Understanding the Contrary Modes of Noumenal Saluting. If there is a mode of saluting – and I guess most ideologies have salutes of one sort or another – germane to Social Theocracy and/or Social Transcendentalism (for the terms are both loosely interchangeable and indicative of a state/church dichotomy within the Centre, our projected ideological context of a religiously sovereign people), it is that which exemplifies life in noumenal subjectivity and noumenal anti-objectivity at the northeast point of the intercardinal axial compass – in short, that which is illustrative of a metaphysical and an antimetachemical orientation. I can think of none better, for this purpose, than a clenched fist on a loosely bent arm that is raised and capable of rotating the fist backwards and forwards in due curvilinear fashion, the arm and fist being gently turned towards the person in confirmation of a subjective orientation that should leave one in no doubt that metaphysical transcendentalism and/or idealism is the allegiance being upheld. But this noumenally subjective mode of Social Theocratic and/or Social Transcendentalist saluting should be differentiated, as metaphysics from antimetachemistry, from its female or, more correctly, antifemale complement, which should have reference to an open-handed salute on a loosely bent arm the angle of which is likewise, as with the male, gently turned towards the person and therefore in no way fascist. For fascist open-handed saluting is of course conducted on a straight raised arm the hand of which points away from the person in due noumenally objective vein, symptomatic of a metachemical allegiance germane to the unequivocally hegemonic position at the northwest point of the intercardinal axial compass and therefore as far removed from metaphysical godliness, not to mention antimetachemical antidevilishness, as it is possible to be. The squareness, so to speak, of the typical raised arm fascist salute is indicative of the barbarism of Devil the Mother and/or the Daughter of the Devil hyped as God on a contemporary, or post-worldly and even global, basis, and where metachemistry vainly parades its noumenal objectivity one will invariably find antimetaphysics pseudo-meekly parading its noumenal antisubjectivity in terms of a raised-arm salute the clenched fist of which likewise points away from the person in due subjectivity-defying upended male fashion, the fashion, in other words, of the antidivine antimale, the devotee of the Antison of Antigod in free soma and of Antigod the Antifather in bound psyche, under the hegemonic pressure of the diabolic female. Thus neither the outright squareness of the one nor the twisted and upended ‘hipness’ of the other, the former fascist and the latter communist, are of any saluting relevance to Social Theocracy, since symptomatic of all that is rooted in or subordinate to metachemical barbarism and therefore contrary to the metaphysical culture of a godly resolve. We Social Theocrats should be careful to preserve, according to gender, both clenched-fist and open-handed saluting in relation to a loosely bent arm that is capable of metaphysically graceful/wise and antimetachemically pseudo-punishing/good curvilinear movement in defence of noumenal subjectivity and noumenal anti-objectivity. This is the hipness that unabashedly stands apart from and contrary to all squareness, and therefore it is fitting that its principal mode of gestural exemplification, germane to noumenal subjectivity, should take a clenched-fist form for males and its subordinate mode of gestural exemplification, germane to noumenal anti-objectivity, an open-hand form for antifemales, whose palm will, like the fist of their male counterparts, be gently facing back towards the person on an arm which is not indisposed to some degree, varying with the individual, of oscillatory movement. Thus do we radically distinguish ourselves from all that is fascist and communist, since we Centrists, in that special Social Theocratic and/or Transcendentalist sense in which I normally employ that term, are heirs to a liberal order of totalitarianism which respects both male and antifemale positions and stands in marked contrast to all that would autocratically set the one gender at the throat of the other in the interests of total female domination of society to the lasting detriment if not effective exclusion of anything else.