CYCLE TWENTY-FOUR

1. To contrast the hatred of ugliness with the love of beauty in space-time metachemistry, the former primary and the latter secondary manifestations of materialism.

2. To contrast the humility of weakness with the pride of strength in volume-mass chemistry, the former primary and the latter secondary manifestations of realism.

3. To contrast the pain of ignorance with the pleasure of knowledge in mass-volume physics, the former secondary and the latter primary manifestations of naturalism.

4. To contrast the woe of falsity with the joy of truth in time-space metaphysics, the former secondary and the latter primary manifestations of idealism.

5. Since the noumenal objectivity of space-time metachemistry proceeds, in due primary fashion, from most particles/least wavicles to least particles/most wavicles via more (relative to most) particles/less (relative to least) wavicles and less (relative to least) particles/more (relative to most) wavicles, it is objectively more correct to think in terms of things proceeding from most ugliness/least love to least ugliness/most love via more (relative to most) ugliness/less (relative to least) love and less (relative to least) ugliness/more (relative to most) love than from most hatred/least beauty to least hatred/most beauty via more (relative to most) hatred/less (relative to least) beauty and less (relative to least) hatred/more (relative to most) beauty.

6. Since the phenomenal objectivity of volume-mass chemistry proceeds, in due primary fashion, from most particles/least wavicles to least particles/most wavicles via more (relative to most) particles/less (relative to least) wavicles and less (relative to least) particles/more (relative to most) wavicles, it is objectively more correct to think in terms of things proceeding from most weakness/least pride to least weakness/most pride via more (relative to most) weakness/less (relative to least) pride and less (relative to least) weakness/more (relative to most) pride than from most humility/least strength to least humility/most strength via more (relative to most) humility/less (relative to least) strength and less (relative to least) humility/more (relative to most) strength.

7. Since the phenomenal subjectivity of mass-volume physics proceeds, in due secondary vein, from least wavicles/most particles to most wavicles/least particles via less (relative to least) wavicles/more (relative to most) particles and more (relative to most) wavicles/less (relative to least) particles, it is subjectively more correct to think in terms of things proceeding from least pleasure/most ignorance to most pleasure/least ignorance via less (relative to least) pleasure/more (relative to most) ignorance and more (relative to most) pleasure/less (relative to least) ignorance than from least knowledge/most pain to most knowledge/least pain via less (relative to least) knowledge/more (relative to most) pain and more (relative to most) knowledge/less (relative to least) pain.

8. Since the noumenal subjectivity of time-space metaphysics proceeds, in due secondary vein, from least wavicles/most particles to most wavicles/least particles via less (relative to least) wavicles/more (relative to most) particles and more (relative to most) wavicles/less (relative to least) particles, it is subjectively more correct to think in terms of things proceeding from least joy/most falsehood to most joy/least falsehood via less (relative to least) joy/more (relative to most) falsehood and more (relative to most) joy/less (relative to least) falsehood than from least truth/most woe to most truth/least woe via less (relative to least) truth/more (relative to most) woe and more (relative to most) truth/less (relative to least) woe.

9. Either one thinks in terms of from 'most to least' on the basis of a particle predominance, or one thinks in terms of from 'least to most' on the basis of a wavicle preponderance.

10. On the other hand, to think of the objective axes of space-time metachemistry and volume-mass chemistry subjectively ... from 'least to most' ... would be a male subversion of what are, in fact, devolutionary, and hence female, alternatives in fire and water.

11. Likewise, to think of the subjective axes of mass-volume physics and time-space metaphysics objectively ... from 'most to least' ... would be a female subversion of what are, in fact, evolutionary, and hence male, alternatives in vegetation and air.

12. Particles and wavicles are never completely independent of one another, but remain two aspects of the same element and/or elementino in whatever mode of its overall manifestation ... from most particle/least wavicle to least particle/most wavicle via the intermediate positions (primary) or, alternatively, from least wavicle/most particle to most wavicle/least particle via the intermediate positions (secondary).

13. The particle aspect of an element and/or elementino corresponds to its appearance, the wavicle aspect of an element and/or elementino to its essence.

14. Appearance becomes quantitative with the molecular mode of any given element and/or elementino's particle manifestation, whereas essence becomes qualitative or, rather, the molecular mode of any given element and/or elementino's wavicle manifestation is commensurate with a qualitative shortfall from essence.

15. There is about the appearance/essence antithesis the suggestion of a doing/being dichotomy which contrasts, in elemental terms, with the giving/taking dichotomy that most characterizes the molecular antithesis between quantity and quality.

16. Where there is most appearance (as in objective elements and/or elementinos) there will be least essence and, conversely, where there is most essence (as in subjective elements and/or elementinos) there will be least appearance.

17. Where there is most or, rather, more (relative to most) quantity (as in objective elements and/or elementinos) there will be less (relative to least) quality, and, conversely, where there is more (relative to most) quality (as in subjective elements and/or elementinos) there will be less (relative to least) quantity.

18. Appearance and essence are only in their per se, or genuine, manifestations on the noumenal planes of Time and Space, whether in the space-time objectivity of most appearance/least essence (materialism), or in the time-space subjectivity of most essence/least appearance (idealism).

19. Quantity and quality are only in their per se, or genuine, manifestations on the phenomenal planes of Volume and Mass, whether in the volume-mass objectivity of more (relative to most) quantity/less (relative to least) quality (realism), or in the mass-volume subjectivity of more (relative to most) quality/less (relative to least) quantity (naturalism).

20. The greater the ratio of appearance to essence, of elemental particles to wavicles, the greater the corresponding degree of negativity, while, conversely, the greater the ratio of essence to appearance, of elemental wavicles to particles, the greater will be the corresponding degree of positivity.

21. Likewise, the greater the ratio of quantity to quality, of molecular particles to wavicles, the greater the corresponding degree of negativity, while, conversely, the greater the ratio of quality to quantity, of molecular wavicles to particles, the greater will be the corresponding degree of positivity.

22. Although each of the above contentions may seem limited in applicability to the restricted parameters in which their respective subdivisions operate, there is, in fact, scope for considerable variation ... both in terms of the objective/subjective axial alternatives and in relation, moreover, to the outer and inner distinctions between elements and elementinos, the latter allowing for enhanced wavicle preponderance and/or diminished particle predominance, depending on the context.

23. Things are never more ugly, weak, ignorant, or false than when the particle predominance is such that the ratio of atomic factors is most to least.

24. Things are never more loving, proud, pleasurable, or joyful than when the wavicle preponderance is such that the ratio of atomic factors is most to least.

25. Just as ugliness, weakness, ignorance, and falsity respectively engender hatred, humility, pain, and woe, so love, pride, pleasure, and joy require to be respectively engendered by beauty, strength, knowledge, and truth.

26. The power precedes the glory, whether negatively (in relation to a particle predominance) or positively (in relation to a wavicle preponderance), as the egg precedes the chicken.