardinal axial compass is
therefore one between the phenomenal low and the phenomenal antihigh, heathenism
and antichristianity, nature and anti-artifice, insofar as, in gender
representative terms, what constitutes lowness in the one case, namely somatic
freedom, is complemented by what constitutes antihighness in the other case,
namely psychic binding.
PHENOMENAL HIGHNESS AND PHENOMENAL ANTILOWNESS
The distinction between physics and
antichemistry at the southeast point of the intercardinal axial compass is
therefore one between the phenomenal high and the phenomenal antilow,
Christianity and antiheathenism, artifice and antinature, insofar as, in gender
representative terms, what constitutes highness in the one case, namely psychic
freedom, is complemented by what constitutes antilowness in the other case,
namely somatic binding.
AXIAL SUBVERSION AND INVERSION DOESN’T CHANGE
THE FUNDAMENTAL STATUS OF PHENOMENAL HEGEMONIC POSITIONS
Of course, this detracts nothing from the fact
that the hegemonic phenomenal positions are normally subject to axial
subversion and paradoxical inversion at the behest of the noumenal positions
axially corresponding to themselves, so that, far from an outright heathenism
of free somatic emphasis in the chemical/antiphysical gender dichotomy at the
southwest point of the intercardinal axial compass one finds, traditionally at
any rate, the paradoxical inversion to bound psychic emphasis vis-à-vis such
free psyche ostensibly obtaining in metaphysics over antimetachemistry at the
northeast point of what constitutes church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axial
criteria in Roman Catholic fashion. Likewise, if in contrary terms, far
from an outright Christianity of free psychic emphasis in the
physical/antichemical gender dichotomy at the southeast point of the
intercardinal axial compass, one finds, again traditionally, the paradoxical
inversion to bound somatic emphasis vis-à-vis such free soma as indubitably
obtains in metachemistry over antimetaphysics at the northwest point of what
constitutes state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axial criteria in Anglican
Monarchic fashion. Nevertheless, even then, we have a logical right to
distinguish, according to gender, between the phenomenal low/phenomenal
antihigh on the one axial hand, and their phenomenally high/phenomenally
antilow ethnic counterparts on the other axial hand, as between the generality
of persons of Irish Catholic and British Puritan descent.
SANITY AND FREEDOM
Because freedom and sanity are correlative, it
follows that there can be no sanity without freedom and, conversely, no freedom
without sanity. What is not generally acknowledged, however, is that
sanity, like freedom, takes two forms – the female form rooted in soma and the
male form centred in psyche, and that the one, when hegemonic, tends to exclude
the other. I have, in the past, described the metachemical and chemical
forms of sanity as outer sanity, or ‘outsanity’ for short, and the physical and
metaphysical forms of sanity, by contrast, as inner sanity, or ‘insanity’ for
short, since in the one case soma and in the other case psyche are the
characteristic factors attaching to these elements.
ELEMENTAL SANITY VIS-À-VIS ANTI-ELEMENTAL
ANTISANITY
Where there are elements, however, there are
also, in under-plane subjection, anti-elements, i.e., antimetaphysics under
metachemistry, antiphysics under chemistry, antichemistry under physics, and
antimetachemistry under metaphysics, and if the elements are significant,
relative to gender, of opposite forms of sanity, then the anti-elements could
be described as signifying, again relative to gender, opposite forms of
antisanity, whether in terms of the anti-insanity of antimetaphysics and
antiphysics or, across the axial divide, in terms of the anti-outsanity of
antichemistry and antimetachemistry.
THE MADNESS OF ANTISANITY
I have no hesitation in equating the antisanity
of the anti-elemental positions with madness and in differentiating it from
both ‘outsanity’, viz. outer sanity, and ‘insanity’, viz, inner sanity, since
it is in all instances a product, primarily, of binding, of psychic binding in
the antimetaphysical and antiphysical anti-elements under the free-somatic
hegemonic pressure of metachemistry and chemistry respectively, and of somatic
binding in the antichemical and antimetachemical anti-elements under the
free-psychic hegemonic pressure of physics and metaphysics respectively.
Hence that which, in the one case, is anti-insane in the antisanity of
antimetaphysical or antiphysical bound psyche and that which, in the other
case, is anti-outsane in the antisanity of antichemical or antimetachemical
bound soma is alone mad, in the sense of being at cross-purposes with its
gender actuality under hegemonic pressure from the opposite gender, be that
gender female and given to free soma (outer sanity) or male and given to free
psyche (inner sanity), the former type of sanity low and the latter type of
sanity high in both phenomenal and noumenal elemental contexts.
THE REALLY INTERESTING QUESTION
The really interesting question in relation to the
preceding findings is whether or not disillusion with the madness of antisanity
leads to sanity for the disillusioned, whether in terms of a male acceptance of
inner sanity or, contrariwise, a female acceptance of outer sanity, or whether,
on the contrary, the hegemonic pressure on the subject gender is such as to
preclude movement, attendant upon a formal rejection of their upended
predicament, in one of the two alternative directions open to their class
position, be it noumenal in antimetaphysics and antimetachemistry or phenomenal
in antiphysics and antichemistry.
PERPETUATION OF ANTISANITY IN THE INTERESTS OF
AXIAL STABILITY
Now this question is more complex than at first
seems to be the case, since inter-class factors also play their part in maintaining,
at the expense of phenomenal freedom, either church-hegemonic/state-subordinate
axial criteria or, across the ethnic divide, state-hegemonic/church-subordinate
axial criteria, as previously outlined in various of my mature writings, the
former axis tending to ascend from southwest to northeast points and the latter
axis tending, by contrast, to descend from northwest to southeast points of the
intercardinal axial compass. Consequently few if any male catholics,
corresponding to antiphysics, at the southwest point of the said compass get
encouragement from their polar counterparts at the northeast on what is the
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis to abandon their bound-psychic
antisanity under chemical outer sanity for a class-related inner sanity
corresponding to physics. On the contrary, they are made to believe in
salvation to God ‘on high’, meaning metaphysics (though that is never fully or
properly the case in view of the extent to which metachemistry hyped
metaphysically detracts from true metaphysics and usually leads to it being
done down antimetachemically) and to accept their sinful predicament as a
matter of course. Contrariwise, few if any female puritans, corresponding
to antichemistry, at the southeast point of the intercardinal axial compass get
encouragement from their polar counterparts at the northwest on what is the
state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis to abandon their bound-somatic
antisanity under physical inner sanity for a class-related outer sanity
corresponding to chemistry. On the contrary, they are encouraged to
accept their antisane fate since it corresponds to what is good in
state-hegemonic contrast to all that, in metachemical free soma, is
fundamentally evil, and without their polar status to this noumenal form of
outer sanity no state-hegemonic/church-subordinate primacy would exist to
perpetuate the axis in question as one characterized, overall, by female
dominion. Consequently the phenomenal forms of antisanity remain axially
fixed in each ethnic case in the overall interests of axial stability and
continuity. The same applies, with minor variations, to their noumenal
counterparts, antimetaphysics remaining subject to metachemistry and
antimetachemistry subject to a degree of compromised metaphysics.
HOW WE PERCEIVE SPACE
Space in terms of a void is not something that
our mind, as a function of our brain, is able or inclined to comprehend.
For space is nothing to us unless it is perceived as a function of an object,
since that is precisely what our mind is, whose object is the brain.
Objects determine space and they do so in one of two principal ways: either in
terms of the space between objects, which is spatial, or in terms of the
relative positions, in space, of objects one to another, which is spaced.
In the first case, we have room between this and that. In the second
case, this is here and that is there, whether to left or right, above or
beneath, behind or in front, and so on. The first, moored in a spatial
vacuum, is arguably a metachemical perception and the latter an
antimetachemical conception or, more correctly, antiperception in which space
is less important than what fills it and how. In neither case do we have
anything metaphysical, but it could certainly be argued that the spaced take on
space owes a lot to metaphysical pressures emanating from a male hegemonic
position in time, which is repetitive, and is therefore, as antispace, more
antifemale than female. Its male or, rather, antimale counterpart would
be the sequential approach to time as antitime which, being antimetaphysical,
owes a lot to metachemical pressures emanating from a female hegemonic position
in space, which is spatial, and therefore concerned with the spaces between
objects such that can only extend time or draw it out proportionately.
SPACE AS SPATIAL VACUUM OR SPACED ANTIVACUUM
Space as room between objects, being spatial,
appertains to a vacuum, and is therefore inherently female in character.
Space as relative position of objects, being spaced, appertains to an
antivacuum, and is therefore inherently antifemale in character. In no
sense is space male and of a plenum.
PROTONS AND ANTIPHOTONS
Having already established that metachemistry
over antimetaphysics at the northwest point of the intercardinal axial compass
is equivalent to heat over antilight, I should now like to take the process a
subatomic step further and contend, probably for the first time in my entire
philosophical vocation, that heat is equivalent to protons and antilight to
antiphotons, so that metachemistry becomes identified, willy-nilly, with
protons and antimetaphysics with antiphotons.
PHOTONS AND ANTIPROTONS
Having already established that metaphysics
over antimetachemistry at the northeast point of the intercardinal axial compass
is equivalent to light over antiheat, I should now like to take the process a
subatomic step further and contend, probably for the first time in my entire
philosophical vocation, that light is equivalent to photons and antiheat to
antiprotons, so that metaphysics becomes identified, willy-nilly, with photons
and antimetachemistry with antiprotons.
ELECTRONS AND ANTINEUTRONS
Having already established that chemistry over
antiphysics at the southwest point of the intercardinal axial compass is equivalent
to motion over antiforce, I should now like to take the process a subatomic
step further and contend, probably for the first time in my entire
philosophical vocation, that motion is equivalent to electrons and antiforce to
antineutrons, so that chemistry becomes identified, willy-nilly, with electrons
and antiphysics with antineutrons.
NEUTRONS AND ANTI-ELECTRONS
Having already established that physics over
antichemistry at the southeast point of the intercardinal axial compass is
equivalent to force over antimotion, I should now like to take the process a
subatomic step further and contend, probably for the first time in my entire
philosophical vocation, that force is equivalent to neutrons and antimotion to
anti-electrons, so that physics becomes identified, willy-nilly, with neutrons
and antichemistry with anti-electrons.
AXIAL OVERVIEW OF SUBATOMIC ELEMENTS AND
ANTI-ELEMENTS
Regarding the intercardinal axial compass in
toto, we would have a descending axis from protons and antiphotons at the northwest
to neutrons and anti-electrons at the southeast, but an ascending axis, by
contrast, from electrons and antineutrons at the southwest to photons and
antiprotons at the northeast, as though in an ethnic distinction, overall,
between state-hegemonic/church-subordinate and
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axial criteria.
PROTONS TO ANTI-ELECTRONS AND ANTIPHOTONS TO
NEUTRONS
The state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis,
descending from northwest to southeast, would accordingly furnish us with a gender-parallel
polarity between metachemical protons and antichemical anti-electrons on
primary (female) state-hegemonic/church-subordinate terms and between
antimetaphysical antiphotons and physical neutrons on secondary (male)
state-hegemonic/church-subordinate terms.
ANTINEUTRONS TO PHOTONS AND ELECTRONS TO
ANTIPROTONS
The church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis,
ascending from southwest to northeast, would accordingly furnish us with a gender-parallel
polarity between antiphysical antineutrons and metaphysical photons on primary
(male) church-hegemonic/state-subordinate terms and between chemical electrons
and antimetachemical antiprotons on secondary (female)
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate terms.
THE PROTONS OF SPACE VIS-À-VIS THE ANTIPHOTONS
OF ANTITIME
One should note a correspondence between space
(spatial) and protons in metachemistry, and antitime (sequential) and
antiphotons in antimetaphysics, as between heat and antilight, the former
equivalent to devility and the latter to antidivinity.
THE PHOTONS OF TIME VIS-À-VIS THE ANTIPROTONS
OF ANTISPACE
One should note a correspondence between time
(repetitive) and photons in metaphysics, and antispace (spaced) and antiprotons
in antimetachemistry, as between light and antiheat, the former equivalent to
divinity and the latter to antidevility.
THE ELECTRONS OF VOLUME VIS-À-VIS THE
ANTINEUTRONS OF ANTIMASS
One should note a correspondence between volume
(volumetric) and electrons in chemistry, and antimass (massed) and antineutrons
in antiphysics, as between motion and antiforce, the former equivalent to
femininity and the latter to antimasculinity.
THE NEUTRONS OF MASS VIS-À-VIS THE
ANTI-ELECTRONS OF ANTIVOLUME
One should note a correspondence between mass
(massive) and neutrons in physics, and antivolume (voluminous) and
anti-electrons in antichemistry, as between force and antimotion, the former
equivalent to masculinity and the latter to antifemininity.
SPATIAL PITCH VIS-À-VIS SEQUENTIAL ANTIRHYTHM
In musical terms, pitch, being durational,
would correspond to space and hence to proton heat, whereas antirhythm would
correspond to antitime and hence to antiphoton antilight, pitch (spatial) dominating
antirhythm (sequential) as the Devil Antigod and/or Hell Antiheaven at the
metachemical/antimetaphysical northwest point of the intercardinal axial
compass.
REPETITIVE RHYTHM VIS-À-VIS SPACED ANTIPITCH
In musical terms, rhythm would correspond to
time and hence to photon light, whereas antipitch would correspond to antispace
and hence to antiproton antiheat, time (repetitive) dominating antipitch
(spaced) as God the Antidevil and/or Heaven Antihell at the
metaphysical/antimetachemical northeast point of the intercardinal axial
compass.
VOLUMETRIC MELODY VIS-À-VIS MASSED ANTIHARMONY
In musical terms, melody would correspond to
motion and hence to electron volume, whereas antiharmony would correspond to
antimass and hence to antineutron antiforce, melody (volumetric) dominating
antiharmony (massed) as Woman Antiman and/or Purgatory Anti-earth at the
chemical/antiphysical southwest point of the intercardinal axial compass.
MASSIVE HARMONY VIS-À-VIS VOLUMINOUS ANTIMELODY
In musical terms, harmony would correspond to
force and hence to neutron mass, whereas antimelody would correspond to
antivolume and hence to anti-electron antimotion, harmony (massive) dominating
antimelody (voluminous) as Man Antiwoman and/or the Earth Antipurgatory at the physical/antichemical
southeast point of the intercardinal axial compass.
SUPREMACY AND PRIMACY
Just as we have distinguished the light from
the dark, or brightness from shadow, in terms of freedom and binding,
irrespective of whether in relation to soma or to psyche, so we can further
distinguish the light from the dark in terms of supremacy and primacy, the
former appertaining to freedom and the latter to binding, so that supremacy,
like primacy, can be either somatic or psychic, female or male, sensual or
sensible, alpha or omega, metachemical and/or chemical or physical and/or
metaphysical.
SUPREMACY VIS-À-VIS PRIMACY IN METACHEMISTRY
Therefore metachemistry affords us elemental proof
of a context in which supernatural supremacy, affiliated to free soma,
co-exists with supernatural primacy, affiliated to bound psyche, in terms of
beauty and love vis-à-vis ugliness and hatred, the former pair germane to free
will and spirit, the latter pair to bound ego and soul.
SUPREMACY VIS-À-VIS PRIMACY IN CHEMISTRY
Likewise chemistry affords us elemental proof
of a context in which natural supremacy, affiliated to free soma, co-exists
with natural primacy, affiliated to bound psyche, in terms of strength and
pride vis-à-vis weakness and humility, the former pair germane to free will and
spirit, the latter pair to bound ego and soul.
SUPREMACY VIS-À-VIS PRIMACY IN PHYSICS
Contrariwise, physics affords us elemental
proof of a context in which artificial supremacy, affiliated to free psyche,
co-exists with artificial primacy, affiliated to bound soma, in terms of
knowledge and pleasure vis-à-vis ignorance and pain, the former pair germane to
free ego and soul, the latter pair to bound will and spirit.
SUPREMACY VIS-À-VIS PRIMACY IN METAPHYSICS
Similarly metaphysics affords us elemental
proof of a context in which super-artificial supremacy, affiliated to free
psyche, co-exists with super-artificial primacy, affiliated to bound soma, in
terms of truth and joy vis-à-vis illusion and woe, the former pair germane to
free ego and soul, the latter pair to bound will and spirit.
ELEMENTAL PARTIALITIES TO WILL, SPIRIT, EGO, OR
SOUL
Although will, spirit, ego, and soul are to be
found in every elemental position, as at every point of the intercardinal axial
compass, they do not exist on the same terms or with the same emphasis in every
element, since that which, as metachemistry, is conditioned by the noumenal
objectivity of space will be more partial to will (and subsequently to spirit)
than to soul or ego; that which, as chemistry, is conditioned by the phenomenal
objectivity of volume will be more partial to spirit (and subsequently to will)
than to ego or soul; that which, as physics, is conditioned by the phenomenal
subjectivity of mass will be more partial to ego (and subsequently to soul)
than to spirit or will; and that which, as metaphysics, is conditioned by the
noumenal subjectivity of time will be more partial to soul (and subsequently to
ego) than to will or spirit. In fact, in all cases, the principal and
subsequent partialities will be free and the remaining attributes or factors
bound.
ORDER OF RANK OF METACHEMICAL PARTIALITIES
In fact, one could speak of metachemistry as
the element which is most partial to will, more (relative to most) partial to
spirit, less (relative to least) partial to ego, and least partial to soul, the
most and more partial factors corresponding to somatic freedom, and hence to
low noumenal supremacy; the less and least partial factors corresponding to
psychic binding, and hence to high noumenal primacy.
ORDER OF RANK OF CHEMICAL PARTIALITIES
Likewise one could speak of chemistry as the element
which is most partial to spirit, more (relative to most) partial to will, less
(relative to least) partial to soul, and least partial to ego, the most and
more partial factors corresponding to somatic freedom, and hence to low
phenomenal supremacy; the less and least partial factors corresponding to
psychic binding, and hence to high phenomenal primacy.
ORDER OF RANK OF PHYSICAL PARTIALITIES
Contrariwise, one could speak of physics as the
element which is most partial to ego, more (relative to most) partial to soul,
less (relative to least) partial to will, and least partial to spirit, the most
and more partial factors corresponding to psychic freedom, and hence to high
phenomenal supremacy; the less and least partial factors corresponding to somatic
binding, and hence to low phenomenal primacy.
ORDER OF RANK OF METAPHYSICAL PARTIALITIES
Likewise one could speak of metaphysics as the
element which is most partial to soul, more (relative to most) partial to ego,
less (relative to least) partial to spirit, and least partial to will, the most
and more partial factors corresponding to psychic freedom, and hence to high
noumenal supremacy; the less and least partial factors corresponding to somatic
binding, and hence to low noumenal primacy.
METACHEMICAL SUPREMACY OF BEAUTY AND LOVE
Hence, in metachemistry, beauty and love,
corresponding to free will and spirit, to noumenally supreme doing and giving,
take precedence over ugliness and hatred, corresponding to bound ego and soul,
to noumenally primal taking and being, as low noumenal supremacy over high
noumenal primacy.
CHEMICAL SUPREMACY OF STRENGTH AND PRIDE
Likewise, in chemistry, strength and pride,
corresponding to free will and spirit, to phenomenally supreme doing and
giving, take precedence over weakness and humility, corresponding to bound ego
and soul, to phenomenally primal taking and being, as low phenomenal supremacy
over high phenomenal primacy.
PHYSICAL SUPREMACY OF KNOWLEDGE AND PLEASURE
Contrariwise, in physics, knowledge and pleasure,
corresponding to free ego and soul, to phenomenally supreme taking and being,
take precedence over ignorance and pain, corresponding to bound will and
spirit, to phenomenally primal doing and giving, as high phenomenal supremacy
over low phenomenal primacy.
METAPHYSICAL SUPREMACY OF TRUTH AND JOY
Similarly, in metaphysics, truth and joy,
corresponding to free ego and soul, to noumenally supreme taking and being,
take precedence over illusion and woe, corresponding to bound will and spirit,
to noumenally primal doing and giving, as high noumenal supremacy over low
noumenal primacy.
THE STANDINGS OF WILL AND SPIRIT IN
METACHEMISTRY AND CHEMISTRY
However, strictly speaking, will takes
precedence over spirit in metachemistry, which is an element conditioned by the
beauty of supreme doing in free will, whereas spirit, by contrast, takes
precedence over will in chemistry, which is an element conditioned by the pride
of supreme giving in free spirit – the difference, one could argue, between
fire and water, noumenal objectivity and phenomenal objectivity, elemental
particles and molecular particles, devility and femininity.
THE STANDINGS OF EGO AND SOUL IN PHYSICS AND
METAPHYSICS
Contrariwise, ego takes precedence over soul in
physics, which is an element conditioned by the knowledge of supreme taking in
free ego (thought), whereas soul, by contrast, takes precedence over ego in
metaphysics, which is an element conditioned by the joy of supreme being in
free soul – the difference, one could argue, between earth (vegetation) and
air, phenomenal subjectivity and noumenal subjectivity, molecular wavicles and
elemental wavicles, masculinity and divinity.
ANTISUPREMACY AND ANTIPRIMACY IN THE
ANTI-ELEMENTS
Having dealt with the principal elements, viz. metachemistry,
chemistry, physics, and metaphysics, I should now like to briefly
deal with their corresponding anti-elements, viz. antimetaphysics, antiphysics,
antichemistry, and antimetachemistry, in which an ‘anti’ approach to the
freedom and binding, the supremacy and primacy, of their elemental counterparts
can be adduced, principally in consequence of elemental pressure from the
hegemonic gender position at each point of the intercardinal axial compass
which is responsible, in no small degree, for the gender cross-purposes and
upendedness, as I usually term it, of the subservient gender, now reduced to an
antimale and/or antifemale status which approaches the hegemonic gender ideal
through the distorting prism, as it were, of its own anti-elemental position.
ANTIMETAPHYSICAL ANTISUPREMACY AND ANTIPRIMACY
Since antimetaphysics is ranged under
metachemistry at the northwest point of the intercardinal axial compass, as
antitime under space, so it is correspondingly characterized by antihigh noumenal
antisupremacy in bound psyche and by antilow noumenal antiprimacy in free soma,
anti-truth/joy and anti-illusion/woe, which renders it deferential, with what
remains to it, to low noumenal supremacy in free soma and to high noumenal
primacy in bound psyche, viz. beauty and love on the one hand, and ugliness and
hatred on the other hand, the former pair taking precedence over the latter as
light supremacy over shadow primacy, even though such a situation cannot but be
paradoxical from a male standpoint which, were it not at antidivine antimale
cross-purposes with itself, would be orientated towards free psyche and bound
soma.
ANTIPHYSICAL ANTISUPREMACY AND ANTIPRIMACY
Since antiphysics is ranged under chemistry at
the southwest point of the intercardinal axial compass, as antimass under
volume, so it is correspondingly characterized by antihigh phenomenal
antisupremacy in bound psyche and by antilow phenomenal antiprimacy in free
soma, anti-knowledge/pleasure and anti-ignorance/pain, which renders it
deferential, with what remains to it, to low phenomenal supremacy in free soma
and to high phenomenal primacy in bound psyche, viz. strength and pride on the
one hand, and weakness and humility (if not humiliation) on the other hand, the
former pair effectively taking precedence over the latter as light supremacy
over shadow primacy, even though such a situation cannot but be paradoxical
from a male standpoint which, were it not at antimasculine antimale
cross-purposes with itself, would be orientated towards free psyche and bound
soma.
ANTICHEMICAL ANTISUPREMACY AND ANTIPRIMACY
Since antichemistry is ranged under physics at
the southeast point of the intercardinal axial compass, as antivolume under
mass, so it is correspondingly characterized by antilow phenomenal
antisupremacy in bound soma and by antihigh phenomenal antiprimacy in free
psyche, anti-strength/pride and anti-weakness/humility, which renders it
deferential, with what remains to it, to high phenomenal supremacy in free
psyche and to low phenomenal primacy in bound soma, viz. knowledge and pleasure
on the one hand, and ignorance and pain on the other hand, the former pair
effectively taking precedence over the latter as light supremacy over shadow
primacy, even though such a situation cannot but be paradoxical from a female
standpoint which, were it not at antifeminine antifemale cross-purposes with
itself, would be orientated towards free soma and bound psyche.
ANTIMETACHEMICAL ANTISUPREMACY AND ANTIPRIMACY
Since antimetachemistry is ranged under
metaphysics at the northeast point of the intercardinal axial compass, as
antispace under time, so it is correspondingly characterized by antilow
noumenal antisupremacy in bound soma and by antihigh noumenal antiprimacy in
free psyche, anti-beauty/love and anti-ugliness/hate, which renders it
deferential, with what remains to it, to high noumenal supremacy in free psyche
and to low noumenal primacy in bound soma, viz. truth and joy on the one hand,
and illusion and woe on the other hand, the former pair taking precedence over
the latter as light supremacy over shadow primacy, even though such a situation
cannot but be paradoxical from a female standpoint which, were it not at
antidiabolic antifemale cross-purposes with itself, would be orientated towards
free soma and bound psyche.
PARADOXICAL INVERSION OF GENDER EMPHASIS WITH
AXIAL POLARITIES
Of course, axial interplay between the
phenomenal positions and their corresponding noumenal counterparts on both the
state-hegemonic and church-hegemonic axes modifies the phenomenal positions
away from an overly supreme emphasis on either somatic (chemical/antiphysical)
or psychic (physical/antichemical) terms, corresponding to heathenistic and
christianistic alternatives, thereby resulting in the paradoxical emphasis on
either bound psyche at the southwest or bound soma at the southeast points of
the intercardinal axial compass, neither of which corresponds to supremacy but
only to primal pre-conditions (church-hegemonic axis) or post-conditions
(state-hegemonic axis) of supremacy, be that supremacy psychic and high or
somatic and low at the noumenal poles of their respective axes.
CLOSE PROXIMITY OF LOW WITH HIGH AND OF HIGH
WITH LOW
It has been said that the low and the high or, conversely,
the high and the low ‘hang together’, in elemental proximity to each other,
and, to be sure, that is absolutely the case. Even if we account for the
Devil and Antigod noumenal lowness and noumenal antihighness at the northwest
point or, conversely, the God and Antidevil noumenal highness and noumenal
antilowness at the northeast point of the intercardinal axial compass, we soon
find, on closer inspection, that such distinctions amount to generalizations
concerning the more characteristic, according to gender, aspects of each
position, be it elemental or anti-elemental, hegemonic or subservient.
For such juxtapositions of lowness and highness accrue, as we have seen, to the
same element, be it metachemical, chemical, physical, or metaphysical, and even
their corresponding anti-elements reflect such a dichotomy both in terms,
always more significant, of what they are against and, with what little remains
to them following the rejection (consciously or unconsciously) of their gender
ideal, the extent to which they defer to the prevailing ideal, be it somatic
(and female) or psychic (and male).
SUPREME NOUMENAL LOWNESS WITH PRIMAL NOUMENAL
HIGHNESS
Thus metachemistry affords us the juxtaposition
of supreme noumenal lowness with primal noumenal highness in terms of the
beauty and love of free metachemical soma with the ugliness and hatred of bound
metachemical psyche, supreme noumenal doing and giving with primal noumenal
taking and being, play light with work darkness in the noumenal objectivity of
space which, being fiery, is spatial.
SUPREME PHENOMENAL LOWNESS WITH PRIMAL
PHENOMENAL HIGHNESS
Thus chemistry affords us the juxtaposition of
supreme phenomenal lowness with primal phenomenal highness in terms of the
strength and pride of free chemical soma with the weakness and humility of
bound chemical psyche, supreme phenomenal doing and giving with primal
phenomenal taking and being, play light with work darkness in the phenomenal
objectivity of volume which, being watery, is volumetric.
SUPREME PHENOMENAL HIGHNESS WITH PRIMAL
PHENOMENAL LOWNESS
Thus physics affords us the juxtaposition of
supreme phenomenal highness with primal phenomenal lowness in terms of the
knowledge and pleasure of free physical psyche with the ignorance and pain of
bound physical soma, supreme phenomenal taking and being with primal phenomenal
doing and giving, play light with work darkness in the phenomenal subjectivity
of mass which, being earthy (or vegetative), is massive.
SUPREME NOUMENAL HIGHNESS WITH PRIMAL NOUMENAL
LOWNESS
Thus metaphysics affords us the juxtaposition
of supreme noumenal highness with primal noumenal lowness in terms of the truth
and joy of free metaphysical psyche with the illusion and woe of bound
metaphysical soma, supreme noumenal taking and being with primal noumenal doing
and giving, play light with work darkness in the noumenal subjectivity of time
which, being airy, is repetitive.
ANTISUPREME NOUMENAL ANTILOWNESS WITH
ANTIPRIMAL NOUMENAL ANTIHIGHNESS
However, antimetachemistry affords us the
juxtaposition of antisupreme noumenal antilowness with antiprimal noumenal
antihighness in terms of the antibeauty and antilove of bound antimetachemical
soma with the anti-ugliness and antihatred of free antimetachemical psyche,
antisupreme noumenal antidoing and antigiving with antiprimal noumenal
antitaking and antibeing, antiplay antilight with antiwork antidarkness in the
noumenal anti-objectivity of antispace which, being antifiery, is spaced.
ANTISUPREME PHENOMENAL ANTILOWNESS WITH
ANTIPRIMAL PHENOMENAL ANTIHIGHNESS
Similarly, antichemistry affords us the
juxtaposition of antisupreme phenomenal antilowness with antiprimal phenomenal
antihighness in terms of the antistrength and antipride of bound antichemical
soma with the antiweakness and antihumility of free antichemical psyche,
antisupreme phenomenal antidoing and antigiving with antiprimal phenomenal
antitaking and antibeing, antiplay antilight with antiwork antidarkness in the
phenomenal anti-objectivity of antivolume which, being antiwatery, is
voluminous.
ANTISUPREME PHENOMENAL ANTIHIGHNESS WITH
ANTIPRIMAL PHENOMENAL ANTILOWNESS
Contrariwise, antiphysics affords us the
juxtaposition of antisupreme phenomenal antihighness with antiprimal phenomenal
antilowness in terms of the antiknowledge and antipleasure of bound
antiphysical psyche with the anti-ignorance and antipain of free antiphysical
soma, antisupreme phenomenal antitaking and antibeing with antiprimal
phenomenal antidoing and antigiving, antiplay antilight with antiwork
antidarkness in the phenomenal antisubjectivity of antimass which, being
anti-earthy (or antivegetative), is massed.
ANTISUPREME NOUMENAL ANTIHIGHNESS WITH
ANTIPRIMAL NOUMENAL ANTILOWNESS
Likewise, antimetaphysics affords us the
juxtaposition of antisupreme noumenal antihighness with antiprimal noumenal
antilowness in terms of the antitruth and antijoy of bound antimetaphysical
psyche with the anti-illusion and antiwoe of free antimetaphysical soma,
antisupreme noumenal antitaking and antibeing with antiprimal noumenal
antidoing and antigiving, antiplay antilight with antiwork antidarkness in the
noumenal antisubjectivity of antitime which, being anti-airy, is sequential.
POSTION OF ANTI-ELEMENTS MORE THAN MERELY
ANTI-ELEMENTAL
That said, one would be underestimating the
‘anti’ positions, with their rejection of the supreme and primal elemental
values, were one to confine them to nothing more than an ‘anti’ approach to the
positivity and negativity of their corresponding elements – antimetaphysics
vis-à-vis metaphysics, antiphysics vis-à-vis physics, antichemistry vis-à-vis
chemistry, and antimetachemistry vis-à-vis metachemistry – since their
deference to the hegemonic elements prevailing over them in relation to the
opposite gender is partly founded upon a paradoxical inversion of the elemental
values, be they positive (and supreme) or negative (and primal) to which their
hegemonic counterparts would normally subscribe.
SHADOW SUPREMACY AND PRIMACY OF ANTIMETAPHYSICS
In the case, for example, of antimetaphysics
under metachemistry at the northwest point of the intercardinal axial compass,
the rejection of bound metaphysical soma in the anti-illusion and antiwoe of
free antimetaphysical soma makes for a secondary low noumenal supremacy in
terms of truth and joy, whereas the correlative rejection of free metaphysical
psyche in the antitruth and antijoy of bound antimetaphysical psyche makes for
a secondary high noumenal primacy in terms of illusion and woe, the former pair
deferring, on secondary state-hegemonic terms, to the beauty and love of free
metachemical soma, the latter pair deferring, on secondary church-subordinate
terms, to the ugliness and hatred of bound metachemical psyche. Neither
mode of secondary supremacy and primacy, however, can be anything but false in
relation to metaphysics, where supremacy is ever psychic and primacy somatic.
SHADOW SUPREMACY AND PRIMACY OF ANTIPHYSICS
In the case, likewise, of antiphysics under
chemistry at the southwest point of the intercardinal axial compass, the
rejection of bound physical soma in the anti-ignorance and antipain of free
antiphysical soma makes for a secondary low phenomenal supremacy in terms of
knowledge and pleasure, whereas the correlative rejection of free physical
psyche in the antiknowledge and antipleasure of bound antiphysical psyche makes
for a secondary high phenomenal primacy in terms of ignorance and pain, the
former pair deferring, on secondary state-subordinate terms locally but
reluctantly (with a marked sense of its folly) on primary state-subordinate
terms in relation to such metaphysics as Catholicism allows, to the strength
and pride of free chemical soma, the latter pair deferring, on secondary
church-hegemonic terms locally but reluctantly (with a marked sense of its
sinfulness) on primary church-hegemonic terms in relation to such metaphysics
as Catholicism allows, to the weakness and humility of bound chemical
psyche. Neither mode of secondary supremacy and primacy, however, can be
anything but false in relation to physics, where supremacy is ever psychic and
primacy somatic.
SHADOW PRIMACY AND SUPREMACY OF ANTICHEMISTRY
In the case, on the other hand, of
antichemistry under physics at the southeast point of the intercardinal axial
compass, the rejection of free chemical soma in the antistrength and antipride
of bound antichemical soma makes for a secondary low phenomenal primacy in
terms of weakness and humility, whereas the correlative rejection of bound
chemical psyche in the antiweakness and antihumility of free antichemical
psyche makes for a secondary high phenomenal supremacy in terms of strength and
pride, the former pair deferring, on secondary state-hegemonic terms locally
but reluctantly (with a marked sense of its goodness) on primary
state-hegemonic terms in relation to such metachemistry as Anglican Monarchism
allows, to the ignorance and pain of bound physical soma, the latter pair
deferring, on secondary church-subordinate terms locally but reluctantly (with
a marked sense of its punishingness) on primary church-subordinate terms in
relation to such metachemistry as Anglican Monarchism allows, to the knowledge
and pleasure of free physical psyche. Neither mode of secondary primacy
and supremacy, however, can be anything but false in relation to chemistry,
where primacy is ever psychic and supremacy somatic.
SHADOW PRIMACY AND SUPREMACY OF
ANTIMETACHEMISTRY
In the case, likewise, of antimetachemistry
under metaphysics at the northeast point of the intercardinal axial compass,
the rejection of free metachemical soma in the antibeauty and antilove of bound
antimetachemical soma makes for a secondary low noumenal primacy in terms of
ugliness and hatred, whereas the correlative rejection of bound metachemical
psyche in the anti-ugliness and antihatred of free antimetachemical psyche
makes for a secondary high noumenal supremacy in terms of beauty and love, the
former pair deferring, on secondary state-subordinate terms, to the illusion
and woe of bound metaphysical soma, the latter pair deferring, on secondary
church-hegemonic terms, to the truth and joy of free metaphysical psyche.
Neither mode of secondary primacy and supremacy, however, can be anything but
false in relation to metachemistry, where primacy is ever psychic and supremacy
somatic.
HOPE AND FEAR IN SUPREMACY AND PRIMACY
Whilst on the subject of supreme and primal
distinctions according with free and bound corollaries in both soma and psyche,
I should mention that supremacy, when genuine, always encourages hope, and
hence trust, whereas primacy, when genuine, always encourages fear, and hence
suspicion. Therefore hope resides in the light, fear in the darkness, the
one having intimate associations with play and the other with work, since play
is an expression of supremacy, and therefore freedom, no less than work an
expression of primacy, and therefore (contractual) binding.
LESSER HOPE AND GREATER FEAR OF SHADOW
SUPREMACY AND PRIMACY
When supremacy is false, however, because a
consequence of gender upendedness under the opposite gender’s hegemonic sway,
then there is scope for uncertainty about one’s position and even
disillusionment with it to subvert the apparent or seeming hope of the
secondary supreme position, and such subverted hope, whether or not it results
in disillusionment, usually opens the door on that greater fear which follows
from a position of secondary primacy in relation to the hegemonic primacy
obtaining above, whether in noumenal or phenomenal terms and whether with
regard to psyche or to soma, female or male hegemonies.
THE TOTALITY OF METACHEMICAL FACTORS
To contrast the beauty of Devil the Mother and
the love of Hell the Clear Spirit in low noumenal supremacy with the ugliness of
the Daughter of the Devil and the hatred of the Clear Soul of Hell in high
noumenal primacy, as one would contrast the free will and spirit of
metachemical supreme doing and giving with the bound ego and soul of
metachemical primal taking and being at the hegemonic position of the northwest
point of the intercardinal axial compass which, being noumenally objective,
corresponds to spatial space, or space per se.
THE TOTALITY OF ANTIMETAPHYSICAL FACTORS
To contrast the anti-illusion (coupled to false
truth) of the Antison of Antigod and the antiwoe (coupled to false joy) of the
Unholy Spirit of Antiheaven in low noumenal antisupremacy with the antitruth
(coupled to false illusion) of Antigod the Antifather and the antijoy (coupled
to false woe) of Antiheaven the Unholy Soul in high noumenal antiprimacy, as
one would contrast the free antiwill and antispirit (coupled to false will and
spirit) of antimetaphysical antisupreme antidoing and antigiving (coupled to
false doing and giving) with the bound anti-ego and antisoul (coupled to false
ego and soul) of antimetaphysical antiprimal antitaking and antibeing (coupled
to false taking and being) at the subservient position of the northwest point
of the intercardinal axial compass which, being noumenally antisubjective,
corresponds to sequential time, or antitime.
THE TOTALITY OF CHEMICAL FACTORS
To contrast the strength of Woman the Mother
and the pride of Purgatory the Clear Spirit in low phenomenal supremacy with
the weakness of the Daughter of Woman and the humility (if not humiliation) of
the Clear Soul of Purgatory in high phenomenal primacy, as one would contrast
the free will and spirit of chemical supreme doing and giving with the bound
ego and soul of chemical primal taking and being at the hegemonic position of
the southwest point of the intercardinal axial compass which, being
phenomenally objective, corresponds to volumetric volume, or volume per se.
THE TOTALITY OF ANTIPHYSICAL FACTORS
To contrast the anti-ignorance (coupled to
false, i.e. carnal, knowledge) of the Antison of Antiman and the antipain
(coupled to false, i.e. carnal, pleasure) of the Unholy Spirit of Anti-earth in
low phenomenal antisupremacy with the antiknowledge (coupled to false
ignorance) of Antiman the Antifather and the antipleasure (coupled to false
pain) of Anti-earth the Unholy Soul in high phenomenal antiprimacy, as one
would contrast the free antiwill and antispirit (coupled to false will and
spirit) of antiphysical antisupreme antidoing and antigiving (coupled to false doing
and giving) with the bound anti-ego and antisoul (coupled to false ego and
soul) of antiphysical antiprimal antitaking and antibeing (coupled to false
taking and being) at the subservient position of the southwest point of the
intercardinal axial compass which, being phenomenally antisubjective,
corresponds to massed mass, or antimass.
THE TOTALITY OF PHYSICAL FACTORS
To contrast the knowledge of Man the Father and
the pleasure of Earth the Holy Soul in high phenomenal supremacy with the
ignorance of the Son of Man and the pain of the Holy Spirit of the Earth in low
phenomenal primacy, as one would contrast the free ego and soul of physical
supreme taking and being with the bound will and spirit of physical primal
doing and giving at the hegemonic position of the southeast point of the
intercardinal axial compass which, being phenomenally subjective, corresponds
to massive mass, or mass per se.
THE TOTALITY OF ANTICHEMICAL FACTORS
To contrast the antiweakness (coupled to false strength)
of the Antidaughter of Antipurgatory and the antihumility (coupled to false
pride) of the Unclear Soul of Antipurgatory in high phenomenal antisupremacy
with the antistrength (coupled to false weakness) of Antiwoman the Antimother
and the antipride (coupled to false humility) of Antipurgatory the Unclear
Spirit in low phenomenal antiprimacy, as one would contrast the free anti-ego
and antisoul (coupled to false ego and soul) of antichemical antisupreme
antitaking and antibeing (coupled to false taking and being) with the bound
antiwill and antispirit (coupled to false will and spirit) of antichemical
antiprimal antidoing and antigiving (coupled to false doing and giving) at the
subservient position of the southeast point of the intercardinal axial compass
which, being phenomenally anti-objective, corresponds to voluminous volume, or
antivolume.
THE TOTALITY OF METAPHYSICAL FACTORS
To contrast the truth of God the Father and the
joy of Heaven the Holy Soul in high noumenal supremacy with the illusion of the
Son of God and the woe of the Holy Spirit of Heaven in low noumenal primacy, as
one would contrast the free ego and soul of metaphysical supreme taking and
being with the bound will and spirit of metaphysical primal doing and giving at
the hegemonic position of the northeast point of the intercardinal axial
compass which, being noumenally subjective, corresponds to repetitive time, or
time per se.
THE TOTALITY OF ANTIMETACHEMICAL FACTORS
To contrast the anti-ugliness (coupled to false
beauty) of the Antidaughter of Antihell and the antihatred (coupled to false
love) of the Unclear Soul of Antihell in high noumenal antisupremacy with the
antibeauty (coupled to false ugliness) of Antidevil the Antimother and the
antilove (coupled to false hatred) of Antihell the Unclear Spirit in low
noumenal antiprimacy, as one would contrast the free anti-ego and antisoul
(coupled to false ego and soul) of antimetachemical antisupreme antitaking and
antibeing (coupled to false taking and being) with the bound antiwill and
antispirit (coupled to false will and spirit) of antimetachemical antiprimal
antidoing and antigiving (coupled to false doing and giving) at the subservient
position of the northeast point of the intercardinal axial compass which, being
noumenally anti-objective, corresponds to spaced space, or antispace.
SOMATIC PRECEDENCE OF PSYCHE WITH METACHEMISTRY
AND CHEMISTRY
Since soma precedes - and predominates over -
psyche on the female side of the gender divide, I have written the
antimetaphysical and antiphysical (antimale) positions under metachemistry and
chemistry respectively with soma taking precedence over psyche, irrespective of
axial subversion of the phenomenal positions, viz. chemistry and antiphysics,
in the broader framework of what would, with them, constitute the southwest
point of the church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis in which, theoretically,
bound psyche would paradoxically take precedence over free soma.
PSYCHIC PRECEDENCE OF SOMA WITH PHYSICS AND
METAPHYSICS
Since psyche precedes - and preponderates over
- soma on the male side of the gender divide, I have written the antichemical
and antimetachemical (antifemale) positions under physics and metaphysics
respectively with psyche taking precedence over soma, irrespective of axial
subversion of the phenomenal positions, viz. physics and antichemistry, in the
broader framework of what would, with them, constitute the southeast point of
the state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis in which, theoretically, bound soma
would paradoxically take precedence over free psyche.
THE PARADOXICAL JUSTIFICATION OF AXIAL
STABILITY
Life is ever paradoxical, and axial subversion
is not the least of the paradoxes which afflict life and render the Many subject
to the overall control of the Few in the interests of axial continuity and
stability, such freedom - and therefore supremacy - as hegemonically obtains
always being primarily characteristic of the respective noumenal positions and
rarely if ever of their phenomenal counterparts whose equivocal freedoms are
systematically subverted by a combination of opposite gender pressures designed
to render them subject to an emphasis on binding - and therefore primacy - in
what, for them, should constitute secondary church-hegemonic or state-hegemonic
standings, depending on the axis, vis-à-vis their nominally subservient
'upended' gender companions.
APOLOGIA FOR SOCIAL THEOCRACY
However, as the reader may already have
gathered from other examples of my compendious writings, axial continuity and
stability is not something that I personally or vocationally subscribe to,
since, quite apart from its worldly status, the relativity of contrary axes is
symptomatic of exploitation, specifically of the church-hegemonic by the
state-hegemonic, and is therefore unacceptable from a divine standpoint such
that, in otherworldly fashion, upholds metaphysics and its antimetachemical
complement in the interests of the deliverance of the preyed-upon Many at the
southwest point of the intercardinal axial compass from those who, whether
metachemical/antimetaphysical or physical/antichemical, noumenal or phenomenal,
commercially prey upon them and thus constrain them to the worship of, amongst
other things, evil and crime. Whether the antiphysical/chemical can be
delivered from such an unchristian if not heathenistic worship remains to be
seen; but it has long been the objective of my Social Theocratic teachings to
support and advocate, to the best of my intellectual ability, such a
deliverance, thereby holding out the possibility of salvation and
counter-damnation from the southwest to the northeast points of the aforesaid
axial compass on what would be revolutionary church-hegemonic/state-subordinate
terms, with the long-term objective of defeating the
state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis and bringing divine righteousness and
antidiabolic counter-justice to bear on those who are the superheathen and
anti-superchristian enemies of God and the Antidevil. All it will take -
and this is not to be underestimated - is a majority mandate for religious
sovereignty from out a paradoxical election in countries with, like Eire, a
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axial tradition. That, for me, is
commensurate with Judgement. For only the paradoxical utilization of the
democratic process to a revolutionary theocratic end can lead to the
traditionally church-hegemonic being delivered from the quasi-state-hegemonic
paradox of deference to all that is most ungodly in its devilish and antigodly
freedoms - the freedoms not of psyche but of soma, not, in gender
representative terms, of truth and antibeauty but of beauty and antitruth, not
of righteousness and counter-justice but of vanity and pseudo-meekness, not of
the One and the Anti-Not-One but of the Not-One and the Anti-One, not of Peace
and Antiwar but of War and Antipeace, not of Heaven and Antihell but of Hell
and Antiheaven. Let judgement decide and, under the leadership of
righteousness, let counter-justice be done, in order that the theosophical
truth of eternity may reign supreme in the self-illumination of everlasting
blessedness!
LONDON 2007 (Revised 2012)
