CYCLE THREE
1. The contention, expressed above, that Italy
should be identified with watery re-birth (the womb) lends itself to the notion
that Italian sensibility is not only Marian as opposed to, say, Christic, but that Roman Catholicism, the mode of
Christianity one would most identify with Italy, is accordingly biased towards Marianism, in contrast to the Christic
bias of, say, Eastern Orthodoxy in connection with the Russian Church.
2. Now if Romanism is the Catholicism of Mary
and Orthodoxy, at least in its Russian manifestation, the Catholicism of
Christ, then one would have reason to believe that Greek Orthodoxy was, in
comparative terms, the Catholicism of the Father, and what may be called Celtic
Radicalism the Catholicism of the Holy Spirit.
3. Put elementally, in terms of fire, water,
vegetation, and air, this would suggest that Catholicism could be regarded as
stretching from fiery fundamentalism on the Far Left, as it were, of the
Christian spectrum to airy transcendentalism on the Far Right, with watery humanism
and vegetative nonconformism holding comparatively
left- and right-wing positions in between - as, overall, from Greek Orthodoxy
to Celtic Radicalism via Roman Catholicism and Russian Orthodoxy.
4. Hence Christianity would afford us the
contrast, within the same religion, of Greek fieriness, Italian wateriness,
Russian vegetativeness, and Irish airiness, with
corresponding distinctions of emphasis between the Father, the Mother, the Son,
and the Holy Ghost.
5. If this were so, then we can believe that the
Gaelic aspects of Irish culture, including stout and sport, owe more to Celtic
Radicalism than ever they do to Roman Catholicism, and that there is
accordingly a struggle at large in Ireland between the Marian culture of the
official church and the spiritual culture of the church which, in its Celtic
idealism, most corresponds to Gaelic sensibility.
6. That which is best in and about Ireland would
therefore be less Roman than Celtic, and we may hold that only in the idealism
of the Celtic Church would the Irish people come anywhere near the true
spirituality of full-blown transcendentalism.
7. The Social Transcendentalism to which I, as a
self-professed Messiah, subscribe would, of course, leave the Christian
spirituality of Celtic Radicalism far behind in its advocacy of transcendental
meditation and total break with Biblical adherence, through the Old Testament,
to Creator-based concepts of God, but, in comparative terms, Celtic Radicalism
would seem to be the mode of Christianity which does most justice, within the
restricted parameters of the Catholic Church, to Christian idealism, with due
reference, in consequence, to the Holy Ghost.
8. In this respect, it
could be regarded as standing above both the Christic
bias of Russian Orthodoxy and the Marian bias of Roman Catholicism, as air
transcends both vegetation and water.... Which is not to say that vegetation
and water don't religiously exist in Ireland, but, rather, that they would be
less characteristic of the Celtic majority's sensibility than air, bearing in
mind the extent to which Irish Celts are historically drawn, through Gaelic
culture, to airy transcendentalism in response, in no small measure, to the
mountainous uplands which typify a not-inconsiderable proportion of the island
of Ireland.
9. Which, of course, is also true of Scottish
and Welsh Celts, whose Gaelic traditions display a bias towards airy
sensibility over vegetative and watery, not to mention fiery, parallels
existing elsewhere.
10. Indeed, just as Scottish and/or Welsh Gaels
can be added to their Irish counterparts in relation to airy sensibility, often
culturally manifesting itself through piping of one kind or another, so it
seems to me that the Portuguese should be added to the Germans where airy
sensuality is concerned, since Portugal is by no means as flat or plain-like as
Spain, and Portuguese influence in South America betrays ample evidence of an
airy bias not incompatible with German influence there.
11. However that may be, there is scope, in
Europe, for making fourfold ethnic distinctions, based on the elements, between
fiery Gallic, watery Nordic, vegetative Slavic, and airy Celtic, with Latin or,
rather, Hispanic (in broad terms), Teutonic, Slavonic, and Gaelic cultural
implications respectively.
12. The Gaul and the Gael are not as close as a
superficial analysis could lead one to believe, but are as antipodes in a
gender dichotomy which places Gallic and Nordic on one side of the fence, and
Slavic and Celtic on the other - the former as fire and water in relation to
female alternatives, the latter as vegetation and air in relation to male ones.
13. Verily, the Slavic and Celtic side of the
ethnic divide, being subjective, is beyond the objectivity of its female side, as
folly and wisdom lie beyond evil and good, the one relatively so, the other
absolutely so, as befitting the distinction between vegetative sin and airy
grace.
14. Such, in very general terms, is how I conceive
of the principal European peoples, although, in practice, they are much more
mixed than such straightforward theories would allow, and all countries contain
minorities, in any case, which seem to elude neat pigeonholing in relation to
Christianity, either because they come from outside Europe or because they are
products of cross-breeding, or for some other no-less cogent reason. My task as a philosopher is simply to
establish broad categories whereby some pattern or methodology can be
maintained, to the end of securing an enhanced understanding of life in general
terms. And in this respect I believe I
have succeeded where others, before me, have failed.