CYCLE TWENTY-NINE

1. Doing in appearance, as opposed to giving in quantity, taking in quality, and being in essence.

2. To devolve, through the noumenal objectivity of space-time metachemistry, from the primary appearance/secondary essence of most particle/least wavicle to the secondary appearance/primary essence of least particle/most wavicle via the primary quantity/secondary quality of more (relative to most) particle/less (relative to least) wavicle and the secondary quantity/primary quality of less (relative to least) particle/more (relative to most) wavicle ... in relation to photon and/or photino materialism.

3. To devolve, through the phenomenal objectivity of volume-mass chemistry, from the primary appearance/secondary essence of most particle/least wavicle to the secondary appearance/primary essence of least particle/most wavicle via the primary quantity/secondary quality of more (relative to most) particle/less (relative to least) wavicle and the secondary quantity/primary quality of less (relative to least) particle/more (relative to most) wavicle ... in relation to electron and/or electrino (conventional) or positron and/or positrino (radical) realism.

4. To evolve, through the phenomenal subjectivity of mass-volume physics, from the secondary essence/primary appearance of least wavicle/most particle to the primary essence/secondary appearance of most wavicle/least particle via the secondary quality/primary quantity of less (relative to least) wavicle/more (relative to most) particle and the primary quality/secondary quantity of more (relative to most) wavicle/less (relative to least) particle ... in relation to neutron and/or neutrino (conventional) or deuteron and/or deuterino (radical) naturalism.

5. To evolve, through the noumenal subjectivity of time-space metaphysics, from the secondary essence/primary appearance of least wavicle/most particle to the primary essence/secondary appearance of most wavicle/least particle via the secondary quality/primary quantity of less (relative to least) wavicle/more (relative to most) particle and the primary quality/secondary quantity of more (relative to most) wavicle/less (relative to least) particle ... in relation to proton and/or protino idealism.

6. To contrast the per se materialism of noumenal objectivity in its most particle/least wavicle mode (which is scientific) with the quasi-realistic materialism of the more (relative to most) particle/less (relative to least) wavicle mode of noumenal objectivity (which is political), the quasi-naturalistic materialism of the less (relative to least) particle/more (relative to most) wavicle mode of noumenal objectivity (which is economic), and the quasi-idealistic materialism of the least particle/most wavicle mode of noumenal objectivity (which is religious), thereby proceeding, in metachemical terms, from appearance to essence via quantity and quality.

7. To contrast the per se realism of phenomenal objectivity in its more (relative to most) particle/less (relative to least) wavicle mode (which is political) with the quasi-materialistic realism of the most particle/least wavicle mode of phenomenal objectivity (which is scientific), the quasi-idealistic realism of the least particle/most wavicle mode of phenomenal objectivity (which is religious), and the quasi-naturalistic realism of the less (relative to least) particle/more (relative to most) wavicle mode of phenomenal objectivity (which is economic), thereby proceeding, in chemical terms, from quantity to quality via appearance and essence.

8. To contrast the per se naturalism of phenomenal subjectivity in its more (relative to most) wavicle/less (relative to least) particle mode (which is economic) with the quasi-idealistic naturalism of the most wavicle/least particle mode of phenomenal subjectivity (which is religious), the quasi-materialistic naturalism of the least wavicle/most particle mode of phenomenal subjectivity (which is scientific), and the quasi-realistic naturalism of the less (relative to least) wavicle/more (relative to most) particle mode of phenomenal subjectivity (which is political), thereby proceeding, in physical terms, from quality to quantity via essence and appearance.

9. To contrast the per se idealism of noumenal subjectivity in its most wavicle/least particle mode (which is religious) with the quasi-materialistic idealism of the least wavicle/most particle mode of noumenal subjectivity (which is scientific), the quasi-realistic idealism of the less (relative to least) wavicle/more (relative to most) particle mode of noumenal subjectivity (which is political), and the quasi-naturalistic idealism of the more (relative to most) wavicle/less (relative to least) particle mode of noumenal subjectivity (which is economic), thereby proceeding, in metaphysical terms, from essence to appearance via quantity and quality.

10. Just as Science is in its per se manifestation only in materialism, so politics is in its per se manifestation only in realism, economics in its per se manifestation only in naturalism, and religion in its per se manifestation only in idealism.

11. It is the materialistic appearance, the realistic quantity, the naturalistic quality, and the idealistic essence which correspond to the per se manifestations of science, politics, economics, and religion.

12. Appearance is never more materialistic than in fire, quantity never more realistic than in water, quality never more naturalistic than in vegetation, and essence never more idealistic than in air.

13. And this applies to untransvaluated/once-born options no less than to transvaluated/re-born ones, so that we are bisecting more than one plane, relative to noumenal or to phenomenal alternatives, in each case.

14. Hence appearance is never more materialistic (and scientific) than in noumenal objectivity, which is metachemically extensive in Space and Time as space-time materialism.

15. Hence quantity is never more realistic (and political) than in phenomenal objectivity, which is chemically extensive in Volume and Mass as volume-mass realism.

16. Hence quality is never more naturalistic (and economic) than in phenomenal subjectivity, which is physically intensive in Mass and Volume as mass-volume naturalism.

17. Hence essence is never more idealistic (and religious) than in noumenal subjectivity, which is metaphysically intensive in Time and Space as time-space idealism.

18. Just as doing is maximized in space-time materialism, so giving is maximized in volume-mass realism, taking maximized in mass-volume naturalism, and being maximized in time-space idealism.

19. From the maximized doing of the Devil/Hell in space-time materialism to the maximized being of Heaven/God in time-space idealism, as from noumenal alpha to noumenal omega.

20. From the maximized giving of woman/purgatory in volume-mass realism to the maximized taking of earth/man in mass-volume naturalism, as from phenomenal alpha to phenomenal omega.

21. Just as the Devil/Hell, corresponding to a particle/wavicle distinction in space-time materialism, can be either negative or positive, which is to say, factors of damnation or salvation in relation to doing, so Heaven/God, corresponding to a wavicle/particle distinction in time-space idealism, can be either negative or positive, that is to say, factors of cursedness or blessedness in relation to being.

22. Just as woman/purgatory, corresponding to a particle/wavicle distinction in volume-mass realism, can be either negative or positive, which is to say, factors of opposition (left) or governance (right) in relation to giving, so earth/man, corresponding to a wavicle/particle distinction in mass-volume naturalism, can be either negative or positive, that is to say, factors of poverty or wealth in relation to taking.

23. The appearance of doing contrasts with the essence of being, no less than the quantity of giving with the quality of taking.

24. Doing is a crime (against the clear id by the unclear soul), whether the doer be damned to negative doing or saved (from negative doing) to positive doing.

25. Giving is a punishment (of the unclear soul by the clear id), whether the giver be confined to negative giving (opposition) or defined by positive giving (governance).

26. Taking is a sin (of the unholy mind against the holy spirit), whether the taker be reduced to negative taking (through poverty) or induced (through wealth) to take positively.

27. Being is a grace (of the holy spirit beyond the unholy mind), whether the be-er is cursed by negative being or blessed by positive being.

28. To contrast the evil (noumenal objectivity) of crime with the goodness (phenomenal objectivity) of punishment, the former unclear in its vicious immorality and the latter clear in its virtuous immorality, as between fire and water.

29. To contrast the folly (phenomenal subjectivity) of sin with the wisdom (noumenal subjectivity) of grace, the former unholy in its vicious morality and the latter holy in its virtuous morality, as between vegetation and air.