77
Edmund Burke
1729–1797
Outside Trinity College in central Dublin
stand two statues, one of the poet Goldsmith, the other of Edmund Burke. For the nineteenth century, they represented
the two aspects of Anglo-Irish culture which the college was most proud
of. Though Goldsmith is still much
admired, it is Burke as a political writer and statesman who has come to be
seen as the most influential. He remains
the great philosopher and expounder of the anti-revolutionary philosophy that
Ireland has produced.
Like
that of his country, Burke's was a divided, perhaps even confused,
identity. His father came from a Catholic
family, but being an attorney he had conformed to the Church of Ireland for
professional reasons. His mother was a
Catholic from rural Cork. Burke himself
seems to have been born not at his father's house in Dublin but at his uncle's
house in rural Cork. As a small child he
was sent to live among his Cork relatives, where he would have absorbed the
Catholic culture. From there he entered
Trinity College, which he seems to have found intellectually stimulating, and
where he distinguished himself. He was
to be a lawyer and was sent by his father to study at the Middle Temple in
London. In London he married a Catholic,
Mary Nugent (who remained a Catholic all her life). Burke's view of Christianity was an inclusive
one, covering both the Catholicism of his mother and the nominal Anglicanism of
his father. In later life he was
secretive about his background and his relations, as the nature of his
upbringing might not have appealed to many in London political circles.
Burke
did not care for the law; his father did not care that his son wished to be a
writer. Breaking with his father, Burke
entered on the lower rungs of a political career. In 1756 he made his name with a satire on
Bolingbroke called A Vindication of Natural Society, but the irony was
easily misunderstood. Far more
successful was his essay on 'The Sublime on the Beautiful'. His literary career continued, and among his
books was one dealing with the political settlement with America, a continent
always of interest to him. He began the Annual
Register, a record of political, social, and criminal events which still
continues, and from the beginning proved a success and an essential source for
later historians.
When
WILLIAM HAMILTON [76] was
made Irish secretary, Burke accompanied him to Dublin. His views on the social situation of his
native country were reinforced by this stay.
As John Morley, himself immersed in Irish affairs, later wrote: 'He
always took the interest of an ardent patriot in his unfortunate country; and
made more than one weighty sacrifice on behalf of the principles which he
deemed to be bound up with her welfare.'
Though
he was entitled to a small pension for his services, Burke quarrelled with
Hamilton and gave it up. England was now
passing into a period of political change under George III, who wished to break
with the settlement of 1688 and rule with more authority rather than the
permission of a set of great families.
In July 1767, Lord Rockingham became prime minister in a reversal of
fortune for the king, and appointed Burke his secretary. This remained a lifelong friendship. But Rockingham fell from power, largely
because he was not supported by William Pitt.
This ended any possibility of a wise policy toward the American
colonies. Burke had now been elected a
member of Parliament. From the day of
his election until 1790 he was to be one of the essential guides of a revival
of the Whig party, from which, in due course, would spring the great Liberal
party of the nineteenth century. In
opposition, Burke showed by his writings and speeches that he had a
wide-ranging and firm grasp of the details and prospects of political life that
was unrivalled.
Oddly
enough for a man who had been a penniless scribbler a few years before, Burke
was now able to buy an estate costing £22,000, which brought him £500 a year in
rents. His finances were another
mysterious aspect of his life. He spent
more than he made - far more - for he was a friendly man who kept up with his
friends and others of interest in London.
Burke
was more than a politician; he was an eminent man of letters. Until very recently, his description of Marie
Antoinette was among those pieces of famous prose which every schoolchild in
Ireland studied.
The
main themes of his political life, aside from his sympathy for Ireland, were
the fate of the American colonies, the beginnings of the British imperial
adventure in India, and the French Revolution.
These events inspired Burke's most eloquent pieces. His desire for a policy of reconciliation in
Ireland led to the loss of his seat. But
he was soon re-elected for another borough and held several offices in
government. However, these were small
matters compared with the saga of the impeachment of Warren Hastings for his
highhanded and cruel actions against the natives of India, which Burke pursued
from 1787.
In
1790 he published Reflections on the Revolution in France, which
appeared in eleven editions at the time, and drew fierce responses from the
romantic admirers of the bloody events in Paris; one of these being Tom Paine's
Rights of Man. Though it gained
Burke a universal reputation, it also led to a break with the leader of his
party, Charles James Fox, a more radical man than Burke, in May 1791.
When
the long trial of Warren Hastings concluded with his acquittal in April 1795,
Burke gave up his seat in Parliament.
Though his writings and speeches on the whole defended the value of
tradition and good order, he was not a great admirer of the landed oligarchs of
the Whig party. He was a representative
of 'the new man', the sort of person who rose through the ranks of British
society and would become a great feature of the nineteenth century.
Burke
died at his house in Beaconsfield on 9th July 1797. He remains an outstanding figure, a proponent
of a view of society which has many admirers.
Like many other Irishmen later, he had made a career for himself in
British public life. 'There have been,'
his admirer John Morley concluded, 'many subtler, more original, and more
systematic thinkers about the condition of the social union. But no one that ever lived used the general
ideas of the thinker more successfully to judge the particular problems of
statesmen. No one has ever come so close
to the details of practical politics, and at the same time remembered that
these can only be understood and only dealt with by the aid of the broad
conceptions of political philosophy. And
what is more than all for the perpetuity of fame, he was one of the great
masters of the high and difficult art of elaborate composition.'
It
has been the lament of many Irish people since that these amazing talents could
not have served his native country more directly than they did. But Burke was caught by the political
circumstances of his day, and like all leaders of men had to make what he could
of them.