Primacy and Supremacy Revaluated. Just as we distinguish between sensual and sensible, alpha and omega, outer and inner, so we should distinguish between primal and supreme on a like basis, but with a further distinction between antisupremacy and antiprimacy, as in antisupremacy under primacy and antiprimacy under supremacy, the former germane to either noumenal or phenomenal sensuality, the latter to their sensible counterparts.  Hence not only primacy and supremacy as alpha and omega, but antisupremacy as anti-omega and antiprimacy as anti-alpha, with something like doing and antibeing lining up in noumenal sensuality and antisensibility against taking and antigiving in phenomenal sensibility and antisensuality where state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axial criteria in respect of a polar antithesis between the northwest and the southeast points of the intercardinal axial compass are concerned, and, conversely, giving and antitaking lining up in phenomenal sensuality and antisensibility against being and antidoing in noumenal sensibility and antisensuality where church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axial criteria in respect of a polar antithesis between the southwest and northeast points of the intercardinal axial compass are concerned.  Hence doing over antibeing as noumenal primacy over noumenal antisupremacy at the space/antitime northwest point of the intercardinal axial compass, but taking over antigiving as phenomenal supremacy over phenomenal antiprimacy at the mass/antivolume southeast point of the said compass.  Hence, too, giving over antitaking as phenomenal primacy over phenomenal antisupremacy at the volume/antimass southwest point of the intercardinal axial compass, but being over antidoing as noumenal supremacy over noumenal antiprimacy at the time/antispace northeast point of the said compass.  Therefore metachemical primacy, in noumenally objective doing, over antimetaphysical antisupremacy, in noumenally antisubjective antibeing, will contrast with physical supremacy, in phenomenally subjective taking, over antichemical antiprimacy, in phenomenally anti-objective antigiving, where the northwest-southeast antithesis of state-hegemonic/church-subordinate axial criteria is concerned, whereas chemical primacy, in phenomenally objective giving, over antiphysical antisupremacy, in phenomenally antisubjective antitaking, will contrast with metaphysical supremacy, in noumenally subjective being, over antimetachemical antiprimacy, in noumenally anti-objective antidoing, where the southwest-northeast antithesis of church-hegemonic/state-subordinate axial criteria is concerned.  Today the latter axis is, thanks to the post-worldly prevalence of the former one, much less prevalent than previously; but its revolutionary overhaul and 'resurrection' is just a matter of time, and one will then witness a growing trend towards metaphysical supremacy and antimetachemical antiprimacy as the antiphysical antisupreme are saved and the chemical primal counter-damned to their respective gender destinies at the northeast point of the intercardinal axial compass, leaving their lowly fates at the southwest point of what, under the influence of contrary axial pressures in post-worldly society, was less church-hegemonic/state-subordinate than quasi-state-hegemonic/quasi-church-subordinate far behind them.