UNDERSTANDING
VARIOUS MEDIA
1. Televisions and computers stand to radios and
telephones as the noumenal abstract to the phenomenal
concrete, since there is something almost ethereal about full screen-utilizing
media which sets them apart, on the above-mentioned basis, from the more
mundane media, by and large, of radios and telephones.
2. Given that televisions and computers are more
noumenal than phenomenal on account of their
screen-utilizing abstractness, it seems that they provide us with a kind of
technological parallel with fire and air, metachemistry
and metaphysics, as though significant of a diabolic/divine dichotomy hovering
ethereally above the world.
3. No such dichotomy, however, could be regarded
as applying to radios and telephones, since the Elemental parallel here is
rather with water and vegetation, chemistry and physics, in what amounts to a
kind of feminine/masculine dichotomy more significant of the world than of
anything effectively towering above it, whether on an anterior (and metachemical) or a posterior (and metaphysical) basis.
4. One could expect, given their technological
natures, that the chief or principal manifestations of antipoetry,
antiphilosophy, antidrama,
and antiprose would take place in connection with
such media of image and sound reproduction, and, to be sure, it may well be
that television especially lends itself to an antipoetic bias, computers to an antiphilosophic bias, radio to an antidramatic
bias, and telephones to an antiprosodic bias.
5. Be that as it may, there can be no question
that a correspondence exists between the noumenal
objectivity of television and materialism; between the noumenal
subjectivity of computers and idealism; between the phenomenal objectivity of
radio and realism; and between the phenomenal subjectivity of telephones and
naturalism - at least where the older varieties of each medium are concerned.
6. For it seems to me that these media are
capable of evolving or of being evolved from primacy to supremacy, as though
from an inorganic parallel to an organic parallel, and that the supersession of, for want of a better word, conventional
televisions, computers, radios, and telephones by more advanced levels of
these media, like flat-screen televisions and computers, is indicative of such
an evolution, whereby it becomes less feasible to equate them with negativity
and more attractive, by contrast, to allow for greater positivity
or, at any rate, the possibility thereof.
7. Thus while we may still equate conventional
(cathode-ray tube) television with materialism, it becomes possible to equate
the more advanced types of television, including flat-screen digitals, with
fundamentalism, as though in acknowledgement of a progression from inorganic
primacy to organic supremacy within a predominantly or basically metachemical medium.
8. Likewise while we may still equate
conventional VDU computers with idealism, it becomes possible to equate the
more advanced types of computer, including flat-screen LCDs,
with transcendentalism, as though in acknowledgement, once again, of a
progression from the cosmic negativity of inorganic primacy to the universal positivity of organic supremacy within a predominantly
metaphysical medium.
9. Similarly, while we may still prefer to
equate conventional two-band radio with realism, it becomes possible to equate
the more advanced types of radio, including FM digital, with nonconformism, as though in acknowledgement of a
progression from inorganic primacy to organic supremacy within a basically
chemical medium.
10. And while we may still prefer to equate conventional
telephones with naturalism, it becomes possible to equate the more advanced
types of phone, including mobiles, with humanism, as though in acknowledgement,
once again, of a progression from the geologic negativity of inorganic primacy
to the personal positivity of organic supremacy
within a predominantly physical medium.
11. Doubtless similar progressions apply within
the contexts of those related media like video recorders and/or players,
cassette recorders and/or players, record-players, and compact-disc players
and/or recorders, since progress can certainly be noted here that would seem to
parallel what has been alluded to above.
12. Certainly the advancement of DVD at the
expense of video and even conventional CD would seem to be a case in point, as
would the longer-established advancement of cassettes, including micros, at the
expense of tape-recorders and of CDs at the expense of records, meaning LPs and
EPs and vinyl singles, with cassette-players superseding tape-recorders and
CD-players superseding record-players.
13. Other examples, some of them quite distinct
from the above, could doubtless be given, but I do not profess to any great
expertise in these matters and would consider it a kind of soft-underbelly of
my writings.
14. However, it is clear that, whatever the
medium, be it primary or secondary, cosmic or geologic, universal or personal,
public or private, advances have been made from a more conventional, and
possibly inorganic, basis to what are now cutting-edge technologies which hold
out the promise of greater positivity and organic
compatibility for the future. In that
respect, things can only get better!