Free Will verses Free Soul. When we contrast the two types of strength (in general terms) that are both gender and moral opposites, metachemical and/or chemical free soma vis-à-vis metaphysical and/or physical free psyche, it soon becomes necessary to ask ourselves: which of the two is the strongest, that is, which tends to have most sway, traditionally or even contemporaneously, over life? And the answer to that question must be: the female-based metachemical and/or chemical orders of freedom which have hitherto ruled the roost and, exceptions to the rule notwithstanding, generally continue so to do from the standpoints of will and/or spirit. For when we look more closely into the distinctions between metachemistry and metaphysics, or devil and god, and also between chemistry and physics, or woman and man, we find that the female elements, corresponding to fire and water, are primary in their vacuous objectivity and the male elements, corresponding to vegetation (earth) and air, merely secondary in their plenumous subjectivity. Verily, fire and water precede vegetation and air, as metachemical and chemical free soma in will and spirit precede physical and metaphysical free psyche in ego and soul. That which is godly, or metaphysical, is not first but last in the overall chain of devolutionary and/or evolutionary events, even though, as metaphysical psyche, it precedes its metaphysically somatic counterpart, as, in metaphorical terms, father precedes son. But on the female side of life mother precedes daughter, metachemical soma its psychic counterpart, and therefore before there is any prospect of grace in free soul there is a hellish amount of evil in free will, the free will, more specifically, of metachemical soma and thus of Devil the Mother (hyped as God). Frankly free psyche is no match, in nature, for free soma, and God, in any genuine sense, is anything but the Almighty that the arrogation of divine attributes to what is fundamentally diabolic would tend to suggest. On the contrary, godliness is as far removed from anything all-powerful, in metachemical free will, as it is possible for anything or, better, anyone to be, and therefore something or someone that only comes to pass by turning away from the rule of somatic freedom and shutting itself off, as far as possible, from the sway of evil and its criminal accomplice of metachemical bound psyche, pretty much as the exception to the general rule. At least this has always been the monk-like case up till now; though we are living in an age, fortunately, which, thanks to synthetic artificiality in a variety of contexts, not least urban, is gradually turning the tables on all forms of naturalism and slowly but surely gaining the upper hand over nature, including, not least, its cosmic progenitor. Therefore the prospects for free psyche having its way at the expense of free soma, of metaphysics at the expense of metachemistry, have never been brighter, even though metaphysics, like its physical lesser brother, corresponds to a secondary element in the overall spectrum of elements stretching from fire and water to vegetation and air. This, however, is not something that need penalize it in an age which can turn things around from metachemical and/or chemical domination to physical and/or metaphysical liberation from such a naturalistic dominion, and precisely through the utilization of synthetically artificial means commensurate with one degree or another of civilization. Even at the mankind stage of evolution (which after all succeeds both the cosmic and natural stages of devolution … from fire to water) physical liberation from chemical domination tends to be the salient aspect of the gender struggle, not least in respect of a certain puritanical opposition to anything catholic. But that is, of course, to oversimplify, and we now live in a time which, superficially universal and therefore cyborgistic, demands a higher and altogether post-worldly, not to say post-Western, pattern of liberation, namely that of metaphysics from any outstanding metachemistry, whether traditional or contemporary, in order that godliness may get the better of devilishness, of any and all forms of Devil the Mother (hyped as God), in the interests of what properly appertains to God the Father, and the masses of those countries which are overwhelmingly antiphysical/chemical in their catholic antecedents be brought to salvation and counter-damnation in terms of metaphysical and antimetachemical deliverance from their specific types of worldly plight, whether phenomenally alpha or anti-omega, a plight that leaves them at the mercy of every kind of metachemical and antimetaphysical imposition from the noumenal alpha and anti-omega heights of state-hegemonic/church-subordinate criteria as the last manifestations of free will and bound soul play themselves out to a devilish and antigodly tune which is really no music at all but a kind of barbarous and pseudo-philistine noise in which vanity and pseudo-meekness take centre stage. The power is still there, that cannot be denied, but the time has come for that which pertains to contentment to sing its free psychic song as the expense of all manifestations of somatic freedom that would keep the world chained to evil/crime and pseudo-folly/pseudo-sin whether the world is as described above or, across the axial divide, simply that which, omega worldly in its physicality and anti-alpha worldly in its antichemistry, is financially in partnership with its metachemical/antimetaphysical axial poles in a Faust-like pact between antiwoman and the Devil and man and Antigod to the detriment not only of woman and antiman but, from a truly moral standpoint, God and the Antidevil, neither of which will be in a position to save and counter-damn from the anti-omega and alpha manifestations of worldliness until the church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axis in question has been substantially overhauled and - given the extents to which its base is now quasi-state-hegemonic/church-subordinate under external pressures - effectively resurrected in relation to what expectation would regard as ‘Kingdom Come’ but which I have all along associated with Social Theocracy and its promise of religious sovereignty in the event of a paradoxical utilization, in certain countries (not least Eire), of the democratic process to a profoundly theocratic end, an end in which, with a majority mandate for religious sovereignty, God the Father and the Son of God will be metaphysically hegemonic over Antidevil the Antimother and the Antidaughter of the Antidevil and, by extrapolation, Heaven the Holy Soul and the Holy Spirit of Heaven hegemonic over Antihell the Unclear Spirit and the Unclear Soul of Antihell for all Eternity and Anti-Infinity in a classless/anti-upperclass partnership, at the northeast point of the axial compass, between the Celestial City of true godliness and the Anti-Vanity Fair of beautiful antidevilishness. Verily it is for those who are chemically and/or antiphysically aloof from physics and antichemistry but victims of metachemical and antimetaphysical impositions to accept such a paradoxical utilization of the democratic process in due course and be delivered from their respective types of worldly shortcomings to the otherworldly and anti-netherworldly heights of a metaphysical and antimetachemical elevation which, according to gender, will be both salvation and counter-damnation, psychic liberation and somatic counter-enslavement, for all Eternity and Anti-Infinity.