CHRISTIAN
PAGANS
In the Christian
iconography, Christ offers man the possibility of salvation, as He sits in
Judgement between Hell and Heaven.
Atomic religion opens up the possibility of salvation but does not
discount the alternative possibility, for those who have been judged and found
wanting, of damnation. Christ is
abraxas-like, a dual-natured deity who, so the iconographic depictions
demonstrate, damns with one hand and saves with the other, having first
weighed-up the ratio of sins to graces or graces to sins of those deemed
eligible, in the Christian schema, for judgement. Being the Son of God (the Father), Christ,
the second deity in the evolution of gods from the alpha-most to the
omega-most, is perfectly entitled to behave towards the Damned in a manner
owing something to the Father, Who is entirely negative and therefore
indisposed to save anybody, and will accordingly curse those whom He
damns. The Father, if He could curse,
would curse with a capital 'C'. But
Christ, being abraxas-like and therefore diluted, only curses with a small one,
because the better half of Him, in the Christian iconography, is disposed to
bless, albeit with a small 'b', and thus to save. The ultimate blessing or, rather, Blessing
with a capital 'B', would only come from the Holy Spirit, yet not as a deity
separate, like Christ, from those to be blessed, but as one compounded, as it
were, of the Blessed in Spirit, whose very condition is blessed. Christ, however, is not that deity but,
appertaining to the 'Three in One', merely a diluted Holy Ghost. Consequently He cannot offer man ultimate
salvation, but only the relative salvation, still paradoxically couched in
terms of the Father, of the Christian schema.
This salvation is really fictional, though necessarily so for a given
period of evolutionary time. Man cannot
live with the whole truth about salvation when he is still subject to various
illusions, as Christian man inevitably is.
That truth must come with a post-Christian and, hence,
post-atomic age.
Throughout the Christian era, however, there were still many men
who could not identify with Christ and therefore didn't place much confidence
in their prospects of salvation, not so much because they were more disposed
towards a transcendental attitude to Christianity as because, being relatively
pagan in their psychic constitutions, they were insufficiently evolved to
properly relate to the 'Son of God'. A
typical attitude of such men when on the point of death would have been one
which emphasized the part they expected the Father to play in judging them in
the Afterlife. They would have been
preparing themselves for a return to their 'Maker', the Creator in whose image
man had apparently been made, and, as such, they would have died with a pagan
heart. Had they been true Christians,
they would have looked forward to being judged by Christ in the Afterlife,
confident, with what time remained to them, that they had done their best in
this life and could expect the blessed hand of salvation rather than the cursed
hand of damnation to fall upon them. The
prospects for even a less than true Christian was at least 50/50, provided that
his life had not been one long orgy of sin in a category approximating to the
criminal. In a borderline case, Christ
would be more likely to show compassion than vengefulness.
A man, however, who looks forward to returning to his 'Maker',
meaning the Father, is not, objectively considered,
one who can expect to be saved but, on the contrary, one who, in effect, passes
negative judgement upon himself. For to
return to the Father, assuming it were possible, would indeed be to suffer
damnation, since, theologically speaking, the Father is at the opposite
evolutionary remove from the Holy Spirit, corresponding, in essence, to the
most cursed deity, an absolute negativity rather than a negative/positive
compromise, as in Christ, the man-god.
No man who looked forward to meeting his 'Maker' in the Afterlife could
reasonably be considered a Christian, nor could he be regarded as a logical
thinker if he expected to be saved in the process! Whatever he expected, he was effectively
betraying a basic allegiance to the Alpha Absolute, and thus expressing a pagan
orientation analogous to that upheld by certain tribes in pre-atomic America,
whose braves practised the custom of turning towards the sun when death seemed
imminent, in order to align their soul with what was considered to be a return
to its source (in the Diabolic).
Of course, there is no return of the soul either to a 'Maker' -
which is really a theological abstraction along the lines of the Creator,
Jehovah, etc., from the First Cause, or literal root of the Galaxy, in the
central star (the major star from which such minor stars as the sun 'fell',
with the theological equivalent of the Big Bang at the root of Creation), nor
literally to the sun, conceived as the source of all earthly creation, for the
simple reason that, as id-like seat of emotions in the subconscious, the
primitive soul is not eternal but decidedly temporal in constitution, and
therefore couldn't return anywhere - least of all to a cosmic entity at a
considerable remove from itself! At
death, the instinctual soul dies, but so, too, does the spirit, or intellectual
faculty of the superconscious, which, though potentially eternal, is unable to
survive on an absolute basis without physiological support, because accustomed
to a relative existence in conjunction with the id. Thus the man who supposes that, at death, his
soul will return to its 'Maker', to be judged one way or the other, is deluded
twice over, both as regards survival and judgement. And even if he lives in the Christian
civilization, he is yet a sublimated pagan for whom the possibility of
spiritual survival does not enter into account, since he is too wrapped-up in
the prospect of his soul returning to its 'Maker' to have any thoughts to spare
on the alternative prospect of his spirit, arising from the upper half of his
psyche, being admitted to the 'Kingdom of Heaven', viz. the Holy Spirit, by an
intermediate Christ in Judgement. Even
the anticipated return of the soul to its 'Maker' would seem, in such minds, to
be a matter requiring no reference to a negative judgement by Christ, but one
which can by-pass the Christian Judge, as it
speeds on a directly pagan course to its alpha-oriented goal! Not, assuredly, the kind of attitude that a
genuine Christian would uphold. For he
would never leave Christ out of account where the fate of his soul and/or
spirit was concerned, even if, objectively considered, his spirit was no more
likely to attain to salvation than the soul of the quasi-pagan ... to be
damned.
From the theological point-of-view, a man's fate in the
Afterlife could of course be determined by a Christ capable of weighing sins
and graces on a mental balance, and passing judgement according to which way
the scales tipped. Yet precisely because
Christianity was not
an
absolute religion but a compromise between soul and spirit, will and intellect,
there could be no possibility of anyone literally being either damned or
saved. That may sound fairly obvious to
us, but it wouldn't have been so obvious to medieval Christians. For, as a relative compromise, it can only
follow that the mind of a Christian would have been damned to the extent it was
composed of instinctual soul and saved to the extent it was composed of
intellectual spirit. Being in itself
split between Hell and Heaven, fire and light, emotions and awareness,
Christianity could only offer a split judgement to the split humanity over whom
it elected to preside. The Christ in
Judgement between Hell and Heaven is indeed an apt reflection of the psychic
constitution of Christian man. Every man
would simultaneously have been damned and saved, although this is not, of
course, the impression which Christian iconography strives to convey, since it
functions on the theological basis of either/or, rather than both. But even there, the justification of
Judgement can be questioned when scrutinized with a literal eye. For if the soul is temporal and the spirit,
by contrast, only potentially eternal when intellectually housed in the same
psyche as its great instinctual antithesis, one might be forgiven for adopting
the line that the spirit alone would be eligible for judgement and that, as
spirit, it must be a foregone conclusion for admittance to Heaven. However, as this and other such remarks will
have demonstrated, the literal eye is not the most relevant one to apply to
theology, least of all to a theology so closely associated with a medieval
understanding of the psyche!
Getting back to the inability of so many men to come to terms
with Christ and the transcendental prospect which Christianity was intended to
demonstrate, it would be wrong of me to leave the reader with the impression
that only in medieval times was this actually the case. For although it was arguably more prevalent
then, the adherence of various men to sublimated paganism continued throughout
the Christian era and even into the twentieth century, which was scarcely an
archetypal Christian century but, rather, an incipiently transcendental
one. And not only among the ranks of the
lowly or with such paradoxical examples of alpha-oriented allegiance as Jehovah
Witnesses, who alone of Christian sects strive to
reconcile Christianity with Judaism. One
of the most lethal alpha-oriented people of all time was undoubtedly Adolf
Hitler who, as anyone familiar with writings about him will know, was far more
disposed towards references to Providence, or the Creator, the Father, and
other such variations on an alpha-oriented theme, than ever he was towards
references to Christ (and this despite a professedly anti-Semitic disposition
which evidently had no trouble accommodating Creatoresque monotheism). Indeed, he scarcely ever mentioned Christ except
in derogatory terms - rather like Nietzsche - and never seems to have conceived
of God in terms of the Holy Spirit. For
him, the only God that existed and mattered was the Father, whose name he would
evoke, in a variety of guises, with the regular persistence of a
monomaniac. If he escaped relatively
unscathed from an attack upon his life, as he did on more than one occasion, it
was alleged that the hand of
As a theological abstraction from the First Cause,
Politics wasn't the only field, however, in which an arch-pagan
came to the fore in the twentieth century.
My own field of creative writing fell victim to a quite formidable pagan
in the person of John Cowper Powys, whose petty-bourgeois philosophy champions
the cause of a kind of Rousseauesque return to nature, and emphasizes, in a
number of publications, the importance, as he sees it, of psychological
association with the root of all nature in the First Cause, which should be
approached in an ambiguous fashion, depending on one's mood or circumstances,
of either gratitude or defiance.
Gratitude to the First Cause for all the pleasure in life, defiance of
the First Cause for all the pain it entails - these are the alternating poles
of Powys' paganism, a paganism which doesn't even express itself indirectly,
through the medium of some theological abstraction, but refers directly back to
the literal roots of the Universe in what, whether or not he realizes it, can
only be cosmic energy. Treating this
scientific term in a theological way, however, only confounds the issue, and we
may be sure that Powys was as baffled as most of his followers must surely have
been by the exact nature and location of this two-faced First Cause! If ever a man was the champion of the
instinctual soul, wallowing brontosaurus-like in subconscious stupor, it was
this latter-day Druid, this anachronistic heathen, this apostate son of a Welsh
clergyman, this antithetical equivalent to Nietzsche, this revivalist of Celtic
atavisms and arch-enemy of the spirit! I
do not think his work will be greatly admired by future generations.
Neither, however, do I expect the work of D.H. Lawrence, Powys'
literary contemporary and heathen counterpart, to serve as a vehicle of
spiritual enlightenment for future generations, since it, too, falls heavily on
the side of the Alpha absolute. As one
of the few men of his time who could logically distinguish between soul and
spirit, instinct and intellect,