Op. 135
MUSINGS OF A SUPERFLUOUS MAN
Aphoristic Philosophy
Copyright © 2013 John O'Loughlin
_______
CONTENTS
1.
Cultures of
the Triangle
2.
Struggling
for a Free
3.
Correcting
Schopenhauer
4.
'Bullshit'
of the 'Bullshit Reductionists'
5.
Clockwise
and Counter-clockwise Cycles of the Genders
6.
The Natures
of Aristocracy, Meritocracy, Bureaucracy, and Technocracy
7.
Rulers and
Leaders
8.
Wind-Up vis-a-vis Digital Watches
9.
Adolf and
Eva
10.
Zombie
Shoppers
11.
A
Superfluous Man
12.
Thoughts on
the Probable Ethnicity of the Electric Guitar
13.
A Dangerous
Ideology
14.
A Certain
Commonness
15.
The One
True Solution
16.
The Problem
with
17.
Race
18.
Secular
Deviationism of Republican Socialism
19.
Causes and
Consequences of the First and
20.
Multi-tasking
21.
Worst of
all Possible Worlds
22.
More than
Catholic
23.
Lost to
Christ
24.
Towards a Superchristian Destiny
_______
CULTURES OF THE TRIANGLE
Much as one may applaud the Arab peoples' endeavour to throw off
the yoke of authoritarianism which has ruled them, on and off, for
several centuries, the prospects for democracy in the Middle East, although
better than ever before, have still to materialize in substantive terms, and
one feels that the biggest obstacle outside autocracy of one sort or another is
Islam itself and its reliance, from a pseudo-metachemical
standpoint, upon authoritarian rule, not least in respect of those Judaic
factors, both metachemical and
pseudo-metaphysical, in back of the Islamic extrapolation.
There is, about the Islamic world and the Middle East in
particular, a culture rooted or rather fashioned in relation to perpendicular triangularity, a culture in which Jehovah and Satan,
signifying metachemical and pseudo-metaphysical
cosmic bodies, are integral to the rule of a triangular situation in which
Allah is simply the pseudo-metachemical factor in a
cosmic-based relationship which does not allow for any independence from the
ruling factors, any more than the planet Venus, roughly corresponding to
pseudo-metachemistry, could be independent of stellar
and solar factors in back of it, and this despite the proximity of Saturn, a
planet I have long identified with cosmic metaphysics. That exists, but
always within an environment - call it cosmic - dominated by the stellar and
the solar to such an extent that, in that context, there is no possibility of Saturnian/Venusian independence from such a domination, any
more than metaphysics and pseudo-metachemistry at
such a primitive stage of existence could be independent of cosmic metachemistry and pseudo-metaphysics.
Now when you have a tradition that is beholden to Judaic
precedent, to the older tradition of Jehovah and Satan, within a triangular
framework in which Allah is not only the younger factor but the nearest one to
cosmic sensibility (more specifically pseudo-sensuality) that necessarily gets
drawn into perpendicular triangularity in the manner
described, the prospects for democracy, though by no means remote, can only be
hampered by the authoritarian or, in the Moslem case, pseudo-authoritarian
qualities appertaining to Islam itself, which has long been an excuse or
justification for the existence of state authoritarianism. I am not saying that
Moslems should abandon Islam, because that would be difficult if not impossible
in the circumstances of being part of a triangular set-up. They are
necessarily fated to remain Islamic while such triangularity,
in which their 'God' has a specific place, persists, even within a framework
more open to democracy.
No, the only people who can
do anything about such triangularity are, it seems to
me, the Israelis, and precisely because they are the roots of its existence in
a tradition stretching back to Abraham in which Jehovah and Satan were the
principal foci of religion - the one ostensibly as God and the other as
Devil. Now to me this was not really the case, since I am a firm believer
that Jehovah corresponds to Devil the Mother hyped as God (the Father) as the
'best of a bad job' starting-point for civilization as generally understood in
the Judeo-Christian and even Moslem traditions, while Satan corresponds to a
pseudo-God 'done down' as Devil, so that in neither case do you have anything
literally resembling God or Devil but, rather, Devil and pseudo-God, with, when
Islam came to pass and was obliged to enter into triangular partnership with
the Judaic tradition, a pseudo-Devil, or pseudo-Devil-the-pseudo-Mother, hyped
as God added to the overall picture, so that their 'take' on God was at
variance with the Judaic version, though just as much an expedience in which
the nearest thing to anything godly was the pseudo-God 'done down' as Devil,
and not the two types of metachemical deity, the one
corresponding to Devil the Mother and the other, in its pseudo-metachemistry, to pseudo-Devil-the-pseudo-Mother, as
already stated.
Be that as it may, the Jewish Israelis are not so much slaves to
their Judaic traditions as some people might think, and even if Jews could be
accused of dragging their heels in religious terms for several centuries, if
not millennia, in consequence of their ancestors having been forced out of
Ancient Israel by the Romans, they have at least inherited a predilection
towards democracy from their experience in the European diaspora
in particular which distinguishes modern Israel from the majority of its Arab -
and Islamic - neighbours, a predilection, I mean, that could see them using the
democratic process, at some future point in time, to achieve religious
sovereignty under Social Theocracy and thus to reject not only metachemistry hyped as metaphysics but in effect
pseudo-metaphysics 'done down' as metachemistry.
For if they were to democratically reject their religious traditions by opting
for religious sovereignty and the rights accruing to that, which I have gone
into often enough elsewhere in my writings, they would not only be free of
religious autocracy themselves, but would effectively be liberating Moslems
from the persistence of triangularity by removing the
cornerstones, so to speak, of their deference to metachemistry
and pseudo-metaphysics in back of their own pseudo-metachemistry,
their own 'pseudo-God' that is really a pseudo-Devil roped-in to a triangle
dominated by the Devil (Devil the Mother) and contemptuous, as are Moslems, of
the pseudo-God (pseudo-God-the-pseudo-Father) who, denigrated as Devil, is the
one thing approximating to anything male, never mind godly, in a triangle
dominated, on both genuine and pseudo terms, by female entities, corresponding
to Stellar/Venusian bodies vis-a-vis
a Solar 'fall guy' earmarked, by the sanctimonious of either tradition, for
denigration, pretty much, in contemporary terms, like a 'red under the bed' of
a sanctimonious Republican in the American context.
Now without a triangle to be a part of, and an inferior part of at
that, there would be little justification for the continuance of Islam and
little hindrance, in consequence, to the utilization, in Arabic states, of the
democratic process to a religiously sovereign end, the kind of end that can
alone lead to 'Kingdom Come' in which metaphysics is hegemonic over pseudo-metachemistry not as God over the pseudo-Devil but as
Heaven over the pseudo-Devil, given the distinction that would exist in this
context between free soul and bound will, male and pseudo-female, time and
pseudo-space, light and pseudo-heat, photonic wavicles
and pseudo-protonic pseudo-particles, the supercross and the pseudo-superstar, extreme right-wing and
extreme pseudo-left-wing criteria, St George and a neutralized (pseudo) dragon,
the lamb and the (neutralized) wolf and/or lion metaphors for the 'end game',
theocracy and pseudo-autocracy, being and pseudo-doing, truth or, rather, joy
and pseudo-hatred or, rather, pseudo-ugliness, since the principal fulcra of
each position - metaphysical element and pseudo-metachemical
pseudo-element - would be free psyche and pseudo-bound soma corresponding, as
noted above, to free soul (Heaven) and bound will or, rather, pseudo-will
(pseudo-devil), with a 3:1 ratio of free psyche to bound soma in metaphysical
grace and wisdom, and a 1:3 ratio of pseudo-free psyche to pseudo-bound soma
(the product in each case of male or metaphysical hegemonic pressure) in
pseudo-metachemical pseudo-punishment and
pseudo-goodness, the pseudo-justice, to speak in all-embracing terms, under
righteousness, the righteousness of the metaphysically Saved whose Eternal Life
will reign over the pseudo-Infinite pseudo-Death of the pseudo-metachemical counter-Damned for all Eternity - Peace over
pseudo-War without End.
Such is the universal prospect of 'Kingdom Come', but it won't
come to pass if both the Jews and the Arabs remain locked-in to perpendicular triangularity in the manner described. It is really
for the Jews to start the ball rolling by acknowledging what is true and
likely, in consequence, to conduce towards that goal of evolution, which
requires the rejection and refutation of all religious traditions, not least
those rooted in cosmic science, and the thingful
notion of God as 'First Mover' or 'Creator' when, in point of fact, such thingfulness, having a stellar correlation, corresponds to
Devil the Mother as, quite proper to metachemistry,
an entity in which soma predominates over psyche, thingfulness
over no-thingfulness, and not only predominates over it in the ratio (3:1)
described, but precedes it, as in metaphorical terms, Mother preceding
Daughter, or free soma the bound psyche which is its negative concomitant, the supersensuous, as it were, preceding the
subconscious. Calling that 'God' and considering it male may be to sugarcoat the bitter pill of overwhelming female dominance
of cosmic (and to a lesser extent natural) contexts, but it does not advance
'true religion' as that which is not scientifically, much less politically or
economically, 'bovaryized', but able to stand-up for
itself on its own metaphysical terms independently of metachemistry,
with a view to demonstrating that religion is not about God but about Heaven,
and that God in metaphysics is merely Heaven viewed from the outside, not a
separate entity, least of all along the lines of the Judaic, Christian, and
Moslem 'gods'.
Was it not Nietzsche who said that 'all gods are dead'?
Unfortunately, while that may have been or seemed so for him, it is not
reflected in the world around us, least of all where Moslems and Jews are
concerned. Hopefully, one day all the 'old gods' will be dead, or no longer relevant, but that will be not in
consequence of atheistic communism, with its dialectical materialism and
proletarian humanism coupled to a radical social democracy, but in consequence
of Social Theocratic Centrism and the prospect of 'man overcoming' that it
holds out to the world as the way not merely to the Superman but, no less
importantly, to supra-human metaphysical and pseudo-metachemical
communes that will exemplify, in their gender-differentiated manners, the free
soul of Heaven the Holy Soul and the bound pseudo-will of
pseudo-Devil-the-pseudo-Mother in what will be the ultimate societal
arrangement approximating to the righteous and the pseudo-just, the lamb and
the pseudo-lion and/or wolf that what is best and most forward-looking in
traditional religion has always been in favour of, and precisely in order that
the 'kingdom' may 'come'.
The triangle that now precludes that can be defeated, but it will
take the equivalent of a counter-cupidian thrust,
democratically and peacefully, to ensure that such an eventuality actually
transpires. For those who are most pseudo-metaphysical in the Judaic world are
the generality of male Jews who, whether Satanic (sun-like in relation to the
Cosmos) or Davidian (orange-like in relation to
Nature), are alone capable of opting for a 'prodigal son-like' return to
metaphysics at the expense of metachemistry and with
the corollary of a hegemonic triumph over pseudo-metachemistry,
so that the gender positions are reversed, but reversed not in Nature, as with
Moslems, nor even in mankind, as with higher-order Catholics, but in relation
to the coming era of Cyborgkind, and an absolute
antithesis, in consequence, to cosmic fundamentalism and, more particularly,
materialism as the stellar bedrock of female concretion.
STRUGGLING FOR A FREE EUROPE
Those Brits and Americans or whatever who like to claim that
Nazism and the Nazis were tyrannical, autocratic, authoritarian, dictatorial,
etc., tend to conveniently overlook the fact that nothing short of National
Socialism in Germany, least of all the liberal pluralism of the Weimar
Republic, would have got rid of the Communists and the international threat to
German unity and nationhood (still, in the 1930s a comparatively young
phenomenon) that the German Communists (KPD) posed, not least with the help,
wittingly or unwittingly, of the Socialists (SPD), and all this against the backdrop
not only of the Great War but of the Versailles Treaty and the subsequent
reparations and strictures under which Germany was obliged to exist, including
territorial losses.
There would also be Nazis who claimed that, quite apart from the
gradual dismantlement of the restrictions imposed upon Germany by the
Versailles Treaty, they, or Nazi Germany, were fighting not only for
their own nation’s freedom but, more generally, for the freedom of Europe – a
concept difficult if not impossible to comprehend from a Jew-dominated WASP
axial standpoint in the Western democracies of, in particular, Britain and
America. But there is, curiously, some truth in the idea that Nazism
signified a struggle on behalf of European freedom – freedom, not least, from
Jewish domination and the threat, real or potential, of a Communist takeover
with or without, though allegedly with, Jewish connivance, given the kind of
star over pseudo-cross parallelism to mainstream Judaism which one finds in
Bolshevism, or Soviet-style Communism.
Hence the struggle to free Europe from the stranglehold of Jewish
culture (film, theatre, cabaret, jazz), finance, ideology, religion, etc., is
not, as history attests, a vain boast, since, even with the eventual victory of
the Jew-dominated WASP nations, the Nazis largely succeeded in achieving their
goals.
Now if, in the future, Social Theocracy, or the Centrism of a
Social Theocratic/Social Transcendentalist state/church fusion in which the
church aspect of society (Social Transcendentalist) were to be served from what
I have tended, in the past, to call the ‘administrative aside’ of the state
aspect thereof (Social Theocracy), following a majority mandate for religious
sovereignty from the paradoxical utilization of the democratic process in
certain nations or societies with, traditionally, a church-hegemonic axial
bias, like Eire – now if, I say, such a politico-religious ideology could be
anywhere near as successful in ‘finishing the job’ and freeing Europe of
Bibles, prayer-books, hymnals, etc., the contents of which owe much, if not
everything, to the ancient Hebrews, ancestors of the Jews, then it will not
have come to pass – as it surely must – in vain, but will contribute to freeing
Europe from the last bastion of Jewish dominion – the monotheistic Creator-ism
and its Christian offshoots, all of which pander not to true religion but to a
variety of falsehoods rooted, Judaically, in cosmic
science and precluding, by their very existence, any prospect of progress
towards a ‘God’-free society centred, metaphysically, in the cultivation of
Heaven through synthetically-encouraged soulful self-realization – the sole
prerogative, were it to transpire, of males and not of their female
counterparts, who would have to have been ‘bottled up’ or ‘boxed in’ or
otherwise neutralized, in pseudo-metachemical vein,
for metaphysical freedom to properly obtain on the kind of
synthetically-artificial terms we are alluding to in connection with global
civilization and the prospect of true universality.
Hence the ‘lamb’ and, a plane down at the north-east point of the
inter-cardinal axial compass at what would be the apex of the church-hegemonic
axis, the ‘pseudo-lion’ and/or ‘pseudo-wolf’ (neutralized lion and/or wolf)
metaphors which, equivalent to the proverbial Saint (George) and pseudo-Dragon
(neutralized dragon) metaphor, amount to a metaphysical/pseudo-metachemical, male/pseudo-female, time/pseudo-space,
eternity/pseudo-infinity, righteousness/pseudo-justice distinction – the very
distinction that Creator-ism rooted, as it is, in the free, or metachemical, female, sadly precludes from transpiring,
since the hype of beauty and love as god and heaven in metachemical
free soma precludes what is metaphysically proper to heaven and god (as a mere
reflection of heaven) in the metaphysical free psyche of joy and truth
from coming to pass, as it surely must if there is to be a ‘Kingdom Come’ and
an end, in consequence, to the rule of the world by the Devil, i.e. Devil the
Mother hyped as God the Father in what is the root lie of the Judeo-Christian
tradition that panders, through free will, to beauty at the truthful expense,
one might say, of free soul.
Ridding Europe from the stranglehold of Jewish Creator-ism will
only be achieved when the people democratically opt, through Social Theocracy,
for religious sovereignty, and thereby empower their leaders to begin the
process of freeing them from the Bible and other such Creator-oriented texts
that, in the Old Testament, encourage the ‘increasing and multiplying’ as the
prerogative of metachemical free will as it strives,
through beauty (and even love) to achieve a surrogate plenum through maternity,
the only consequence of which is to perpetuate the world and to keep males
enslaved to it at the expense of otherworldly salvation, or deliverance to a
metaphysical hegemony over pseudo-metachemistry,
pretty much, to add yet another metaphor, like a chopper over a jump jet
(pseudo-jet).
But, of course, I am not alluding to males in general, least of
all those who signify an equivocal hegemony of physics over pseudo-chemistry at
the south-east point of the inter-cardinal axial compass at the foot (barring
radical Social Democracy) of the state-hegemonic axis, but solely to the
pseudo-physical under the equivocal hegemony of the (Marian) chemical, the
‘last’, in gender subordination, who will only become ‘first’, in unequivocal
hegemonic dominion over their female counterparts, when they democratically opt
for salvation through Social Theocracy, and Social Theocracy is then legally in
a position to begin the long and difficult task of instituting what, to all
intents and purposes, would amount to ‘Kingdom Come’, a society characterized
not by the dominion of classful science, nor of
occupational economics or sexual politics, but by ethnic religion, which
requires not class, still less occupation or gender, but race as its ethnic
precondition, without which there can be no accommodation of the
metaphysical/pseudo-metachemical ‘heights’ that can
alone make for the true freedom of males from female dominion.
CORRECTING SCHOPENHAUER
Schopenhauer speaks, somewhat one-sidedly in my opinion, of the
human body as the 'objectification of the Will'. Having diagnosed the
Will as metachemical, I would say that it (the body)
is rather the objectification of the Will in the case of adult females,
with a secondary (devolved) objectification of the Spirit which tends to come
to fruition with the surrogate plenum (for a creature who is fundamentally
vacuous) of maternity.
As for males, I would argue, contrary to Schopenhauer, that, being
evolutionary rather than devolutionary in character, the male body is primarily
the subjectification of the Ego and secondarily
(evolved) the subjectification of the Soul, both of
which appertain to psyche as opposed, like the Will and the Spirit, to soma,
which is why one should not speak, echoing Schopenhauer, of the male body as
the objectification of either the Ego or the Soul, since their respective
attributes, Form and Contentment, are variously subjective and contrast,
qualitatively and essentially, with the variously objective (apparent and
quantitative) attributes of Will and Spirit, which are Power and Glory.
Thus the female body is primarily an expression (objectification)
of Power and secondarily an expression (objectification) of Glory, whereas the
male body is primarily an impression (subjectification)
of Form and secondarily an impression (subjectification)
of Contentment. It is precisely the want or inherent absence of Form and
Contentment in the female that makes for Power and Glory as contrary
expressions (noumenal and phenomenal) of Will and
Spirit. And when this impacts upon the male, as it often does, his Form
and Contentment are severely compromised; in fact, they become bound to a
pseudo-Will and a pseudo-Spirit that, according with pseudo-free soma under
female free somatic pressure, translate into pseudo-Power and pseudo-Glory, the
pseudo-Power and pseudo-Glory of pseudo-metaphysical and pseudo-physical
subordination to metachemistry and chemistry respectively
in which the semblance of objectivity, which is actually pseudo-subjective,
must needs continue to play 'second fiddle', both in terms of an inferior ratio
of 'free' to 'bound' and the 'pseudo' nature of what is, after all, the product
of female pressure and converse of male gender norms, to a female hegemony
rooted in objectivity and, hence, through the objectification of Will and
Spirit, the triumph of Power and Glory.
For 'Thine is the Power and the Glory'
is not a prayer that accords with anything male and centred, in contrast to the
above, in Form and Contentment, but, on the contrary, one that acknowledges the
triumph (or reality) of female dominance over males world-without-end. It is,
in fact, contrary to the spirit of Christ, who taught liberation from the world
… of female dominion through the Form and Contentment that comes via 'turning
the other cheek' and simply being 'true to oneself' as a male.
'BULLSHIT' OF THE 'BULLSHIT REDUCTIONISTS'
Hail ye 'bullshit reductionists' ... no I don't want to paraphrase
Nietzsche. Let's do it my way.
Those who constantly reduce everything they disagree with or
consider erroneous to the anti-masculine status - all too prevalent in a
female-dominated age like ours - of 'bullshit' are not only guilty of crass
reductionism on a par with the proletarian humanist obsession with bourgeois
humanism, not to mention, in that context, with the element of physics
(equivocally hegemonic over pseudo-chemistry) at the south-east point of the
inter-cardinal axial compass, but evidently don't even do justice to that,
since the pseudo-chemical corollary of physics, arguably more congenial to
novelists than to essayists, could and, in my opinion, should also be
considered, and on terms, approximately equivalent to the aforementioned
epithet, of 'pseudo-cowpiss', given its pseudo-female
status as a constrained (bound) rather than free objectivity under the
masculine subjectivity of physics.
Then, of course, there is the chemical/pseudo-physical distinction
back across the lower-order axial divide of what, in equivalent though
disparate terms, could be called 'cowpiss' and
'pseudo-bullshit', whereof we are alluding to feminine objectivity and
masculine or, rather, pseudo-masculine pseudo-subjectivity, not to
mention the metachemical/pseudo-metaphysical
distinction, polar to physics/pseudo-chemistry, between, say, 'cowpuss' (or 'supercowpiss') and
'pseudo-bullgas' (or 'pseudo-superbullshit'), which
is less feminine and pseudo-masculine than superfeminine
(diabolic) and pseudo-supermasculine (pseudo-divine)
in its noumenal, as opposed to phenomenal, orders of
objectivity and pseudo-subjectivity.
But let us be comprehensively exacting and not forget to mention,
across the upper-order axial divide, the metaphysical/pseudo-metachemical distinction between 'bullgas'
(or 'superbullshit') and 'pseudo-cowpuss'
(or 'pseudo-supercowpiss') - this latter dichotomous
pairing as polar, in its supermasculine (divine) noumenal subjectivity and pseudo-superfeminine
(pseudo-diabolic) noumenal pseudo-objectivity, to the
'cowpiss' and 'pseudo-bullshit' of
chemistry/pseudo-physics as is the former dichotomous pairing, viz. 'cowpuss' and 'pseudo-bullgas', to the aforementioned
'bullshit' and 'pseudo-cowpiss' of
physics/pseudo-chemistry, which share with chemistry/pseudo-physics a mere
phenomenal, or corporeal, standing.
Now, presumably, in an intelligent world rather than one governed
or characterized by reductionist clowns, all of these denigrative
terms would have if not an equal place then, at any rate, an unequal one in the
overall scheme of things, and people would be less partial to brand anything
they dislike or disagree with as 'bullshit' when, in point of fact, it might,
like the novel, have more to do with 'pseudo-cowpiss'
or even 'cowpiss', like pseudo-drama, or poetic
'pseudo-bullshit', not to mention dramatic 'cowpuss'
or pseudo-poetic 'pseudo-bullgas' and, lest we
overlook metaphysics/pseudo-metachemistry, aphoristic
'bullgas' or pseudo-prosaic (short as opposed to
novelistic long prose) 'pseudo-cowpuss'.
Bah! these practitioners of 'bullshit reductionism' are doubtless
more guilty than anybody else of 'bullshit'! If there are others who 'piss me
off', and still others who 'cheese (puss) me off', all I can say is these
people 'brown me off', or something to that effect, except, of course, when
what they are denigrating really is 'bullshit' and therefore approximates, in
literary terms, to the essayistic prolixity of pseudo-philosophy, not to
mention a certain male-oriented approach to association football, that
quintessentially physical/pseudo-chemical sport down at the south-east point of
the inter-cardinal axial compass at the foot, to all liberal intents and
purposes, of the state-hegemonic axis.
CLOCKWISE AND COUNTER-CLOCKWISE CYCLES OF THE GENDERS
Normally the female operates on a clockwise basis descending, in
devolution, from the fulcrum of metachemistry in
beautiful free will to the fulcrum of chemistry in proud free spirit, as from
power to glory, via the 'once-bovaryized' free spirit
of metachemical love, returning via the 'once-bovaryized' free will of chemical strength to her effective
starting-point in the beauty of metachemical free
will in a cyclical regression from the noumenal to
the phenomenal, as from the objective ethereal (metachemistry)
to the objective corporeal (chemistry), all of which has the effect of
precipitating the male into a counter-clockwise ascent, in evolution, from the
fulcrum of physics in knowledgeable free ego to the fulcrum of metaphysics in joyful
free soul, as from form to contentment, via the 'once-bovaryized'
free soul of physical pleasure, to return via the 'once-bovaryized'
free ego (superego or, better, superconsciousness) of
metaphysical truth to his effective starting-point in the knowledge of physical
free ego in a cyclical progression from the phenomenal to the noumenal, as from the subjective corporeal (physics) to the
subjective ethereal (metaphysics).
Hence counter-clockwise cycling in consequence of clockwise
cyclical pressure from the free female is the male's evolutionary alternative
to female devolution, even though both genders are subject, on a subordinate
pseudo-gender basis, to the hegemonic sway of the opposite gender, as when
pseudo-males defer to metachemical beauty/love and
chemical strength/pride from pseudo-metaphysical and pseudo-physical
standpoints in pseudo-truth/joy in the one case and pseudo-knowledge/pleasure
in the other, in what could be described as a kind of dotted-line, or
secondary, clockwise cycling that would contrast with any counter-clockwise
secondary cycling of the female as pseudo-female vis-a-vis
her male hegemonic partner in relation to a pseudo-strength/pride subordination
to knowledge/pleasure in the one case, that of pseudo-chemistry under physics,
and to a pseudo-beauty/love subordination to truth/joy in the other case, that
of pseudo-metachemistry under metaphysics, neither of
which pseudo-female positions would bear any resemblance to the genuine
beauty/love of metachemistry or strength/pride of
chemistry - any more than the pseudo-truth/joy or pseudo-knowledge/pleasure of
their pseudo-male counterparts, alluded to above, would bear any resemblance to
the genuine truth/joy of metaphysics or knowledge/pleasure of physics.
Be that as it may, the idea, apparently deriving, if we are to
believe Hollingdale, from Nietzsche, that the female
is merely base and the male evil does not accord, it seems to me, with the
above theory, but strikes me, as I believe I have written before elsewhere in
my voluminous writings, as being the converse of the actual case, since it is
precisely because of the evil free will (positive) of the metachemical
female that the male is brought low from his idealistic perch or, better,
transcendent ideals in metaphysics to the baser realm of physics wherein the
knowledge of free ego can so easily be diverted, through chemical seduction,
from the path of dispassionate knowledge into the pseudo-knowledge, or carnal
knowledge, of pseudo-physical pseudo-free will in relation to coitus, thereby
removing him even from the counter-clockwise cycle to which he is, perforce,
more inherently partial as a male and duly subordinating him, as a pseudo-male,
to the governance, as it were, of maternal pride and strength in chemistry,
whereof the female is prime mover.
Therefore the beauty that wars on pseudo-truth/joy through love is
soon to descend from metachemistry to chemistry and
war on pseudo-knowledge/pleasure through strength in the interests, primarily,
of maternal pride. Short of neutralizing the female, there is no way that
the legitimate male aspirations from the phenomenal to the noumenal,
as from corporeal subjectivity in knowledge/pleasure to ethereal subjectivity
in joy/truth, could bear permanent fruit and remain eternally beholden to truth
through joy, to godliness through Heaven. Until - if ever - he
elects to neutralize the female he will continue to remain her
counter-clockwise plaything who can so ruthlessly be picked off by beauty and
brought low not merely to knowledge but, via pseudo-truth/joy deferring to
beauty/love, to a pseudo-pleasure and pseudo-knowledge deferential to pride and
strength, and thus to the maternal resolution of the female in woman.
Men are not born of God, or in the image of God; neither are they
born, through folly, in sin: they are born, through pseudo-evil, in the
strength of Woman the Mother, and only aspire, from humble corporeal
beginnings, towards that heavenly goal which, releasing them from 'the world',
would be the resolution of all counter-clockwise cyclical striving were they
not simultaneously subject to female predation in the interests of
offspring. That is the truth, and it owes nothing to the Nietzschean notion of base women and evil men, still less
to the Biblical notion of the precedence of a ready-made (in the image of God!)
metaphysical male whose Creator subsequently, at his request, makes a creature
who seduces him from his Edenic innocence and brings
him low, to walk the world as the proverbial slave of a slave which Baudelaire
aptly describes man as, that same Baudelaire, hated by conventional religious
types, who was one of the few men of his time - or indeed of any time - who
also had a correct sense of moral evil and of the female's role in its
perpetuation, a sense that owes nothing to the contemporary concept of evil as
that which causes harm to others - as do storms and earthquakes - even though,
in relation to joy and truth, or to an insufficiently evolved and independent
joy and truth, that is exactly what beauty and love do, to the lasting
detriment of the male who, having freed himself, no matter how imperfectly or
intermittently, from pseudo-knowledge and pseudo-pleasure, must start the
noble task, all over again, of ascending from knowledge and pleasure to joy and
truth, the latter of which is simply the godly (outer) reflection of the former
which, as Heaven, is the true end of male striving to overcome his humble
mundane origins in woman and become divine, truly the God who or, rather, which
(for it is after all psychically universal) resides in Heaven.
THE NATURES OF ARISTOCRACY, MERITOCRACY, BUREAUCRACY, AND
TECHNOCRACY
Since I am always writing about what I call the inter-cardinal
axial compass these days, I should like to suggest some alternative terms for
the equivalent to pseudo-metaphysics under metachemistry
at the north-west point of the said compass – namely pseudo-theocracy under
autocracy, the former of which can – and should – be called aristocracy.
Likewise some alternative terms for the equivalent to pseudo-chemistry
under physics at the south-east point of the said compass – namely
pseudo-democracy under plutocracy, the former of which can – and should – be
called meritocracy.
Thus what I have tended to identify with
state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axial criteria would be comprised, in
overall terms, of a female polarity between autocracy and meritocracy, and a
male polarity between aristocracy and plutocracy, as between metachemistry and pseudo-chemistry in the one case, that of
primary state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axial criteria, and
pseudo-metaphysics and physics in the other case, that of secondary
state-hegemonic/church-subordinate criteria.
As for the church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis stretching, by
contrast, from the south-west to the north-east points of the inter-cardinal
axial compass, I should like to suggest some alternative terms for the
equivalent to pseudo-physics under chemistry at the south-west point of the
said compass – namely pseudo-plutocracy under democracy, the former of which
can – and should – be called bureaucracy.
Likewise some alternative terms for the equivalent to pseudo-metachemistry under metaphysics at the north-east point of
the said compass – namely pseudo-autocracy under theocracy, the former of which
can – and should – be called technocracy.
Thus what I have tended to identify with
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axial criteria would be comprised, in
overall terms, of a male polarity between bureaucracy and theocracy, and a
female polarity between democracy and technocracy, as between pseudo-physics
and metaphysics in the one case, that of primary
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axial criteria, and chemistry and pseudo-metachemistry in the other case, that of secondary
church-hegemonic/state-subordinate criteria.
Baudelaire saw woman as a paradoxical cross between a tyrant and a
slave – in other words (mine), as a combination of autocrat and democrat,
requiring of the subordinate male (pseudo-male) an aristocratic deference
towards autocracy and/or a bureaucratic deference towards democracy. Such
deferences would aptly describe the nature, it seems
to me, of a ‘sonofabitch’, as one who follows the
female lead or, rather, rule in dotted-line clockwise terms.
Be that as it may, there are also what could be called
pseudo-slaves and pseudo-tyrants where subordinate female (pseudo-female)
positions to a male hegemony are concerned, and I venture to suggest that the
pseudo-chemical deference to physics would imply a meritocratic
(pseudo-democratic) deference to plutocracy on the pseudo-female’s part, while
the pseudo-metachemical deference to metaphysics
would imply a technocratic (pseudo-autocratic) deference to theocracy on her
part, making each of them akin to what could be called, in keeping with the
sentiment of the above, a ‘daughterofabastard’, or
one who follows the male rule or, rather, lead in dotted-line counter-clockwise
terms.
RULERS AND LEADERS
Hitler is a prime example of the equivalent of Devil the
Mother hyped as God the Father, i.e. of the age-old male accommodation,
beginning with the ancient Hebrews and extending into the Judeo-Christian West,
of female domination in order to sugarcoat the bitter
pill, as it were, of such a cosmos-derived situation with a covering of male
sweetness, whether in terms of autocracy hyped as theocracy, the Cosmos hyped
as the Universe (if not as universal), metachemistry
hyped as metaphysics, beauty as truth, or, indeed, where men like Hitler are
concerned, a ruler hyped as a leader.
Let me say at once that true leaders are not like Hitler or indeed
any number of other autocratic dictators; they do not have soldiers marching
around in columns and squares in preparation for a new war, only later to
propel them, like fattened sheep or pigs, into the slaughter of their imperial
adventures. On the contrary, they encourage people, and males in
particular, to be true to themselves and cultivate their mind and/or soul
through education and culture. They are akin to teachers or artists or
philosophers, and he who is or becomes via them his own leader, namely a
progressive artist or writer, has no need of others to lead him, least of all
towards the opposite of self-determination and self-cultivation. Only the
broad masses require leaders or, for that matter, rulers, depending on their
national or ethnic dispositions – the former to encourage what could be called
psychic expansion, the latter somatic expansion, as in body-building and
warmongering aggression.
On the other hand, the perfect corollary of a ruler is a pseudo-leader,
or someone who will encourage, especially in the male population, psychic
contraction (obedience) to the rule of somatic expansion, contrary to the male
grain. Likewise, the perfect corollary of a leader is a pseudo-ruler, or
somebody who will encourage, especially in the female population, somatic
contraction (obedience) to the lead of psychic expansion, contrary to the
female grain. The one combination, that of rulers and pseudo-leaders,
tends to make for aggressive state-hegemonic societies. The other
combination, that of leaders and pseudo-rulers, tends to encourage passive
church-hegemonic societies. Only the latter can have any inkling, through
male-hegemonic divine criteria, of heaven. The former, for all its
religious boasts, simply results in the living embodiment of hell, which is the
diabolic.
WIND-UP VIS-A-VIS DIGITAL WATCHES
Wind-up watches are clockwise, like free females, whether as
square-faced metachemical parallels or as round-faced
pseudo-metaphysical parallels – the former female and the latter male or,
rather, pseudo-male, as in the case of boxing-ring ‘sonsofbitches’,
whose pseudo-subjectivity makes for pseudo-convergence (though not, I have
logically argued, without divergent pressures, including the square shape of
the boxing ring, ‘from above’, as from a metachemical
female or female equivalent).
Digital watches, on the other hand, are counter-clockwise, like
free males, in the right-sided digital increments of seconds and minutes vis-a-vis hours, as though in ascending motion, and are
therefore antithetical to wind-up watches, whether as round-faced metaphysical
parallels especially suited to males or as square-faced pseudo-metachemical parallels more suited, in their
pseudo-objectivity and pseudo-divergence, to pseudo-females, as though
indicative of a dotted-line deference, within counter-clockwise parameters, to
what is properly male and therefore convergently
subjective, symptomatic of evolutionary rather than of counter-devolutionary
criteria.
Ideally, digital watches should be worn on the right wrist since,
like anything sensibly male, they indicate a right-wing alternative to the
fundamentally left-wing, because divergently objective, nature of conventional
wind-up watches, especially, one could argue, square-faced ones, and such a
right-wing alternative, favouring what is subjective, will always be associated
with psyche as opposed to soma, mind as opposed to body, church as opposed to
state, the centripetal as opposed to the centrifugal, evolution as opposed to
devolution, and male as opposed to female values.
Further to the above, I should add that digital watches signify,
with their right-sided digit momentum, rising as opposed, like conventional
watches, falling time, and are therefore centred truthfully in time as opposed,
like wind-ups, to a beautiful rootedness in space, from the clock-face of which
the hands devolve in clockwise fashion. Frankly, it is logically
inconceivable that a self-respecting male could possibly prefer a wind-up watch
to a digital one, and it would be a paradoxical kind of male who, having opted
to sport a digital watch, made a habit of taking a clockwise walk through his
local park, like any naive sonofabitch!
As a further footnote to the above, I should also add that watches
of whichever sort can also be rectangular or elliptical, having a relative
rather than an absolute design, and would be more suitable, one can only
surmise, to lower-order types who shy away, in their corporeal dispositions,
from ethereal criteria properly germane to space and time.
ADOLF AND EVA
These days instead of Adam and Eve in the Garden of Eden
surrounded by a wrathful God, we have Adolf and Eva in the Berghof
in Berchestgarten surrounded by the heavenly
mountains of the Obersalzberg in the fairly Nietzschean – some would say Old Testament-like –
beginnings of … global civilization, with its machine-oriented and
camera-fuelled post-humanist drive towards the cyborgization
of human life.
ZOMBIE SHOPPERS
I’ve always detested London for its soullessness – never more
evident than in the West End in large stores. One feels nothing in these
places except a zombie-like complicity in product-oriented curiosity. It
may be no exaggeration to say that shoppers or browsers in shops are akin to
the ‘living dead’, who can only be ‘resurrected’, via ‘Kingdom Come’, in
relation to an entitlement to ‘dope’ of one kind or another, thus removing them
from product-oriented optical curiosity to substance-oriented inner visions and
self-transcendence – at least in the case of males. Whew! What a
prospect! What a task! Completely against the contemporary grain.
A SUPERFLUOUS MAN
I once wrote in, I think it was, ‘Between Truth and Illusion’
(1977) that there are no ‘superfluous men’. I was wrong. I forgot
about myself. As a solitary bohemian intellectual in lonely exile in
north London I am one of the most superfluous of men, one who, having been
rejected by both parents in their separate ways, not only has no family
(not that I want one of my own now), but no recognition for what I do and have
done for several decades – namely my philosophy and writings generally, not to
mention my music (understandable really, because an aside to my principal
literary tasks), art, photography, literary transcripts, websites, etc. which
have kept me preoccupied and relatively free of guilt.
Yes, I am hard-working and have achieved a lot, considering my
disadvantaged circumstances, but compared to some prominent Jews like Stephen
Fry or Alan Sugar or Michael Winner or … I am nothing, fated, despite my
intellectual (logical) integrity and metaphysical (religious) genius to remain
unknown and … superfluous to the world and to what rules over it from
fundamentally netherworldly heights (in metachemistry and, for the pseudo-otherworldly ‘fall guy’
position or element, pseudo-metaphysics). He who, as philosopher king, is
true to his self or, at any rate, truly pro-religious and metaphysical is
obliged to live ‘beyond the pale’ of the female-dominated status quo, with its
false ‘God’-oriented religions, relatively superfluous to the commercial
interests of pseudo-male ‘sonsofbitches’, but most
especially superfluous to free females and their exploitation of beauty through
free will. From their respective standpoints, the messianic individual is
truly superfluous and therefore someone to shun as irrelevant. All they
care about is the world and what rules over it ‘in back’. All I, on the
contrary, really care about is the ‘overcoming’ of the world and the
repudiation of all that rules over it, ostensibly from godly heights, in the
interests of whatever is most contrary to the Lie – namely the Truth, and
germane, in consequence, to the kingdom-coming triumph of Heaven. They
may ignore me, but I have not ‘gone away’, nor do I intend to. For it is
only he who, in one system, is most superfluous that can become, in another,
most indispensable, rather like Hitler.
THOUGHTS ON THE PROBABLE ETHNICITY OF THE ELECTRIC GUITAR
Although it may appear axially church-hegemonic, as from
south-west to north-east points of the inter-cardinal axial compass, to an
audience watching an electric guitarist on stage, the electric guitar is
effectively a Protestant-derived musical instrument of, in the case of the
great majority of players, a south-east (body) to north-west (fretboard and/or machine head) axial directionality
commensurate with state-hegemonic criteria, as though played from right to
left, the right hand more active in harmonic strumming and the left hand in pitchful improvisation - a distinction, in Britain, between
parliamentary/puritan and monarchic/anglican criteria
whereby phenomenal 'pricks' co-exist, in the same person, with metachemical 'jerks', the former effectively masculine and
the latter superfeminine, given the male nature of
physics (over pseudo-chemistry), as of harmony (over pseudo-melody), and the
female nature of metachemistry (over
pseudo-metaphysics), as of pitch (over pseudo-rhythm), pseudo-rhythm no less
spaced out (by pitchful space) in sequential fashion vis-a-vis metachemical space than
pseudo-melody is massed out (by harmonic mass) in voluminous fashion vis-a-vis physical mass.
Although some guitarists seem to be balanced between pitch and
harmony (never mind melody and rhythm), there are plenty who are either biased
towards pitch or, alternatively, biased towards harmony, thereby assuming
either a monarchic/anglican bias or a
parliamentary/puritan one, which keeps them poles apart from one another in the
musical equivalent of an English civil war dichotomy. It is as though the
pitch-orientated are left wing and the harmony-orientated right wing, with
those who strike a balance between the two poles somehow liberal and even
musically androgynous, as though neither female (metachemically
superfeminine) nor male (physically masculine).
Playing the electric guitar in left-handed fashion, as from
right-handed rhythmic harmony to left-handed melodic pitch, like Jimi Hendrix, would seem to be a kind of catholic exception
to the general rule of state-hegemonic axial directionality, and may even
partly explain why, as a youth, I tended to idolize Hendrix, since I was then
in rebellion, as a catholic boy who had been sent to a protestant children's
home, against protestant criteria from a fundamentally catholic
standpoint. But such a contrary method of playing the guitar would not be
properly commensurate with church-hegemonic axial directionality, as from
south-west (body) to north-east (head) points of the inter-cardinal axial
compass, if only because the electric guitar is more usually played the other
way around and stands out as a protestant-type of instrument more suited, in a
secular age, to those whose axial aspirations - barring a radically social
democratic nadir - are from south-east to north-west or, alternatively, would
prefer to see themselves in terms of a parliamentary-monarchic polarity, with
an ancestral tie, in England, to 'roundheads' or 'cavaliers' rather than to
some centrist or watered-down combination of both.
In my youth, when I listened to a lot of rock music, I would have
detected such a polarity in the guitar-playing of, for example, Pete Townshend
and Alvin Lee, as between a bias towards harmony in the one case and a bias
towards pitch in the other, rock music with either 'classical' or 'jazz'
overtones, even if demonstrably distinct from either.
If there is a church-hegemonic axial alternative to the electric
guitar, it could well be the so-called synth-axe or
portable keyboard, but it would have to be played from left to right, as though
from melody in the keyboard-based left hand to something approaching rhythm, or
whatever it would be that was non-pitchful in the
right hand, the hand that holds and manipulates a variety of buttons on the
neck of the instrument. In that respect, people like Jan Hammer and
George Duke and even Chick Corea may well be more
representative of church-hegemonic axial directionality, suited to persons of
catholic descent, than the left-handed exception to the guitar-playing rule,
like Hendrix - preferable as he would be to the plethora of right-handed
guitarists, not least those whose musical bias seems to be in the left hand
with melody infused with pitch (improvisation) rather than in the right one
with harmony infused with rhythm (strumming) in what, with its bodily corporeality,
is probably the most representative approach to the electric guitar.
A DANGEROUS IDEOLOGY
The idea that all men are equal is a dangerous ideology since it
reduces truth (assuming for the sake of argument it is still considered to
exist) to what every tom-dick-and-harry thinks it is (the Protestant position),
irrespective of how far removed from truth the results may be (not least of all
axially). When every person is considered equal, irrespective of gender,
class, race, occupation, etc., there is no truth but only variations on error,
if not the Lie. One can only lead a people from above, presuming upon a
genuine capacity for ideological truth, and such leadership is only possible
through the repudiation of equality and the submission of the majority to what
is ideologically true, whether they directly submit to it (as males) or
indirectly (via pseudo-beauty) as females.
Democracy, by its very equalitarian nature, is detrimental to
truth and thus to religion conceived in relation to metaphysics, and especially
to a stage of metaphysics, beyond cosmic, natural, and human stages, that would
be relevant, in its cyborgistic orientation, to
contemporary globalization.
I have never even believed that all men, meaning mankind, are born
equal, never mind how they develop subsequently. There are distinctions, even
at birth, of gender, race, class, fortune, size, weight, eye coloration,
health, etc., that belies the commonplace notion, owing not a little to the
likes of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, that they are born equal.
A CERTAIN COMMONNESS
There is a certain commonness to the majority of so-called
coloured peoples – at least in respect of their more or less uniform eye
coloration and dark skin. They normally exemplify what could be called a
common attitude to life … and sex … that is decidedly unChristian
in its alpha-stemming if not alpha-oriented naturalism. Bangladeshis, for
example, tend to look alike, with eating habits that revolve around a
particular approach to diet that, with its origins in a given environment and
probable want of alternatives, is more or less common to all. In that
respect, as in so many others, they are closer to nature and more akin, in some
respects, to animals or, at any rate, to those animals who retain a standard diet
with little or no variation. But this can, in certain respects, be an
advantage, particularly if the diet is, as with Bangladeshis, nutritious.
THE ONE TRUE SOLUTION
In the current secular climate and with not a little Northern
Irish input, there are those in Ireland who think that democracy (on a
republican socialist basis) should be independent of the Catholic Church,
thereby reducing society to the lowest-common-denominator of a
Marxist-influenced secularity. But they are fools. The justification
of Irish independence from Britain was premised, as de Valera well-knew, upon a
majority Catholic population, not upon secular values more congenial, in any
case, to the Protestant British. What we need for the future is a new
church, so to speak, a church to end all churches, which will save (and
counter-damn) the relevant people as never before, thereby establishing
‘Kingdom Come’ or, at any rate, the nearest feasible equivalent to that in
contemporary terms.
I believe I have called this ultimate church ‘the centre’, and
identified it with Social Theocracy … as the political front of Social
Transcendentalism, the actual context, or ‘church’-equivalence, of what would
be a religiously sovereign people in the event of a majority mandate for
religious sovereignty from the people via the exploitation (utilization) of the
democratic process by the Social Theocratic Party and/or Movement to a
religiously sovereign end, the end commensurate, so I have always believed,
with a context analogous to ‘Kingdom Come’.
Secular republicanism, as opposed to the church-backed
republicanism that was instrumental in both freeing Ireland from British
imperialism and, under de Valera, consolidating Irish church-hegemonic axial
criteria, is to be expected in the current WASP-dominated era of a dotted-line
sell out to state-hegemonic axial criteria, with its rugby and soccer, but it
is not the solution to Ireland’s problems and merely compounds them by being an
extension, fuelled by the decades-long influence of British secularity upon
northern Catholics, of that secular concession to British and American
influence and pressures. Without an axis of their own, Gaelic football to
hurling-like in its traditionally church-hegemonic integrity, the majority
Irish people would be even more vulnerable to Anglo-American pressures than at
present. The only solution to the dilemma that divides them between
dotted-line WASP deviationism and secular republicanism, as a further descent
down the state-hegemonic axis, is the resurrection of the church-hegemonic axis
under Social Theocracy and the beginning of a process that will deliver the
majority population from their lowly chemical/pseudo-physical gender estates as
never before, saving the pseudo-physical ‘last’ to metaphysics and having the
chemical ‘first’ counter-damned to pseudo-metachemistry
in a stepped-up north-east point of the inter-cardinal axial compass that will
not only be able to deliver the majority catholic population from the
extrapolative straining-at-the-leash limitations of Catholic tradition but, in
delivering them more gender categorically to their metaphysical and pseudo-metachemical polarities and destinies ‘on high’, eventually
bring down the other axis – that secular fruit of schismatic heresy – for want
of prey, the prey, more precisely, that the majority of Catholics, marooned in
a chemical/pseudo-physical mundane phenomenality, now
represent to the somatic licence and profiteering from said licence of the
female-dominated predatory axis of Anglo-American WASP secularity.
Needless to say, this ultimate solution, embracing an ultimate
‘church’-like repudiation of all alpha-stemming churches, will require the
overcoming, democratically, of the current republic, which is manifestly
unsuited to the task of taking Ireland to the next level of evolution, being
part of the contemporary problem in what is fundamentally an Anglo-Irish
divide-and-rule stratagem that keeps the main Celtic traditions of Orange and
Green divided and ruled by the White middle of the tricolour. Although born in
the Irish Republic and an Irish citizen, this is not an emblem, much less a
process, I can or would wish to identify with.
Let it be said that if and when Social Theocracy succeeds in
garnering a majority mandate for that ultimate sovereignty which I have
identified with religious sovereignty, the sovereignty that would free the
people from the last – and oldest – bastion of tyranny in the metachemical Lie of Devil the Mother hyped as God the
Father as Judaic ‘Creator’ in back of the Marian and Christian extrapolations,
then there would be no place for the Church-slavering republic and no place, in
consequence, for republicans! As Hitler demolished the Weimar Republic,
with its Jewish domination and secular values so congenial to female exploitation,
so must the future Leader (of his people) demolish the Irish Republic through
the exploitation of the democratic process to a religiously sovereign
end. For only then will it be possible for the building of ‘kingdom come’
to begin on a thoroughgoing Social Theocratic basis ever deferential to Social
Transcendentalism, to the service, in other words, of the religiously
sovereign. All else is futile worldly perpetuation and enslavement to the
lie of a God ‘in back’ of the world, and while the Republic continues to exist
and to uphold, by its very worldly nature, this Lie, the majority Irish people
will never be free – not of the British, not of the world, not of ethnic
division, not of liberal confusion, not of dotted-line state-hegemonic deviationism,
not of Marxist secularity, and not, worst of all, of the world’s oldest tyranny
that falsely wears a religious mask and was the product of Jewish subterfuge.
THE PROBLEM WITH ENGLAND
The problem with England is that it is slanted - one might say
weighted - towards phenomenal (corporeal and/or mundane) lowness in
plutocratic/pseudo-democratic terms because physics over pseudo-chemistry at
the south-east point of the inter-cardinal axial compass at the foot (barring a
radical social democratic nadir analogous to Marxist Communism) of the
state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axis is the only context for the English in
which there is any sensibility coupled, in pseudo-chemistry, to what may
be called pseudo-sensuality, as germane to a relatively neutralized female, and
therefore their only genuine (relatively speaking) claim to sensibility, and
hence a degree or type of culture, corresponds to the phenomenal lowness (as
opposed to noumenal highness) of the plebeian
corporeality alluded to above - as though in a parliamentary/puritan polarity
with the monarchic/anglican noumenal
highness which, in metachemistry over
pseudo-metaphysics at the north-west point of the aforesaid compass, rules the
state-hegemonic axis from a standpoint rooted, metachemically,
in noumenal sensuality, with barbarous (metachemical) and pseudo-philistine (pseudo-metaphysical)
associations as opposed, like their physical/pseudo-chemical polarities, to
pseudo-cultural and civil ones.
It is precisely because - and contrary to appearances - the more
civilized aspects of the British axis happen to be pseudo-cultural and civil
that the majority of British people attribute more significance to physics and
pseudo-chemistry than to metachemistry and
pseudo-metaphysics, even though this means they remain biased, as a people,
towards the corporeal lowness of the plutocratic/pseudo-democratic alliance in
defiance of or, at any rate, preference to the autocratic/pseudo-theocratic
upper-order positions to which they perforce remain subject, if in relation to
a constitutional monarchy which has no power to interfere with the executive
nature of the parliamentary 'below' (except indirectly through the House of
Lords), to which the majority of British people subscribe, without, however,
having the benefit of a Bill of Rights. For Britain is not, like the
United States, a republic, but a post-civil war compromise between noumenal ethereality, rooted metachemically
in the objective (as in free somatic female objectivity), and phenomenal
corporeality, centred physically in the subjective (as in free psychic male
subjectivity), with, in consequence, contrary gender associations that cannot
but be at ideological loggerheads, as were the 'cavaliers' and 'roundheads' of
the English Civil War
The British, in short, are a people that cannot be led, only
ruled. For their representatives (to the monarchy through the Lords) in the
House of Commons (plebs) are not true leaders, only representatives of the
general will of the people. Nor would radical social democrats, seeking
communistic independence of parliament and parliamentary accountability,
through the Lords, to the Monarchy, be true leaders but, worse than
representatives, only deceivers of the people who invite rule through the back
door, as it were. A true leader will only be found on the
church-hegemonic axis to which British politics makes no concessions. And
he will messianically lead from above to what lies
beyond ...
RACE
Thinking in terms of race, skin colour is only one of a number of
factors that have to be taken into account. Factors like colour of hair
and eyes; shape and size of head; the way hair grows on the head and as
moustache and/or beard (obviously in the case of males); the width and shape of
the nose; whether hair grows, in the case of males, on the chest, back,
shoulders, arms, etc., and if so how and to what extent; the size of the
backside and thighs; weight and height, and so on … a whole host of factors
which have to be considered even before one embarks upon an investigation of
language, culture, religion, accent, character, temperament, etc.
People who judge others simply by the colour of their skin without
taking all these other – and more – factors into account are grossly
superficial, and their concept of race will be slanted accordingly.
SECULAR DEVIATIONISM OF REPUBLICAN SOCIALISM
The fatality of Republican Socialism, not least in the Republic of
Ireland, as of ‘Liberty Leading the People’, that Delacroix painting which
illustrates what might be called the ideological implications of the French
Revolution, is that, characterized by a female hegemony of chemistry over
pseudo-physics at the south-west point of the inter-cardinal axial
compass, as of politics (republican democracy) over pseudo-economics
(socialism), it does not and cannot remain bogged down, so to speak, in
its own gender dichotomous phenomenality at the foot,
effectively, of the church-hegemonic axis (stretching from south-west to
north-east points of the inter-cardinal axial compass), but, bad enough as that
would be, inevitably becomes subject to a clockwise cycle of female dominion in
terms of a return to metachemistry (female) over
pseudo-metaphysics (pseudo-male) at the north-west point of the said compass,
which, besides being fundamentally autocratic and therefore requiring some
dictatorial ‘vanguard’ and so-called ‘leader of the people’, is the
starting-point of the predominating ratio factor (3:1) in the free soma of
beauty and love (as opposed to ugliness and hatred in bound psyche) to
subsequently achieve a worldly resolution in the pride and strength of the
predominating ratio factor (2 ½:1½) in the free soma (as opposed to humble and
weak bound psyche) of chemistry, so that chemistry is not, in these secular and
church-defying terms, the only female element in the cycle but, rather, the one
implying a surrogate plenum of maternity that, although effectively an end-game
for females, cannot allow them to remain resigned to a permanent sojourn in
such a phenomenal position but, as noted above, will encourage them to return
to the noumenal heights of metachemistry
(and therefore beauty and love) as and when circumstances allow, thereby
causing them to perpetuate the clockwise cycle that precludes any possibility
of male salvation (deliverance from female dominion) through church-hegemonic
axial criteria, the kind of criteria that will have to be ‘stepped up’
(resurrected) on revolutionary (social theocratic) terms if the pseudo-physical
‘last’ are to become, through salvation, the metaphysical ‘first’ and, by contrast,
the chemical ‘first’, equivocally hegemonic over the pseudo-physical, become
pseudo-metachemically ‘last’ in what would be the
counter-damnation corollary, for females, of male salvation.
That is the only way out of the clockwise cycle of female dominion
for males, the long-suffering victims of such dominion, and it is only going to
happen via messianic intervention and the subsequent ‘overcoming’ of the
mainstream world of the chemical and pseudo-physical from a position, germane
to the church-hegemonic axis, centred in the hegemony of metaphysics over
pseudo-metachemistry, and thus of a structure that,
once fully achieved, will resemble the proverbial Saint and neutralized Dragon
or, to adopt an equivalent metaphor, the proverbial Lamb and neutralized Lion
and/or Wolf that, so neutralized, is obliged to ‘lie down’, a plane down from
metaphysics at the north-east point of the inter-cardinal axial compass, with
that which, in metaphysical dominion, signifies all that is most metaphysically
righteous in its salvation from the world (of female dominion of chemistry over
pseudo-physics).
CAUSES AND CONSEQUENCES OF THE FIRST AND SECOND WORLD WARS
When Britain and France declared war on Nazi Germany (though not
subsequently on the Poland co-invading Soviet Union) on the 3rd September 1939,
following the Nazi invasion of Poland on September 1st, they transformed (in
theory) a local conflict (involving the ultimate dismantlement and revocation
of the Versailles Treaty by Hitler over Danzig and the Corridor, with East
Prussia cut off from the rest of Germany) into a European conflict that would
eventually spill over into the Balkans and North Africa, as well as into the
Soviet Union, that bastion of Communism which Hitler invaded in June
1941. But this European conflict did not really become a world war until
the bombing of Pearl Harbour by Japan in December 1941 which quickly brought
America into the war and obliged Nazi Germany, an ally of Japan, to declare war
on the United States, thereby condemning it to what would increasingly become a
war on two fronts, to its ultimate detriment and final downfall.
In the First World War, Britain and France declared war on
Germany, a country that had come to the defence of the Austro-Hungarian Empire
after Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been assassinated by a Bosnian Serb
terrorist, one Gavrilo Princip,
who implicated the Serbian military, and Austria-Hungary accordingly responded
to the outrage by declaring war on the Kingdom of Serbia, a country that had an
agreement with Russia, which accordingly declared war on Austria-Hungary,
obliging Germany to come to its assistance against Russia as part of the Triple
Alliance. But Britain and France? Through closer ties between
Russia and France which impacted upon Britain, they fought, as in the Second
World War, alongside Russia against not only Germany but the country that had
suffered the heinous crime of the assassination of Archduke Franz
Ferdinand. They were on the side not only of Russia but of Serbia, the
country from which, as a Bosnian Serb, the assassin had effectively
emerged. And when, with American and other outside assistance largely
drawn from the British Empire, they finally forced Germany to an Armistice five
long years later, the Versailles Treaty was what Germany had to swallow, with
the most punitive restrictions and reparations ever imposed upon a defeated
nation. But this was the country that had come to the rescue of
Austria-Hungary after Serbia’s ally Russia had declared war on that Empire! No
wonder Hitler and his National Socialists eventually came to power in
Germany! They were the most determined of all the German parties to
repudiate the crippling terms of the Versailles Treaty and put Germany back on
its feet. And they succeeded. But subsequently, as we all know,
they became embroiled in a struggle to the death with those nations,
principally Britain, France, and Russia, who were against it in the Great
War. And once again might triumphed over right as Germany suffered a second
and more devastating defeat at the hands of the allies and was dismembered,
carved up into zones of occupation by Britain, France, America, and
Russia. There’s justice for you. For if the Versailles Treaty was bad
enough, surely it is even worse to be occupied by allied powers and split into
different zones, as between Communism in the Russian sphere of influence and
Capitalism of one sort or another in the American, British, and French ones?
For now it is not merely a question of reparations and restrictions; a
wholesale process of de-Nazification and ideological
cleansing and bringing to justice is set in train which will culminate in the
division of Germany into East and West and put one part of it at loggerheads
with the other. Fortunately, that era is now safely in the historical
past, having come to an end with the fall of the Berlin Wall in November
1989. But even if Germany is now united, it is still occupied and
exploited by the victorious allies,who, naturally
enough, are keen to ensure that large swathes of German industry serve them
before they serve anybody else. For a Germany that exclusively served
itself, like the Third Reich, would not be to anybody's advantage, least of all
those who fought long and hard to protect their freedoms which, with one
possible exception, are largely the product of female dominion.
Let us not forget that Germany, together with Austria, was and
remains the land of Bach, Handel, Haydn, Mozart, Beethoven, Schubert,
Mendelssohn, Schumann, Brahms, Bruckner, Bruch, Wagner, Strauss, Mahler, Berg,
Webern, Schoenberg, et al. Which explains, in some measure, why Communism
was defeated by National Socialism in Germany, the only ideology capable of
standing up to Communism rather than simply co-existing with it and/or being
overcome by it. Later, it came back with a vengeance in the
Soviet-dominated East of the country, but even that is now history and Germany
stands once more united, the so-called economic powerhouse of Europe.
MULTI-TASKING
I don’t need a computer that multi-tasks. Multi-tasking is
for women, those alpha-stemming creatures who, according to a reputable source
whose name eludes me, are ‘all antennae and no brains’. I refuse, on
principle, to multi-task.
WORST OF ALL POSSIBLE WORLDS
The worst of all possible worlds and/or societies is one
dominated, in WASPish vein, by females.
Contemporary ‘Western’ society is nothing if not pro-feminist and, hence,
anti-male. You can’t have it both ways. Either females dominate
males, in heathenistic vein, or, conversely, males
dominate females in – dare I say it? – Christian or equivalent vein.
Today’s secular societies are nothing if not female-dominated.
MORE THAN CATHOLIC
I have long considered myself more than Catholic, not
counter-catholic (protestant), but Social Theocratic, that is, one who is in
favour of the ‘resurrection’ of the church-hegemonic axis on Social Theocratic
terms.
LOST TO CHRIST
Sons-of-bitches are lost to Christ, as to Christianity. They
would also be lost, as things stand, to Superchristianity,
i.e. Social Theocracy and the ‘resurrection of the (secular) dead’ through
religious sovereignty.
TOWARDS A SUPERCHRISTIAN DESTINY
The more a man sucks up to women, the less Christian can he
be. The only way the Church (RC) has accommodated the masses to Christ is
by having men confess to their sins, largely, I suspect, in relation to women.
The idea of women confessing to sins is, frankly, a contradiction
in terms, since that gender is both evil and criminal, pseudo-evil and
pseudo-criminal (specifically at the chemical world of mainstream catholicism) in its free soma and bound psyche, and sin,
like folly, its pseudo-free somatic corollary, is less feminine than
pseudo-masculine, or pseudo-physical, to put it in equivalent elemental (more
specifically, pseudo-elemental) terms, with pseudo-bound psyche the product of
female domination in chemistry.
Sucking on the ‘body of Christ’ is, on the other hand, more
appropriate to women than to men, and could accordingly be construed as being
more chemical than pseudo-physical – the opposite, in polar terms, of the
‘confession of sins’ to a priest which, as alluded to above, I believe to have
more relevance to males than to females and to accordingly be more metaphysical
(after a limited Christ-oriented fashion) than pseudo-metachemical,
the pseudo-female (pseudo-superfeminine) corollary of
a supermasculine disposition towards metaphysics.
But Catholic metaphysics is a rather limited affair, confined to
the bound soma of the Crucifixion paradigm by dint of the extrapolative nature
of Roman Catholicism as deriving, in a certain type of worldliness
characterized by chemistry and pseudo-physics, from the Judaic root of the
Christian tradition, and capable of doing no more, in consequence, than
straining at the leash, so to speak, of that root, via its peculiar type of
worldliness, towards metaphysics which, as noted above, can only be done to a
bound-somatic extent, an extent well short of free psyche and therefore of that
which, in joy and truth, or Heaven and God(liness),
would have to be completely independent of any such Judaic root, or anchor (to
cite another of my favourite metaphors), which, as a metachemical
entity (albeit hyped as metaphysical, as Devil the Mother as God the Father, as
the Cosmos as Universe, etc., etc.), is actually contrary to what is
metaphysical, including the ‘Christ On High’ of the Crucifixion.
Therefore the rejection of the Alpha is crucial to the achievement
of the Omega, at least in its full complement of a 3:1 ratio (approximating to super:sub, as germane to noumenal
absolutism as against phenomenal relativity) of free psyche (joy and truth) to
bound soma (woe and illusion), the former alone bright because positive and the
latter dark because negative, the mere bound will (son of godliness) and bound
spirit (holy spirit of heaven) corollary of free soul (heaven the holy soul)
and free ego or, rather, nearest thing to free ego (god the father, or godfatherliness) which, in truth, is really a superconscious emanation of the supersensible
soul, halo-like, which could have no independent existence from that which, as
heavenly soul, precedes it and is responsible for its existence … pretty much
as candle-flame for candlelight (to use a well-trodden metaphor), so that, just
as there would be no candlelight without candle-flame, there could be no God(liness) without Heaven, no superconscious
semblance of ego but actually emanation of soul in metaphysics without the supersensible soul whose essence is joy (not love!) and
which has its seat, its origin, not in the delusory female-fuelled heart … of
mankind, as of (worldly) humanism, but in the male-oriented spinal cord of a
position which is more germane, if truth be told, to cyborgkind,
mankind’s evolutionary successor. But such a seat, or origin place, of
the soul is not, on that account, God, or godly, since we have already settled
that matter to our metaphysical satisfaction, but simply the systemic basis of
Heaven or, better, the systemic basis of the Soul whose joyful essence, when
released from physiological bondage, is heavenly, and thus pertinent to Heaven.
Hence spinal cord = soul, and the joy of the free soul,
independent of physiological attachments, including those pertaining to the
bodily self or, rather, not-self, the organs in general and so on, is
commensurate with Heaven, which is the condition of free soul and not a place,
still less an offshoot of God!
But all this is of course metaphysical and, hence, male, not at
all female, whether metachemical or chemical, noumenally objective or phenomenally objective, from which
the notion of God preceding Heaven, though it would, in point of fact, be Devil
the Mother preceding Hell the Clear Spirit, makes perfect metachemical
sense, and specifically in relation to beauty preceding love, or free will
preceding the ‘once-bovaryized’ (compared to chemical
spirit) free spirit which is the complementary aspect of metachemical
free soma that predominates, on a 3:1 ratio basis, over the ugliness and hatred
of the bound psyche of the Daughter of the Devil and the Clear Soul of
Hell, as of bound ego and soul, or the nearest equivalents thereof.
When you have a civilization rooted in metachemistry,
like the Judeo-Christian, then it is easy to see how the notion of God preceding
Heaven took root, and why free will, the metachemical
‘first mover’ in things, is falsely identified with God, as of divinity.
Nothing, however, could be further from the truth, but then again, as Ionesco
once remarked, the masses will never (at least voluntarily) demystify
themselves, since it would be too painfully against their alpha-stemming and
alpha-worshipping grain, whereof the dominance of males by females leading to
families is the social and worldly norm.
I spit upon this norm, as I spit upon anything to do with the
masses, including republican socialism, and look forward to the day when it
will have been consigned to the rubbish bin of social history. For only
when males are free of female domination, of the gender which is soma before it
is psyche, can there be any prospect of a fulfilment of Christianity in and
with ‘Kingdom Come’. And by Christianity I do of course mean Roman
Catholicism as that which is axially germane to the prospect, with ‘Kingdom
Come’, of a superchristian overhaul through Social
Theocracy/Social Transcendentalism (roughly corresponding to a state/church
distinction between the Centre-proper of the religiously sovereign and the
administrative aside to it) in order that the relevant masses, chemical and
pseudo-physical in their feminine/pseudo-masculine gender differentiation, may
be delivered from their respective kinds of worldly estates to the otherworldly
and pseudo-netherworldly estates which await them,
through metaphysics and pseudo-metachemistry, ‘On
High’, as and when the pseudo-physical ‘meek’ are saved (from chemical females)
to metaphysical righteousness and the chemical ‘pseudo-vain’ counter-damned (in
gender subordination to the metaphysical in pseudo-space under time, or
pseudo-infinity under eternity) to pseudo-metachemical
pseudo-justice, no mere monk and nun-like exception to the Christian rule this
time but, from out of a mass-oriented society characterized by democracy, the
generality of those deemed fit for such dissimilar fates that can – and should
– be identified with our proverbial Saint and (neutralized) Dragon, or Lamb and
(neutralized) Wolf and/or Lion, in a word, the pseudo-wolf and/or lion under
the Lamb not so much of God as of Heaven the Holy Soul.
LONDON 2011 (Revised 2012)
