Contrasting Objectivity with Antisubjectivity and Subjectivity with Anti-objectivity in Noumenal and Phenomenal Contexts. To contrast the noumenal objectivity of Space, i.e. spatial space, with the noumenal antisubjectivity of Antitime, i.e. sequential time, at the northwest point of the intercardinal axial compass, where metachemistry is unequivocally hegemonic over antimetaphysics; to contrast the phenomenal subjectivity of Mass, i.e. massive mass, with the phenomenal anti-objectivity of Antivolume, i.e. voluminous volume, at the southeast point of the said compass, where physics is equivocally hegemonic over – though subverted to somatic emphasis by its subordinate complement acting in conjunction with metachemistry – antichemistry; to contrast the phenomenal objectivity of Volume, i.e. volumetric volume, with the phenomenal antisubjectivity of Antimass, i.e. massed mass, at the southwest point of the intercardinal axial compass, where chemistry is equivocally hegemonic over – though subverted to psychic emphasis by its subordinate complement acting in conjunction with metaphysics – antiphysics; to contrast, finally, the noumenal subjectivity of Time, i.e. repetitive time, with the noumenal anti-objectivity of Antispace, i.e. spaced space, at the northeast point of the said compass, where metaphysics is unequivocally hegemonic over antimetachemistry. Thus an axial antithesis between the noumenal objectivity of Space and the phenomenal anti-objectivity of Antivolume coupled to the noumenal antisubjectivity of Antitime and the phenomenal subjectivity of Mass on the one hand, that of state-hegemonic/church subordinate axial criteria, where metachemistry and antichemistry form female polarities as against the male polarities of antimetaphysics and physics; and, contrariwise, an axial antithesis between the phenomenal antisubjectivity of Antivolume and the noumenal subjectivity of Time coupled to the phenomenal objectivity of Volume and the noumenal anti-objectivity of Antispace on the other hand, that of church-hegemonic/state subordinate axial criteria, where antiphysics and metaphysics form male polarities as against the female polarities of chemistry and antimetachemistry. Strictly speaking, we have a logical right to describe antimetaphysics as antimale in an antidivine way and antichemistry as antifemale in an antifeminine way, while reserving to antiphysics and antimetachemistry the distinction between an antimasculine mode of antimaleness and an antidiabolic mode of antifemaleness. For that which is ‘anti’, whether in sensuality or in sensibility, is contrary to its male or female counterpart. Hence the noumenal antisubjectivity of antimetaphysics is axially contrary to the noumenal subjectivity of metaphysics as antidivine antimaleness to divine maleness; hence the phenomenal antisubjectivity of antiphysics is axially contrary to the phenomenal subjectivity of physics as antimasculine antimaleness to masculine maleness; hence, by gender contrast, the phenomenal anti-objectivity of antichemistry is axially contrary to the phenomenal objectivity of chemistry as antifeminine antifemaleness to feminine femaleness; hence, finally, the noumenal anti-objectivity antimetachemistry is axially contrary to the noumenal objectivity of metachemistry as antidiabolic antifemaleness to diabolic femaleness. This, believe it or not, is how things add up, and it would indicate that the axial interdependence and interrelativity of worldly societies is more complicated than a simple humanistic reductionism would suggest. As, for that matter is the reversal of worldly criteria in a post-worldly age or stage of civilization, where not the ‘below’ but the ‘above’ call the shots, whether for worse, as in relation to the netherworldly/anti-otherworldly northwest point of the intercardinal axial compass, or for better, hopefully in times to come with a resurrected northeast point commensurate with ‘Kingdom Come’ and, hence, with more genuine otherworldly/anti-netherworldly criteria relative to a universal (divine male)/antipolyversal (antidiabolic antifemale) stage of globalization, when not metachemistry and antimetaphysics but metaphysics and antimetachemistry will determine the fate of everything else, not least those entitled to deliverance from antiphysical antisubjectivity and chemical objectivity in the forms, according with gender, of salvation and counter-damnation.