5
September 1900
I must not lose the thread of this
narrative: I must master the past by giving it the meaning which only now it
possesses for me. I had left Paris, had I not, and come back to London? I
was penniless, but I was the prodigal son who is allowed to return home as long
as he remains prodigal; and so, in order to retain the position which I had
assumed, I was compelled to set to work.
I pawned my Gold Medal from Trinity and lectured upon America in the North of England: I do not know
which caused me the greater pain.
I
first met my wife, Constance, in Dublin, in the autumn of that year. Poor Constance, the last time I saw her was in
prison. We discussed Cyril and Vyvyan but we did not talk about each other for there was,
really, nothing left to say. I had said,
and lied, too much to her in the past.
She looked at me with pity in that dreadful place but it was I who
pitied her - I had descended into Hell through my own vanity and weakness but
she, unknowing, had been taken there.
I
visited her grave in Genoa last year. It lies in a
small cemetery outside the town, surrounded by wonderful wild flowers, and I
was so moved by the sight that I asked the cabman to wait. I was seized with a fit of weeping but a
sense, also, of the uselessness of weeping.
Life is simple: the simple things happen always. I killed her just as surely as if I had fed
her poison from a spoon. And now my name
is not even on the stone which marks her grave.
My
friends often asked me why I married her, and I used to reply that it was
merely to find out what she thought of me; but, in truth, I knew that well
enough. She loved me, that is all, and it is difficult to resist a love which is as
innocent as it is unselfish. I saw
myself as a romantic figure - not like Werther, who
finds power in love, but like Pelleas, who finds
salvation. I married Constance because I was afraid - afraid of what I
might have become alone, of the desires which, if I had yielded to them, I
would not have been able to control. I
wished to build my life, not destroy it as I had seen others destroyed in Paris, and marriage to Constance was one means of doing so. If she was an angel, as I informed my
friends, she was one who with flaming sword kept me from a paradise of
forbidden pleasures.
My
mother approved of the match. Constance was beautiful - women are always susceptible
to the beauty of others. She was pale
and very slim - my mother said she had the figure of a boy, but I pretended not
to understand her. And she came from a
fine Irish family. Really, I might have
been performing a service to the nation.
But I have always listened to my mother's advice - she possessed a
shrewd common sense, at least in matters which did not concern herself, which, combined with her decidedly theatrical
manner, was quite merciless. They became
close friends: they would shop together and on the evenings when I was not at
home, evenings which became too frequent, they would sit and talk about the
children, or about Madame Blavatsky. My mother supported Constance until the end, until the burden of grief
became too great even for her to hold.
Constance revered the idea of marriage: she had a
vision of the heart guarded, if not by Penates, at
least by a bamboo tea-table and a floriated carpet. She tried to influence me in that direction
but I have always loathed modern domesticity, the life of the villas where they
play waltz music and shop for their feelings in the circulating libraries. And so, in the little house we bought in Tite Street, we moved quite away from conventional
interiors: it seems hard to recall but in those days, in the early Eighties,
you could not have mahogany tables without magazines, or magazines without
mahogany tables. With the help of Godwin
we created in Chelsea a set of beautiful interiors: they took six months to
fashion, one sordid and bitter afternoon to be destroyed by my creditors.
Tite Street is hideous, of course. All streets in London are.
My friends told me that by living there I had become suburban, but I
told them I was like the railway company - London and suburban. I can still see each room in that house: my
study, with its statue of Hermes Praxiteles and the
desk on which Carlyle wrote that wonderful, imaginary autobiography, Sartor Resartus,
the dining room with Whistler's extraordinary ceiling, the drawing room where
Constance and I would sit, in the early days of our marriage, in silent
companionship. We had a piano there, and
sometimes Constance would play for me the popular songs; it
amused her to hear me sing them, for even then I could invest the most banal
sentiment with a wealth of feeling.
Some
of my acquaintances abandoned me after my marriage: Frank Miles was absurd
enough to think I had betrayed him.
Others did not understand Constance: because she was quiet, they thought her dull. She was indeed silent in their company, but
she was never dull about them afterwards.
Some of the most trenchant comments about my friends came, not from the
judges in the Old Bailey, but from her.
She was not witty, but she was amusing.
She was not an advanced woman - her lessons came from Wilde, not from
Ibsen. I guided her in everything: she
had a poetical nature, but she was still searching for the poetry with which to
fill it. I placed beautifully bound
books in her hands; we would visit the Grosvenor
Gallery, not to look but to be looked at, for I have always considered myself
to be an example of modern art; we would travel to Regent Street and I would choose the material for the
dresses which I designed for her. It
saddens me now, however, to think of the extraordinary compliance of her nature
- I stiffened it, and then I broke it.
But
in the early years of our marriage Constance was at peace: she used to sing to herself, and often seemed so
perfectly happy that I was afraid to come near her. But she had a nervous habit of stroking her
hair with her left hand, and would sometimes retreat into silences which were
so sudden that they were inexplicable to me.
I suspected her then of leading another life which she hid from me - but
of course it was only the life which she had always led, filled with trivial
routines and small pleasures. She would
come back from tea with one of her childhood friends, her face quite bright
with pleasure.
'Whom
have you seen, my dear?' I would ask her.
'Oh,
no-one, Oscar, no-one you know.'
But
she could not refrain from describing to me then where she had been and what
had been said. I listened always, but it
is possible she suspected me of mocking her secretly, for often she would
falter and fall silent. Now I am
reminded of how I watched her with fascination whenever she was engaged in
small household tasks - and how, if she saw me observing her, she would grow
self-conscious and hesitant in her movements.
It is as if I am describing a stranger, is it not? Perhaps I did not know Constance at all.
Nevertheless
I am convinced that in our first years we were happy. It was only after the birth of our children
that we grew more reserved towards each other.
When she bore our first son, the sight of her with child repelled me
somewhat: it is charming in religious art, but not elsewhere. I averted my eyes, and I busied myself about
trivial matters. And, when Cyril was
born, Constance herself became less childlike.
I wished her to remain as she had been when I first met her, but I could
no more restrain the progress of her maturity than I could hasten my own. For she required of me then a love which I
could not give her: but she had learned from me how to dissimulate her feelings,
and grew more distant. And so by gradual
degree that innocent and joyful love which I had conceived for her I gave
instead to my children.
It
is strange how from the wreck of the past I can rescue only the smallest
things: there was a tiny milk-cart, I remember, which I gave to Cyril and, when
he broke one of its little horses, I spent the entire afternoon piecing it
together with glue. He would ride upon
my back, and I would tell him that our destination was the stars. For some reason, Vyvyan
always wept when I lifted him up, and I would comfort him with pastilles.
To
know that they are living somewhere, and that I shall
never see them again: I cannot speak of it.
I could weep for them longer than Niobe, who
wept for ever, and mourn more bitterly than Demeter ever did: their children were
snatched from them by the gods. I pushed
mine away by my own deeds.
I
find it hard now even to look upon other children in the street: I have this
peculiar fear that they are in danger from the cabs and the omnibuses. When I see a father pick up his child and
carry him upon his shoulders, it is all I can do to restrain myself from
pleading with him not to do so. I do not
know why this should be: I do not comprehend, sometimes, the forms which
suffering takes.
I
think I have written somewhere that marriage is a sort of forcing house. Constance never really understood me: that was no doubt why I married her;
but boredom and frustration can lead to desperation, and desperation brings
strange sins to fruit. I spent less and
less of my time in Tite Street, and deception became necessary - but I
cannot speak of my sins yet. I will
employ what Pater calls the 'marvellous tact of
omission'.
The
marriage, then, was not satisfactory for either party. Sometimes, towards the end, it seemed to me
that Constance and I were like characters out of Modern Love. I do not suppose that anyone had experienced
marital discord until Meredith invented it, but nevertheless it was a
ridiculous posture - to be reduced to a poem.
Even my mother was strangely affected; she would write letters to me
explaining how sorrowful and lonely Constance was becoming and then, in my guilt, I would try to rekindle that
love which, in Ovid's words, 'lights up the house'. And there were days when we were happy again
but petty quarrels, and the shadow which my own life was beginning to cast,
destroyed that happiness. It was as
trite as a Drury Lane melodrama and yet wearying also, terribly
wearying.
I
have remembered one of the songs Constance and I played together in Tite Street:
And
never sit down with a tear or a frown
But
paddle your own canoe.
It is
wonderfully suggestive, is it not?