CRITIQUE OF POST-DIALECTICAL IDEALISM:
Although not a critique in the strictly analytical sense, this 1989-91 work is
nonetheless sufficiently methodical and wide-ranging in its comprehensive
treatment of a variety of interrelated subjects to warrant serious
consideration as a vehicle for the advancement, on a Social Transcendentalist
basis, of post-dialectical idealism (truth) in a world too long torn between
the conflicting claims of realism and materialism. Of especial significance here are the T-like
diagrammatic structures which enabled me to flesh-out, in fairly comprehensive
vein, the various components of any given subject and to analyse it in relation
to my overriding idealistic bias.
Subjects tackled include a theory of the connections between a given
mode of attire and the most appropriate approach to sexual intercourse in
relation to it, as well as an investigation of the relationships between
'naturalistic' and artificial products or technologies at both 'head' and
'bodily' levels.
PHILOSOPHICAL TRUTH: Akin to the above,
this 1991-2 work builds from its initial dualistic introduction to a
fully-fledged Social Transcendentalist critique, in which the by-now familiar
quadruple structures of the earlier work are examined with regard to a number
of new contexts, with particular emphasis on music and its relationship to
ideological parallels.
VERITAS PHILOSOPHICUS: This text derives
its Latin-sounding title from the use of 'V' structures in a majority of the
diagrams which characterize it and which enabled me to approach Truth or, in
this case, Veritas from a more systematic and
comprehensive standpoint, building on the 'T' structures common to both the
CRITIQUE OF POST-DIALECTICAL IDEALISM and PHILOSOPHICAL TRUTH (see above),
until I had amassed a considerable number of diagrammatic quadruplicities
of the sort deriving from their 'elemental' theories. Of real significance here is the modification
of perspective which develops from the use of two different types of
diagrammatic structure, and it is characteristic of my methodology that the
earlier perspective is either corrected or refuted, as we move into a more
logically advanced structural mode.
LAST JUDGEMENTS: This is the final (and
shortest) volume of what I now like to regard as 'The Post-Dialectical Idealism
Quartet', i.e. the four volumes of supernotes stemming from THE CRITIQUE OF
POST-DIALECTICAL IDEALISM, with its structural quadruplicities, and, not
surprisingly, it tends to sum up and/or refine upon a number of the principal
theories already discussed, as well as lay the foundation for the next stage of
my philosophical advance, which was to be more purely aphoristic or, more
correctly, maximistic, in what were to be several
volumes of maxims.
Copyright © 1989–2012 John O’Loughlin