ALDOUS HUXLEY
More than
any other author of his generation, Huxley deepened the novel, took it away
from literary realism towards a metaphysical idealism, and exploited it as a
vehicle from which to explore the paradoxical pathways of alternative religion,
particularly, from approximately Eyeless in
Writing about such drug-taking experiments
in The Doors of Perception & Heaven and Hell, Huxley does not
dismiss the 'Artificial Paradises' obtained - as the great French poet
Baudelaire would probably have done under similar circumstances or, indeed, as Koestler actually did do - but, on the contrary, sees in
their otherworldly intimations a necessary reprieve from naturalism and the
attainment of expanded consciousness made easy - a not-unattractive proposition
in an age of technological expansion and artificial culture, and preferable, by
far, to continued recourse to such mind-contracting drugs as alcohol and
tobacco!
Despite his English origins and very
English cultivation, Huxley was no puritan, condemning drugs wholesale, but
flexible and realistic enough to perceive in the sensible use of certain kinds
of synthetic hallucinogens an alternative to pure religion, which, whilst
ultimately inadequate for spiritual salvation, was within the reach of most
people and of some benefit in the short term, if only as a means to combating
traditional dependence on the more sensual, because naturalistic, drugs, and
leading people towards a higher possibility - namely, self-realization achieved
independently of visionary experience through transcendental meditation. For whilst artificially-induced visionary experience
is preferable to alcoholic somnolence, true enlightenment lies in a realm of
pure mind necessarily beyond and above all appearances, a realm corresponding
to the utmost spiritual essence.
So Huxley was aware of the two approaches
to religious enlightenment, what in previous works I have called 'the romantic'
and 'the classic', or the indirect approach and the direct approach, which of
course find traditional parallels in the Christian distinction between Roman
Catholicism and Protestantism (with especial reference to Puritanism), and he very
wisely dismissed neither the one nor the other, as, in their opposite ways,
both Koestler and Jung were to do. America was moving towards artificial
appearances when Huxley experimented with hallucinogens, gradually abandoning
its puritan roots under pressure from various contemporary phenomena, some
ethnic, some technological, others social, and it is a trend that will
doubtless continue into the next civilization - the transcendental civilization
of what I have called Centrism ... in countries destined, in the short term,
for supertheocratic transformation. Appearances precede essences, and no less on
the transcendent level of artificial religion than on lower or naturalistic
levels - Social Transcendentalism the antithetical equivalent to Roman Catholicism.
So Huxley to some extent participated in
alternative civilization within the decadence of puritan civilization, when
oriental mysticism was on the increase, and his findings were by no means
negative. On the contrary, they indicate
a strong sympathy for an alternative approach to religion, and Huxley is now
better known for writings concerned with mind-expanding drugs than as an
advocate of transcendental meditation - great though his interest was in all
aspects of oriental religion. Even Island,
his last and in some ways most radical novel, has its own variant on LSD called
'soma', and since his death an anthology of his writings on drugs entitled Moksha has appeared, as though in confirmation of this
alternative bias.
Certainly, I would never have taken to
Huxley had he been a typical, instead of highly untypical, Englishman, and
although he lived abroad - first in France and then in the United States - on
account of his eyes requiring a drier and brighter climate, one is never given
the impression that this was in any way an inconvenience to him, but, on the
contrary, can well believe that those countries were more congenial to his
intellectual temperament than England, with its deadpan academicism and
philistine conservatism. Doubtless Huxley
would never have achieved the spiritual standing he did, had it not been for
this exile abroad, which not only encouraged him to deepen the novel, but to
expand essayistically towards imaginative horizons
transcending the narrow parochialism of British letters. In the first if not the second respect, he
resembles