CYCLE SEVEN

 

1.   Of course, what applies to Jews also applies, in no small degree, to most Christians, who are beholden, through Biblical Scripture, to the God-over-Devil delusion, if you will, that adherence to the notion of 'First Mover' as God unfortunately implies.

 

2.   Christians will likewise have to demonstrate a willingness, come Judgement, or the ultimate election (the election for religious sovereignty as against the retention of political sovereignty in what I regard as a context of 'worldly sin'), to part company with this God-over-Devil delusion, since the Bible provides the Scriptural basis for its perpetuation, and so long as people mistakenly identify God with a cosmic 'First Mover', there will never be any progress towards genuine spirituality in inner transcendentalism.

 

3.   The Bible, in short, is something from which the People require to be delivered, if there is to be a New Order of religion in due course, an order built around wise spirituality rather than the false and fundamentally evil spirituality that stems from spatial space and accordingly has a superfeminine correlation in noumenal objectivity.

 

4.   This wise spirituality will be built around spaced space, the true spirituality of the supermasculine transcendentalism of noumenal subjectivity, an inner idealism the metaphysical essence of which should serve as an example to mankind in general, including those for whom transcendentalism would be too elect and elitist for their phenomenal limitations, and who would therefore require new forms of nonconformism and humanism 'down below', in what I have tended, in the past, to regard as the bottom two tiers of the triadic Beyond, the context of religious praxis in 'Kingdom Come' that, at this moment in time, lies beyond the World and its Heathen/Christian relativity.

 

5.   Certainly the World must be overcome, democratically and officially, if there is to be this post-worldly context of 'Kingdom Come', i.e. the triadic Beyond that Social Transcendentalism would establish in the event of a majority of people opting to vote, once the opportunity had significantly come to pass in a variety of countries, for religious sovereignty, with an end, in consequence, to political sovereignty and such judicial or economic concomitants as I lump collectively together as 'sins of the World'.

 

6.   If the People are to be delivered from these 'sins of the World', they will have to vote for religious sovereignty, the ultimate sovereignty, and pass over, in the event of a majority mandate, into the triadic Beyond of 'Kingdom Come'.

 

7.   Only thus will there be a New Purgatory of watery femininity, a New Earth of vegetative masculinity, and, above all, a New Heaven of airy supermasculinity, the transcendental apex of the triadic Beyond which would lead and be deferred to by those earmarked for its lower tiers, which includes the majority of what are now Puritans and Anglicans.

 

8.   I have gone into this subject in sufficient detail in earlier texts, including my Omeganotes (‘Of an Ideological Philosopher’), so will not waste any more time expanding upon it here.  What I shall do, however, is to remind people that 'Kingdom Come', as conceived by me in relation to the leadership of Social Transcendentalism, is about the development of religious sovereignty, and that the democratic assumption of this sovereignty by the People would entitle them to rights in relation to religious self-realization.

 

9.   Such rights would save people not only from 'sins of the World' (as earlier defined by me in relation, for example, to political sovereignty) but also, and no less importantly, from religious subjection, as worshippers, to tyrannical and/or primitive Godhead, the sort of Godhead upheld by the Old Testament in defiance of a Christian rebirth, and with the unfortunate consequence - one might almost say the sole intention - of perpetuating falsehood, as already discussed in regard to the God-over-Devil delusion.

 

10.  Only religious sovereignty, the sovereignty alone commensurate with 'Kingdom Come', can deliver the People from such Biblical falsehood; for they may rest assured that Social Transcendentalism will take measures, once in power, to free them from all degrees of pseudo-religion, including the actual removal, through carefully regulated and properly monitored artificial incineration, of Bibles and all such related matter.

 

11.  So long as the People remain under the rule of Biblical primitivity, they will continue to be the worshipful dupes of tyrannical humbug and in no position, in consequence, to take their respective sensible selves seriously.

 

12.  The 'Day of Judgement' is fast approaching, and it will be for the People to decide, independently, as far as possible, of clerical or other pressures from traditional vested interests, whether to go forward into the triadic Beyond of 'Kingdom Come' or remain bogged down in worldly sin, with a tyrannical delusion behind it.

 

13.  Of course, when I say 'Kingdom Come', I do not just mean to imply a context of religious sovereignty, the last and ultimate kind of sovereignty that would deliver the People from the religious equivalent of being humble subjects of political tyranny in authoritarian monarchism; I also have in mind a federation of countries which I regard as eminently suited to become the initial if not chief manifestation of such a 'Kingdom'.

 

14.  These countries are Ireland, Scotland, and Wales, and they are all traditionally Gaelic, which is to say, given to a type of culture which is both Celtic and more than Celtic.

 

15.  In fact, being Gaelic is no more synonymous with Celtic than ... being Jewish is synonymous with Semitic.  Most Jews may well be racially Semitic, but there would still be far more Semites than Jews in the world, not least of all in Arab countries.

 

16.  Likewise, one could argue that most Gaels are Celtic, but there would still be far more Celts than Gaels in the world, not least of all in England, France, Spain, Germany, Portugal, Russia, Austria, etc.

 

17.  Thus 'Gaelic' is no more a racial or tribal definition than 'Jewish'.  Rather is it a cultural definition, and therein lies its similarity with Judaism, or the fact of a person's being Jewish.

 

18.  Gaels are, in effect, the Jews of the modern world, and, like the Jews before them, they have been persecuted and driven from their homelands, sometimes across thousands of miles, as to Australia, but often enough within their own country, so that they do not always think of themselves as one people, so accustomed are they to having been divided and ruled by the English, not to mention their Anglo-Irish, Anglo-Scottish, and Anglo-Welsh descendants, upholders of British imperialism in what is regarded by them as the British nation.

 

19.  Let there be no mistake on this point: the Gael is not British, but the victim, historically, of British rule, the rule, at times descending into sheer brutishness, of the Englishman both in his homeland and across the borders/overseas, where his Britishness is more pronounced in view of its association with Anglo-Irish, Anglo-Scottish, and Anglo-Welsh interests.

 

20.  For the Englishman, Britain is the key to the subversion and suppression of Gaelic nationalism, the means whereby his rule over the Gael may be sustained.  For the Gael, on the other hand, Britain is both the enemy of his national aspirations and a continuing source of self-division.  He regards himself as an Irishman, a Scotsman, a Welshman, whether within or without the British context.  But, in actuality, there is no Irish nation, there is no Scottish nation, there is no Welsh nation: there is only a Gaelic nation which has been divided and ruled by perfidious Albion!

 

21.  To all intents and purposes Ireland, Scotland, and Wales are extrapolations from British nationalism; one might even say the Anglo-Irish, Anglo-Scotch, and Anglo-Welsh versions of such nationalism, which accordingly co-exist within the nation-state or, rather, superstate of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, as pertaining to the United Kingdom.

 

22.  But this is a Kingdom of the Devil, not of God, as I hope presently to demonstrate.  What self-respecting Gael could possibly be satisfied, the way his British counterpart evidently is, with a Devil's Kingdom, a constitutional monarchy affiliated to the 'Blood Royal'?