CYCLE SIXTEEN
1. Thus, in relation to the above contentions,
it is really the size of the atomic element that determines the ratio of
particle to wavicle, as well as its gender
predilection towards either objective (if female) or subjective (if male)
behaviour.
2. The objective
elements and elementinos, being extensive, will
always favour the particle at the expense of the wavicle,
whereas the subjective elements and elementinos,
being intensive, will favour the wavicle at the
expense of the particle.
3. It is this fact which renders the objective
elements/elementinos more suited to science and
politics, but the subjective elements/elementinos
more suited, by contrast, to economics and religion.
4. Fire is the per se
of science and water the per se of politics, whereas vegetation (earth)
is the per se of economics and air the per se of religion.
5. When you do not have a per se
manifestation of any given discipline, you have a 'bovaryization'
of it which is of subordinate status not only to its per
se manifestation, but to the per se manifestation of the discipline
to which it is elementally affiliated.
6. Thus each element, or axis of all the
elemental elementary positions, will have a per se discipline and
three 'bovaryized' disciplines in both outer and
inner contexts.
7. Metachemistry will
have a scientific per se characterized by a most particle/least wavicle ratio of elemental components in relation to
photons and/or photinos, but 'bovaryized'
manifestations of politics, economics, and religion.
8. Chemistry will have a political per se
characterized by a more (relative to most) particle/less (relative to least) wavicle ratio of elemental components in relation to
electrons and/or electrinos (conventional) or
positrons and/or positrinos (radical), but 'bovaryized' manifestations of science, economics, and
religion.
9. Physics will have an economic per se
characterized by a more (relative to most) wavicle/less
(relative to least) particle ratio of elemental components in relation to
neutrons and/or neutrinos (conventional) or deuterons and/or deuterinos (radical), but 'bovaryized'
manifestations of science, politics, and religion.
10. Metaphysics will have a religious per se
characterized by a most wavicle/least particle ratio
of elemental components in relation to protons and/or protinos,
but 'bovaryized' manifestations of science, politics,
and economics.
11. Since science is in its
per se manifestation only in metachemistry,
it is 'once bovaryized' in chemistry, 'twice bovaryized' in physics, and 'thrice bovaryized'
in metaphysics.
12. Since politics is in
its per se manifestation only in chemistry, it is 'once bovaryized'
in metachemistry, 'twice bovaryized'
in metaphysics, and 'thrice bovaryized' in physics.
13. Since economics is in its
per se manifestation only in physics, it is 'once bovaryized' in metaphysics, 'twice bovaryized'
in metachemistry, and 'thrice bovaryized'
in chemistry.
14. Since religion is in its
per se manifestation only in metaphysics, it is 'once bovaryized' in physics, 'twice bovaryized'
in chemistry, and 'thrice bovaryized' in metachemistry.
15. Put in similar, if blunter terms, this means
that compared to metachemical science, chemical
science is second-rate, physical science third-rate and metaphysical science
fourth-rate.
16. Compared to chemical politics, metachemical politics is second-rate, metaphysical politics
third-rate, and physical politics fourth-rate.
17. Compared to physical economics, metaphysical
economics is second-rate, metachemical economics
third-rate, and chemical economics fourth-rate.
18. Compared to metaphysical religion, physical
religion is second-rate, chemical religion third-rate, and metachemical
religion fourth-rate.
19. Thus from the metachemically
extensive space-time objective per se of science to the
'ultimate bovaryization' of science in relation to
metaphysically intensive time-space subjectivity via the 'intermediate bovaryizations' ... of a chemically extensive volume-mass
objectivity and a physically intensive mass-volume subjectivity.
20. Thus from the chemically extensive volume-mass
objective per se of politics to the 'ultimate bovaryization'
of politics in relation to physically intensive mass-volume subjectivity via
the 'intermediate bovaryizations' ... of a metachemically extensive space-time objectivity and a
metaphysically intensive time-space subjectivity.
21. Thus from the physically intensive mass-volume
subjective per se of economics to the 'ultimate bovaryization'
of economics in relation to chemically extensive volume-mass objectivity via
the 'intermediate bovaryizations' ... of a
metaphysically intensive time-space subjectivity and a metachemically
extensive space-time objectivity.
22. Thus from the metaphysically intensive
time-space subjective per se of religion to the 'ultimate bovaryization' of religion in relation to metachemically extensive space-time objectivity via the
'intermediate bovaryizations' ... of a physically
intensive mass-volume subjectivity and a chemically extensive volume-mass
objectivity.
23. The tendency to evaluate objective elements
subjectively and, conversely, subjective ones objectively, in terms of a
contrary order of elemental ratios, is probably due, in no small measure, to
one's gender: females tending towards an objective bias in this matter and
males, by contrast, towards a subjective one.
24. Hence, instead of evaluating objective
elements from a particle-based devolutionary perspective, males would be more
inclined, I feel, to evaluate them from their own subjective bias towards the wavicle, deeming metachemical
religion, for example, to reflect most wavicle/least
particle rather than, as is objectively the case, least particle/most wavicle.
25. Conversely, females would be more inclined,
from their objective point of view, to evaluate physical religion, say, in
terms of least particle/most wavicle rather than in
the subjectively more accurate manner of most wavicle/least
particle.
26. Thus while males are more likely to have an
optimistic, if not inflated, view of the objective elements, the innate objectivity
of the female will lead her to take a pessimistic, if not deflated, view of the
subjective elements. The former are
likely to hype-up or exaggerate the positive aspect of what are fundamentally
negative elements, while the latter will incline to be cynically dismissive of
the positive aspect of positive elements from a negative point of view.
27. The net result is that males, whether divine
or masculine, deceive themselves as to the true worth of, say, love or pride in
relation to beauty and strength, while females, whether diabolic or feminine,
continue to undervalue the true worth of joy or pleasure in relation to truth
and knowledge. Each sex effectively
approaches the elements from their own standpoint, as dupes and cynics
respectively, and the biggest losers, at the end of the day, are males.
28. For it is worse, as a male, to exaggerate the
importance of the Devil, and thereby deprive oneself of God, than to undervalue
the significance of God, and thereby still have the benefits, as a female, of
the Devil.
29. In actuality, metachemical religion is fundamentally least particle/most wavicle, not most wavicle/least
particle, and therefore something that remains on the opposite side of the
gender fence from that which, being metaphysical, is most wavicle/least
particle.
30. The pursuit of love through beauty is a
fourth-rate religion compared to the pursuit of joy through truth. You may, as a male, be able to twist it
around to a degree, so that there is more love than beauty, more wavicle than particle or, rather, most wavicle/least
particle as opposed to least particle/most wavicle,
but it is doubtful that the female with whom you have romantic associations
will be either able or feel inclined to follow suit.
31. She, remember, is the beauty, not you, and
consequently she has less incentive to develop love in
relation to you than you have in relation to her. Her love will largely be in response to
yours, not a love of your (dubious) beauty as such. She will be effectively
loving your love of her, while reserving her direct love, so to speak,
for the child to which she aspires as a female.
