Concerning Educated Females. One thing for sure about education in relation to females is that it does not turn them into males or in any way make them second-class male citizens. On the contrary, an educated female is simply a female who can intellectually express the female side of life more articulately and methodically than would otherwise be the case, rounding on male values with a vengeance as she preaches, effectively if not literally from a realistic and/or materialistic point of view, in favour of female freedoms and the abandonment of any kind of deference to the male sex. But of course the only upshot of all this somatically liberated realism and/or materialism, coupled, be it not forgotten, to a degree of bound-psychic nonconformism and/or fundamentalism, is a world in which somatic freedoms are taken for granted, along with their bound-psychic corollaries, and psychic freedom is if not castigated as a legacy of male chauvinism, then conveniently or perhaps even inadvertently overlooked as a social irrelevance. An educated female is usually someone who paradoxically works on behalf of female freedoms through the intellectual medium of her gender adversary, using words not to liberate from the flesh but to advocate and enslave to the flesh in as many ways as are compatible with one or another kind of somatic freedom. Females do not, even when highly educated, struggle on behalf of the intellect or the soul but, on the contrary, in the name of the will and/or the spirit, which they use, as ever, to dominate males in the interests, more usually, of reproduction. A liberated female will rarely be liberated from herself as a female, whether feminine or diabolic, chemical or metachemical. On the contrary, she will be liberated from male domination and that sensibility which requires that females defer either from an antirealist/antinonconformist antichemical standpoint to the physicality of naturalism/humanism or from an antifundamentalist/antimaterialist metachemical standpoint to the metaphysicality of transcendentalism/idealism, depending on the axis and the corresponding emphasis upon either bound soma or free psyche. Unfortunately, domination of the one gender by the other is not the exception but the rule of life and therefore if males aren’t sensibly engaged in dominating females from hegemonic vantage-points in physics over antichemistry or metaphysics over antimetachemistry, according to axis, females will be sensually engaged in dominating males from hegemonic vantage-points in chemistry over antiphysics or metachemistry over antimetaphysics, again according to axis and with all the inevitable vengeance of a more openly heathenistic disposition. Such is the nature of life, which requires the domination of the weaker by the stronger whether the stronger happens to be objectively somatic, as in the female case, or subjectively psychic, as in the male case, and one has two opposite if not opposing systems of domination – state-hegemonic/church-subordinate female and church-hegemonic/state-subordinate male, with all the axial differentiation already described in my writings between northwest and southeast points of the one axis and southwest and northeast points of the other on both male and female terms. Thus the metachemical-to-antichemical polarity of primary state-hegemonic/church-subordinate values is coupled to the antimetaphysical-to-physical polarity of secondary state-hegemonic/church-subordinate vales on the one axis and, conversely, the metaphysical-to-antiphysical polarity of primary church-hegemonic/state-subordinate values is coupled to the antimetachemical-to-chemical polarity of secondary church-hegemonic/state-subordinate values on the other axis, the axis which, far from exemplifying overall female dominion, is indicative of the psychic bias of male dominion, the only dominion commensurate with the possibility of church-hegemonic salvation for males from antiphysical bound psyche (antihumanism) to metaphysical free psyche (transcendentalism) and of church-hegemonic counter-damnation for females from chemical bound psyche (nonconformism) to antimetachemical free psyche (antifundamentalism), as well, correlatively, as with the possibility of state-subordinate salvation for males from antiphysical free soma (antinaturalism) to metaphysical bound soma (idealism) and of state-subordinate counter-damnation for females from chemical free soma (realism) to antimetachemical bound soma (antimaterialism). Such is the axis that will have to be overhauled from its Catholic and/or Buddhist, Western or Eastern past if it is to meet the challenges of modernity and stretch into an eternal future of global universality, a future in which there will be no liberated females but only males liberated from female dominion and able to lead godly lives in relation to metaphysics and its hegemonic transcendentalist/idealist control of antimetachemistry and, hence, of antifundamentalist/antimaterialist antidevility.