CYCLE TWENTY-EIGHT
1. Although I don't think all that highly of
theocracy, I ought to allow for the possibility that, in light of the above
antithesis concerning the distinction between universality and polyversality, the Father, so to speak, is less
polytheistic than monotheistic in view of the association of this concept with
Creator-based fundamentalism, as effectively applying to the space-time axis of
metachemical materialism.
2. It would seem, if my inspired hunch is
correct, that the Mother is less monotheistic than polytheistic, since
associated, through phenomenal objectivity, with volume-mass realism, the very
thing which connotes, in its relativity, with a polyversal
as opposed to universal status.
3. Hence if there is a parallel between polyversality and polytheism, one should have no hesitation
in equating the latter with a feminine bias, whilst allowing the absolutism of
the Father and/or Creator to correlate, in due noumenal
fashion, with monotheism, the universal antithesis to atheism or, more
correctly, deism, as that which is more than simply against theism but in
favour, through noumenal subjectivity, of a deistic,
and thus properly deity-centred, alternative to it.
4. Only in deism, it seems to me, does one
approach the airy realm of genuine spirituality, whether negatively, through
falsehood and woe, or positively, through truth and joy, and whether in outer
or inner, 'once-born' or 're-born' contexts.
5. Polytheism would therefore be reflective of a
feminine bias and would stand on opposite sides of the gender fence from
pantheism, or that which, though equally polyversal
in its phenomenal relativity, is effectively masculine through a fleshy
correlation with nature and all that is vegetative in one degree, shape, form
or another.
6. Hence we should contrast the universal
antithesis of monotheism and deism with the polyversal
antithesis, down below, of polytheism and pantheism, the former antithesis
having noumenal reference to fire and air, the latter
one having phenomenal reference to water and vegetation.
7. Religion could therefore be concluded to
descend, state-wise, from the monotheistic universality of the Father to the
polytheistic polyversality of the Mother, and to
ascend, by contrast, from the pantheistic polyversality
of the Son to the deistic universality of the Holy Ghost, the latter of which
would be atheistically 'beyond the (anthropomorphic) pale' of theism, and thus
of everything which pertained, via theology and theocracy, to either metachemical, chemical, or physical shortfalls from metaphysics,
or that which, being airy in one way or another, alone pertains to genuine
religion.
8. Only when religion ceases to be ruled by the
Devil in monotheistic universality, or to be governed by woman in polytheistic polyversality, or to be represented by man in pantheistic polyversality ... will it be led by God in deistic
universality, as, traditionally, in the Far East to one degree or another.
9. Even in Christendom, it is logically
inevitable and profoundly demonstrable that the Church becomes truer and/or
less theistically bogus the farther east one goes, which is why Russian
Orthodoxy remains the mode of Christianity which is closest, in vegetative
'rebirth', to Christ.
10. The farther west one
goes, on the other hand, the more bogus and the less 'true' the Church
generally becomes, as the Father and the Mother tend to eclipse the Son and the
Holy Ghost in due state-dominated fashion.
11. This is especially true of certain Protestant
churches of the American Far West, but it also applies, in no small degree, to
the westernmost examples of Roman Catholicism, which, at times, are virtually
indistinguishable from outright Marianism, and
occasionally border on Creator-oriented fundamentalism.
12. It is often said that we live in a fundamentalist
age, and, certainly, one can believe that the extent to which objective values,
partly conditioned by appearance-based media technology, have gained the upper
hand, through materialism and realism, over subjective ones ... is proof enough
of the difficulty confronting anyone who seeks to reverse the trend of female
domination in favour of male liberation, through naturalism and especially
idealism, from heathenistic norms.
13. One of the principal reasons why
fundamentalism, in particular, is always a force to be reckoned with ... is
that men are beholden, especially when young, to the attractive power of female
beauty, and often succumb to its allure by falling in love and experiencing
what amounts to a positive manifestation of fundamentalist glory.
14. Then, of course, something more humanistic,
and hence realistic, often follows as a matter of familial course, as men
succumb to the maternal ambitions of women and gravitate from the worship of
beauty and love, through noumenal objectivity, to the
worship of strength and pride through its phenomenal counterpart.
15. In neither case is
there anything demonstrably Christian, or male, but simply a surrender, by men,
to that which, always and everywhere, is un-Christian in its Superheathen and Heathen femaleness, the male effectively
reduced to a worship of state power even as it assumes a religious pose.
16. Baudelaire wrote rather disparagingly, in his
'Intimate Journals', of man's relationship to woman being akin to that of a
slave of a slave, and, frankly, one can see what he meant. There isn't much to suggest that man is
anything but an adjunct to female power when fundamentalist and humanist
criteria considerably prevail, and even nonconformism
leaves something to be desired when it is merely that which, in Anglican
fashion, represents the male aspect of life in relation to, rather than in
defiance of, the female aspect of it.
17. Only that nonconformism
which, being Catholic, encourages men to 'turn their back' on women and to look
upon fleshy self-indulgence as 'sinful', thereby necessitating confession and
repentance, stands closer to Christ, and hence to the Cross which is the
necessary precondition, through vegetative self-denial, of spiritual
self-affirmation, and thus of salvation not only from the World, but from that
which diabolically rules over it in due fundamentalist fashion.
18. Such Catholic nonconformism
is less pantheistic, and hence nature-struck, than atheistic, or against the
neutral mode of nonconformism, and it paves the way
for the possibility of deistic transcendentalism in due course, the reward for
those who can climb beyond naturalism to idealism, beyond sin to grace, and to
the attainment, in consequence, of spiritual self-deliverance through God and
Heaven, truth and joy, divine power and sublime glory.
19. Such is the supernature
of the superman, and the superman is one who has the capacity to live
transcendentally aloof from the world of humanist and/or nonconformist
relativity in what amounts, in its subjective universality, to a noumenal antithesis to fundamentalism.
20. Only that man who was high to begin with, or
who had the capacity to achieve the heights, either because he was an outer
kind of transcendentalist (subman) or, alternatively,
an exceptional kind of inner nonconformist (upper man) ... can become a
superman, and thus a true 'Son of God', at home in the lofty realms of sensible
metaphysics.
21. Not everyone can become such, and that is why
the generality must remain less than supermasculine,
even as they achieve new manifestations of femininity and masculinity in what I
would regard as the lower tiers of the triadic Beyond, come the introduction,
through Social Transcendentalism, of 'Kingdom Come'.