48
Samuel Beckett
1906–1989
Yet another of Ireland's Nobel Prize
winners, Samuel Beckett, in his spare, bleak plays, seems to many of his admirers
to epitomize the sense of despair many felt immediately after the war, the
sense of alienation and isolation, of suppressed rage with life, which
characterize the modern age. In 1969,
the citation of the Nobel committee spoke of 'his writings, in which - in new
forms for the novel and drama - the destitution of modern man acquires its
elevation'. According to Robert Hogan,
'He remains perhaps the century's most acclaimed and influential avant-garde
writer'.
Samuel
Barclay Beckett was born in Foxrock, a genteel,
largely Protestant suburb of Dublin, on 13th April 1906. He had a comfortable upbringing in a material
sense. He was educated at Portora Royal School in Enniskillen in Northern Ireland – OSCAR WILDE'S [97] old school. He entered Trinity College in the autumn of
1923, where he studied modern languages (French in particular) and took his
bachelor's degree in 1927. For a few
months he taught French at a Protestant school in Belfast before going to the Ecole Normale Supérieure
in Paris as a lecturer.
It
was in Paris that he made friends with the Irish poet and art critic Thomas
McGreevy, through whom he was introduced into the circle of JAMES JOYCE [25].
Joyce was to be the greatest literary influence on Beckett's own
work. He was one of a number of the
friends who assisted the nearly blind Joyce by reading and researching material
for 'Work in Progress' eventually published as Finnegans
Wake. Beckett was also one of the
young men in whom Joyce's daughter took a romantic interest.
Beckett
had literary ambitions of his own. His
first publications were a long poem called 'Whoroscope'
in 1930, and a short study of Proust for a London
publishers in 1931. In the autumn of
1930 he went back to Dublin to teach French at Trinity College, where McGreevy
introduced him to JACK YEATS [26], whom Beckett deeply admired. Indeed the later pictures of Yeats, with
their isolated figures and blasted landscapes, have much in common with
Beckett's writing.
Beckett's
stay in Dublin was fraught with ill health and personal and emotional problems,
especially with his demanding mother.
Having taken his master's degree, he went back to Paris in December
1931. There he began a novel (which
remained unpublished till after his death) and a collection of stories, More
Pricks Than Kicks, which makes use of familiar Dublin in a unique way,
pointing towards his later work.
Beckett
now identified with his French friends, and during the occupation he worked
with the French Resistance, though in 1942 he was forced to flee south to Roussillon. Later he
was awarded the Croix de Guerre. Ireland
may have been neutral - Samuel Beckett was not.
On
his return to Paris, Beckett settled into his major period of production. He was now writing in French rather than
English. Molloy was finished in
1948, and was followed by Malone Meurt. By the first months of 1950 he had finished L'Innommable.
But
these books, when published, either in French or English, made little impact
compared with the sensation that was caused by the production of his play En
Attendant Godot in a theatre studio early in
1953. As Waiting for Godot, it was successfully produced in London and New
York. Its novelty and strange atmosphere
at once made it a talking point not only among the avant-garde, but the general
public. It was the beginning of the
Theatre of the Absurd, which many saw as growing out of the existential
philosophies of Sartre and Camus.
His
earlier work came back into print, often in his own translations. In 1956 came Fin de Partie
(Endgame in English). He
ceased to write novels, and his plays became briefer and more etiolated. In 1961 he married his long-time companion
Suzanne Deschevaux-Dumesnil. Though they maintained flats beside each
other in Paris, much of their time was spent in the country or in North
Africa. In July 1989 Beckett's wife
died, and he himself passed away on 22nd December.
The
following year one critic observed that 'by the year 2000 Beckett criticism
will equal that of Wagner and Napoleon, who are the most written about personae
in history'. Beckett himself was an
obsessively private person, and his biographers have not even yet fully plumbed
the depths of his experiences. It is
clear now, however, that though he wrote in French and published in Paris as a
European author, much of his initial inspiration draws on his early experiences
in Dublin. Indeed, it was the ambition
of the actor Peter O'Toole to film Waiting for Godot
in the bleak rocky district of the Burren in the west
of Ireland, as its windswept acres seemed to echo the barren isolation of the
play. Like Joyce, who influenced him
greatly, Beckett never escaped from Ireland, and a haunted childhood and
illness were major matters in his life.
Many would now regard as his best work not the later briefer items, but
the more closely grained world of his novels and early plays.
When
the Nobel committee spoke of destitution, they seemed to be thinking of the
bleakness of life and soul which his work reflects, and thinking how
appropriate this was for an era threatened with annihilation at a moment's
notice. Personal courage would have no
place in an atomic war, but for Beckett, waiting for the end had become
intolerable, while life itself was even more so.
Quite
how his work will wear with time is still a matter of controversy, but his
influence on the literature of the late twentieth century was very great. 'Beckettian' is an
adjective that everyone understands the meaning of, even if they cannot
understand the meaning of Beckett.