Reading
And yet if criticism is due ... from my own anti-bourgeois
standpoint, then it must be on account of his complacent acceptance of and
willingness to deeply immerse himself in bourgeois criteria, in a world teeming
with middle-class references ... from country houses to wealthy merchants, from
passionate lovers to dispassionate priests, from expensive clothes to precious
jewels - a whole world of open-society phenomena which Durrell
objectively portrays with an acumen and stylistic brilliance worthy of the very
greatest literary talent, albeit it remains strictly bourgeois, the impartial
artist open to a vast panorama of the Given, the antithesis to the
revolutionary.
One is almost won over, almost converted by Durrell,
but not quite! Despite the manifest
genius of his writings, a lacuna opens-up in the soul and remains there on
account of the disparity between the contents of the page, natural as well as
bourgeois, and one's inability or unwillingness to relate to them. All these lovers long-suffering in exotic
spaces - what can they mean to a man who regards love as a bourgeois ideal and
marriage as an outmoded tradition?
One reads, as with so many novels, from a higher moral-ground,
call it supertheocratic or superproletarian,
and no matter how impressive the style or poetic the metaphors, one is still
unable to really admire something to which one cannot relate, because it
reflects a lower stage of evolution.
This is the old world, Western civilization, and it is destined for
extinction. Poetic novels are no less
obsolescent from a revolutionary point-of-view than philosophical novels and
literary novels, the Conservative-Labour-Liberal triangle of idealism,
materialism, and realism clinging to life with desperate intent but doomed,
sooner or later, to severance from it.
Only bourgeois diehards and moral hypocrites would pretend otherwise!