CYCLE EIGHT

1. Someone told, in heathenistic fashion, to 'fuck off' is the subject of an anti-masculine form of sexist abuse whose origins can only be feminine and thus affiliated, amongst other things, to Protestant nonconformism, particularly, I would argue, with regard to the watery realm of Puritanism.

2. Conversely, someone told to 'sod off' and/or 'piss off' is the subject of an anti-feminine form of sexist abuse whose origins can only be masculine and thus affiliated, willy-nilly, to the vegetative realm of Anglicanism.

3. The sort of person who gets 'pissed off' about something is quite the reverse of one whose preferred term of reference is 'browned off'. The former is likely to be Anglican and the latter Puritan, since we are dealing with masculine and feminine, vegetative and watery, alternatives in regard to 'shit' and 'piss'.

4. It is highly unusual for people to verbally denigrate one another in terms of 'jerk off' and 'snog off', since such terms of abuse would not easily fit into the sort of phenomenal framework which characterizes Western and, in particular, Protestant civilization, being, if anything, too noumenal for people who only have a tangential relationship, as a rule, with fire and air.

5. Yet if such verbal denigrations as 'jerk off' and 'snog off' are far less characteristic of lower-class heathenistic mentalities than derogatory recourse to admonitions like 'fuck off' and 'sod off' and/or 'piss off', it cannot be said that the use of denigratory terms like 'jerk' and/or 'wanker' on the one hand, and 'bum' and/or 'tramp' on the other is unheard of, particularly, I would argue, in connection with a sort of mini-transcendentalist/fundamentalist rivalry between Catholic and Protestant extremists.

6. Be that as it may, most if not all terms of abuse, whether verbally intended or otherwise, are traceable to the heathenistic antagonisms which, in time-honoured Protestant fashion, pit women against men and men against women ... to the detriment, especially, of men, many of whom will be 'bent' away from their masculine gender to a degree which makes them less pseudo-masculine, in Anglicanism, than quasi-feminine/subfeminine and, hence, either Puritanical or Dissenteresque.

7. The man who is 'shit' to the heathenistic woman and/or 'bent man' may well be disposed to regard his denigrator as someone who, exposing herself as a 'cunt' and/or 'sod', ought to 'piss off'.

8. Conversely, the woman and/or 'bent man' who is a 'cunt' to the pseudo-Christian male will be disposed to regarding her detractor as someone who, exposing himself as a 'prick', ought to 'fuck off'.

9. In neither case is there any mutual admiration or respect, but only a belittling of the opposite sex or of those who, being recognizably 'bent', have 'sold out' to the opposite sex for apparent gain or are otherwise identifiable with it because of their ethnic disposition, etc.

10. Even the pseudo-masculine male may well be jealous of the more genuinely masculine male and be disposed, in consequence, to disparage him as a 'nut' or a 'bum', since pseudo-masculinity relates less to 'bullshit' than to 'cowshit', and cannot allow itself to identify with a Roman Catholic position in consequence of the degree to which it is beholden, in pseudo-Christian fashion, to the hegemony of heathenism, obliged to take whatever 'cowpiss' and/or 'cowpuss' the latter decides to inflict upon it in the interests of so-called Protestant solidarity.

11. Such 'solidarity' really amounts to little more than a mutually disrespectful society governed by heathen tensions which constantly war on one another, even as their perpetrators turn against outsiders with a view to disparaging them for being different, e.g. Christian.

12. It is doubtful that 'outsiders' could be included in such a society and/or system, since the inverted triangle is exclusive of anything Christian, which, in any case, would be incompatible with it.

13. Only the democratic dismantling of such an exclusive system could free the majority of its victims for inclusion within a better system, one necessarily non-triangular in structure. But such an inclusion cannot come about vis-à-vis Catholic alternatives to the Protestant system, since Catholicism by itself would not amount to anything new, least of all in Ireland where, in any case, it tends to assume a Marian bias on account of its association with Romanism.

14. What is needed is a sort of Superchristian New Order, in which there will be neither Catholics nor Protestants but only Social Transcendentalists, or people, in other words, who relate to the Centre, the concept and, one day hopefully context, of religious sovereignty for those who democratically opt for it if and when the opportunity finally comes to pass.