Antitheses Exclude, Polarities Attract. Appearance excludes essence and vice versa to what, on the noumenal planes of space/antitime and time/antispace, amounts to something like an absolute degree, viz. 3:1, since either beauty and love (coupled to ugliness and hatred) triumph over anti-illusion and anti-woe (coupled to anti-truth and anti-joy) in the unequivocal hegemony of metachemistry over antimetaphysics or, across the sensual/sensible noumenal divide, truth and joy (coupled to illusion and woe) triumph over anti-ugliness and anti-hatred (coupled to anti-beauty and anti-love) in the unequivocal hegemony of metaphysics over antimetachemistry.  Similarly quantity excludes quality and vice versa to what, on the phenomenal planes of volume/antimass and mass/antivolume, amounts to something like a relative degree, viz. 2½:1½, since either strength and pride (coupled to weakness and humility) triumph over anti-ignorance and anti-pain (coupled to anti-knowledge and anti-pleasure) in the equivocal hegemony of chemistry over antiphysics or, across the sensual/sensible phenomenal divide, knowledge and pleasure (coupled to ignorance and pain) triumph over anti-weakness and anti-humility (coupled to anti-strength and anti-pride) in the equivocal hegemony of physics over antichemistry.  Hence no more than metachemistry is acceptable from a metaphysical standpoint ... can chemistry be acceptable from a physical standpoint.  The one gender's hegemony necessarily excludes the other's.  However, the modification of the phenomenal positions attendant upon a polar link with the noumenal ones germane to a given axis ensures that, at any rate traditionally, the equivocal triumphs of chemistry over antiphysics and of physics over antichemistry are subverted in favour of psychic emphasis in the one case and somatic emphasis in the other, thereby resulting in a paradoxical upending of hegemonic priorities in favour of the underplane position, be it antimale in the case of antiphysics or antifemale in the case of antichemistry.  For on this basis - and this basis alone - is axial continuity and consistency guaranteed, whether with regard to state-hegemonic/church-subordinate criteria or, in complete contrast, to church-hegemonic/state-subordinate criteria.  Hence the polarity of metachemistry and antichemistry is one of beauty and love (coupled to ugliness and hatred) vis-à-vis anti-strength and anti-pride (coupled to anti-weakness and anti-humility) on primary state-hegemonic/church-subordinate terms, with the polarity between antimetaphysics and physics being one of anti-illusion and anti-woe (coupled to anti-truth and anti-joy) vis-à-vis ignorance and pain (coupled to knowledge and pleasure) on secondary state-hegemonic/church-subordinate terms.  Hence, across the axial divide, the polarity of metaphysics and antiphysics is one of truth and joy (coupled to illusion and woe) vis-à-vis anti-knowledge and anti-pleasure (coupled to anti-ignorance and anti-pain) on primary church-hegemonic/state-subordinate terms, with the polarity between antimetachemistry and chemistry being one of anti-ugliness and anti-hatred (coupled to anti-beauty and anti-love) vis-à-vis weakness and humility (coupled to strength and pride) on secondary church-hegemonic/state-subordinate terms.  Noumenal free soma (coupled to noumenal bound psyche) excludes noumenal free psyche (coupled to noumenal bound soma) and vice versa, but noumenal free soma vis-à-vis phenomenal bound soma constitutes state-hegemonic criteria and noumenal bound psyche vis-à-vis phenomenal free psyche church-subordinate criteria, whether on primary or secondary, female or male, terms.  Conversely, phenomenal free soma (coupled to phenomenal bound psyche) excludes phenomenal free psyche (coupled to phenomenal bound soma) and vice versa, but noumenal free psyche vis-à-vis phenomenal bound psyche constitutes church-hegemonic criteria and noumenal bound soma vis-à-vis phenomenal free soma state-subordinate criteria, whether on primary or secondary, male or female, terms.